Potential mechanisms of ascorbate-induced cytotoxicity in pancreatic cancer cells - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Potential mechanisms of ascorbate-induced cytotoxicity in pancreatic cancer cells

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Juan Du Last modified by: cullenj Created Date: 10/27/2006 7:40:01 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Juan160
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Potential mechanisms of ascorbate-induced cytotoxicity in pancreatic cancer cells


1
Potential mechanisms of ascorbate-induced
cytotoxicity in pancreatic cancer cells
  • Juan Du, Garry R. Buettner, Larry W. Oberley,
    Joseph J. Cullen
  • From the Departments of Surgery, Radiation
    Oncology and Free Radical Radiation Biology
    Program, University of Iowa College of Medicine
    and VAMC, Iowa City, IA.

2
Abstract Pharmacological concentrations of
ascorbate easily achieved in humans may be
effective in cancer therapeutics (PNAS, 1048749,
2007). We hypothesized that ascorbate
concentrations achievable with intravenous dosing
may be cytotoxic in pancreatic cancer where the
five year survival is lt 3. Pancreatic cancer
cell lines were treated with ascorbate (0, 5, and
10 mM) for one hour and viability and clonogenic
survival were determined. In addition, the
immortal H6c7 cell line (pancreatic ductal
epithelial cell) and its derivatives, H6c7eR-pBp
(retroviral vector control), H6c7er-Kras (H6c7
cells expressing K-ras oncogene), and
H6c7eR-KrasT (tumorigenic H6c7 cells expressing
K-ras oncogene) (Cancer Res., 655045, 2005) were
treated with ascorbate (0, 5, and 10 mM) and
viability were determined. MIA PaCa-2 pancreatic
cancer cell lines with functional mitochondria
(rho) and the same lines without functional
mitochondria (rhoo) (J. Biol. Chem. 28137416,
2006), were treated with ascorbate and clonogenic
survival determined. The oxygen electrode method
was used to determine H2O2 production. There was
a time and dose-dependent increase in measured
H2O2 production with increased concentrations of
ascorbate. Ascorbate decreased clonogenic
survival and viability in pancreatic cancer cell
lines in a dose-dependent manner. Ascorbate had
no effect on the H6c7 cell line, but decreased
viability in the H6c7 cell lines that express
K-ras oncogene. Ascorbate (5 and 10 mM) decreased
viability in all human pancreatic cancer cell
lines tested. In rho cells, ascorbate resulted
in a dose-dependent decrease in clonogenic
survival, but no cytotoxicity in the rhoo cells.
We conclude that pharmacological doses of
ascorbate, achievable in humans when given
intravenously, may have potential for therapy in
pancreatic cancer. The ascorbate-induced
cytotoxicity in pancreatic cancer cells may be
mediated by a mitochondrial mechanism. Support
NIH grants CA115785, CA66081, the Medical
Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs,
and the Susan L. Bader Foundation of Hope.
3
Introduction
  • Pharmacological concentrations of ascorbate
    easily achieved in humans may be effective in
    cancer therapeutics (PNAS, 1048749, 2007).

4
Predicted plasma Vitamin C concentrations in
healthy persons after oral (top) or
intravenous (bottom) administration of Vitamin C.
Annals of Internal Medicine 140533, 2004
5
  • Ascorbate as an anti-tumor agent. Ascorbate
    (vitamin C, ascorbate) is one of the early
    unorthodox therapies for cancer without
    supporting data. Initial published case reports
    demonstrated potential benefit from high dose
    ascorbate treatment. Subsequent reports
    documented the results of 100 patients with
    terminal cancer, in whom conventional therapy was
    no longer considered useful and were given
    intravenous ascorbate. Patients who received
    ascorbate survived 300 days longer than controls.
    A prospective study was then conducted
    randomizing patients to ascorbate treatment or
    palliative therapy. Treated patients had a median
    survival of 343 days vs. 180 days for controls.
    Smaller studies have also reported benefits of
    ascorbate.
  • To test whether ascorbate was effective, Moertel
    conducted two randomized placebo controlled
    studies randomized to oral ascorbate and neither
    study showed any benefit. Because Moertels
    studies were taken as definitive, ascorbate
    treatment was considered useless. However
    Moertels results were not comparable to those
    previous studies because ascorbate was given
    orally and not intravenously.
  • Emerging knowledge suggests that the role of
    ascorbate in cancer treatment should be
    reexamined. The evidence falls into two
    categories clinical data on dose concentration
    relationships and laboratory data describing
    potential cell toxicity with high concentrations
    of ascorbate in vitro. Clinical data show that
    when ascorbate is given orally, fasting plasma
    concentrations are tightly controlled at lt 100
    ?M. As doses exceed 200 mg, absorption decreases,
    urine excretion increases and ascorbate
    bioavailability is reduced. In contrast, when
    1.25 grams of ascorbate are administered
    intravenously, concentrations as high as 1 mM are
    achieved. Some clinicians have infused more than
    10 grams of ascorbate in cancer patients and
    achieved plasma concentration of 1 to 5 mM. Thus,
    it is clear that intravenous administration of
    ascorbate can yield very high plasma levels,
    while oral treatment does not.
  • Chen et al. measured cell death in 10 cancer and
    4 normal cell types using 1 hour exposures to
    ascorbate. Normal cells were unaffected by 20 mM
    ascorbate whereas 5 cancer cell lines had EC50
    values of lt 4 mM, a concentration achievable by
    intravenous administration. In addition, cell
    death was independent of metal chelators and
    dependent on H2O2 formation. H2O2 generation was
    dependent on ascorbate concentration, incubation
    time, and displayed a linear relationship with
    ascorbate radical formation. In vivo, Chen and
    colleagues demonstrated that intravenous
    injection of ascorbate (0.25-0.5 mg/g body
    weight) increased baseline concentrations of
    ascorbate in blood and extracellular fluid to gt 8
    mM and increased formation H2O2. These studies
    provides a foundation for pursuing pharmacologic
    ascorbate as a prooxidant agent in cancer therapy.

