5/3/07 UNIT 3: Waste Management (cont.) Unit 4: Resources - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 84
About This Presentation
Title:

5/3/07 UNIT 3: Waste Management (cont.) Unit 4: Resources

Description:

5/3/07 UNIT 3: Waste Management (cont.) Unit 4: Resources Hazardous Chemical and Radioactive Waste Management Don t put down the drain or in the landfill Hazardous ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:211
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 85
Provided by: Emilco1
Learn more at: http://home.sandiego.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 5/3/07 UNIT 3: Waste Management (cont.) Unit 4: Resources


1
5/3/07 UNIT 3Waste Management (cont.)Unit
4Resources
2
Hazardous Chemical and Radioactive Waste
Management
  • Dont put down the drain or
  • in the landfill

3
Hazardous Chemical and Radioactive Waste
Management
  • Dont put down the drain or
  • in the landfill

4
Hazardous Waste
  • Toxic to humans and other living things
  • ignite or explode
  • corrosive
  • Unstable
  • 150 million metric tons (excluding radioactive
    waste) generated in the U.S. per year

5
Examples of hazardous waste
  • Organic compounds
  • Organic solvents and residues
  • Heavy metals
  • Oil
  • Pigments
  • Acids
  • Cyanides
  • Dyes
  • Ammonia salts
  • Radioactive waste

6
Hazardous wastes may be produced in the
manufacture of
  • plastics
  • pesticides
  • medicines
  • paints
  • petroleum products
  • metals
  • leather
  • textiles

7
Regulations
  • 1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
    (RCRA)
  • Stringent record keeping and reporting to track
    cradle to grave control of hazardous waste
  • 1976 The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
  • gives EPA the ability and authority to track,
    test and ban industrial chemicals currently
    produced or imported into the US

8
1980 Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
  • Established a revolving fund (superfund) to
    clean up the worst abandoned hazardous waste
    sites
  • EPA National Priorities List

9
Envi Impacts at Superfund Priorities Sites
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Cost of Superfund
  • taxes on oil and some products that generate
    hazardous wastes
  • 1980 1.6 billion
  • 1986 8.5 billion
  • 1990 11.5 billion
  • Average cost to clean up a SINGLE SITE
  • 30 million (not counting litigation)
  • By 2000 30 billion (2000)
  • Economic questions has it been worth it
    cost-benefit analysis
  • Impact on the housing market

13
Hazardous waste disposal
  • Hazardous Chemical Wastes
  • 1) Secure landfill
  • 2) Deep well
  • 3) Other
  • Incineration
  • Neutralized by chemical treatment
  • Radioactive Wastes

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Kettleman Hills CWM Hazardous Waste Facility
  • CERCLA - approved, TSCA and RCRA permitted, Class
    I, II and III Facility.
  • accepts waste from all over the west, but mostly
    serves California.
  • one of less than 30 commercial chemical waste
    sites in the country
  • one of less than ten sites licensed to take
    PCB's.
  • 4 miles from in Kettleman City (95 Latino).
  • "The next closest populated area, Avenal, has a
    population of 12,000 people (6000 of which are in
    prison)."

18
Kettleman Hills Environmental Justice Issues
  • 200 twenty-ton trucks filled with chemical wastes
    like PCBs, benzene, and asbestos pass near town
    center
  • 1985 Chemical Waste Management was fined 3.5
    million by the EPA and state for faulty record
    keeping and other violations such as toxic
    leakage into water supplies.
  • 1990 Chemical Waste proposed to build a
    hazardous waste incinerator
  • farm workers, agribusiness growers, and
    politicians organized to oppose the planned
    incinerator.
  • In 1991, a lawsuit filed by California Rural
    Legal Assistance on behalf of the community
  • the permit process violated the civil rights of
    residents, as meetings, hearings, and technical
    information were given only in English.
  • this allegation of environmental racism was the
    first case in the nation to allege civil rights
    violations in an attempt to block a toxic
    incinerator.
  • By 1994, the efforts of protesters, more
    stringent requirements under the Clinton
    administration, and the two successful lawsuits
    filed by California Rural Legal Assistance
    instigated Chemical Waste Management to abandon
    its plans.
  • Link to EPA website
  • http//www.epa.gov/region09/toxic/pcb/disposal.htm
    l

19
Radioactive waste
  • Differ from other hazardous chemical wastes
  • Half life
  • Uranium-238 T1/2 4.5 billion yrs
  • Plutonium-239 T1/2 24,000 yrs.
  • Strontium-90 T1/2 29 yrs
  • Iodine-131 T1/2 8 days
  • Type of radiation emitted

