Climate Change: A Step Toward Realism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Climate Change: A Step Toward Realism

Description:

Climate Change: A Step Toward Realism Joel Schwartz Visiting Fellow American Enterprise Institute Industrial Environment/California Manufacturers and Technology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:243
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: Claude122
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Climate Change: A Step Toward Realism


1
Climate Change A Step Toward Realism
  • Joel Schwartz
  • Visiting Fellow
  • American Enterprise Institute
  • Industrial Environment/California Manufacturers
    and Technology Association Annual Meeting
  • November 8, 2007
  • San Diego, California

2
Environmentalists claim air pollution will
increase in future due to greenhouse warming
3
Back in the real world Rising
TemperaturesDeclining Air Pollution
Ozone 8-hour exceedance days/year PM2.5 annual
average. Temperature and pollution levels are
national averages.
4
More driving, more energyless air pollution (1)
Change in ambient pollution levels, 1980-2005
Sources EPA, DOT, DOE
5
More driving, more energyless air pollution (2)
Change in pollutant emissions, 1980-2005
Sources EPA, DOT, DOE
6
Air pollution will continue to decline
  • Motor vehicle standards will eliminate more than
    80 of vehicle NOx, VOC and PM, even after
    accounting for growth in driving
  • Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) will eliminate
    more than 70 of SO2 and more than 50 of NOx
    during the next two decades
  • MACT rules eliminate most emissions from a wide
    range of industrial sources
  • Overall, existing requirements will eliminate at
    least 70-80 of remaining air pollution during
    next 20 years or so

7
Long-term ambient, on-road, and stack
measurements confirm pollution reductions
  • On-road emissions
  • Average automobiles emissions are dropping VOC
    -12/yr NOx -6/yr CO -10/yr.
  • Heavy-duty diesel trucks NOx -4/yr soot -8/yr
  • Rate of NOx and soot declines will accelerate as
    vehicles built to new Tier 2 (2004) and
    heavy-duty (2007) emissions standards begin to
    permeate the on-road fleet
  • Power plant emissions
  • NOx SIP Call recently reduced coal-fired NOx
    emissions nearly 60 below 1998 level. SO2 down
    23 since 1998.
  • Ambient levels of directly emitted pollutants
  • Steady declines in NO2, CO, SO2, benzene,
    1,3-butadiene, total VOC, etc. All dropping a few
    percent to several percent per year.

8
So how did NRDC come up with rising air pollution
levels in the future?
  • NRDCs press release
  • Smog Poses Greater Health Risk Because of Global
    Warming
  • More Bad Air Days for Southern, Eastern U.S.
    Cities
  • WASHINGTON, DC (September 13, 2007) -- People
    living in ten mid-sized metropolitan areas are
    expected to experience significantly more 'red
    alert' air pollution days in coming years due to
    increasing lung-damaging smog caused by higher
    temperatures from global warming.
  • Researchers project that, unless action is taken
    to curb global warming, by mid-century people
    living in a total of 50 cities in the eastern
    United States would see
  • A doubling of the number of unhealthy red alert
    days
  • A 68 percent (5.5 day) increase in the average
    number of days exceeding the current 8-hour ozone
    standard

9
NRDCs Sleight of Hand
  • Used the 1996 EPA emissions inventory to
    predict ozone levels in the 2050s
  • But 1996 ozone-precursor emissions were more than
    30 higher than 2006 emissions
  • In other words, NRDC got higher future ozone
    levels by assuming a large increase in future
    ozone-forming emissions. However, NRDC obscures
    this fact in its report and press release.

10
NRDCs response to Schwartzs critique of Heat
Advisory Deception and evasion
  • NRDC The project on which Heat Advisory is
    based kept anthropogenic ozone precursor emission
    levels constant as a way of evaluating the effect
    that climate change alone could have on ozone
    concentrations.
  • Misleading Constant really means constant at
    1996 levels, which really means more than 30
    higher than today, and at least four or five
    times higher than emissions in coming decades
  • NRDC While we would expect significant
    reductions in precursor emissions over the next
    decade there are no reliable estimates of
    precursor emissions extending to the mid 21st
    century.
  • Climate activists assume climate models provide
    accurate predictions of future temperatures
    without batting an eye. But when it comes to
    ozone, NRDC pleads uncertainty and then chooses
    increases in future ozone-forming emissions that
    are patently at odds with any plausible future
    scenario.
  • If anything, the statement that there are no
    reliable estimates.extending to the mid 21st
    Century is far more applicable to greenhouse gas
    emissions and climate models predictive skill
    than it is for ozone-forming emissions.
  • Imagine NRDCs reaction if climate skeptics
    assumed CO2 emissions would stay constant at 1996
    levels to predict future climate

