How to Starve a Lawyer: Targets for Practice Change and Risk Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

How to Starve a Lawyer: Targets for Practice Change and Risk Management

Description:

How to Starve a Lawyer: Targets for Practice Change and Risk Management David J. Robinson, MD Associate Professor and Vice-Chairman of Emergency Medicine – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:141
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: DavidR243
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How to Starve a Lawyer: Targets for Practice Change and Risk Management


1
How to Starve a Lawyer Targets for Practice
Change and Risk Management
  • David J. Robinson, MD
  • Associate Professor and Vice-Chairman of
    Emergency Medicine
  • Department of Emergency Medicine
  • March 8, 2012

2
Goals
  • Identify high risk groups or presentations
    through closed litigated and/or settled cases
  • Identified features of high risk litigated cases
  • Provide case based examples for risk management
  • Offer Starve points to reduce risk and
    (hopefully) litigation

3
What are the issues?
  • More than 42 of all physicians have been sued,
    20 more twice
  • Errors in diagnoses (37), improper performance
    (17) top 2 of 3
  • In 18 of cases, no medical error was identified
    (2)
  • Failure to supervise or monitor are notable (7)
  • Litigation due to medication errors (2)
  • Can we mitigate our risk?

4
  • Looked at closed claims from 1985-2007 (11,529)
    with any ED involvement from PIAA (Physician
    Insurers Association of America) database
  • AMI (5), Fractures (6), Appendicitis (2) most
    common in adults
  • 70 closed without payment, 29 settlement, 7
    verdict (85 for clinician)

Brown, et al. AEM 201017 (5)553-560
5
Summary of closed Claim Injuries
  • Most closed claims result from serious injuries,
    1/3 involve a death (1985-2007)
  • Over 80 of total indemnity of claims made was
    paid for serious or permanent injury
  • Average indemnity and expenses have more than
    doubled since 1985. Avg EM indemnity 185,226
  • However,
  • 85 of verdicts favored the physician
  • emotional or insignificant injuries not
    significant source of claims
  • 7,220 closed claims ( not settled) cost 85 M in
    expenses

Brown, et al. AEM 201017 (5)553-560
6
Claims payout for Severity and Outcomes follow
condition of patient
Brown, et al. AEM 201017 (5)553-560
7
Four Risk management techniques to reduce
successful litigation
  • Understand characteristics of high risk
    presentations
  • Recognize limitations of diagnostic work-ups,
    particularly with presentations that have high
    levels of uncertainty (chest pain, abdominal
    pain)
  • Listen to patients complaint
  • Communicate

8
Characteristics for Closed Claims Related to 3
Main Categories
  • Chest pain (4, 34 paid), AMI (5 , 42), aortic
    aneurism (2, 32)
  • Abdominal pain (3, 27), Appendicitis (2, 31)
  • Injuries Fractures / open wounds 11, 28-31

Brown, et al. AEM 201017 (5)553-560
9
Chest pain
  • A 32 year old homeless male presents to the
    Emergency Department complaining of chest pain.
    He admits to the clinician of drinking excessive
    amounts of alcohol on a regular basis. At this
    time there is alcohol on his breath. His sinus
    rhythm is 100 and his ECG is non-diagnostic.

FromBlauthttp//community.advanceweb.com/blogs/al_
1/archive/2009/08/14/ami-case-study.aspx
10
Chest pain Continued
  • Hx of uncontrolled HTN, borderline DM, hx drug
    and etoh abuse. Time 0 and 2 TCK and MB
    elevated, trops (-)
  • Patient ruled out and sent home with Chest pain
    and alcohol / substance abuse
  • Outcome?
  • Unknown, but the author (A chemist and
    statistician) of the blog recommended that the
    patient be sent home and that no further work-up
    is necessary

FromBlauthttp//community.advanceweb.com/blogs/al_
1/archive/2009/08/14/ami-case-study.aspx
11
Factors Associated with Missed AMI
  • Low volume EDs
  • Not reading the ECGs
  • Underestimating the patients risk
  • Atypical presentation
  • Young age of patient
  • Starve point beware of the young (patient,
    ED, provider)

Rusnak, et al. Litigation against the emergency
physician common features in cases of missed
myocardial infarction. Ann Emer Med.
198918(10)1029-1034
12
6 Starve points for AMI management
  • Differing expectations
  • Sharp pain or chest wall tenderness excludes MI
  • A normal ECG excludes MI
  • Young patients cannot have an MI
  • Indigestion symptoms exclude an MI
  • Normal cardiac enzymes exclude an MI

13
(No Transcript)
14
Case of Wrongful Death
  • 66 y/o with prior MI presents to ED with CP, SOB
    and pain to both arms. Remained in ED overnight.
    Admitted to hospital room in am. Experienced CP
    in hospital, anginal pain with stress test during
    stay. Coded on transfer from floor to CCU
  • Outcome cardiologist hospital settled for
    225,000 for wrongful death (improper monitoring
    in a known cardiac patient)
  • Starve point expectation of delivered care
    (performance error)

http//www.goldsmithlegal.com/web_app/main/default
.aspx?PT5
15
Case of Failure to Diagnose
  • 47 with syncope seen in ED on 9/15/99. ECG
    noted prolonged QT (K 3.0). Hx HTN on and arb
    Observed in ED for 3 hours and gave K.
    Discharged with dx of Anxiety. Gave xanax and
    told to follow up with pcp.
  • Outcome died of sudden cardiac death on 10/31/99
  • Verdict 700,000 to ED MD for failing to
    recognize cardiac abnormalities
  • Avoidable?

http//www.goldsmithlegal.com/web_app/main/default
.aspx?PT5
16
Top 10 Errors Associated with Closed Claims
  • Error in diagnosis and improper performance 54
    of paid claims
  • Note Failure to supervise, perform, delay,
    recognize, treat Communication issues?

