Ling 390 - Intro to Linguistics - Winter 2005 Class 1 - Monday, January 3, 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ling 390 - Intro to Linguistics - Winter 2005 Class 1 - Monday, January 3, 2005

Description:

Title: Ling 390 - Intro to Linguistics - Winter 2005 Class 1 - Monday, January 3, 2005 Author: Jeff Conn Last modified by: Jeff Conn Created Date – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:436
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: JeffC4
Learn more at: https://web.pdx.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ling 390 - Intro to Linguistics - Winter 2005 Class 1 - Monday, January 3, 2005


1
Step 1 Memorize IPA - practice quiz today - real
quiz on Tuesday (over consonants)!
Phonology is about looking for patterns and
arguing your assessment of those patterns (be
clear, orderly and logical) Course calendar may
change depending on you HW1 due Tues 1/17
practice for Quiz Quiz 1 is on Tues 1/17 Quiz 2
on Thurs 1/19
About me, you and this course. Webpage
web.pdx.edu/connjc
2
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Phonology - the organization of sound system of a
    language includes how sounds vary within
    contexts, the sequencing and distribution of
    sounds, and it is interfaced with other aspects
    of grammar like syntax and morphology.
  • Phonemic distinction - a phonetic difference is
    meaningful
  • Phonemes the minimal units that serve to
    distinguish words with each other (p. 20)

3
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Looking for meaningful contrast between sounds
  • (distinctive sounds, sounds in opposition)
    phonemes
  • Minimal Pairs - 2 forms with distinct meanings
    that differ by only 1 segment found in the same
    position in each form
  • Like 2 words that rhyme (minimal pairs test for
    consonants)
  • sip and zip show a meaningful difference between
    the segments s and z
  • Because of this minimal pair, we can say for sure
    that /s/ and /z/ are separate phonemes
  • Can also use minimal triplet or for more, minimal
    set

4
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Minimal pairs is a test used to find phonemes
  • Phonemes - segments that contrast with each
    other in a particular language belong to separate
    phonemes
  • Cant always find MP for all phonemes in all
    environments
  • only occur in certain
    environments in English

5
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • When 2 or more sounds never occur in the same
    environment then they are in complementary
    distribution

6
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • When 2 or more sounds never occur in the same
    environment then they are in complementary
    distribution

voiceless stop
aspirated voiceless stop
unreleased voiceless stop
7
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Allophones - When two or more segments are
    phonetically distinct but phonologically the same
    (predictable variation).

at the Daily Planet
saving the world
at Darcelles
8
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Phonetic representation - shows all allophones
    and all information about segments that is
    phonetically produced
  • Phonemic representation - only shows phoneme

Phonemic representation
/p/
Phonetic representation
9
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • English one phoneme /p/ and allophones include
    p and ph

Phonemic representation
/p/
p ph
Phonetic representation
  • Thai 2 phonemes /p/ and /ph/

Phonemic representation
/p/ /ph/
p ph
Phonetic representation
10
  • Complementary Distribution - remember that the
    phoneme /p/ has 3 allophones

Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
Environments
Phonetic Environments Examples ___ word
initial ___ word final s ___ after
s ___ C before a consonants C ___ V
between a consonant and a vowel V ___ V
between two vowels V ___ word-final after a
vowel C ___ word-final after a consonant
11
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • The component of the grammar that determines the
    selection of speech sounds and that governs both
    the sound patterns and the systematic phonetic
    variation found in language.
  • Phoneme - the idea of the sound and
    organizational unit for all its allophones - in
    yo head
  • Allophones - the phonetic realizations of the
    phoneme in certain phonetic environments - out
    yo mouth

12
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
13
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
Yes - minimal pairs 1-7 2-8 3-9 4-10 so
14
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
Phonetic Environments ___ word initial ___
word final s ___ after s o ___ e
between o and e
Phonetic Environments ___ C before a
consonant C ___ V between a consonant and a
vowel V ___ V between two vowels V ___
word-final after a vowel C ___ word-final
after a consonant
15
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
organize your data
16
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
Organize your data! Where does each sound
occur? List the specific immediately preceding
sound and the specific immediately following
sound (dont generalize yet!)
17
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
Phonetic Environments ___ word initial ___
word final s ___ after s o ___ e
between o and e
Phonetic Environments ___ C before a
consonant C ___ V between a consonant and a
vowel V ___ V between two vowels V ___
word-final after a vowel C ___ word-final
after a consonant
18
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
Organize your data! Where does each sound
occur? List the specific immediately preceding
sound and the specific immediately following
sound (dont generalize yet!)
before a, o, e, o, word initially, etc
elsewhere
all before u
all before i
19
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
20
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Underlying representation (UR) - the
    unpredictable phonological information
    represented in a phonemic representation (green
    folders)
  • Surface representations (PR) - the phonetic
    representations (manila folders)
  • We use rules (formalized phonological processes)
    to derive the PR from the UR

21
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
22
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • The text talks about /eI/ shortening that the
    vowel is shorter before voiceless consonants.
    See data on p. 22 for more details. Everyone
    understand this?