J. Am. Coll. Nutrition 19423, 2000
6
  • Pancreatic cancer therapy. Pancreatic cancer is
    the 4th most common cause of cancer death in the
    United States with over 33,000 fatal cases
    annually in the United States alone. Surgical
    resection of the primary tumor remains the only
    potentially curative treatment for pancreatic
    cancer. However, in population-based studies the
    number of patients undergoing resection with
    curative intent can be less than 3. Even after
    resection, median survival is only 12-18 months
    and less than 20 of resected patients survive 5
    years. The majority of patients die of metastatic
    cancer recurrence.
  • Other adjuvant treatments such as radiation
    therapy and chemotherapy, have not improved
    long-term survival after resection. The rate of
    chemotherapeutic response is less than 20, while
    less than 10 of patients benefit from radiation
    therapy.
  • Because of the lack of poor therapeutic
    responsiveness of pancreatic cancer to surgery,
    chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, survival
    beyond five years is rare with median survival
    less than six months.
  • Thus, novel and effective therapies directed
    against pancreatic cancer are needed to control
    progression and metastatic disease.

CA Cancer J Clin 5743-66, 2007. Cur Probl. Surg
3659-152, 1999.
7
Hypothesis
  • Ascorbate concentrations achievable with
    intravenous dosing may be cytotoxic in pancreatic
    cancer where the five year survival is lt 3.

8
Methods
  • Pancreatic cancer cell lines were treated with
    ascorbate (0, 5, and 10 mM) for one hour and
    viability and clonogenic survival were
    determined.
  • The immortal H6c7 cell line (pancreatic ductal
    epithelial cell) and its derivative H6c7er-Kras
    (H6c7 cells expressing K-ras oncogene) (Cancer
    Res., 655045, 2005) were treated with ascorbate
    (0, 5, and 10 mM) and viability were determined.
  • MIA PaCa-2 pancreatic cancer cell lines with
    functional mitochondria (rho) and the same lines
    without functional mitochondria (rhoo) (J. Biol.
    Chem. 28137416, 2006), were treated with
    ascorbate and clonogenic survival determined.
  • The oxygen electrode method was used to determine
    H2O2 production.

9
Mia PaCa-2 Plt0.05 vs 0 mM Ascorbate Arrow
indicates that no colonies were formed when 20
mM ascorbate was given for one hour
Clonogenic Survival (Clonogenic survival relative
to 0 mM Ascorbate)


Ascorbate
10
AsPC-1 Plt0.05 vs 0 mM Ascorbate

Clonogenic Survival (Clonogenic survival relative
to 0 mM Ascorbate)


Ascorbate
11
  • Figure 1. MIA PaCa-2 and AsPC-1 pancreatic cancer
    cells were treated with ascorbate (0-20 mM) for
    one hour and clonogenic survival determined.
    Ascorbate caused a dose-dependent decrease in
    clonogenic survival in pancreatic cancer cell
    lines.

