Water Management and River Basin Planning in the US - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Water Management and River Basin Planning in the US

Description:

Water Management and River Basin Planning in the US Elizabeth Albright Doctoral Candidate Duke University Fulbright Scholar Mississippi River Basin Chesapeake Bay The ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:162
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Pis60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Water Management and River Basin Planning in the US


1
Water Management and River Basin Planning in the
US
  • Elizabeth Albright
  • Doctoral Candidate
  • Duke University
  • Fulbright Scholar

2
Mississippi River Basin
http//www.epa.gov/msbasin/subbasins/index.htm
3
Chesapeake Bay
  • The Chesapeake Bay is the largest of 130
    estuaries in the United States.
  • Includes parts of six states (Delaware, Maryland,
    New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West
    Virginia) and all of the District of Columbia.
  • 64,000 square-mile drainage basin or watershed
    (163,480 square kilometers)
  • Chesapeake Bay Program partnership
  • Issues nutrients, oysters, toxics

http//www.chesapeakebay.net/
4
Columbia River Basin
  • Fourth Largest Basin 250,000 square miles
  • Main issues
  • Dams, Salmon
  • There are over 250 reservoirs and around 150
    hydroelectric projects in the basin.

http//www.nwd.usace.army.mil/ps/colrvbsn.htm
5
North Carolina River Basins
6
Water Management in the United States
  • Federal/ National Level Management
  • State Management
  • Local Management

7
Federal System of Management
  • Federal Law
  • Clean Water Act
  • Safe Drinking Water Act
  • National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
  • Environmental Impact Statements
  • Federal Agencies
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency
  • US Department of Agriculture
  • Non-point source controls
  • Wetlands
  • Army Corps of Engineers
  • River regulation
  • Department of Interior
  • Endangered species
  • National Parks
  • United States Geological Survey
  • Flow Monitoring

8
US Clean Water Act
  • Goals of Clean Water Act
  • Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of
    1972, 1977, 1987
  • The objective of the Act is to restore and
    maintain the chemical, physical, and biological
    integrity of the Nations waters.
  • Discharge of pollutants into the navigable waters
    be eliminated by 1985
  • The Act does not deal directly with ground water
    nor with water quantity issues

9
Point Source Pollution
http//www.epa.gov/watertrain/cwa/cwa38.htm
10
Non-Point Source Pollution
  • Voluntary programs
  • Total Maximum Daily Load
  • During the last decade more attention has been
    given to physical and biological integrity.

11
Big Picture of Water Quality Management
12
State Water Management
  • Monitor water quality
  • Chemical parameters
  • Dissolved oxygen, nutrients, heavy metals, fecal
    coliform, pH, chlorophyll a, turbidity
  • Aquatic Toxicology
  • Biological Assessment
  • Develop water quality standards for all water
    bodies
  • Different uses of waters
  • Recreation, drinking water supply, biological
    integrity, High Quality Waters, fish consumption
  • Approved by EPA
  • Designate Waters as Impaired
  • Similar to EUWFD good status
  • Chemical Impairment (e.g., dissolved oxygen,
    fecal coliform)
  • River Basin Management Plans

13
State River Basin Management Plans
  • River basin plans developed on rotating basis
  • In North Carolina, plan developed every five
    years (17 basins)
  • The goals of basinwide planning are to
  • Identify water quality problems and restore full
    use to Impaired waters.
  • Identify and protect high value resource waters.
  • Protect unimpaired waters yet allow for
    reasonable economic growth.
  • DWQ accomplishes these goals through the
    following objectives
  • Collaborate with other agencies to develop
    appropriate management strategies.
  • Assure equitable distribution of waste
    assimilative capacity.
  • Better evaluate cumulative effects of pollution.
  • Improve public awareness and involvement.
  • http//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/basinwide/

14
List of Impaired Waters 303(d)
http//www.epa.gov/watertrain/cwa/cwa27.htm
15
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program
  • Clean Water Act Mandates that TMDL must be
    developed for all impaired water bodies
  • A TMDL or Total Maximum Daily Load is a
    calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant
    that a waterbody can receive and still meet water
    quality standards, and an allocation of that
    amount to the pollutant's sources.
  • http//www.tmdls.net/
  • Weaknesses
  • How to deal with water bodies that are
    biologically impaired but meet chemical standards
    (e.g., erosion, sedimentation, loss of stream
    habitat, channelization)
  • Frequently no implementation
  • Lawsuit driven

16
Local Water Management (City and County)
  • Wastewater Treatment Plant Facilities
  • Drinking Water Facilities
  • Additional Monitoring
  • Storm Water Management
  • Land Use Planning

17
Status of Water Bodies throughout United States
http//www.epa.gov/305b/2000report/factsheet.pdf
18
Challenges to Water Quality Management
  • Fiscal concerns
  • State versus Federal funding responsibility?
  • Non-Point Source Pollution
  • Current voluntary programs versus mandatory
    programs
  • Storm water controls
  • Monitoring Networks
  • Frequently monthly monitoring
  • Spatial extent of monitoring
  • Uncertainty
  • Interstate Cooperation
  • Different water quality standards, monitoring,
    values, pollutants, financial resources
  • Wetland and stream buffer protection
  • Private property versus common good debate
  • Dam and levee maintenance
  • Dam removals

19
Comparison of CWA and EUWFD
  • Similar goals
  • WFD Good Water Status
  • Ecological status
  • Chemical
  • US CWA
  • More vague on description
  • Does not list specific parameters to monitor
  • Similar focus on water quality
  • EUWFD subsidiarity principle versus US Federalist
    approach
  • Monitoring
  • CWA leaves it to the state and EPA, offers little
    guidance
  • EUWFDAnnex 5, sampling parameters
  • River Basin Planning
  • EUWFD mandates river basin plans
  • CWA does not require river basin plans per say,
    TMDLs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com