Title: SBIRT and Public Health Practice: The Peer In-Reach Team Model
1SBIRT and Public Health Practice The Peer
In-Reach Team Modelbridging the gap between
clinical medicine and public health
- Edward Bernstein MD
- Judith Bernstein RNC, PhD
Dept. of Emergency Medicine Project Assert and
the BNI-ART Institute NIAAA Youth Alcohol
Prevention Center
2BNI-ART Education Faculty
- Lisa Allee MSW, Boston Medical Center
- Kate Brown, Youth Alcohol Prevention Center, BU
School of Public Health - James Feldman MD, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, BU
School of Medicine - William Fernandez MD, Dept. of EM, BU School of
Medicine - Andrea Hall LISW, Boston Medical Center/ BEST
Team - Patricia Mitchell RN, Dept. of EM, BU School of
Medicine - Melanie Rambaud, Youth Alcohol Prevention Center,
BU School of Public Health - Brenda Rodriquez MBA, BNI-ART Institute, BU
School of Public Health - Benjamin Shelton MD, Chief Resident, EM
Residency Program, Boston Medical Center - Luann Sweeney RN, Boston Medical Center
- Ludy Young, Licensed LADC II, Project ASSERT, BMC
3SBIRT Workshop
- rationale and evidence for SBIRT
- Project ASSERT collaborative model
- NIAAA screening guidelines
- motivational interviewing principles
- brief negotiation interview referral skills
- practice SBIRT with case studies
4Contending Frameworks, Strategies Policies
- Is addiction a moral failing/crime
- best controlled by punishment (jail or drug court
mandate) - Is addiction a medical problem
- best treated by acute and chronic disease
management - Is addiction a public health problem requires
access to - universal screening
- brief intervention
- specialized treatment
- comprehensive supports for individuals, families
and communities (i.e. jobs, mental health
services and housing) - safeguards for human rights
5Why do SBIRT? SBIRT--Treatment Works! NESARC
study 2001-02
- 35.9 of U.S. adults with alcohol dependence that
began more than one year ago were in full
recovery (18 abstainers, 17 low risk drinkers) - an additional 27 were in partial remission
- 12 were asymptomatic high risk drinkers
- only 25 with alcohol dependence who began
treatment more than one year ago were still
dependent (treatment failures)
6Substance abuse resembles other chronic recurrent
illnesses a time for a paradigm shift
- lt30 of patients with asthma, HTN, diabetes
adhere to prescribed diet and/or behavioral
changes, and 50 experience recurrence - challenges of adherence and recurrence with a
substance abuse diagnosis are not different from
those found in other chronic diseases - substance abuse should be insured, monitored,
treated and evaluated like other chronic diseases
McClellan AT, Lewis DC, et al. JAMA 2000
2841689-1695.
7THE TREATMENT GAPPast Year Need for Receipt of
Tx for Illicit Drug/ Alcohol Abuse among Persons
Aged 12 2002-3
8WHY DO SBIRT SCREENING WIDENS THE NET
ABUSE/ DEPENDENCE (8.5)
ABSTAINERS MILD DRINKERS (71)
AT-RISK DRINKERS (20)
Specialized Treatment
Brief Intervention
Primary Prevention
9 Intersection of Opportunity Need An
Emergency Department Perspective
- 7.6 /111 million ED visits are alcohol
attributable (McDonald, 2004) - 31 of urban ED pts gt 2 CAGE positive
(Bernstein, 1996) - 26 of ED patients high risk/dependent drinkers
(Academic ED SBIRT Collaborative, 2005)
10WHY DO SBIRT?because brief intervention works!
- Chafetz et al, 1961
- (n200)
- 65 of those receiving brief intervention in the
MGH ED showed up for treatment vs 5 of controls - 40 in the intervention group vs 0 in the
control group kept 5 appointments -
Establishing treatment relations with alcoholics.
J Nerv Ment Dis 1962 134
390-410.
11Brief Intervention in the Trauma Center
- 1153 (46) of 2524 screened positive
- 762 were randomized to control or intervention
status - at 6 months, decreases in both groups (NS)
- at 12 months
- ? 21.9 drinks per week (intervention) vs 6.7
(control) - at 3 years
- 47 greater reduction in serious repeat injuries
in the intervention group vs controls (state
dataset) - Gentilello, Rivara et al. Ann Surg 1999 230
473-483
12Meta-analyses of Motivational Interviewing
- small but real effect sizes
- Dunn et al, 2001
- Hettema et al, 2005 (.30 at 1 yr)
- Vasilaki et al, 2006 (aggregate .18, .60 at 3 mo)
13So if brief intervention works and saves money
Why dont health professionals routinely
screen, practice brief intervention, and refer,
when indicated, to the substance abuse treatment
system?