11
  • NRDC then claimed Heat Advisory wasnt really
    making predictions of future ozone levels
  • The project on which Heat Advisory is based kept
    anthropogenic ozone precursor emission levels
    constant as a way of evaluating the effect that
    climate change alone could have on ozone
    concentrations. Other researchers may choose
    alternative assumptions about how anthropogenic
    ozone precursors could change in the future, and
    will arrive at different projected ozone
    concentrations. Projections of how global warming
    would affect ozone levels are not predictions of
    what will happen.
  • Now look at NRDCs press release
  • Smog Poses Greater Health Risk Because of Global
    Warming
  • More Bad Air Days for Southern, Eastern U.S.
    Cities
  • WASHINGTON, DC (September 13, 2007) -- People
    living in ten mid-sized metropolitan areas are
    expected to experience significantly more 'red
    alert' air pollution days in coming years due to
    increasing lung-damaging smog caused by higher
    temperatures from global warming.
  • Researchers project that, unless action is taken
    to curb global warming, by mid-century people
    living in a total of 50 cities in the eastern
    United States would see
  • A doubling of the number of unhealthy red
    alert days
  • A 68 percent (5.5 day) increase in the average
    number of days exceeding the current 8-hour ozone
    standard

12
NRDC certainly knows that air pollution will
declinetheir press releases highlight the new
regulations
  • EPA Rule Means Progress Against Diesel Pollution
    According to Natural Resources Defense Council,
    May 10, 2004
  • These standardswill reduce particulate soot and
    nitrogen oxide emissions from non-road diesel
    vehicles by 90-95 percent in most cases
  • NEW DIESEL FUEL HITTING PUMPS NATIONWIDE ON
    OCTOBER 15 CUTS POLLUTION, ENABLES NEW
    LOW-EMISSION ENGINE TECHNOLOGY, October 10, 2006
  • when combined with a new generation of engines
    hitting the road in January, it will enable
    emission reductions of up to 95 percent,
    according to the Natural Resources Defense
    Council
  • EPA touts new, cleaner cars, January 26, 2004 
  • Mike Leavitt, head of the Environmental
    Protection Agency, unveiled 17 new cars and
    trucks designed to meet stricter "Tier 2"
    emissions standards set in 1999. The vehicles,
    which burn low-sulfur fuel, are 77 percent to 95
    percent cleaner than current models.

13
What makes Heat Advisory even more egregious is
that the report was actually written by
university and government scientists
  • Heat Advisorys authors are from major
    universities and govt agencies
  • Activism thinly cloaked in a scientific wrapper

14
Heat Advisorys results have also been published
in two journal articles
  • Knowlton et al., Assessing ozone-related health
    impacts under a changing climate, Environmental
    Health Perspectives, 112 (2004) 1557-63
  • Bell et al., Climate change, ambient ozone, and
    health in 50 US cities, Climatic Change, 82
    (2007) 61-87
  • These studies both manufacture increases in
    future ozone by assuming increases in
    ozone-forming emissions that are patently at odds
    with any plausible future scenario.
  • Both studies are peer-reviewed. Both are
    published in prestigious journals. And both have
    nothing to do with reality.

15
Lets pretend is almost standard in
peer-reviewed scientific studies
  • Sitch et al., Indirect radiative forcing of
    climate change through ozone effects on the
    land-carbon sink, Nature, 48 (2007).
  • Study uses IPCC A2 scenario for future ozone
    precursor emissions.
  • But A2 scenario has no relationship to reality.
    A2 assumes rising NOx and VOC in developed
    countriesjust the opposite of the actual trend.

