VARIANT CJD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

VARIANT CJD

Description:

Title: No Slide Title Author: Statistician/Epidemiologist Last modified by: Freas Created Date: 9/18/2001 2:35:33 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: Statistici6
Learn more at: http://www.fda.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: VARIANT CJD


1
VARIANT CJD
  • AN UPDATE
  • DR. HESTER WARD
  • National CJD Surveillance Centre
  • Edinburgh, UK
  • h.ward_at_ed.ac.uk

2
UK frequency of CJD

3
Variant CJD
  • UK
  • 114 definite probable cases
  • 89 definite cases- confirmed neuropathologically
  • 14 probable cases- died- no post mortem
  • 1 probable case- died- awaiting post mortem
  • 10 probable cases- alive
  • FRANCE 3 definite 2 alive probable cases
  • REPUBLIC OF IRELAND 1 definite case

4
Variant CJD
  • AGE
  • Median age at onset 26 years (range 12 - 74
    years)
  • Median age at death 28 years (range 14 - 74
    years)
  • GENDER 60 males 54 females
  • DURATION OF ILLNES
  • Median 13 months (range 6 - 39 months)
  • GENETICS All tested MM at codon 129 (n 97)

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Courtesy of Nick Andrews, PHLS Statistics Unit,
London
9
Geographical distribution of places of residence
at onset of symptoms of vCJD cases (n93)
10
Variant CJD - GEOGRAPHY
11
Variant CJD - GEOGRAPHY
12
Variant CJD - GEOGRAPHY
13
Variant CJD- GEOGRAPHY
  • Dietary Nutritional Survey of British Adults
  • 1986 - 1987
  • 2197 adults aged 16 to 64 years
  • weighed, 7 day dietary records
  • Household Food consumption Expenditure Report
  • 1984 - 1986
  • 20, 000 households
  • One week records of all foods entering home for
    consumption

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
Scatterplot of cumulative, age-standardised vCJD
incidence against weekly consumption of other
meat and meat products (grams) by region
(Household Food Consumption and Expenditure
1988)
  • of cumulative, age-standardised vCJD incidence
    against weekly consumption of other meat and meat
    products (grams) by region (dietary data from
    Household Food Consumption and Expenditure1988)

17
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED CASES (GACs) of vCJD
18
Geographically associated cases
  • Definition
  • 2 or more cases of probable or definite vCJD
    where preliminary investigations suggest there is
    an association between the cases because of
  • a) Geographical proximity of residence at some
    time, either now or in the past
  • b) Other link with the same geographic area, eg.
    attending the same school or work place or
    attending functions in the same area.

19
The Leicester cluster
  • 5 cases of variant CJD lived in Leicestershire
    (population 870, 000)
  • Cumulative incidence
  • UK 1.5/ million Leicester 5.7/ million
  • 4/5 from Charnwood (142, 000) 28.2 / million
  • Kulldorffs method- spatial scan statistic-
  • Leicestershire- most likely cluster (plt0.004)
  • No other significant clusters
  • (Cousens et al. Lancet 2001 357 1002- 1007)

20
The Leicester cluster
  • 4/5 were reported to have bought meat from
    butchers who processed whole carcass beasts
    split the heads to remove the brains for
    commercial purposes
  • Hypothesis- cases bought meat from butchers that
    split heads
  • Tested - control study- matched each case to 6
    community controls
  • OR 15 (1.6- 139)

21
The Leicester cluster
  • If true minimal incubation- between 10- 16years
  • Does this explain other cases in UK in other
    countries?
  • BUT
  • Bias
  • Interview with butchers
  • Brain- where did it go?- food chain..

22
Variant CJD- RISK FACTORS
  • TO DATE from case control study
  • No evidence of increased risk of CJD associated
    with diet, surgery or occupation (although,
    some differences in diet between cases
    controls)
  • BUT- rare disease, recall bias, surrogate
    witnesses, small numbers, control recruitment

23
Size of the vCJD epidemic- predictions
  • 1997 Cousens et al. Nature 385 197-198 (n14
    vCJD)
  • 75- 80, 000
  • Back calculation
  • MM genotype
  • 2000 Ghani et al. Nature 406 583- 584 (n
    55 vCJD)
  • 63- 136 000
  • Scenario analysis (gt 5 million combinations of
    parameters)
  • MM genotype
  • lt 2 cases vCJD per infectious bovine

24
Size of the epidemic- predictions
  • 2001 Huillard dAignaux et al. Science 294
    1792- 1931 (n 82)
  • Clinical cases hundreds - few thousands
  • Infected individuals hundreds - millions, but
    long mean incubation period so die from
    competing causes
  • Close to peak of epidemic
  • Back calculation- calc. number infected based on
    assumptions of when infected incubation pd
  • Exposure cut off- 1996
  • MM genotype
  • ? not reassuring re. potential secondary spread

