Perils of Powerpoint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Perils of Powerpoint

Description:

Title: Perils of Powerpoint Author: jogb Last modified by: jogb Created Date: 1/20/2003 6:32:04 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: jogb
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Perils of Powerpoint


1
Internal policy case study of SABC J3,PGdip
2004
2
Coming up
  1. Review
  2. Background, Bill, Policy consultation process.
  3. Process and place of exercise
  4. Implementation
  5. Key issues
  6. Conclusion

3
1. REVIEW OF ISSUES
  • Who, what, where, when, etc.?
  • What paradigm specs do you use?
  • Functionalist?
  • Liberal pluralist?
  • Power?
  • Participatory?
  • Chaos?
  • Steyns issues liberalistn, pbs, etc.

4
Review cntd.
  • Policy ethos content structure
  • Interventionist vs liberal.
  • Systems Authoritarian, Libertarian, Regulatory,
    Free MarketState.
  • Singling out broadcasting
  • Convergence does internal policy need platform
    nuances?.

5
2. BACKGROUND
  • 2002 Broadcast Amendment Bill
  • Board ensure reporting which advances the
    national public interest of the Republic
  • Board should prepare policies and submit for
    Ministerial approval.

6
Bdcst Amend Bill cntd
  • SABC needs jist code of conduct
  • Bill dropped clause in old Act which had
    guaranteed SABC free expression, and
    journalistic, creative and programming
    independence.

7
Bdcst Amend Bill cntd
  • Minister should split Board and prescribe
    functions through Articles of Assoc of the new
    corporatised body.
  • There should be 2 state TV channels in African
    languages.

8
Govt comments
  • Journos need to account.
  • Cannot be allowed to report in a manner that can
    damage economy or trigger rand collapse.
  • Content should be more local
  • Our leaders, not foreign rulers, should be
    shown. (Ivy)

9
Assessment
  • Govt control agenda.
  • Govt vote of no-confidence in SABC language
    delivery.
  • Undermines public broadcasting, accountable to
    public, not the govt.

10
Outcry
  • Opposition, Civil Society
  • Media (Sanef, Misa), SABC,
  • Icasa only needs to consider Ministers policy,
    not accept.
  • No directive from govt that may interfere with
    independence, power, function, and licensing
    autonomy.
  • Therefore unconstitutionality on Minister
    approval of SABC policy and new TV stations.

11
Changes made
  • Broadcast to serve both national and public
    interest.
  • New TV stations to be based at SABC and be
    public-funded.
  • Icasa to be asked to licence.
  • One SABC board, tho PBS and PCBS division in
    corporation.

12
Govt comments
  • We tried for 2 years to engage SABC on role and
    obligs (Ivy)
  • What seemed extreme was intended to focus
    attention on accountability.
  • No regulator can operate without direction

13
Changes made to Bill
  • SABC fxi independence clause reinstated - but
    this right is correctly placed in the context of,
    and is to be balanced with, other rights of all
    citizens (Ivy)

14
Changes cntd
  • Board must prepare policies,
  • Should accord with Icasas code of conduct,
    licence conditions, Broadcasting Act objectives.
  • Icasa must approve,
  • Public participation must be enabled.
  • Also Board must institute regular
    effective means to solicit public opinion and
    give due consideration to it (Ivy)

15
ANC policy change
  • 51st congress - Dec 02.
  • Pro state funds for public community
    broadcasting.
  • Also pro cross-subsidy
  • Parliament TV, Africa link-ups
  • Gender, culture, kids progrs.
  • Captions for deaf.

16
3. SABC PROCESS
  • Draft done, consultation commences.
  • Unfortunate no indication given to public that
    consultation was not a foregone matter.
  • Question Trust that SABC consulting because it
    truly believes the people have an NB role to
    play, and not merely to comply with the law
    Ngoako Ramatlhodi

17
Place of exercise
  • Draft correctly lays out parameters (Icasa,
    Legislation, BCCSA, etc.).
  • But within these limits, there is enormous scope
    for interpret-ation and elaboration
  • Public input can make a meaningful impact.

18
Consultation principle
  • South Africans co-authors of history in the
    making
  • Legacy of struggle in SA
  • Commendable for publishing the Draft in main SA
    languages.

19
Purpose of policies
  • To give guidance to SABC employees.
  • To clarify what the public is entitled to expect
    from the broadcaster.
  • Be communicative transparent.
  • Responsive and adaptive.
  • Clarify accountability.

20
Basic Assumptions
  • Draft links SABC to Constitution
  • But omits reference to right to FXI
  • Thus misses that right to send and receive info
    is fundamental to citizenship.
  • Ignores inequalities of expression in language,
    and access.

21
Basic Assumptions
  • Genesis of initiative assists in analysing why
    policies are shaped as they are, what might be
    informing them, and what their impact might be.
    (FXI) namely
  • SABC Commercial broadcaster.
  • Macro economic climate.
  • PBS starved like other delivery areas.

22
4. IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES?
  • Appropriate training strategies
  • Staff knowledge and understanding
  • Skills to implement the guidelines.
  • Monitoring mechanism
  • How know if actioned?
  • How know degree of excess?
  • Who will do it, when?

23
Indicators
  • Indicators needed to audit whether all of the
    proposed policies are having effects.
  • Language policy lacks detail (ANC)
  • Needs targets
  • Three year operational plan
  • Detail on practical measures to meet needs of
    deaf blind (ANC)

24
Economics
  • Cost of policy on language programming and local
    content.
  • Danger of noble policy goals, undermined by
    economic model
  • Shortfall can undermine credibility
  • Editorial policies should not be pure wish-list
    or unachievable goal.

25
Alternative economics
  • Imperative of redress should inform resource
    allocation, not vice versa.
  • Eg. SABC should ID a need, eg. Tsonga language,
    and seek funds for it.
  • Without plans, hard to convince govt to invest.
  • (Policy stretch view)

26
Power Who?
  • Draft Policies suggest CEO should be Editor in
    Chief, and new MD of News be part of the line of
    accountability.
  • Upward referral for extraordinary events
  • Mechanism for consultation
  • ALSO notify top managers of controversy or
    impact on SABC

27
5. KEY ISSUES
  • PBS and CPBS
  • Advertising
  • Platforms
  • News
  • Programming
  • Holism

28
6. CONCLUSION
  • Reviewed policy theory
  • Background to process
  • Process
  • Implementation
  • Key issues
  • Fakir Hassen (Tues)
  • READ SABC policy booklet draft,
    Submission, Berger (MG), and final.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com