HOM Damping Simulation and Measurement of JLab Ampere Class Cavity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

HOM Damping Simulation and Measurement of JLab Ampere Class Cavity

Description:

HOM Damping Simulation and Measurement of JLab Ampere Class Cavity Haipeng Wang also Robert Rimmer and Frank Marhauser Jefferson Lab, Newport News, Virginia 23606, USA – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:132
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Haipen8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HOM Damping Simulation and Measurement of JLab Ampere Class Cavity


1
HOM Damping Simulation and Measurement of JLab
Ampere Class Cavity
  • Haipeng Wang
  • also Robert Rimmer and Frank Marhauser
  • Jefferson Lab, Newport News, Virginia 23606, USA

2
MAFIA wakefield calculation for both broad and
narrow bands HOM impedance calculation
Critical steps to get correct cavitys
impedance through FFT of wake function
WG
WG
WG
WG
WG
WG
WG
  • Generate 3D cavity vacuum CAD drawing with
    waveguide ports facing to Cartesian coordinates.

WG
  • Import CAD geometry, mesh volume with uniform
    steps (5mm) in beam direction.
  • Define waveguide port positions and mesh in 2D.
  • Solve 10 lowest eigen modes in each WG port.
  • Load WG solutions to each port with zero power
    input. Check any ignored mode.
  • Set up 1D current in Gaussian bunch with s3cm,
    010s long, 1q charge at a defined off-axis
    distance.
  • Set up wake potential monitor in beam direction
    at a defined path.
  • Calculate 1311m long wave (4days, 1millon
    meshes)
  • Take max. 2n wake data set with rest of them zero
    out. Do the Cosine window tapering.
  • FFT wake (get Wzfft and Gaussian beam.
  • Normalized impedance with ZamWzfft/Bam
    ZphWzfftph-Bph. With correct phase wrapping
    within -90o to 90o, the real part of impedance
    Zre should be always gt0.

3
Broadband impedances contribute to power
deposition or BBU below beam pipe cut-off
frequency
bunch length 3cm
Monopole modes excited by on-axis beam bunch
monopole dipole modes excited by off-axis 5cm
beam bunch
beam excitation Frequency (GHz) monopole modes only impedance (?) dipole modes only impedance (?) at 1cm off-axis beam peak current (A) Monopole HOM power (W) Dipole HOM power at 1cm off axis (W) beam power (W)
1.497 255.566 3.289 4.000 4089 52.6 4141.7
2.994 278.308 2.232 4.000 4453 35.7 4488.6
4
Broadband HOM power calculation for above cut-off
Calculation formula
8.5 kW
Total 18kW/cavity
2 Amp
5 cell
1.33 nC
can be improved by model measurement or high
power computing
Obtained from ABCI or MAFIA
5
Copper model bench measurement
  • S21 from beam pipe to beam pipe.
  • Labview automation.
  • Ceramic bead-pull on-axis or off-axis.
  • End groups staggered relatively at 30o or 60o.
  • 5, 6, 7-cell stack assembly then 5-cell welded.
  • Data sets with dummy loads or shorts.
  • Rotatable coupling antennas.

6
Five-peak fitting program to get real peak,
frequency and Q
  • Multi-peak fitting program is try to find real
    amplitude at each Lorenz resonance frequency, and
    filter out the contribution from each neighbor
    peak. Totally five peaks cab be fitted together.
  • Each resonance peak is fitted with the Lorenz
    function.
  • Total amplitude Am2(Re1P2Re2P3Re3)2(Im1P
    2Im2P3Im3bpBg)2
  • P2, P3,is each peak polarity1 or -1. bp is
    background polarity. Bg is total background.
  • This fitting program can be also used to find
    real impedance of each HOM from overlapped HOMs
    spectrum like obtained from MAFIA wakefield FFT..

7
First measurement data do not agree simulation
well
8
RF dummy load and single cell aluminum model
bench measurement
9
E-antenna rotation changes excitation of the HOMs
  • Antenna rotation relatively 90 degree can
    suppress one or other polarization of dipole
    modes, but once the beam pipe uses absorber, and
    for those above cut-off modes, this advantage
    disappear quickly
  • HOM mode IDs is most complication in the HOM
    impedance measurement.

10
Multiple beam (1d current) excitation of wake in
3D structure
One beam
Two beams
Monopole modes only
Dipole modes, polar 1
Quadruple modes, polar 1
  • If there is no structure asymmetry about
    mid-plane and no asymmetric meshing, wave
    excitation and reflection have to satisfy the
    enforced boundary condition. A proper mode
    suppression should be made.
  • In reality of the squared (MAFIA) and finite
    number of meshes, the mode contamination of high
    Q modes always happen.
  • Excitation more than three-beam is possible.

Three beams
Dipole modes, polar 2
Quadruple modes, polar 2
11
Multiple beam excitation of wakes in a
single-cell high current cavity with one Y
waveguide group
12
Mode ID can be labeled to the spectrum from the
MAFIA simulations without a bead pulling
13
MAFIA multi-beam wakefield simulation, monopole
mode excitation only
14
MAFIA multi-beam wakefield simulation, dipole
mode excitation only
15
MAFIA multi-beam wakefield simulation, quadruple
mode excitation only
16
Summary
  • Multiple beam excitation technique used in MAFIA
    time domain wakefield calculation is very
    powerful simulation tool. It can selectively
    choose BC and number of beam, position and
    polarization to suppress unwanted modes.
  • FFT of MAFIA wake can get both real and
    amplitude, narrow and broad band cavitys
    impedance if the wake function is properly phase
    unwrapped and normalized.
  • Mode identity is most important part of HOM
    measurement, it can be improved by rotation and
    position of antennas, bead pulling, and 2D (eigen
    mode) or 3D (time domain) simulation.
  • After careful mode ID, calibration and
    bead-pull, Initial data bellow cut-off
    frequencies on single-cell aluminum model agrees
    with simulations.
  • By this measurement, we bunch-marked our
    simulation method and data used in the prototype
    design.
  • R/Q measurement by calibrated bead-pulling is
    needed to replace MAFIA 2D R/Q for above cut-off
    modes.
  • We need re-measure the 5-cell structure after
    mode ID is clear from the new simulations.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com