Integrated Justice and Homeland Security in CO Presented to the NGA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Integrated Justice and Homeland Security in CO Presented to the NGA

Description:

Title: Criminal Justice Agencies Author: Tanya Hake Created Date: 8/7/2002 10:15:05 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Other titles: Times New Roman ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:171
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Tanya56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Integrated Justice and Homeland Security in CO Presented to the NGA


1
Integrated Justice and Homeland Security in
COPresented tothe NGAs Center for Best
PracticesIntegrated Justice WorkshopByTheres
a Brandorff, Director, CICJISDirector, CIOJim
Lynn, CDPS CIOSeptember 2003
2
CICJIS
3
Main CICJIS Benefit
  • Getting the right information to the right
    people at the right time and place in the
    criminal justice process.

4
(No Transcript)
5
CICJIS Information Sharing Main Components
  • Event triggered data transfers
  • A warrant is entered by the courts (event) and it
    can be seen immediately by police on the street!
  • Information queries
  • DA or Probation Officer can directly access a
    persons RAP Sheet, Driver History, and Current
    Status
  • Central Index
  • Each agency has different business models each
    agency has its own language the CICJIS Central
    Index helps translate and communicate

6
New Requirements
  • Information Sharing Model for the State
  • Enterprise Model for the State
  • Use Model for Homeland Security Information
    Sharing
  • Local and State Requirements
  • Use Model for Homeland Defense
  • Pilots with Northern Command (US NORTHCOM)

7
Constraints
  • Time to Market
  • Existing technical solution
  • Cost
  • Efficiency/Effectiveness
  • Funding
  • State Budget Crisis
  • Traditional Justice Grants

8
CICJIS Homeland Security
  • U.S. Northern Command Informal Work Group
  • Information Requirements Gap Analysis
  • Cyber Security Task Force
  • 9 State Regions
  • OPSFS
  • HLS Grant livescan in every sheriffs office
  • Pilots
  • JRIES, ACTD,

9
Informal Information Sharing Working Gro
up
10
(No Transcript)
11
Communications Infrastructure
SIPRNET NIPRNET
INTERNET
LEO
GuardNet
NLETS
RISS
SATCOM
DISN
12
Problem Statement
  • Communications interrupted
  • DoD insight was very limited
  • Limited Intelligence sharing
  • Slow Command, Control, and Coordination between
    DoD and Civil authorities

13
HLS C2 ACTD Overview
  • History
  • Pre-dates 911 attacks
  • Submitted as candidate in Feb 2001
  • Approved for FY02 Start
  • Program Less Than One Year Old
  • 5 Year Program 4 Thrust Areas
  • Assured Communications
  • Interoperability
  • Threat Attribution/Alert
  • Command, Control, Coordination
  • Missions Supported
  • Homeland Defense, Military Assistance to Civil
    Authorities, Critical Infrastructure Protection
    and Antiterrorism/Force Protection
  • Stakeholders
  • OSD, DISA, NSA, DTRA, NIMA, DIA
  • JFCOM/NORTHCOM
  • National Guard Bureau
  • Additional Participants
  • Federal Agencies, State and Local Governments
  • NGOs and commercial enterprises

Fall Demonstration Locations/Participants
  • Program Schedule
  • Stakeholder Meetings
  • Implementation Directive
  • Management Plan
  • Key Milestones
  • Crisis Response Demonstration (April 23-25)
  • WALEX (June 25-26)
  • Fall Demo - Coastal Operations
  • Industry Day (Dec 3-4)
  • Pentagon OPNAV and HQMC command centers
  • NORTHCOM
  • Tidewater, VA
  • JTF/CS, JBC
  • CINCLANTFLT, Navy Installations
  • Cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake
  • Virginia Port Authority
  • Louisiana
  • State EOC, State Police, Guard CST, Port
    Authority
  • Hawaii
  • CINCPACFLT, MARFORPAC, Pacific Disaster Ctr
  • California
  • San Diego Navy and Marine Installations
  • Washington
  • Seattle

14
Goal Move DoDs Reaction Point
Incident
Local Regional
DISA
DTRA
North Com
NIMA
NSA
EOC
INTEL COMM
Reaction Point
FIRST RESPONDERS
DoD
Prevention
Deterrence
Consequence Management
Crisis Response
Information Sharing/Intelligence Coordination
Strong DoD/Federal/Civil interfaces will save
lives, infrastructure, resources
15
Not Your Typical ACTD
  • National priority concern
  • HLS Requirements emerging
  • US NORTHCOM Command structure evolving
  • Technology may precede policy
  • Rapid prototyping/spiral development
  • Complex interagency interactions
  • DoD/Federal/State/Local/Commercial
  • Communications to the 1st Responder
  • Improve intelligence/information flow
  • Multi level information protection/release

16
Area Security Operations C2 Workstation
Situational Awareness
Information Pull
Information Push
Operational Picture
  • Database access and GCCS Track Database Manager
  • Web Access/Portal
  • Common Operating Picture
  • Knowledge Board
  • Event visualization capabilities
  • Arc IMS feed view
  • Baseline Microsoft? suite
  • SIPRNET approved

17
What This ACTD Will Deliver
Critical Operational Issues
Potential Technologies
Priority Network Access Transportable
Communications
Ability to communicate through congestion and
disruption
Communications with Appropriate Assurance
Private, protected information sharing between
DoD, IC, Civil, State Local agencies
Scalable collaboration applications for all HLS
echelons
Decision Support Tools/CR2OP
Intelligence Applications and Alert Function
Intelligence sharing for attribution and
prevention
Collaboration Planning and Prediction Tools
HLS planning and prediction for deterrence and
crisis management
Transition to Operations
Representative HLS architecture
18
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com