Title: Presentation to OST 3 MARCH 2004 OST WP 01-04 on Loss of Control Action Plans O.S. Nordland, Operations Div.
1Presentation to OST 3 MARCH 2004OST WP 01-04
on Loss of Control Action PlansO.S. Nordland,
Operations Div.
2JSSI FRAMEWORK JAA AIM FOR SAFETY
Under JAA overall objectives The JAA aim at
continuous improvements of its effective safety
system leading to further reductions of the
annual number of accidents and the annual number
of fatalities irrespective of the growth of the
air traffic
3JSSI FRAMEWORK THE TWO APPROACHES
- Two complementary approaches are being used to
develop the JSSI focused agenda - The Historic Approach (Broadly based on CAST
approach) - The predictive approach (The Future Aviation
Safety Team)
4HISTORIC APPROACH
- Controlled flight into terrain
- Approach and landing
- Loss of Control
- Design related
- Weather
- Occupant safety and Survivability
- Runways safety
- means common with CAST
5Commercial Aviation Safety Team.
- The Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST)
chartered the Joint Safety Analysis Team (JSAT)
to review and analyse data on loss of control
accidents, then develop and recommend
interventions that could reduce the rate of loss
of control accidents and thereby support CASTs
goal to reduce the fatal accident rate by 80 by
2007.
6Commercial Aviation Safety Team.
- CAST then chartered the LoC Joint safety
Implementation Team (JSIT) to identify the
interventions recommended by the JSAT that were
likely to be feasible and which offered high
safety benefits. - The interventions that were determined to have
high priority were then consolidated into three
broad project areas.
7Commercial Aviation Safety Team.
- The three project areas and the safety
enhancements approved by CAST for implementation
were - Aircraft Design
- Policies and Procedures
- Training
8Commercial Aviation Safety Team.
- CAST has evaluated all Safety Enhancements (
evaluation if a proposed safety enhancement could
avoid or mitigate accidents that occurred to
operators in a given region or worldwide) against
category events, and have identified areas of
unmitigated risks (remaining risk) not covered by
the Safety Enhancements.
9JSSI Action Plan Team.
- The task of the Action Plans Team (APT) was to
develop work programmes (action plans) that
define how each of the intervention strategies
determined by the JSSI Steering Group for
CFIT/ALAR/LoC could best be implemented, and to
allocate priorities. - Note The APT was not tasked with implementing
any of the intervention strategies its
responsibilities was confined to developing work
programmes that other bodies must apply in order
to deliver the desired results.
10JSSI Action Plan Team.
- The Action Plans Team (APT)
- has developed the Loss of Control
- Action Plans based on
- CAST Safety Enhancements
- SE 26 34,
- SE 36,
- SE 39 41,
- SE 86 and
- SE 119.
- .
11JSSIAction Plan Team
- The JSSI/APT has monitored the CAST JIMDAT and RR
JSAT progress and implementation of Safety
Enhancements worldwide. - Statistics on distribution of full Airplane
Fatality Loss Equivalents by accident location
(worldwide), operator domicile and proportion of
turboprop/jet airplanes has been provided to JSSI
by CAST/ICAO. - JIMDAT Score Ratings has also been provided.
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17The 5 highest Score Rankings (LoC)
- 18,3 (Flight Envelope Protection in New Aircraft
Design), (CAST Study) - 15,5 (Flight Envelope Protection in Existing and
Future Derivative Airplane Design), (CAST Study) - 11,4 (Advance Manoeuvre Training), AP 3.01
- 8,8 (Icing Detection, Annunciation and
Mitigation) (EASA Research), and - 6,4 (Dissemination of Essential Safety
Information and Procedures) AP 3.04.
18 State of Play CFIT/ ALA/ LOC
- CFIT and
- APPROACH AND LANDING
- Action Plans have been adopted by JAAC at their
- 04-1 Meeting.