14(No Transcript)
15- Project ASSERT Bringing down the barriers
-
- A Model for
- Brief Intervention in the ED
- 1993 SAMHSA CSAT
- Critical Populations Demonstration Grant
- Bernstein E, Bernstein J, Levenson S Project
ASSERT An ED-based intervention to increase
access to primary care, preventive services and
the substance abuse treatment system. Ann Emerg
Med 199730181-189.
16Established with funding from CSAT in 1993 to
empower patients to reduce substance abuse and
other harmful health and social behaviors, and
facilitate ED patient access to primary care,
preventive services and substance abuse
treatment.
17(No Transcript)
18Peer educators provide consultation to nurses and
physicians
19providing empathy and support
20offering resources
21From CSAT Demonstration Grant to Boston Medical
Center ED Budget Line ItemRESULTS FROM PROJECT
ASSERT
- 17,495 patients received screening and BNI from
2001-2005 - 16,114 total referrals made to SA treatment,
AA/NA, social service, behavioral health and
primary care. - 5,607 patients sent to detox often by taxi
- 1608 beds detox unavailablecase management
- 1708 SA outpatient
- 1,656 appointments made for primary care
22Brief Intervention in the Clinical Setting
Reduces Cocaine and Heroin Use Bernstein et al.
Drug Alcohol Dependence, 20047749-59
- 23,669 patients screened
- 1175 enrollees (follow-up rate 82)
- among 778 with positive hair at baseline
- intervention group more likely to be abstinent at
30 days than the control group - cocaine alone (22.3 vs 16.9)
- heroin alone (40.2 vs 30.6)
- both drugs (17.4 v s 12.8), with adjusted OR of
1.51-1.57 - cocaine levels in hair reduced
- 29 for intervention group vs 4 control group
23 THE IMPACT OF ED Provider SBIRT ON PATIENTS
ALCOHOL USE
- Funded in part by NIAAA R21 AA015123
- and 14 RO3s AA 01511-14
- with collaborative funding from SAMHSA
24Academic Emergency Medicine SBIRT Collaborative
New England Med.
Boston Medical
25Patient Response to SBIRT at 3 month F/U Summary
- At 3 months, controlling for baseline drinking
levels, patients receiving the intervention
reported - 3.25 fewer typical number of drinks per week
than controls (B -3.25 SE 1.16, p lt .05) - almost ¾ of a drink less for maximum number of
drinks per occasion than controls (B -.72 SE
.32, p lt .05). - Benefits of brief intervention were confined to
those with at-risk drinking rather than dependent
drinking patterns, as measured by the CAGE.
26SBIRT
27SBIRT Why Screen?THE PROBLEM DRINKER (National
Gallery)
28Screening Questions
- Do you smoke? Do you drink? Do you use drugs?
- On average, how many days per week do you drink
alcohol ( beer, wine, liquor )? - On a typical day when you drink, how many drinks
do you have? - NIAAA Guidelines (risky drinking)gt14 drinks/week
for men and gt7 drinks per week for women - What is the maximum number of drinks you had on
any given occasion during the last month? - NIAAA Guidelines gt4 for men gt3 for women
29Remember that a standard drink consists of
30 THE ED BRIEF NEGOTIATION INTERVIEW A
toolkit for enhancing motivation for changein
the clinical setting--developed with Stephen
Rollnick,1994
31Effective communication about alcohol and drugs.
- .approaching the drinking driver to facilitate
behavior change
from The Emergency Physician and the Problem
Drinker DOnofrio, Bernstein
Bernstein, 1996
32NEGOTIATING BEHAVIOR CHANGEPrinciples of Good
Practice
- Respect the autonomy of clients and their choices
- Set an agenda for change together
- Offer information in a neutral, non-personal
manner - Make clear from the start that the client is the
active decision maker
33OTHER PRINCIPLES OF MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING
- Ask open-ended questions.
- Practice reflective listening to encourage
patients to talk about their drinking and the
barriers to change. - Accept resistance as a normal response.
- Avoid confrontation, labeling, stereotyping and
forcing patients to accept a label or diagnosis.
34NEGOTIATING BEHAVIOR CHANGEPrinciples of Good
Practice
Motivational interviewing was developed from the
rather simple notion that the way clients are
spoken to about changing addictive behavior
affects their willingness to talk freely about
why and how they might change.
Stephen Rollnick, PhD
Addiction 2001
961769-70.
35THE BRIEF NEGOTIATION INTERVIEW
- establish rapport ask permission to raise
subject - provide feedback
- enhance motivation
- explore pros and cons
- assess readiness to change and sources of
resilience - explore discrepancies between actual state
goals - develop action plan, using strengths/resources
- referral to primary care and tx if indicated
READY (8 - 10)
UNSURE (4 - 7)
NOT READY (1 - 3)
1 2 3 4
5 6 7
8 9 10
36INTERVENTION ALGORITHM
- Hello, I am _____. Would you mind taking a few
minutes to talk with me about your use of X?
