Preventing Farm Machinery Entanglements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Preventing Farm Machinery Entanglements

Description:

Preventing Farm Machinery Entanglements Outline Background Accident/incident analysis Machinery hazards Case studies Acceptable risk Making ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:412
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: julieb69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Preventing Farm Machinery Entanglements


1
Preventing Farm Machinery Entanglements
2
Outline
  • Background
  • Accident/incident
    analysis
  • Machinery hazards
  • Case studies
  • Acceptable risk
  • Making changes
  • Conclusion

3
Background
  • Farm machinery entanglements in Canada
  • comprise one third of all farm machinery
    injuries.
  • involve both sexes and all ages.
  • cause an average of ten deaths per year.
  • seriously injure another 275 people per year.

4
  • Entanglement injuries are among the most
    traumatic events seen in hospital emergency
    departments.
  • Major lacerations
  • Crushed or fractured limbs
  • Amputations
  • Head and spinal cord injuries
  • Permanent disability

5
Machinery hazards
  • Entanglement can occur when a machine has one or
    more of the following hazards
  • pinch point
  • crush point
  • wrap point
  • pull-in point
  • shearing, cutting points

6
Pinch point
  • Two or more parts move together with one moving
    in a circle.
  • Example
  • pulley
  • belt

7
Crush point
  • Two components move toward each other.
  • Example
  • three-point hitch
  • hydraulic cylinder

8
Wrap point
  • Exposed, rotating components. (Nicks, mud or rust
    increase wrap potential.)
  • Example
  • PTO shaft
  • auger

9
Pull-in point
  • Mechanism designed to pull in crops or other
    material.
  • Example
  • baler pick-up
  • combine
  • feed grinder
  • conveyor

10
Shearing, cutting points
  • Two parts move across each other, or one part
    moves across a stationary object.
  • Example
  • cutter bar
  • auger
  • feed mixer
  • fan blade

11
Learning from experience Accident/incident
analysis
  • Immediate cause
  • Possible contributing factors
  • Human
  • Mechanical
  • Environmental
  • Basic, systemic cause
  • What one thing could prevent a similar incident?

12
Case Studies
  • Stories of real people injured in farm machinery
    entanglements. Why highlight injuries rather than
    fatalities?
  • For every entanglement fatality, there are 27
    serious entanglement injuries.
  • What survivors tell us can help prevent a similar
    incident.

13
Case Study 1
  • Erwin Lehmann
  • Approximately 125 people suffer serious head
    and/or spinal cord injuries in farm machinery
    related incidents every year in Canada.
  • Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance
    Program. Hospitalized Farm Injuries in Canada,
    1990 1995

14
Case Study 1 Incident analysis
  • What was the immediate cause
    of the incident?
  • What were possible contributing
    factors
  • human
  • mechanical
  • environmental
  • What one thing could prevent a similar incident?

15
Case Study 2
  • Doug Thoms
  • In Canada, over thirty people a year suffer
    injuries that require admission to hospital as a
    result of becoming entangled in a baler.
  • Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance
    Program. Hospitalized Farm Injuries in Canada,
    1990 1995

16
Case Study 2 Incident analysis
  • What was the immediate cause
    of the incident?
  • What were possible contributing
    factors?
  • human
  • mechanical
  • environmental
  • What one thing could prevent a similar incident?

17
Case Study 3
  • Bernard Bigoraj
  • Approximately 275 people a year in Canada are
    seriously injured when they become entangled or
    caught in a farm machine. Over 5 of all farm
    work-related injuries are initiated by a trip or
    fall.
  • Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance
    Program. Hospitalized Farm Injuries in Canada,
    1990 1995

18
Case Study 3 Incident analysis
  • What was the immediate cause
    of the incident?
  • What were possible contributing
    factors?
  • human
  • mechanical
  • environmental
  • What one thing could prevent a similar incident?

19
Case Study 4
  • Clara Crawford
  • Almost sixty women a year in Canada are seriously
    injured in incidents involving farm machinery.
  • Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance
    Program. Hospitalized Farm Injuries in Canada,
    1990 1995

20
Case Study 4 Incident analysis
  • What was the immediate cause
    of the incident?
  • What were possible contributing
    factors?
  • human
  • mechanical
  • environmental
  • What one thing could prevent a similar incident?

