Experimental study of the effects of Transmission Power Control and Blacklisting in Wireless Sensor Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Experimental study of the effects of Transmission Power Control and Blacklisting in Wireless Sensor Networks

Description:

Experimental study of the effects of Transmission Power Control and Blacklisting in Wireless Sensor Networks Dongjin Son, Bhaskar Krishnamachari and John Heidemann – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:177
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Sanjeev54
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Experimental study of the effects of Transmission Power Control and Blacklisting in Wireless Sensor Networks


1
Experimental study of the effects of Transmission
Power Control and Blacklisting in Wireless Sensor
Networks
  • Dongjin Son, Bhaskar Krishnamachari and John
    Heidemann
  • Presented by Anandha Gopalan
  • Nov. 3, 2004

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Experiments
  • Transmission Power Control (TPC) with
    blacklisting
  • Conclusion and Future work

3
Introduction
  • Zikes !!! Yet another paper on power-management
  • This one has a slightly different take about it
  • ? Thank goodness for that ?
  • So, whats different ???
  • Simulations usually assume idealized link
    conditions
  • Experimentally evaluate the effect of
    transmission power on link conditions
  • Sometimes, increasing TP may help ? Aha !!!
    thats a bit different

4
Experiments
  • Effects of unreliable wireless links
  • Effects of TPC
  • Experimental study of varying TP on a single
    wireless link
  • One receiver and multiple transmitters
  • One transmitter and multiple receivers
  • Wireless link distance
  • Node location (Multi-Path and Interference)
  • Time (Environment change)

5
Experiments
  • Testbed
  • PC104 testbed with mica2 motes
  • Directed diffusion routing
  • S-MAC MAC protocol
  • Weak link
  • Packet Reception Rate (PRR) lt Threshold
  • Asymmetric link
  • PRR gt Threshold in only one direction

6
Experiments
  • Effect of unreliable wireless links
  • Having unreliable links is worse than having any
    links at all
  • They tend to be utilized
  • Convert unreliable links to good links or prevent
    them from being used

7
Experiments
  • Effects of TPC
  • Increased TP leads to more good links
  • Unreliable links can be converted to good links
  • New communication links can be discovered and
    used for packet delivery
  • Problem May lead to new unreliable links
  • Taken care of by blacklisting
  • Problem May use up more network capacity

8
Experiments
  • New definitions
  • Weak link
  • Packet Reception Rate (PRR) lt Threshold, even
    after TPC
  • Asymmetric link
  • PRR gt Threshold in only one direction, even after
    TPC

9
Experiments
  • One receiver and multiple transmitters
  • Difference is not obvious at close distances
  • Difference b/w node 27 and nodes (30,20) noticed
    after a distance of 17m
  • Difference b/w nodes 30 and 20 noticed after a
    distance of 23m

10
Experiments
  • One transmitter and multiple receivers
  • In the TP range b/w -3 and 6 dBm, the link
    quality is different at the same TP level, while
    different TP is required for each link to reach
    the same PRR level
  • Range of TP that generates this kind of variation
    is called unreliable transmission power range
    (UTPR)
  • UTPR can be avoided in two ways
  • Assign a TP high enough for every link to be
    outside UTPR
  • Assign a distinct TP for each link

11
Experiments
  • Effect of wireless link distance
  • Clear line of sight b/w transmitter and receiver
  • Distance b/w transmitter and receiver is varied
  • Experiments show that new reliable, communication
    links that are not available at default TP can be
    generated with TPC

12
Experiments
  • Effect of node location
  • No clear line of sight b/w the sender and
    receiver
  • Receiver is placed in six different locations in
    the same indoor environment
  • Results
  • Multi-path interference effect are severe
    indoors, where signal is weak
  • Severe link quality variation can be expected
    with small movement of sensor nodes

13
Experiments
  • Effect of surrounding environment change
  • Variation in link quality is observed at
    different times of the day and night
  • Results
  • Variation in link quality observed during the day
    due to change in surrounding environment
  • The difference in link quality is only b/w the TP
    of -7 to 2 dBm

14
TPC with blacklisting (PCBL) - Characteristics
  • TPC for link quality control
  • Convert unreliable links to reliable links
  • Packet-based TPC
  • TP is assigned to each packet based on its
    destination and type of packet, considering link
    quality requirement
  • Metric-based link quality estimation
  • Link quality is measured based on PRR

15
PCBL - Characteristics
  • Blacklisting at adjusted TP level
  • Not all links can be converted to a good link
    with TPC
  • New weak or asymmetric links can be generated at
    adjusted TP level
  • Blacklisting is used with TPC to remove remaining
    unreliable links after TPC

16
PCBL - Algorithm
  • 1. Collect link statistics in PRR metric
  • 2. Select a unicast power for each link
  • 3. Blacklist unreliable links
  • 4. Select a broadcast power for each node

17
PCBL - Algorithm
  • 1. Collect link statistics
  • PRRs at pre-selected transmission power levels
    are collected
  • 2. Select a unicast power for each link
  • Select a link quality control threshold (THLQ)
  • Unicast power for each link is assigned such as
    Ui-gtj P where PRRpi gt THLQ and P min pi,
    otherwise Ui-gtj is set to maximum TP (Pmax)

18
PCBL - Algorithm
  • 3. Blacklist unreliable links
  • Links that cannot be converted to good links
    based on the blacklist threshold (THBL) are
    blacklisted and not used for any packet
    transmission or reception
  • 4. Select a broadcast power for each node
  • Broadcast transmission power of node i (Bi) is
    selected to be max (Ui-gtj )
  • Ensures that broadcast packets reach every node
    with a good wireless link

19
PCBL Algorithm On-demand optimization for
Long-lived Routing
  • 1. Collect link statistics only at the maximum
    transmission power level
  • 2. Blacklist unreliable links before using a
    routing protocol
  • 3. Find a delivery path with a routing protocol
  • 4. Identify unicast transmission powers to use
    only for links in the delivery path

20
PCBL Analysis for Single Data Flows
  • Packet Delivery Rates
  • PCBL is better than TPP-P0, TPP-P5 and TPP-P10,
    but worse than M-BL
  • Energy Consumption
  • PCBL consumes more than TPP-P0
  • Energy consumption per packet
  • PCBL consumes less than TPP-P0

21
PCBL Analysis for Multiple Data Flows
  • Packet Delivery Rates
  • PCBL is better than M-BL for flows 12, but is
    slightly worse for flow 3
  • Improvement in flows 12 due to the saturation of
    the wireless link around node 11 for M-BL

22
Conclusion and Future work
  • Presented an experimental study of the effects of
    TPC on wireless link quality
  • A TPC scheme with blacklisting for link quality
    control was proposed
  • Analysis of the proposed scheme was carried out
    using experiments
  • Optimizations for the proposed algorithm is to be
    studied for future work

23
Issues with the paper
  • Overhead of collecting link statistics ???
  • How are the statistics collected ???
  • Comparing PCBL with TPP-P0, TPP-P5 and TPP-P10
    for multiple flows
  • How do you get the threshold values ???
  • Mistakes in the paper

?????
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com