The Role of Complementizers in Verb Classification in Thai - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Role of Complementizers in Verb Classification in Thai

Description:

The Role of Complementizers in Verb Classification in Thai Amara Prasithrathsint Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand Amara.Pr_at_chula.ac.th Introduction What is ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: thi45
Learn more at: http://jseals.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Role of Complementizers in Verb Classification in Thai


1
The Role of Complementizers in Verb
Classification in Thai
  • Amara PrasithrathsintChulalongkorn
    UniversityBangkok, ThailandAmara.Pr_at_chula.ac.th

2
Introduction
  • What is a complementizer?
  • The term "complementiser" was apparently first
    used by Rosenbaum (1967).
  • A complementizer is defined here as
  • a syntactic category/function word that marks a
    complement clause, which is an argument of a
    matrix verb e.g. that
  • I think that he will leave tomorrow.

3
Complemenizer and complement clause
  • I think that he will leave tomorrow.
  • Complement clause an argument of the matrix
    verb think.
  • Complement clause Sentential complement

4
Types of complementizers in English
  • that as a complementizer
  • that, for-to and poss-ing (gerund).(Akmajian
    1977)
  • to-infinitive, bare infinitive, participle,
    whether/if, wh-word
  • Altogether there are eight complementizers in
    English.

5
Complementizers in English
  • (1) to-infinitive Its easy to park your car
    here.
  • (2) for-to infinitive Its important for us
    to get there first.
  • (3) bare infinitive I saw him enter the
    building
  • (4) participle I saw him entering the
    building
  • (5) poss-ing / gerund I always enjoyed his/him
    singing that song.
  • (6) that-clause I saw that he entered the
    building
  • (7) whether/if-clause I dont know whether he
    entered the building.
  • (8) wh-constructions I dont know who entered
    the building

6
Complementizers and verb classification--French
  • verbs in French related to infinitival complement
    clauses 1) perception verbs, and 2) causation
    verbs (Archard (1998 93-94).
  • (10) Jai vu partir Paul. (perception)
  • I saw Paul leave.
  • (11) Marie fait danser Paul. (causation)
  • Mary makes Paul dance.

7
Complementizers and verb classification--French
  • Verbs of volition, verbs of declaration, and
    verbs of thoughts and beliefs are compatible with
    que (that)-complement clauses
  • (12) Je veux que je sois en mesure de partir de?s
    demain. (volition)
  • I want that I be in a position to
    leave as early as tomorrow.
  • (13) Paul dit que Marie est belle. (declaration)
  • Paul says that Mary is beautiful.
  • (14) Je pense que Jai compris le proble?me.
    (thought)
  • I think I understand the problem.

8
Complementizers and verbs in Thai (Higbie
Thinsan 2003 84-85)
  • (15) man ma?y ci? thi?i cha?n ra?k kha?w
  • it not true Comp I love him
  • It is not true that I love him
  • (16) man ma?y ci? wa?a cha?n ra?k kha?w
  • it not true Comp I love him
  • It is not true that I love him
  • (17) man ma?y ci? thi?i- wa?a cha?n ra?k kha?w
  • it not true Comp I love him
  • It is not true that I love him

9
Complementizers and verbs in Thai (Iwasaki
Ingkaphirom 2005 255-268)
  • Verbs showing evaluation and emotion
  • (18) pho?m dii-cay thi?i da?y pho?b khun
  • I (m.) be glad Comp.get meet
    you
  • I am glad to meet you.
  • Verbs of speech and cognition
  • (19) kha?w phu?ut wa?a khun pen khon dii
  • he say Comp. you be person
    good
  • He says that you are a good person.
  • (20) kha?w khi?t wa?a khun pen khon dii
  • he think Comp. you be person
    good
  • He thinks that you are a good person.

10
Summary of the review of previous studies
  • In Thai, three complementizers are mentioned, but
    ha?y is not recognized.
  • There has been some attempt to sub-categorize
    verbs in Thai according to the complementizers
    they occur with, but there is no in-depth
    analysis.
  • Several types of complementizers are recognized
    in English and French.

11
Problems that remain
  • Is ha?y, which is ignored by most linguists, a
    complementizer in Thai?
  • Is it possible to classify verbs according to the
    complementizers that occur with them?
  • How are the verb classes different semantically ?

12
Problems that remain
  • How are the complementizers different from one
    another. What are their cognitive meanings?
  • Are there any verbs that are compatible with more
    than one complementizer? If so, do they have
    different meanings when they occur with different
    complementizers?

13
Purpose and Hypothesis
  • To identify complementizers in Thai
  • To find out the conditions of their occurrence
    with verbs.
  • Hypotheses Three complementizers are identified.
    They have different cognitive values, which
    classify the verbs into three groups with
    different meanings.