23
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • We use rules (formalized phonological processes)
    to derive the PR from the UR
  • Phonological rules are
  • language specific not all languages follow the
    same rules (not all langs have shorter vowels
    before voiceless consonants)
  • Productive extend to novel cases If new word
    create in Eng, vake, would follow shortening rule
  • Give rise to well-formedness intuitions
    violations are sensed intuitively
  • Untaught not something we learn through direct
    instruction, but rather intuitively
  • Form part of unconscious knowledge these are
    rules we follow but dont know we follow why we
    dont necessarily know that there is a shorter
    vowel before voiceless consonants

24
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Basically, based on the distribution of sounds,
    we can say that these sounds are in complementary
    distribution. All of the allophones except 1
    will be predictable (they will occur in a
    predictable environment usually due to
    assimilation or something like that). The 1
    allophone that is NOT predictable we call
    elsewhere. This way, we can use that as the
    phoneme (the least predictable allophone) and
    write a rule do derive other allophones.

25
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Think about Japanese data we could say that one
    of the affricates is the phoneme, and we would
    have to write a very messy rule to predict where
    its allophone of t would occur!
  • We are going backwards from the data and based on
    the distribution and patterning of sounds, we are
    theorizing that certain sounds are organized
    under 1 unit (a phoneme) and there are rules to
    predict its occurrence

26
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Formalizing phonological rules the first step
    is to be able to state in prose and use a
    simplified features system
  • Look at the data for /l/ in Eng on p. 25 (below
    too). Everyone understand the analysis?

27
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Now we can come up with rules to derive the
    non-elsewhere allophones. See list of rules on
    p. 29 and below
  • Note that some use ___ to indicate word final
    while text uses ___ word

28
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Now look at derivations on p. 30 (below). Need
    to run all possible /l/ instances through all
    rules to make sure that the rule applies when it
    does and it doesnt apply incorrectly

29
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Minimal pair vs. near minimal pair.
  • Minimal Pair
  • sip and zip show a meaningful difference between
    the segments
  • s and z
  • Near Minimal Pair
  • author and either show a meaningful difference
    between the segments
  • However, if we are trying to find allophones of 1
    phoneme, then a near minimal pair could include
    words where the 2 sounds in question are just in
    the same environment but not necessarily a
    minimal pair like tether and pleasure

30
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • It is due to phonology and organization of sounds
    that can differ between languages rather than the
    sounds themselves. Compare Spanish and English.

31
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • It is due to phonology and organization of sounds
    that can differ between languages rather than the
    sounds themselves. Compare Spanish and English.

32
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • It is due to phonology and organization of sounds
    that can differ between languages rather than the
    sounds themselves. Compare Spanish and English.
  • Looking at the 4 sounds involved here are how
    they are phonetically related.

33
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • It is due to phonology and organization of sounds
    that can differ between languages rather than the
    sounds themselves. Compare Spanish and English.
  • Looking at the 4 sounds involved here are how
    they are phonologically different in the 2
    languages.

34
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Massai data - we notice that there can be
    complementary distribution identified for 3
    sounds belonging to 1 phoneme for 3 different
    phonemes. Notice that the same rule can be
    applied to all the different allophones and that
    this is a more general process due to natural
    classes.

35
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Natural class of sounds is defined as any
    complete set of sounds in a given language that
    share the same value for a feature or set of
    features. (p. 43) Note that it needs to be all
    sounds possible for that language they will
    usually behave the same (share phonological
    rules).

36
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Minimal pair vs. near minimal pair.
  • Minimal Pair
  • sip and zip show a meaningful difference between
    the segments
  • s and z
  • Near Minimal Pair
  • author and either show a meaningful difference
    between the segments
  • However, if we are trying to find allophones of 1
    phoneme, then a near minimal pair could include
    words where the 2 sounds in question are just in
    the same environment but not necessarily a
    minimal pair like tether and pleasure

37
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Practice with Phonemic analysis in class
    exercises - groups

38
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Practice with Phonemic analysis in class
    exercises - groups

39
Ch2 Phonemic Analysis
  • Added slide!

40
  • fo? nEkst ta?Im
  • Keep on Ch 2 /Start Ch 3
  • Remember Quizzes on IPA next week and HW1 due on
    Tuesday!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com