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Classification of Radioactive Wastes
  • Low level
  • Over 90
  • States dispose of their own
  • High level
  • Spent reactor fuel rods
  • Currently contained in temporary disposal sites
  • 1985 EPA specified that they should be disposed
    so they cause fewer than 1000 deaths in 10,000
    years

24
How Much Nuclear Waste is in the United States?
  • 49,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel from
    nuclear reactors.
  • 22,000 canisters of solid defense-related
    radioactive waste

25
Where is radioactive waste kept
  • temporary facilities at some 125 sites in 39
    states.
  • more than 161 million people reside within 75
    miles of temporarily stored nuclear waste.

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Treating radioactive waste
  • 1. Leaving it where it is
  • 2. Disposing of it in various ways
  • ? Sub-seabed disposal
  • ?Very deep-hole disposal
  • ? Space disposal
  • ? Ice-sheet disposal
  • ? Island geologic disposal
  • ? Deep-well injection disposal
  • 3. Making it safer through advanced technologies

29
(No Transcript)
30
Nuclear Waste Policy Act (1982)
  • established a comprehensive national program for
    the safe, permanent disposal of highly
    radioactive waste
  • directed the U.S. Department of Energy to study
    suitable sites for a geologic repository
  • the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the
    Department of Energy is to build and operate it
  • in 2002, Congress and the President approved the
    development of a geologic repository at Yucca
    Mountain, Nevada.

31
Selecting a site for permanent high-level
radioactive disposal
  • Issues
  • Sites with LONG TERM geologic stability
  • Social/Political issues
  • Arid climate
  • Low regional water table
  • Low population density
  • Appropriate rock and geologic structure
  • Engineering technology for containment

32
Two sites were in development in U.S.
  • Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)
  • Carlsbad, New Mexico
  • Store waste drums in rooms in underground salt
    deposit
  • Yucca Mountain, Nevada
  • 1987 Congress designated as the only site for
    study
  • Storage in volcanic tuff

33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
Yucca Mountain Projecthttp//www.ocrwm.doe.gov/ym
p/index.shtml
  • Over 20 years of study
  • 4 billion dollars
  • February 15, 2002 President Bush recommended to
    Congress the issuance of a construction permit
    for the site

37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
Most Popular Reasons To Oppose Yucca Mountain
Project
  • 1. Accomplishes No Reasonable Objective.
  • Not enough space to store all of the waste
  • 2. Provides Minimal Protection.
  • The casks provide the protection. So why Yucca
    Mntn?
  • 3. Creates More Nuclear Waste.
  • Facilities have a storage limit. By decreasing
    the storage on-site, additional waste will be
    generated.
  • 4. Adverse Effects on Future Generations.
  • Average half life of over 200,000 years.
  • 5. Earthquake Danger.
  • Third most seismically active area in US.

45
Opposition to Yucca Mnt. (Cont.)
  • 6. Fifty Million People Endangered.
  • Routes will move through 734 counties across the
    United States. The high-level radioactive waste
    contained in the casks will endanger 50 million
    innocent people who live within 3 miles of the
    proposed shipment routes.
  • 7. Terrorist Attacks.
  • 8. Costly Accidents and Limited Liability.
  • For each spill that may occur (one out of every
    300 shipments is expected to have an accident)
    the cost of the clean-up is estimated
    conservatively at 6 billion dollars. Paid by
    taxpayer money.

46
Continued
  • 9. Adverse Impact on Water Sources.
  • Yucca Mountain sits above the only source of
    drinking water for the residents of Amargosa
    Valley.
  • 10. Violates Treaties.
  • Yucca Mountain is located on Native American
    land, belonging to the Western Shoshone by the
    treaty of Ruby Valley. The Western Shoshone
    National Council has declared this land a nuclear
    free zone and demanded an end to nuclear testing
    and the dumping of nuclear wastes on their land.