14
Data
  • Data from a corpus of standard Thai, about
    three-million words long.

15
Analysis
  • Cooccurrences of complementizers and verbs
  • Cognitive semantic approach to the interpretation
    of meanings.

16
Findings--The three complementizers
  • grammaticalized words.
  • ha?y to give
  • wa?a to say
  • thi?i place

17
The three complementizers
  • ha?y
  • (21)kha?w ha?y na??-s???? cha?n
  • he give book I
  • he gave me a book.
  • (22)kha?w sa?? ha?y cha?n na?? lo?
  • he order Comp I sit down
  • He ordered me to sit down.

18
The three complementizers
  • wa?a
  • (23) khun wa?a aray na?
  • you say what Prt.
  • What did you say?
  • (24) cha?n khi?t wa?a khun khuan yu?t
  • I think Comp you should stop
  • I think that you should stop.

19
The three complementizers
  • thi?i
  • (25)cha?n kh?y maa thi?i h??? ni?i l????w
  • I used to come place CLS.this alreadly
  • I have been to this place before.
  • (26)cha?n si?a-cay thi?i khun ma?y maa
  • I be sad Comp you not come
  • I was sad that you did not show up.

20
Verb classification in Thai
  • Directive verbs (ha?y-verbs)
  • Communicative verbs (wa?a-verbs)
  • Emotive verbs (thi?i-verbs)

21
Directive verbs (ha?y-verbs)
  • verbs signifying making people do what the one
    wants.
  • 1) verbs of causation, e.g., pen-he?et to
    cause, pli?an to change
  • 2) verbs of pressure. There is some sense of
    pressure at different levels, such as sa?? to
    order, ri?ak-r???? to demand, m???p-ma?ay to
    assign.
  • (See the appendix for the list of ha?y-verbs)

22
Directive verbs (ha?y-verbs)
  • (27) kha?w pli?an ha?y thu?k-ya?a? dii kh??n
  • he change Comp everything good rise
  • He changed to make everything better,
  • (28) prachachon ri?ak-r???? ha?y nayo?k laa-???k
  • people demand Comp PM resign
  • The people demand that the Prime Minister
    resign.

23
Communicative verbs (wa?a-verbs)
  • verbs expressing or communicating ideas,
    information, and opinions. The complementizer
    wa?a signifies quotation.
  • 1) verbs of saying, such as phu?ut to say,
    athi?baay to explain, tha?am to ask
  • 2) verbs of thinking and cognition, such as khi?t
    think, ru?u to know
  • 3) verbs of feeling, such as klua fear,
    ma?n-cay to be confident
  • 4) verbs of seeing, e.g. duu to look at,
    ca?p-taa to watch
  • 5) verbs of hearing, e.g. da?y-yin to hear
  • 6) verbs of acting, e.g., se?e-s????????????
    to pretend. (See a list of these verbs in the
    appendix.)

24
Communicative verbs (wa?a-verbs)
  • (29)kha?w phu?ut wa?a thu?k-ya?a? diik
    h??n l???w
  • he speak Comp everything good rise already
  • He said that everything had been better
    (improved).
  • (30)kha?w ru?u wa?a thu?k-ya?a? dii
    kh??n l???w
  • he know Comp everything good rise already
  • He knew that everything had been better
    (improved).
  • (31)kha?w ma?n-cay wa?a thu?k-ya?a?
    dii kh??n l???w
  • he confident Comp everything good rise alrea
    dy
  • He was confident that everything had been
    better .

25
Communicative verbs (wa?a-verbs)
  • (32)kha?w he?n wa?a thu?k-ya?a?
    dii kh??n l???w
  • he saw Comp everything good rise already
  • He saw that everything had been better
    (improved).
  • (33)kha?w da?y-yin wa?a thu?k-ya?a? dii kh??n l???
    w
  • he hear Comp everything good rise already
  • He heard that everything had been better
    (improved).
  • (34)kha?w se?e-s???????????? wa?a thu?k-ya?a?
    dii kh??n l???w
  • he pretend Comp everything good
    rise already
  • He pretended that everything had been better
    (improved).

26
Emotive verbs (thi?i-verbs)
  • verbs concerning emotions or mental activities.
  • 1) verbs of feeling, such as dii-cay to be
    glad, si?a-cay to be sad, pala?at-cay to be
    surprised,
  • 2) verbs of intention, e.g. ta??-cay to intend,
    wa?? to hope,
  • 3) verbs of mental character, e.g. ci?-cay to
    be sincere, cay-yen to be cool-hearted,
  • 4) verbs of possibility (assessed in the mind),
    e.g. pen-pay-da?ay to be possible, sadu?ak to
    be convenient. Note that all the verbs with cay
    heart as a component fall into this category.
    (See the appendix.)

