Integration and the Institute of Medicine Report on the Mental Health Workforce for Geriatric Populations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loading...

PPT – Integration and the Institute of Medicine Report on the Mental Health Workforce for Geriatric Populations PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 5a5051-ZjVjN



Loading


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

Integration and the Institute of Medicine Report on the Mental Health Workforce for Geriatric Populations

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author: jgrady Last modified by: Martinez, Octavio N Created Date: 7/16/2010 1:43:09 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:104
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: jgr83
Learn more at: http://c.ymcdn.com
Category:

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Integration and the Institute of Medicine Report on the Mental Health Workforce for Geriatric Populations


1
Integration and the Institute of Medicine Report
on the Mental Health Workforce for Geriatric
Populations
Session A3a October 5, 2012
  • Dan G. Blazer, M.D., M.P.H, Ph.D.
  • J.P. Gibbons Professor of Psychiatry and
    Behavioral Sciences
  • Vice Chair for Education and Academic Affairs
  • Duke University Medical Center.
  •  
  • Octavio N. Martinez Jr., M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A.
  • Executive Director, Hogg Foundation for Mental
    Health
  • Associate Vice President Clinical Professor
  • The University of Texas at Austin.

Collaborative Family Healthcare Association 14th
Annual Conference October 4-6, 2012 Austin,
Texas U.S.A.
2
Faculty Disclosure
  • We have not had any relevant financial
    relationships during the past 12 months.

3
Objectives
  • Participants will be able to
  • - describe the major findings of the
    committees report.
  •  
  • - discuss the major barriers to developing a
    mental and substance use health workforce for
    geriatric populations.
  •  
  • - list at least three of the committees policy
    recommendations that address the needs of a
    mental and substance use health workforce for
    geriatric populations.

4
Committee on the Mental Health Workforce for
Geriatric Populations
  • Committee Members
  • Dan G. Blazer (Chair)
  • Margarita Alegría
  • María P. Aranda
  • Stephen Bartels
  • Christine E. Bishop
  • Frederic C. Blow
  • Kathleen C. Buckwalter
  • Christopher M. Callahan
  • Anni Chung
  • Gary L. Gottlieb
  • Michael A. Hoge
  • Octavio N. Martinez
  • Willard Mays
  • Peter V. Rabins
  • Mark Snowden
  • Robyn Stone

5
Charge to the Committee
  • Determine the mental and behavioral healthcare
    needs of older Americans and then make policy and
    research recommendations for meeting those needs
    through a competent and well-trained mental
    health workforce.

6
Target Population
  • Mental health and substance use (MH/SU)
    conditions that are most prevalent among older
    adults and for which there are sufficient data
    for study.

DSM Mental Disorders (examples) Anxiety
disorders PTSD Bipolar disorder Depressive
disorders Schizophrenia Substance abuse Other
Conditions (examples) Behavioral and psychiatric
symptoms of dementia Complicated grief Fear of
falling Severe self-neglect Suicidal ideation
7
Outside Committees Scope
  • Principal diagnoses of cognitive impairment
    (e.g., Alzheimers disease and other dementias),
    intellectual disability, and autism spectrum
    disorder
  • Effectiveness of individual therapeutic
    interventions (e.g., prescription medications,
    specific approaches to psychotherapy)
  • Tobacco use as a substance use condition
  • Workforce issues related to caregivers needs

8
Who Makes Up the MH/SU Workforce?
  • MH/SU specialists
  • MH/SU providers with specialized training in the
    care of older adults
  • Primary care providers
  • Primary care providers with specialized training
    in the care of older adults
  • Direct care workers
  • Peer support providers
  • Informal caregivers

9
What Makes Older Adults Different?
  • The interaction of medical conditions, cognitive
    impairment, functional impairment, and MH/SU
    conditions
  • Frequent use of multiple medications both for
    chronic medical conditions and MH/SU conditions
  • Goals of care play larger role in health care
    decisions
  • Loss and grief are common

10
KEY FINDINGS Who are the older adults with MH/SU
conditions?
  • About 1 in 5 older Americans has a MH/SU
    condition
  • 8 million older adults have one or more MH/SU
    conditions
  • 2 million older adults have SMI
  • Depressive disorders and behavioral problems
    secondary to dementia are most prevalent
  • Older veterans are more likely to have MH/SU
    conditions than the general older adult population