47
Alternate Disposal Methods
  • MOX fuel burning mixing plutonium with uranium.
    Burns up the plutonium by nuclear fission
  • Vitrification borosilicate glass logs buried in
    deep (over 3km) boreholes
  • Subductive Waste Disposal

48
Mineral Resources
49
(No Transcript)
50
Resources--General Definition
  • All things necessary to human life and
    civilization that have some value to individuals
    and/or society
  • What are some resources weve already studied?
  • Renewable
  • Replaceable on a human time scale

51
Resources reserves
  • 1) Reserves
  • The quantity of a given material that has been
    discovered and can be legally and economically
    extracted with existing technology.
  • A conservative estimate
  • 2) Subeconomic reserves (conditional reserves)
  • Deposits already found but cannot be legally or
    economically extracted with existing technology
  • 3) Speculative resources
  • Undiscovered resources that are expected to be
    found

52
Projections about resource availability and price
depend on
  • Projections of future supply
  • Size of reserves
  • International politics
  • Projections of future demand
  • Population, standard of living, technology
  • Projections of future cost of extraction
  • Including environmental costs

53
Projected lifetime of reserves (years)(Mineral
Commodities Summaries, 1996)
54
Metal Recycling in the US( of consumption)
55
Earth Resources
  • Fuel earth resources
  • B) Non-fuel earth resources
  • 1) Metals (mineral resources)
  • Al, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Ni, Sn, Zn, Au, Ag,
    Pt
  • 2) Non metals (mineral resources)
  • Clays, gypsum, phosphate, salt, sulfur
  • 3) Construction (rock resources)
  • Sand and gravel

56
Lifetime of Fossil Fuel Reserves
57
(No Transcript)
58
Fuel Resources
59
Non fuel mineral-rich countries
  • Cuba
  • 40 of nickel
  • Chile
  • 30 of copper
  • South Africa
  • 50 gold
  • 75 chromium
  • 90 platinum
  • 50 manganese
  • diamonds
  • US
  • 50 of molybdenum
  • Australia New Guinea
  • 50 of aluminum ore
  • Congo
  • 50 of cobalt

60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
(No Transcript)
64
Non fuel mineral-rich countries
  • Cuba
  • 40 of nickel
  • Chile
  • 30 of copper
  • South Africa
  • 50 gold
  • 75 chromium
  • 90 platinum
  • 50 manganese
  • diamonds
  • US
  • 50 of molybdenum
  • Australia New Guinea
  • 50 of aluminum ore
  • Zaire (Congo)
  • 50 of cobalt

WHY ARE NATURAL RESOURCES SO UNEVENLY DISTRIBUTED?
65
  • Ore
  • Rock in which a valuable or useful metal occurs
    at a concentration sufficiently high to make it
    economically worth mining.
  • Concentration factor
  • (Conc. in ore)/(conc. in average cont. crust)
  • Ores are unusual rocks with an uneven worldwide
    distribution

66
Formation processes
  • 1) igneous
  • pegmatites
  • magmatic processes
  • kimberlites
  • 2) hydrothermal
  • Sulfide minerals
  • lead (PbS),
  • zinc (ZnS),
  • copper (CuS, Cu2S, CuFeS2)

67
Formation processes (cont.)
  • 3) metamorphic
  • Graphite (carbon) from metamorphism of coal
  • Asbestos
  • 4) sedimentary
  • BIF (Banded Iron Formations)
  • evaporites
  • phosphorites

68
(No Transcript)
69
(No Transcript)
70
(No Transcript)
71
(No Transcript)
72
(No Transcript)
73
(No Transcript)
74
(No Transcript)
75
(No Transcript)
76
Mining
  • Underground mines
  • Surface mines
  • A) open pit
  • Large, 3-D ore body located near the surface
  • B) strip mines (used mostly for coal)
  • Ore in a strata parallel to the surface

77
(No Transcript)
78
(No Transcript)
79
(No Transcript)
80
Federal Regulations governing mining
  • National Environmental Policy Act.
  • Federal Land Policy and Management Act
  • Clean Air Act
  • Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water
    Act)--Safe Drinking Water Act
  • Solid Waste Disposal Act
  • Comprehensive Environmental Response,
    Compensation and Liability Act
  • Toxic Substance Control Act
  • Endangered Species Act
  • Migratory Bird Treaty Act
  • Rivers and Harbors Act,
  • Mining Law of 1872,
  • National Historic Preservation Act,
  • Law Authorizing Treasury's Bureau of Alcohol,
    Tobacco and Firearms to Regulate Sale, Transport
    and Storage of Explosives, and
  • Federal Mine Safety and Health Act.

81
Modern mine operations
  • NMA Website
  • Gold production
  • http//www.nma.org/technology/gold_production.asp

82
Reclamation
  • contouring of land
  • the placement of topsoil or an approved
    substitute on the graded area
  • reseeding with native vegetation, crops and/or
    trees
  • years of careful monitoring to assure success
  • NMA website Process of reclaimation
  • http//www.nma.org/technology/gold_production.asp

83
(No Transcript)
84
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com