27
Emotive verbs (thi?i-verbs)
  • (35)kha?w dii-cay thi?i cha?n s???p pha?an
  • he be pleased Comp I take exam pass
  • He was pleased that I passed the exam.
  • (36)kha?w ta??-cay thi?i ca ?b???k cha?n k???n
    khon ???n
  • he intend Comp will tell I before people
    other
  • He intended to tell me before other people.

28
Emotive verbs (thi?i-verbs)
  • (37)kha?w cay-yen ma?ak thi?I r?? cha?n s????
    chu?a-moo?
  • he cool-hearted veryComp wait I two hours.
  • He was so cool-hearted that he waited for me for
    two hours.
  • (38) pen-pay-da?ay thi?I cha?n ca? s???p
    pha?an
  • possible Comp I will take exam pass
  • It is possible that I will pass the exam.

29
Overlapping
  • Some verbs can occur with more than one
    complementizer.
  • However, they have different meanings.
  • Each complementizer has its own cognitive
    meaning, which influences the meaning of the verb
    in the main clause.

30
Overlapping
  • (39 a) kha?w phu?ut ha?y khun pen khon dii
  • he speak Comp you be person good
  • He spoke (persuaded) for you to be a good
    person.
  • (39 b) kha?w phuut wa?a khun pen khon dii
  • he speak Comp you be person good
  • He said that you were a good person.

31
Overlapping
  • (40 a) kha?w wa?? wa?a (kha?w) ca? t???-?aan
    ka?p th??
  • he hope Comp he will marry with her. He hopes
    that he will marry her.
  • (40 b)kha?w wa?? thi?i ca? t???-?aan ka?p
    th??
  • he hope Comp will go marry with her
  • He hopes to marry her.

32
Conclusion
  • The three complementizers in Thai, ha?y, wa?a,
    thi?i, occur with different verbs.
  • In other words, they classify verbs in Thai into
    three main groups directive, communicative, and
    emotive verbs.
  • The verbs are not exclusively divided. Some can
    actually occur with more than one complementizer.
  • However, they signify different meanings
    conditioned by the meaning of each
    complementizer i.e., ha?y suggests forcing or
    pressure, wa?a suggests something quoted, and
    thi?i implies the meaning of mental state.
  • A further study needs to be done on the syntactic
    characteristics of a complement clause with each
    of the complementizers.

33
REFERENCES
  • Akmajian. A. A. 1977. The complement structure of
    perception verbs in an autonomous syntax
    framework. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow and A.
    Akmajian. Formal Syntax. New York Academic
    Press.
  • Archard, Michel. 1998. Representation of
    Cognitive Structures. Syntax and Semantics of
    French Sentential Complements. Berlin, New York
    Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Dirven, Rene. 1989. A cognitive perspective on
    complementation. In Jaspers, Dany, Wim Klooster,
    Yvan Putseys, and Pieter Seuren (eds.). 1989.
    Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon.
    Studies in Honour of Wim de Geest. Dordrecht,
    Holland and Providence, U.S.A. Foris
    Publications, 113-139.
  • Iwasaki and Preeya Ingkaphirom. 2005. A Reference
    Grammar of Thai. Cambridge Cambridge University
    Press.
  • Hantson, Andre. 1989. The complimentizer as.
    Jaspers, Dany, Wim Klooster, Yvan Putseys, and
    Pieter Seuren (eds.). 1989. Sentential
    Complementation and the Lexicon. Studies in
    Honour of Wim de Geest. Dordrecht, Holland and
    Providence, U.S.A. Foris Publications, 207-219.

34
REFERENCES
  • Higbie, James and Snea Thinsan. 2003. Thai
    Reference Grammar. The Structure of Spoken Thai.
    Bangkok Orchid Press.
  • Horie, Kaoru (ed.). 2000. Complementation
    Cognitive and Functional Perspectives. Amsterdam
    John Benjamins Publishing Co.
  • Horie, Kaoru. 2000. Complementation in Japanese
    and Korean. In Horie, Kaoru (ed.).
    Complementation Cognitive and Functional
    Perspectives. Amsterdam John Benjamins
    Publishing Co.
  • Jaspers, Dany, Wim Klooster, Yvan Putseys, and
    Pieter Seuren (eds.). 1989. Sentential
    Complementation and the Lexicon. Studies in
    Honour of Wim de Geest. Dordrecht, Holland and
    Providence, U.S.A. Foris Publications.
  • Rosenbaum, Peter S. (1967). The grammar of
    English predicate complement constructions.
    Cambridge, MA MIT Press. 
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com