11
KEY FINDINGS Who are the older adults with MH/SU
conditions? (Contd)
  • Looking to the future
  • There will be greater numbers of blacks and
    Hispanic/Latinos with MH/SU
  • There will be more older adults with dementia and
    associated behavioral and psychological symptoms
  • Use of illicit drugs is likely to increase,
    especially marijuana use and non-medical use of
    prescription drugs

12
KEY FINDINGS Numbers and Training
  • The workforce is not preparedin numbers,
    knowledge, and skillsto care for the MH/SU needs
    of a rapidly aging and increasingly diverse
    population
  • Current educational, training, certification and
    licensure requirements are insufficient, vague,
    and inconsistent
  • Trainees in MH/SU need training in geriatrics
  • Trainees in geriatrics need training in MH/SU
  • Trainees in primary care need training in
    geriatric MH/SU

13
KEY FINDINGS Workforce Implications of Effective
Delivery Models
  • There is research evidence that an adequately
    prepared workforce can improve outcomes for MH/SU
  • Models of care for depression and at-risk
    drinking
  • Systematic outreach and diagnosis
  • Team-based care
  • Patient and family education and self-management
  • Provider accountability for outcomes
  • Close follow-up and monitoring to prevent relapse

14
Conclusions
  • A substantial proportion of older adults have
    symptoms that warrant the attention of a provider
    skilled in geriatric MH/SU problems.
  • Yet only a minority of affected individuals
    receive specialty care, and the primary care they
    receive for MH/SU conditions is often inadequate
  • There is a conspicuous lack of attention to
    preparing the workforce to care for older adults
    who have MH/SU conditions
  • The barriers to progress are fundamental and
    entrenched in numerous public and private systems
    and programs
  • Federal responsibility for geriatric MH/SU is too
    diffuse
  • Agencies efforts are inadequate and dwindling
  • The most basic workforce data are lacking
  • Designating a locus of responsibility within HHS
    will be a critical first step to building the
    workforce

15
Conclusions (contd)
  • There is a fundamental mismatch between older
    adults need for coordinated care and
    fee-for-service reimbursement
  • Medicare and Medicaid payment rules deter rather
    than facilitate access to effective and efficient
    MH/SU services
  • Limitations on which personnel can be reimbursed
    prevent key providers from offering needed
    services
  • Care managers are integral to effective
    management of depression, yet Medicare does not
    cover their services
  • Health care delivery to older adults must be
    reorganized to reflect the chronic nature of
    MH/SU and other health conditions

16
Recommendation 1
  • Congress should direct the Secretary of HHS to
    designate a responsible entity for coordinating
    federal efforts to develop and strengthen the
    nations geriatric MH/SU workforce
  • Congress should fund the already authorized
    National Health Care Workforce Commission to
    serve in this capacity. In the absence of
    congressional action, the Secretary should
    designate an alternative body.

17
Recommendation 1 (contd)
  • The coordinating body should have the following
    priorities
  • Methods for improving recruitment and retention
    of geriatric MH/SU personnel, including ways to
    build a workforce that reflects the increasingly
    diverse older adult population.
  • Wide-scale implementation of evidence-based
    models of geriatric MH/SU care.
  • Model curriculums in geriatric MH/SU, including
    training in integrated rehabilitation, health
    promotion, health care, and social services for
    older adults with serious mental illness.

18
Recommendation 1 (contd)
  • Priorities for the Coordinating Body (contd)
  • Core competencies in geriatric MH/SU for the
    entire workforce spectrum, including direct care
    workers, peer support specialists, primary care
    physicians, nurses (at all levels), clinical
    pharmacists, physician assistants, substance use
    counselors, social workers, psychologists,
    rehabilitation counselors, and marriage and
    family therapists.

19
  • Why Integrated Health Care (IHC) is Important
  • Simply increasing the numbers of PCPs and MH/SU
    providers is not enough.
  • Synergistic workforce adaptations are possible
    and needed.
  • Social Determinants of Health are more likely to
    be considered and addressed poverty,
    transportation, geography, health literacy, etc.
  • Older adults with chronic physical illness are
    more likely to have mental health conditions that
    interfere with self-care.
  • Stigma of mental illness and substance use
    resulting in marginalization and discrimination
    can be addressed.
  • Integrating physical and behavioral health care
    improves outcomes for people with behavioral and
    physical conditions, especially those of a
    chronic nature.