- ltltPAUSE and LISTENgtgt
- Before we start, could you tell me a little about
yourself and your goals (or whats important to
you?) - From what I understand you are using insert
screening data We know that drinking above
certain levels and/or use of illicit drugs can
cause problems, such as insert medical info - I am concerned about your use of X.
- What connection (if any) do you see between your
use of X and this ED visit? - If pt sees connection reiterate what pt has
said. - If pt does not see connection, suggest one, using
medical info (but dont confront). - These are what we consider the upper limits of
low risk drinking for your age and sex. By low
risk we mean that you would be less likely to
experience illness or injury if you stayed within
these guidelines.
- 1. Raise subject
-
-
- 2. Provide feedback
- Review screen
-
-
- Make connection
-
- For alcohol
- Show NIAAA guidelines norms
37- 3. Enhance motivation
- Explore Pros and Cons
-
- Use reflective listening
-
-
-
-
- Readiness to change
-
- Reinforce positives
- Ask pros and cons. Help me to understand what you
enjoy about X? - ltltPAUSE AND LISTENgtgt
- Now tell me what you enjoy less about X or
regret about your use. - ltltPAUSE AND LISTENgtgt
- On the one hand you said
- ltltRESTATE PROSgtgt
- On the other hand you said.
- ltltRESTATE CONSgtgt
- So tell me, where does this leave you? show
readiness ruler - On a scale from 1-10, how ready are you to change
any aspect of your use of X? -
- Ask Why did you choose that number
- and not a lower one like a 1 or a 2? Other
reasons for change? How does this fit with where
you see yourself in the future?
38- 4. Negotiate advise
- Negotiate goal
-
- Benefits of change
- Reinforce resilience /
- resources
- Summarize
- Provide handouts
- Suggest PC f/u
-
- Whats the next step?
- What do you think you can do to stay healthy and
safe? - If you make these changes what do you think might
happen? - What have you succeeded in changing in the past?
How? Could you use these methods to help you with
the challenges of changing? - This is what Ive heard you sayHeres an
agreement I would like you to fill out,
reinforcing your new goals. This is really an
agreement between you and yourself. -
- Provide agreement and information sheet
- Suggest Primary Care f/u to discuss/support
carrying out plan - Thank patient for his/her time
39Applying the algorithmGetting to yes with a
high risk drinker
- Provider Clara Safi, NP
- www.ed.bmc.org/sbirt
40Connecting drinking Reason for Visit
- This is the patients chance to name the problem.
- If there is resistance or lack of awareness of a
connection, the provider can help the patient see
the connection. - Listen carefully for the patients own concerns
to make the link. - Use open ended questions to explore
- What would make this a problem for you?
- How might you prevent that from happening?
- Have you ever done anything you wished you hadnt
while drinking? - Give feedback empathetically, with no shame or
blame.
41 ASSESSING READINESS TO CHANGE
On a scale of 1-10, ten meaning most ready and
one least ready, please mark on the ruler where
you are now on your readiness to change your use
of alcohol and/ or drugs?
You marked five, which indicates you are fifty
percent ready to make a change, so tell me, why
didnt you mark a lower number like a one or two?
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10
42The pros and cons in action.
- Provider Ludy Young, Health Promotion Advocate
- at National Alcohol Screening Day
- www.ed.bmc.org/sbirt
43Exploring the Pros and Cons
- exploring the pros and cons can help you
understand where the patient is coming from and
obstacles to change - pros and cons strategy
- ask, What do you like about your use of X?
- acknowledge that you have heard what they say
- elicit statements about consequences by asking
- What do you like less or regret about your use?
- repeat and affirm statements that lead to change
- summarize briefly on the one hand you said..,
and on the other you said. - ask, Where does that leave you? On a scale of
1-10, how ready are you to make some changes?
44Provider advice and negotiation with the
dependent drinker.
- Provider Gail DOnofrio, MD
- www.ed.bmc.org/sbirt
45THE ROLE OF PROVIDER ADVICE
- meet people where they are at
- timing is importantthe patient should feel heard
and respected before the physician weighs in - conversational style mattersadvice should be
brief, and non-judgmental - advice should be based on fact and weave in
medical events
46IN NEGOTIATING A PLAN, EXPLORE.
- previous strengths, resources and successes
- Have you stopped drinking/using drugs before?
- What personal strengths allowed you to do it?
- Who helped you and what did you do?
- or
- Have you made other kinds of changes
successfully in the past? - How did you accomplish these things?
47Developing and Using a Referral Network
- Provider expectations setting realistic goals
for change in a chronic disease - http//findtreatment.samhsa.gov
- www.ed.bmc.org/sbirt