The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System

Description:

Title: The Maryland Early Childhood Special Education Accountability System Last modified by: vbehren Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:181
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: olmsCteJ
Learn more at: http://olms.ctejhu.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System


1
The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability
System
  • Program Effectiveness Based on Results for
    Children

Maryland State Department of Education Division
of Special Education/Early Intervention
Services September 2007
2
Were Embarking on an Outcome Journey
3
At times the road may become a bit congested!
4
When that happens
  • We will slow down and make sure were all on
    board.

5
  • The Players
  • United States Department of Education, Office of
    Special Education Programs (OSEP)
  • Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO)
  • Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE)
  • Twenty-four Local School Systems/Preschool
    Special Education

6
The Law
  • The Individuals with Disabilities Act 2004 (IDEA
    2004) requires that states report on the progress
    of preschool children with disabilities receiving
    special education and related services.

7

What are the OSEP Child Outcomes?
  • Outcome 1
  • Children have positive social relationships.
  • Outcome 2
  • Children acquire and use knowledge and skills
    (including language/communication).
  • Outcome 3
  • Children take appropriate action to meet
    their needs.

8
Why Measure Child Outcomes?
  • Federal Reporting Requirements
  • Program Effectiveness
  • Program Improvement

9
Why these Outcomes?
  • Outcomes are stated in functional terms
  • Functional refers to
  • Skills, behaviors, experiences that are
    meaningful to the child in the context of
    everyday living
  • A series of behaviors or skills, integrated
    across domains, that allows the child to achieve
    the outcomes

10
Functional Outcomes are not
  • A single behavior
  • The sum of a series of discrete behaviors
  • Domains based - not trying to separate child
    development into discrete areas (e.g.,
    communication, gross motor, self-help)

11
Thinking Functionally!
  • Not just
  • - Know how to imitate a gesture when prompted
  • by others
  • - Use 3 to 4 word phrases
  • - Show a skill in a specific situation
  • But does she
  • - Watch what a peer says or does and
    incorporate it into her own play
  • - Use words to make her needs or wants known
  • - Use a skill in actions across settings and
    situations to accomplish something meaningful

12
Outcome 1 Children have positive social
relationships
  • Involves behaviors such as
  • Relating with adults
  • Relating with other children
  • For older children - following rules related to
    groups or interacting with others

13
Outcome 2 Children acquire and use knowledge
and skills
  • Involves behaviors such as
  • Thinking
  • Reasoning
  • Remembering
  • Problem solving
  • Using symbols and language
  • Demonstrating understanding of physical and
    social worlds

14
Outcome 3 Children take appropriate action to
meet their needs
  • Involves behaviors such as
  • Taking care of basic needs
  • Getting from place to place
  • Using tools
  • For older children, contributing to their own
    health and safety

15
So how will this be accomplished?
  • What assessment will be used?
  • When will data be collected?
  • Who will provide the data?
  • How and when will it be reported?
  • How does this pertain to Child Care Providers?

16
Marylands Assessment Approach The Work Sampling
System
  • The Work Sampling System (WSS), a performance
    based assessment, is used in the context of the
    Maryland Model for School Readiness (MMSR).
  • The MMSR is a framework to assist early
    educators in instructing and assessing young
    children in the knowledge, skills and behaviors
    they need to be prepared for the learning demands
    of formal schooling.
  • WSS addresses all three of the OSEP Child
    Outcomes.

17
Why Choose the Maryland Model for School
Readiness?
  • The intent of MMSR is the use of developmentally
    appropriate practices with all children
  • MMSR promotes a common language among early
    childhood general and special educators by
    enabling a view of children through a shared
    lens.
  • MMSR is a developmental frame of reference for
    aligning IEP goals with the State Learning
    Standards/Voluntary State Curriculum (VSC).