- New envelope Completion Dates has been adopted
- (To be applied also to LoC Action Plans)
19 State of Play CFIT/ ALA/ LOC
- Loss of Control
- Advance Maneuver Policies and Procedures - SOP
Operational procedures - Action Plans to be agreed with Operations
- Division before adoption by the JAAC
- Risk management Human Factors and Automation
- Action Plans put on hold pending
discussions - with FAA on CPS and the future of ATA
- Training Committee
20 State of Play CFIT/ ALA/ LOC
- Loss of Control
- Flight envelope protection Auto-flight Icing
Displays and Alerting systems Vertical situation
displays - Action Plans have been adopted by the
JAAC/EASA. - Auto-flight Icing Displays and Alerting systems
- rely on harmonization work
- JAA NPA on Icing is out
- JAA NPA on auto-flight should be out soon
21Review of Action Plans
- Loss of Control
- APT has proposed 33 Actions for implementation.
- OST is involved in 25 Actions.
- 2 Actions have been completed.
- 11 Action are ON PLAN.
- 8 Actions are put on hold pending co-ordination
with other involved stake holders. (FAA and ATA) - 4 Actions have been withdrawn or deleted
22Review of Action Plans
- Loss of Control
- The 11 Actions which are ON PLAN have been
aggregated into - 7 Activities requiring OST agreement
- (at present time)
- AP 3.01.02, AP 3.01.03-05, AP 3.03.01-02,
- AP 3.03.03-05, AP 3.05.1, AP 3.05.05 and
OPST follow up on Interventions Implementation.
23Review of LoC Action Plans
- Action Plan 3.01.02
- JAA should publish the FAA Airplane Upset
Recovery Training Aid on JAA website. - NAAs should copy The FAA Airplane Upset Recovery
Training Aid for hard copy distribution as
required.
24Review of LoC Action Plans
- Action Plan 3.01.03-05
- The JAA should request operators, through their
NAAs, that they review and by amendment ensure
that their flight crew training syllabuses are
reflecting advance manoeuvre training as supplied
by manufacturers.
25Review of LoC Action Plans
- Action Plan 3.03.01-02
- As a practical implementation (of the above
topic), OST should request the OPSG/HFSC to
review FAA AC 120-71A, the JSAT LoC Report, ICAO
DOC 8186-OPS/611, and report to OST on the basis
of the review if changes/additions are required
to JAR-OPS or other associated material to
provide information on circumstances, where there
is a risk that confusion or misunderstanding
could lead to loss of control. - Based upon the review carried out, revise JAR-OPS
as necessary and publish in hard copy and on the
JAA website guidance and best practice that may
be the result of the review.
26Review of LoC Action Plans
- Action Plan 3.03.03-05
- The JAA should request operators, through their
NAAs, that they review and by amendment ensure
that their procedures, flight crew training
syllabuses and inspecting requirements reflects
best practice guidance on SOPs designed to
minimise risk of loss of control.
27Review of LoC Action Plans
- Action Plan 3.05.01
- Add a requirement into JAR-OPS and JAR-145 that
operators and maintenance organisations describe
their process to update manuals and ensure that
these are available to the relevant operation and
maintenance personnel. - Request NAAs to put a review of such processes in
their regular audits of operators and maintenance
organisations.
28Review of LoC Action Plans
- Action Plan 3.05.05
- Amend the Standard List of Reportable Occurrences
in ACJ 20.x8 to include equipment failures that
affect yaw/roll control.
29Review of LoC Action Plans
- Follow-up on Interventions Implementation
- OST should charge the Operations
- Standardisation Teams, as specified in
- appropriate JAR-FCL/OPS Regulations,
- with the responsibility to include in their
- inspection items a follow-up on
- implementation of
- requirements
- produced by
- NAAs.
30Update Operation Sectorial Team
- The Operations Sectorial Team is invited to
- Provide comments to OST WP 01-04,
- Agree to the Action Strategies as stated in the
Loss of Control Action Plans 3.01, 3.03 and 3.05, - Note the need for OST to re-address Action Plans
3.02 and 3.04, for agreement to proposed
recommendations and return to the JSSI Steering
Group, when these LoC Action Plans have been
completed by APT,