20
Key Components of MH/SU Models for Older Adults
  • Interdisciplinary Team Approach
  • Real team collaboration not just co-location
  • Team building and implementation support
  • Provider training and ongoing support
  • Patient-centered
  • Patient and family education
  • Self-management support
  • Patient preferences, needs and strengths are
    incorporated
  • Population-focused
  • Registry to make sure patients dont fall through
    the cracks
  • Stepped Care
  • Individual and caseload summaries facilitate
    measurement-based practice/ treatment to target
  • Care Management Functions
  • Systematic Outreach
  • Structured templates facilitate efficient /
    effective clinical encounters
  • Close follow-up and monitoring to prevent relapse
  • Outcomes-based Feedback and Quality Improvement
  • Provider accountability
  • Reinforced cultural and linguistic skills

21
Recommendation 2
  • The Secretary of HHS should ensure that its
    agenciesincluding AoA, AHRQ, CMS, HRSA, NIDA,
    NIMH, and SAMHSAassume responsibility for
    building the capacity and facilitating the
    deployment of the MH/SU workforce for older
    Americans.

22
Recommendation 2 (contd)
  • CMS should
  • Evaluate methods for reimbursing care managers
    and the mental health specialists that supervise
    them.
  • Evaluate methods for deploying personnel in
    Community Mental Health Centers to provide older
    adults primary care and chronic disease
    self-management.
  • Explore ways to use QIOs to improve care delivery
    to older adults with MH/SU conditions
  • Enforce PASRR and the MDS rules for assessing
    nursing home residents mental health. These
    assessments should inform residents care plans
    and nursing home personnel should implement the
    care plans accordingly.

23
Recommendation 2 (contd)
  • The HRSA Administrator should ensure that
  • The National Center for Health Care Workforce
    Analysis devotes sufficient attention to
    geriatric MH/SU
  • Geriatric Academic Career Awards career
    development grants include awards to geriatric
    MH/SU specialists if they commit to working with
    older adults who have MH/SU conditions in acute
    or LTC settings).
  • Geriatric Education Centers and the Comprehensive
    Geriatric Education Program institutional awards
    fund programs that train individuals in geriatric
    MH/SU care.

24
Recommendation 2 (contd)
  • The Director of NIMH should ensure that
  • NIMH conducts research on methods for increasing
    the capacity of the mental health workforce to
    provide competent and effective care for older
    adults in the community, nursing homes, or other
    congregate residential settings.

25
Recommendation 2 (contd)
  • The SAMHSA Administrator should ensure that
  • SAMHSA devotes sufficient attention to the
    capacity of the behavioral health workforce to
    provide geriatric mental health and geriatric
    substance use services.
  • SAMHSA restores funding of the Older Adult Mental
    Health Targeted Capacity Expansion Grant program.
  • States that receive MH/SU block grants document
    and report how the funds are used to support
    local capacity to serve older adults

26
Recommendation 3
  • Accreditation and certification organizations and
    state licensing boards should
  • Modify their standards, curriculum requirements,
    and credentialing procedures to require
    professional competence in geriatric MH/SU for
    all levels of personnel
  • Including re-credentialing and professional
    development for already licensed and certified
    personnel.

27
Recommendation 4
  • Congress should
  • Fund training, scholarship, and loan forgiveness
    provisions of the ACA for individuals who work
    with or are preparing to work with older adults
    who have MH/SU conditions. Funding should target
    programs with curriculums in geriatric MH/SU and
    be directed to
  • MH/SU specialists
  • Primary care providers, including MDs, RNs,
    APRNs, and PAs
  • Potential care managers including RNs, APRNs,
    social workers, PAs, and others.
  • Faculty in medicine, nursing, social work,
    psychology, substance use counseling, and other
    specialties.
  • Direct care workers and other front-line
    employees in home health agencies, nursing homes,
    and assisted living facilities
  • Family caregivers of older adults with MH/SU
    conditions.

28
Recommendation 5
  • HHS should direct the coordinating entity to
    develop and coordinate data collection and
    reporting for geriatric MH/SU workforce planning.
    This should include
  • Prevalence data including comorbidities,
    cognitive impairment, age cohort, and demographic
    characteristics
  • Use of MH/SU services
  • Information on the geriatric MH/SU workforce in
    enough detail to assess the workforce by race and
    ethnicity, linguistic skills, geography,
    qualifications, training and certification, areas
    of practice, and hours spent in the care of older
    adults.

29
Thank you
  • Committee on the Mental Health Workforce for
    Geriatric Populations

30
Session Evaluation
  • Please complete and return the evaluation form to
    the classroom monitor before leaving this session.
About PowerShow.com