Today: 4.2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Today: 4.2

Description:

Title: Balanced Incomplete Block Designs Author: Derek Bingham Last modified by: Derek Bingham Created Date: 2/5/2002 2:59:07 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: DerekB71
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Today: 4.2


1
Lecture 11
  • Today 4.2
  • Next day 4.3-4.6

2
Analysis of Unreplicated 2k Factorial Designs
  • For cost reasons, 2k factorial experiments are
    frequently unreplicated
  • Can assess significance of the factorial effects
    using a normal or half-normal probability plot
  • May prefer a formal significance test procedure
  • Cannot use an F-test or t-test because there are
    no degrees of freedom for error

3
Lenths Method
  • Situation
  • have performed an unreplicated 2k factorial
    experiment
  • have 2k-1 factorial effects
  • want to see which effects are significantly
    different from 0
  • If none of the effects is important of the
    factorial effects is an independent realization
    of a N( , )
  • Can use this fact to develop an estimator of the
    effect variance based on the median of the
    absolute effects

4
Lenths Method
  • s0
  • PSE
  • tPSE,i

5
Example Original Growth Layer Experiment
  • Effect Estimates and QQ-Plot

6
Lenths Method
  • s0
  • PSE
  • tPSE,i

7
Fractional Factorial Designs at 2-Levels
  • 2k factorial experiments can be very useful in
    exploring a relatively large number of factors in
    relatively few trials
  • When k is large, the number of trials is large
  • Suppose have enough resources to run only a
    fraction of the 2k unique treatments
  • Which sub-set of the 2k treatments should one
    choose?

8
Example
  • Suppose have 5 factors, each at 2-levels, but
    only enough resources to run 16 trials
  • Can use a 16-run full factorial to design the
    experiment
  • Use the 16 unique treatments for 4 factors to set
    the levels of the first 4 factors (A-D)
  • Use an interaction column from the first 4
    factors to set the levels of the 5th factor

9
Example
10
Fractional Factorial Designs at 2-Levels
  • Use a 2k-p fractional factorial design to explore
    k factors in 2k-p trials
  • In general, can construct a 2k-p fractional
    factorial design from the full factorial design
    with 2k-p trials
  • Set the levels of the first (k-p) factors similar
    to the full factorial design with 2k-p trials
  • Next, use the interaction columns between the
    first (k-p) factors to set levels of the
    remaining factors

11
Fractional Factorial Designs at 2-Levels
  • Use a 2k-p fractional factorial design to explore
    k factors in 2k-p trials
  • In general, can construct a 2k-p fractional
    factorial design from the full factorial design
    with 2k-p trials
  • Set the levels of the first (k-p) factors similar
    to the full factorial design with 2k-p trials
  • Next, use the interaction columns between the
    first (k-p) factors to set levels of the
    remaining factors

12
Example
  • Suppose have 7 factors, each at 2-levels, but
    only enough resources to run 16 trials
  • Can use a 16-run full factorial to design the
    experiment
  • Use the 16 unique treatments for 4 factors to set
    the levels of the first 4 factors (A-D)
  • Use interaction columns from the first 4 factors
    to set the levels of the remaining 3 factors

13
Example
  • The 3 relations imply other relations
  • Defining contrast sub-group
  • Word-length pattern

14
  • How can we compare designs?
  • Resolution
  • Minimum aberration

15
Example
  • Suppose have 7 factors, each at 2-levels, but
    only enough resources to run 32 trials
  • Can use a 27-2 fractional factorial design
  • Which one is better?
  • D1 IABCDFABCEGDEFG
  • D2 IABCFADEGBCDEG
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com