21
Case Study 5
  • Richard Polkinghorne
  • Approximately 50 people a year in Canada are
    killed or seriously injured when they become
    entangled in a power-take-off device.
  • Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance
    Program. Fatal Farm Injuries in Canada, 1990
    1998
  • Hospitalized Farm Injuries in Canada, 1990
    1995

22
Case Study 5 Incident analysis
  • What was the immediate
    cause of the incident?
  • What were possible
    contributing factors
  • human
  • mechanical
  • environmental
  • What one thing could prevent a similar incident?

23
Case Study 6
  • Bob Ellenor
  • Most farm fatalities occur during daylight hours,
    and there are clear peaks during the afternoon,
    from 200 to 600 pm.
  • Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance
    Program. Fatal Farm Injuries in Canada, 1990
    1998

24
Case Study 6 Incident analysis
  • What was the immediate cause
    of the incident?
  • What were possible contributing
    factors?
  • human
  • mechanical
  • environmental
  • What one thing could prevent a similar incident?

25
Case Study 7
  • Charlene Gray
  • On average, every year in Canada, three people
    lose all or part of an arm, another two lose a
    hand, and almost fifty lose a thumb and/or
    fingers in farm work-related injuries.
  • Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance
    Program. Hospitalized Farm Injuries in Canada,
    1990 1995

26
Case Study 7 Incident analysis
  • What was the immediate cause
    of the incident?
  • What were possible contributing
    factors?
  • human
  • mechanical
  • environmental
  • What one thing could prevent a similar incident?

27
Case Study 8
  • Lorraine Klassen
  • On average every year in Canada, nine children
    under the age of fifteen are killed, and over 100
    are seriously injured in incidents involving farm
    machinery.
  • Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance
    Program.
  • Fatal Farm Injuries in Canada, 1990 1998
  • Hospitalized Farm Injuries in Canada, 1990
    1995

28
Case Study 8 Incident analysis
  • What was the immediate cause
    of the incident?
  • What were possible contributing
    factors?
  • human
  • mechanical
  • environmental
  • What one thing could prevent a similar incident?

29
Case Study 9
  • Tony Potoreyko
  • In Canada, fewer than half of farm fatalities are
    witnessed 36 are not discovered for more than
    an hour, which has a huge impact on the survival
    rate of the victims.
  • Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance
    Program. Hospitalized Farm Injuries in Canada,
    1990 1995

30
Case Study 9 Incident analysis
  • What was the immediate cause of the
    incident?
  • What were possible contributing
    factors?
  • human
  • mechanical
  • environmental
  • What one thing could decrease the trauma of a
    similar incident?

31
What can an entanglement cost?
  • Pain and suffering
  • Guilt, shame, loss of self-esteem
  • Production downtime
  • Travel and medical expenses
  • Childcare expenses
  • Machinery damage and/or replacement
  • Hired labour costs
  • Increased farm work for spouse/children
  • Less time for study and/or recreation
  • Decreased income
  • Lifetime disability
  • Family breakdown
  • Loss of the farm

32
What is acceptable risk?
  • There is only one person who can decide what
    level of risk is acceptable for you. Ask yourself
  • Is the comfort of a loose shirt on a hot day
    worth eleven weeks in hospital?
  • Is saving a few bushels of grain worth losing an
    arm?
  • Are the family hassles you avoid by letting your
    child ride on or play around equipment worth
    losing the child?
  • Is getting by on three hours sleep to finish
    harvest a day earlier worth losing the farm?
  • Is the convenience of leaving the tractor running
    while you repair or unplug equipment worth your
    family losing you?

33
Making changes
  • Farm Safety Audit
  • A management tool that can minimize the risk of
    injuries and maximize productivity and
    profitability
  • Cost/benefit analysis process
  • What will it cost - in terms of time, money and
    convenience - to change equipment, the
    environment or a work procedure?
  • Is the potential benefit worth the cost?

34
ConclusionYou can work safely with farm
machinery. Heres how
  • Guard or shield all moving parts.
  • Do a pre-operational safety check on yourself.
  • 3. Disengage PTO, turn off engine and remove keys
    before dismounting tractor.
  • 4. Turn off power before you repair, adjust or
    unplug machinery.

35
  • Walk around, dont climb or
    reach over a rotating
    PTO.
  • Consider yourself a high-risk
    worker and dress for the
    job.
  • Communicate effectively when
    you work with another
    person.
  • Keep bystanders and children
    away from machinery.
  • You may want to invest in a Remote control
    engine shut-off and receiver remote control
    engine shut-off.

36
Program Partners
  • I.ARE.H Centre for Agricultural Medicine
  • University of Saskatchewan
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  • Canadian Coalition for Agricultural Safety and
    Rural Health
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com