12
A.
C.
D.
B.
13
Figure 2. MIA PaCa-2 rho (o) cells depleted of
mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) were generated by
incubating wild type cells (rho ) for 6-8 weeks
with 100 ng/ml ethidium bromide. The medium was
supplemented with 50 ?g/ml uridine and 100 ?g/ml
pyruvate to compensate for the respiratory
metabolism deficit. After selection, the MIA
PaCa-2 rho (o) cells were cultured in the same
medium without ethidium bromide. A. To verify
mtDNA depletion, total cellular DNA was extracted
and subjected to PCR using two pairs of human
mtDNA specific primers 1) Mts1 (forward)
(5?-cctagggataacagcgcaat-3?) and Mtas 1 (reverse)
(5? -tagaagagcgatggtgagag-3?), which gave a
630-bp product, and 2) Mts2 (forward)
(5?-aacatacccatggccaacct-3?) and Mtas2 (reverse)
(5?-ggcaggagtaatcagaggtg-3?), which gave a 532-bp
product. For control, we measured the expression
of GAPDH, which is coded by nuclear DNA. B.
Immunoblot of cytochrome c demonstrating that
this protein which is coded by mtDNA is present
in rho () but not in rho (o) cells. C.
Immunoblots for manganese superoxide dismutase
(MnSOD), copper/zinc SOD (CuZnSOD), thioredoxin
(Trx), glutathione peroxidase (GPx1), and
phospholipid glutathione peroxidase (PhGPx). D.
Cells were incubated with DMSO and DMSO
containing Antimycin A (AntA) 10 ?M for 15
minutes. Cells were stained for hydroethidine
(DHE) and fluorescence measured by flow
cytometry. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)
calculated relative to rho (o) cells. Means ?
SEM, N 3.
14
Mia PaCa-2 rho cells Plt0.05 vs 0 mM Ascorbate

Clonogenic Survival (Clonogenic survival relative
to 0 mM Ascorbate)


Ascorbate
15
Mia PaCa-2 rhoo cells Plt0.05 vs 0 mM Ascorbate
Clonogenic Survival (Clonogenic survival relative
to 0 mM Ascorbate)
Ascorbate
16
  • Figure 3. Ascorbate (0-5 mM) demonstrated
    significant decreases in clonogenic survival in
    MIA PaCa-2 rho cells but no changes in
    clonogenic survival in MIA PaCa-2 rhoo cells.

17

Surviving fraction (relative to no ascorbate for
each treatment point)
18
Plt0.05 vs ascorbate

Surviving fraction (relative to control for each
treatment point)


19
Plt0.05 vs ascorbate

Surviving fraction (relative to control for each
treatment point)




20
Surviving fraction (relative to no ascorbate for
each treatment point)

21


Surviving fraction (relative to no ascorbate for
each treatment point)
22
Surviving fraction (relative to no ascorbate for
each treatment point)

23
  • Figure 4. The addition of the mitochondrial
    electron transport chain (ETC) blocker Antimycin
    A (AntA) to ascorbate decreased human pancreatic
    cancer (MIA PaCa-2) clonogenic survival, relative
    to the use of the AntA alone. MIA PaCa-2 cells
    were treated for one hour with and without
    ascorbate 1 mM for one hour in the presence of
    Antimycin A 10 ?M for 4 hours. MIA PaCa-2 cells
    were treated with ascorbate are represented as
    clear bars per treatment group. Dark bars
    represent the surviving fraction of cells treated
    without ascorbate. P lt 0.05 vs. no ascorbate,
    N3.

24
P lt 0.05 vs 0 mM Ascorbate


H2O2 (?M)

Ascorbate
25
P lt 0.05 vs 0 mM Ascorbate



H2O2 (?M)
Time (min.)
26
  • Figure 5. H2O2 generation in cell culture medium.
    H2O2 was measured by oxygen electrode. H2O2
    increased as a function of ascorbate
    concentration and a function of time (ascorbate 1
    mM).

27
Viability (normalized to 0 mM for each cell line)










Plt0.05 vs 0 mM for each cell line
28
  • Figure 6. Effects of pharmacologic ascorbic acid
    concentrations on pancreatic cancer and
    pancreatic ductal epithelial cells. All cells
    were treated with ascorbate (0, 5, 10 mM) for one
    hour. Cell viability determined by MTT assay. MIA
    PaCa-2, AsPC-1, BxPC-3 are pancreatic cancer cell
    lines. Immortalized pancreatic ductal epithelial
    cell line, H6c7 and its derivatives, and
    H6c7er-Kras (H6c7 cells expressing K-ras
    oncogene), also received ascorbate (0, 5, 10 mM)
    for one hour.

29
Conclusions
  • Pharmacological doses of ascorbate, achievable in
    humans when given intravenously, may have
    potential for therapy in pancreatic cancer.
  • The ascorbate-induced cytotoxicity in pancreatic
    cancer cells may be mediated by a mitochondrial
    mechanism.

30
Animal Protocol
Day 1 Ascorbate 4 g/kg or Saline (1M) q day x 14
days
Day 14 Stop treatment
2 x 106 MIA PaCa-2 Pancreatic cancer cells
31
Ascorbate (4 g/kg I.P.every day for 14 days).
Hypertonic saline (g/kg I.P. every day for 14
days).
Tumor volume (mm3)
Days
32
Survival
Days
33
Survival
Days
34
Plt 0.01 vs control
Surviving fraction (relative to control)

35
Plt 0.01 vs control


Surviving fraction (relative to control)

36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com