16
Sitch et al.s modeled ozone levels also conflict
with measured levels
17
Only one study has tried to use a realistic
estimate of future air pollutant emissions
18
GA Tech/NESCAUM assumptions results
  • Assumptions
  • Climate warms about 2.5F by 2050 (IPCC A1B
    scenario)
  • NOx and SO2 emissions drop 50 VOC emissions
    drop more than 40
  • Results
  • The combined effect of climate change and
    emission reductions lead to a 20 decrease
    (regionally varying from 11 to 28) in the mean
    summer maximum daily 8-hour ozone levels (M8hO3)
    over the United States. Mean annual PM2.5
    concentrations are estimated to be 23 lower
    (varies from 9 to 32).
  • Modeling suggests warming alone increases ambient
    pollution in some regions of U.S. and decreases
    it in others, but effects are small compared to
    effect of emission reductions

19
GA Tech study is actually too pessimistic
  • Future air pollution declines will be greater
    than Georgia Tech/NESCAUM study predicts
  • NOx has already declined more from 2001-2006 than
    study assumed for 2001-2020. VOC has already
    declined more than half the amount predicted for
    2001-2020.
  • In last six years, the U.S. has achieved more
    than one-fourth the ozone and PM2.5 decline
    predicted for 2001-2050

20
California WildfiresAny Connection with Human
Caused Climate Change?
  • Activists and journalists were quick to blame the
    southern California wildfires on drought
    purportedly caused by climate change.
  • In factas anyone who lives in southern
    California knowsSoCal has virtually no rain from
    May through September
  • In fact, it is wet winters that help create
    conditions amenable to wild fire, by stimulating
    growth of vegetation

21
The Real Causes of SoCal Wildfires
  • These SoCal fires often occur in conjunction
    with Santa Ana weather events, which combine high
    winds and low humidity, and tend to follow a wet
    winter rainy seasonover a century of watershed
    reserve management and fire suppression have
    promoted fuel accumulations, helping to shape one
    of the most conflagration-prone environments in
    the world.
  • charcoal records from Santa Barbara Channel
    sediments indicate the frequency of wildfires in
    the region has not changed significantly in the
    last 500 years.
  • The severity of the immediate human impact of
    the October 2003 wildfires was exacerbated by the
    rapid growth of an extensive wildland-urban
    interface proximate to a population of nearly 20
    million in southern CaliforniaThe intensity of
    the fires and the severity of their ecological
    impact on the regions forests were exacerbated
    by the long-term accumulation of fuels such as
    snags, logs, and heavy brush due to 20th Century
    fire suppression policies and watershed
    preservation efforts since the late 1800s.
  • Precipitation tends to be above normal in the
    winter or early spring prior to the fire season,
    suggesting that large fall and winter fires are
    preconditioned two or more seasons in advance.
  • Westerling et al., Climate, Santa Ana Winds and
    Autumn Wildfires in Southern California, EOS, 85
    (2004) 289, 296.

22
What about the effect of future warming?
  • warmer temperatures might tend to reduce the
    moisture available to plants during the growing
    season.
  • In other words, warming less plant growth
    lower fire risk
  • Preliminary results of a Santa Ana wind analysis
    indicate, however, that the frequency of Santa
    Ana events in early fall, when temperatures are
    still high, may decrease by the end of the
    century, which would serve to reinforce any
    reductions in southern California fire risks due
    to changes in temperature and precipitation.
  • In other words, models suggest warming fewer
    Santa Anas lower fire risk
  • Westerling et al. Climate change and wildfire in
    California, Climatic Change, in press

23
Southern California Monthly Precipitation,
2000-2007
24
No human signal in long-term SoCal precipitation
trend
25
According to Cal-EPA...
But note that decline is not volume of runoff,
but percent of total runoff occurring from
April-July (Source Cal-EPA AB1493 briefing
package)
26
Californias Water Supply Is Not Shrinking
Index is unimpaired runoff. Source CA Dept. of
Water Resources
27
No signal of human-caused climate change in
long-term Sacramento River Index
Sacramento River Index, 900-2007
Reconstruction is based on tree-ring
data. Sources Measured runoff CA Dept. of Water
Resources. Reconstructed runoff, NCDC/NOAA
28
According to Cal-EPA
Source Cal-EPA, AB 1493 briefing
True, but sea level has been rising since the
1920sdecades before humans emitted enough GHGs
to affect the climate. Cal-EPAs own graph shows
this. In fact, the graph shows sea level rose as
much from 1860-1885 as it did from 1950-2000.
29
Sea level rise has slowed or stopped since
mid-1980s
San Francisco coastal sea level trend, 1854-2007
Source NOAA, Historic Tide Data
30
World sea levels dont show a global warming
signal
  • Sea level has been rising since at least the
    beginning of the 20th Century
  • But 94 of all human CO2 emissions occurred after
    1910 90 after 1920
  • Rate of sea level increase slowed down during the
    20th Century

