Comments on - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

Comments on

Description:

Comments on Bank Risk Taking and Competition Revisited: New Theory and New Evidence , by Boyd, De Nicolo, and Al Jalal Discussant: Bilal Zia – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: Bila5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comments on


1
Comments on Bank Risk Taking and Competition
Revisited New Theory and New Evidence, by Boyd,
De Nicolo, and Al Jalal
  • Discussant
  • Bilal Zia
  • World Bank

2
Quick Summary
  • This paper
  • Presents contrasting models that relate banking
    competition to stability
  • Tests the relationship empirically
  • Theory
  • CVH (Charter value hypothesis) Competition
    reduces bank profits and lowers franchise value
    ? lower incentives for good loans (higher MH) ?
    correlation between bank concentration and risk
    of failure is negative
  • BDN (Optimal contracting) Int. rates directly
    influence firm project choice (MH) ? correlation
    between bank concentration and risk of failure is
    positive
  • Empirics
  • BDN trumps CVH

3
  • Theoretical part of paper is strong and well
    presented
  • Focus here on empirical section
  • Finding High concentration is positively
    related with risk
  • Measure of concentration Hirschman-Hirfendahl
    Index
  • Measure of risk Z-score (ROA EQA) / sd(ROA)
  • A host of controls

4
Comments
  • Cross-sectional data from US rural banks and
    Bankscope panel from developing countries two
    very different datasets
  • US data
  • Banks with branches in multiple counties
    omitted, but is bank activity concentrated to
    within-county clients only? Dont banks compete
    across neighboring counties? (HHI is at county
    level)
  • Are there different bank types (such as banks
    that serve specific rural-finance functions)? If
    so, incentive structure to lend may be different
    (state mandated? Perhaps not in US)
  • Does calculating market size using mean rather
    than median change results? (Can winsorize and
    then take mean if worried about outliers)

5
Comments
  • Using state FEs is useful but regression is at
    county level, so should do county FEs. (There is
    footnote in paper, but should run these as well).
  • Can you try putting in size controls
    non-parametrically (size deciles)? LHS is loans /
    assets and size control is log(assets), so a
    mechanical relationship exists.
  • Surprisingly large (and significant) coefficient
    on Farm coefficient. Seasonality?
  • IV need to show first stage. Not immediately
    obvious why state dummy is a good instrument for
    bank size?

6
Comments
  • International Sample
  • 2700 banks from 134 developing countries
  • Major issue No mention of differences between
    government owned, private, and foreign banks.
    Large literature on politicization of loans
    through government banks. Could large govt. banks
    be driving results?
  • Does sample include ALL banks, or only banks
    above a certain size? HHI measurement will be
    affected.
  • Need a better control for demand conditions.
    GDP per capita is very imprecise. Do you have any
    measures of business development?
  • Need to show results using relative size of banks
    rather than absolute size across countries.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com