18
So Where, When, Who, How, and What About?
19
Early Childhood Programs
  • Early Childhood Program - A program that includes
    at least 50 nondisabled children includes but
    is not limited to
  • Head Start
  • Kindergarten
  • Reverse mainstream classrooms
  • Private preschools
  • Preschool classes offered to an eligible pre-k
    population by the public school system
  • Group child care
  • Family child care

20
How Work Sampling Relates to Child Care
  • You may be wondering to yourself how the Work
    Sampling System and measuring the early childhood
    special education outcomes involves child care
    programs.
  • Preschool aged children with disabilities are
    found in a variety of settings including Family
    Child Care programs and Child Care Centers.
  • Because Work Sampling is an observational
    assessment tool, child care providers can make
    valuable contributions by providing information
    where appropriate.

21
Clarification for Child Care Providers
  • Child Care Providers would not be asked to report
    on any of the childs special education program
    goals, but rather to provide information and
    observations on the Work Sampling Assessment Tool
    as they relate to the childs participation in
    the child care setting.
  • Parents will participate and provide this same
    type of information as well.

22
Status At Entry Data Collection Process
  • Work Sampling System select appropriate
    checklist based on age of child
  • It is recommended that Status at Entry data be
    collected within an approximate time of 6-8 weeks
    following the initiation of special education
    services
  • Collect examples of childs work either
    documented observations or actual samples
  • The measure is whether a childs performance is
    comparable to typical same-age peers or below

23
Child Care Providers Participation with Status
at Entry
  • Status at Entry data collection for 3 and 4 year
    olds newly identified as having a disability and
    determined eligible to receive special education
    who are included in typical early childhood
    programs such as Family and Center Child Care
    Programs could make a valuable contribution
    through providing observational information
    regarding the three measurable childhood outcomes
    and participating in the work sampling system.
  • A parent or a local school system special
    education teacher may contact you to request
    information.

24
Progress At Exit
  • Only children who had entrance data collected
    will have exit data collected.
  • Exit data is only collected on children who
    received at least 6 months of intervention.
  • Comparing Status at Entry with Progress at Exit
    measures the three early childhood outcomes!

25
When Will Local School Systems CollectProgress
at Exit Data?
  • Prior to a childs exit from Preschool-Kindergarte
    n special education services, the LSS will
    complete an assessment of the childs current
    levels of performance using the WSS.
  • At end of 5-year-old year, or sooner if the child
    is leaving the program for other reasons (moving
    out of state, no longer eligible), the exit
    assessment should be completed as soon as
    possible prior to exit.
  • If a child begins to receive services in one
    jurisdiction and transfers to another
    jurisdiction in Maryland, the LEA from which the
    child is exiting is responsible for conducting
    the exit assessment.

26
Progress at Exit Measures
  • Maintained a level comparable to typical same-age
    peers
  • Closed the gap with typical same-age peers
  • Narrowed the gap with typical same-age peers
  • Made progress, but at the same rate as when they
    entered preschool services, or
  • Did not make progress

27
Child Care Providers Participation with Progress
at Exit
  • When a child exits preschool special education
    services earlier than their Kindergarten year by
    successfully completing their goals,
  • And they are included in a regular early
    childhood setting such as Family or Center Based
    Child Care,
  • A parent or local school system special education
    teacher may contact you to request information.

28
Key Points
  • Assumption Children can be described with
    regard to how close they are to age expected
    behavior for each of the 3 outcomes.
  • By providing services and supports, special
    education is trying to move children closer to
    age expected behavior.
  • As Child Care Providers and teachers of young
    children, you have valuable information to
    contribute and can be part of the solution that
    makes this process successful!

29
Ultimate GoalPositive Results for Preschoolers
and Kindergarteners with Disabilities
30
Questions?
Status at Entry and Progress at Exit
Status at Entry
Same Aged Peers
of students who have closed the gap

of students closing the gap
of students at the same level

Progress at Exit
of students below where they began
  • Have entry data
  • Been in a special education program for 6 months
    or more
  • Students are exiting the program (children
    turning 6 years old)

31
The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability
System
  • Program Effectiveness Based on Results for
    Children

Maryland State Department of Education Division
of Special Education/Early Intervention
Services September 2007
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com