25
Size of the epidemic- predictions
  • 2001 Valleron et al. Science 294 1726- 1728
    (n97)
  • Total number of cases 205 (upper limit 403)
  • Mean incubation pd 16.7 yrs (12- 23)
  • Peak 2000/ 2001
  • Bimodal age distribution
  • Age at diagnosis age at infection incubation
    time.
  • Assuming age of infection parallels BSE
    epidemic- incubation pd calc using deconvolution
    technique.
  • Exposure cut off 1990
  • Exponential decrease in susceptibility gt15 years
    of age

26
Size of the epidemic- predictions
  • 2002 Ferguson et al. Nature 9 January 2002 DOI
    10.1038/nature 709
  • Predictions of future cases of vCJD based on BSE
    infection of British sheep
  • Bovine BSE only Upper 95 CIs 50 000- 100 000
    vCJD cases
  • Bovine ovine BSE Upper 95 CIs 150, 000 vCJD
    cases (BSE endemic in national flock)
  • Past exposure to BSE in UK majority from cattle
  • On- going exposure to BSE sheep greater than
    cattle- reduce risk up to 90- ? age at slaughter
    ? SRM controls
  • Many assumptions epidemiology based on scrapie
    experimental BSE in sheep, tissue infectivity
    during incubation

27
Size of the epidemic- predictions
  • Conclusions
  • Much uncertainty, esp incubation period, risk
    from sheep
  • Only based on MM genotypes (40 of population)
  • ? not necessarily reassuring if considering
    secondary spread

28
Transfusion Medicine Epidemiology Review (TMER)
  • Joint project between National Blood Service
    NCJDSU
  • AIM to investigate whether any evidence that
    CJD, including vCJD, may be transmitted via blood
    supply

29
TMER- vCJD
  • TMER
  • All definite probable cases vCJD- reported to
    transfusion service of relevant country (England,
    Wales, Scotland Northern Ireland)
  • If a donor- trace fate of all donations-
    recipient details passed to NCJDSU
  • Reverse TMER
  • vCJD cases ( matched controls) who have received
    blood transfusions- details passed to BTS
  • Details of donors passed back to NCJDSU

30
TMER- vCJD
  • RESULTS (April 2001)
  • (n 87 vCJD cases)
  • TMER
  • 8 cases vCJD were blood donors- 22 recipients
    between 1981- 1999
  • None have developed CJD to date- 9 have died
    from other causes
  • None have registered as blood donors

31
TMER- vCJD
  • Reverse TMER
  • 4 cases of vCJD received blood components (117- 1
    case 103 of these)
  • 111 donors- none have developed CJD to date

32
National CJD Surveillance Unit, UK
  • Director Neuropathology- Professor J.
    Ironside
  • Neurology-
  • Professor R.G. Will Dr. R. Knight
  • Protein Biochemistry-
  • Dr. M. Head
  • Genetics- Mr. M. Bishop
  • CSF Biochemistry-
  • Dr. A. Green
  • Epidemiology-
  • Dr. H. Ward
  • Care co-ordinator-
  • Dr. B. Weller

33
(No Transcript)
34
  • Blood transmission studies on going
  • Tests of CJD
  • Blood/ urine
  • Screening vs. diagnostic

35
  • DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR vCJD
  • I A Progressive neuropsychiatric disorder
  • B Duration of illness gt 6 months
  • C Routine investigations do not suggest an
    alternative diagnosis
  • D No history of potential iatrogenic exposure
  • E No evidence of a familial form of TSE
  • II A Early psychiatric symptomsa
  • B Persistent painful sensory symptomsb
  • C Ataxia
  • D Myoclonus or chorea or dystonia
  • E Dementia
  • III A EEG does not show the typical appearance of
    sporadic CJD c
  • (or no EEG performed)

36
  • DEFINITE I A and neuropathological confirmation
    of vCJD
  • (spongiform change and extensive PrP
    deposition with florid plaques, throughout
    the cerebrum and cerebellum)
  • PROBABLE I and 4/5 of II and III A and III B
  • OR
  • I and IV Ad
  • POSSIBLE I and 4/5 of II and III A
  • a depression, anxiety, apathy, withdrawal,
    delusions.
  • b this includes both frank pain and/or
    dysaesthesia.
  • c generalised triphasic periodic complexes at
    approximately one per second.
  • d tonsil biopsy is not recommended routinely,
    nor in cases with EEG appearances typical of
    sporadic CJD, but may be useful in suspect cases
    in which the clinical features are compatible
    with vCJD and MRI does not show bilateral
    pulvinar high signal.
  • e spongiform change and extensive PrP deposition
    with florid plaques, throughout the cerebrum
  • and cerebellum.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com