31
Rate of sea level rise is 27 lower than IPCC
estimate
  • Study used GPS data to measure vertical land
    movements and correct for these movements in
    estimating sea-level trend from tide gauges
  • After factoring in vertical land movement,
    average rate of world sea level rise is 27 lower
    than IPCC estimate

32
Reality Stabilizing atmospheric CO2 means
developed world must deindustrialize
  • India, at 1 tonne annual CO2 emissions per
    capita, is the only large-sized economy that is
    below the desired carbon emission levels of 2050.
    India should keep it that way and insist that
    the rich countries pay their share of the burden
    in reducing emissions, says Mr Nicolas Stern.
  • India Times, Nov. 5, 2007

CO2 emissions data source U.S. Energy
Information Administration
33
Wealth requires abundant energy, which in
practice means mainly energy from fossil fuels
CO2/person vs. GDP/person, 2004
Allowable CO2 per capita for stabilization
Source U.S. Energy Information Administration
34
  • The relationship between abundant energy and
    prosperity explains why it is so hard to get
    people to produce less CO2, even in countries
    that claim to be very concerned about climate
    change

35
No magic bullets for reducing fossil fuels
  • Europeans have been paying 5 or 6 per gallon of
    gasoline for decades. But their cars still run on
    gasoline and diesel.
  • They drive smaller cars than we do, and they
    drive them less.
  • Europeans pay a pricenot just in Eurosbut in
    less useful and less comfortable cars, and in
    lower mobility

36
How about getting people out of their cars and
into transit? Europe is going in the opposite
direction.
EU15 trend in person-miles per capita by mode
  • Transits market share dropped from 25 to 16
    between 1970 and 2000
  • Autos account for 78 of travel miles
  • Vast majority of new development is suburban

Source European Environment Agency
37
People buy cars as soon as they become wealthy
enough to afford them
Cars/capita vs. GDP/capita, 2002
Its not just Americans who have a love affair
with the automobile Love affair is also the
wrong metaphor. People the world over buy cars
because no other transport mode offers comparable
flexibility, speed, privacy, convenience, or
autonomy
Source Intl Monetary Fund
38
Unintended consequences when governments try to
pick technology winners through a political
process
  • New research suggests that N2O from fertilizer
    used to grow fuel crops more than offsets any CO2
    savings
  • N2O has about 300x the greenhouse potential of
    CO2

we have shown that, depending on Nitrogen
content, the use of several agricultural crops
for energy production can readily lead to N2O
emissions large enough to cause climate warming
instead of cooling by saved fossil CO2.
39
Energy realism from a climate alarmist
  • Ill tell you one of the horrifying facts of
    global warming, and why it is so inexorable.
    Suppose that you and I wantedto guarantee that
    the concentrations of carbon dioxide in the
    atmospherewould not go up any more.
  • ...Youd have to cut world carbon dioxide
    emissions by 75 percent.
  • Thats a horrific number if you think about
    everything that you do whether its talking on
    the telephone, or driving our cars, or heating or
    cooling our homes. Think of everything thats
    manufactured, energy used to extract metals, for
    exampleYou would have to have a radical change
    in your lifestyle.
  • In fact, its worse than I talk about, because
    suppose that were able to produce the miracle
    the absolute miracle of reducing 75 in our
    emissions globally. Guess what? Over the next
    hundred years, the Earth would warm up another
    degree Fahrenheit, even though we produced that
    miraculous result.
  • its really hard to do something about it in a
    relatively short period of time, say over the
    next three decades. Its really, really hard.
  • Jerry Mahlman, NOAA Climate Scientist, Earth
    Sky interview

40
Dont underestimate the benefits of abundant,
inexpensive energy
41
  • To contact me
  • joel_at_joelschwartz.com
  • To read my papers and presentations
  • www.joelschwartz.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com