Brown, et al. AEM 201017 (5)553-560
17
Review Failure to Diagnose Case
  • Missed AMI associated with highest paid-to-close
    ratio (42 of closed claims)
  • Coupled with diagnostic uncertainty (improper
    performance (7), failure to perform (4),
    failure and delay of consultation(2), fail to
    admit (2) cases like syncope can be difficult to
    manage
  • Starve point define your case management,
    negotiate expectations with patient and family,
    ensure follow-up and get buy-in

Brown, et al. AEM 201017 (5)553-560
18
The problem with settlements No one really wins
except
19
Featherston v Lourdes Hospital Kentucky
Facts A 39 year old woman was taken to the ED
after passing out at home in the bathroom. Her
initial complaint was left sided weakness, facial
droop, and confusion. She had a diagnosis of MS
made weeks before this event. She was observed in
the ED for 5 hours. She claimed she was not seen
by a doctor during this time. The doctor had no
documentation that he had seen her in this
period. Eventually a neurologist saw her and
admitted her to the ICU with a severe right
brain stroke. She needs permanent assistance now.
From G. Moore. Edited from Beware! The New
Hotbed of litigation. ACEP Scientific Assembly,
general lecture series 10/2011
20
Continued
  • Plaintiff You didnt diagnose me in time to
  • give tPA even though I arrived within one hour.
  • Defense Seemed like an MS exacerbation and you
    wouldnt have been a good tPA candidate.
  • Result Jury verdict of 2.1 million.
  • tPA cases a new favorite know indications,
    give informed consent, neuro input is important
  • Meticulously identify time of onset, review each
    case, do not delay, communicate with patient and
    family

From G. Moore. Edited from Beware! The New
Hotbed of litigation. ACEP Scientific Assembly,
general lecture series 10/2011
21
Characteristics of litigation involving
thrombolytics and Ischemic Stroke
  • In 88 of verdicts, injury was claimed from
    failure of treatment with tPA (1).
  • Thiess et al. identified 20 trial court and six
    appellate cases that involved suits over the
    nonuse of IV tPA for patients with a stroke, and
    none for injury caused allegedly by the drug. In
    14 of 20 cases, the verdict was for the defendant
    (2)
  • Starve point Know indications and comply, know
    contraindications, good consent effort, document
    line of thinking, involve consultants
  1. Liang BA, Zivin JA. Empirical characteristics of
    litigation involving tissue plasminogen activator
    and ischemic stroke. Ann Emerg Med.
    2008521604.
  2. Thiess DE, Sattin JA, Larriviere DG. Hot topics
    in risk management in neurologic practice. Neurol
    Clin. 201028429439. doi 10.1016/j.ncl.2009.11.
    005

22
And we wonder why theyre not a greater part of
the ED volume
23
Belly Pain in a 6 year old
  • A 6 y/o boy with 3 days of abdominal pain then
    N/V presents to your ED. Family members have
    similar complaints and have been in the ED before
    with other kids. On exam Abd is TTP diffusely, -
    rebound, CBC is 11.5k/ml, T is 101.4f
  • Parents are concerned for appendicitis the
    parents say the pain is down to the RLQand they
    want the CT

24
Belly pain (continued)
  • They physician reviews the records and sees that
    several family members have been in the ED in the
    last week, all dx with gastroenteritis from a new
    New Years diet that mom has all on. After
    reevaluation, pain is in RLQ but no rebound and
    child appears well. Patient is sent home with
    pain meds, dx of gastroenteritis.
  • Issues with Case?

25
Issues with treating the little people
  • Children and elderly often require specific
    negotiations with care-giver.
  • Often rely on history from proxy. Times and
    dates may not be accurate
  • Physical exam can be vague, non-specific
  • Lab tests may not be useful. Lab ranges can be
    different than in adults

26
  • Reviews closed claims from 1985-2006
  • Most Prevalent Meningitis, Appendicitis,
    Nonteratogenic anamolies, pneumonia, brain damage

27
Starve points from the Pediatric Literature
  • Document pertinent positives and negatives
  • Document carefully, free from flippant,
    critical, or other inappropriate comments
  • Quality not quantity
  • Do not underestimate the importance of referral
    to specialists
  • Red flag specific complaints that the patient
    identifies
  • Communication and use of terminology poor
    communication is the catalyst for most medical
    malpractice lawsuits
  • Avoid language that blames or embellishes
  • Correctly label conditions such as DDH
  • Make sure that the patient (and care-giver)
    understand health information. Written material
    should be at the 8th grade level

McAbee et al. Pediatrics 2008122e1282-e1286
28
Note slightly different cases resulting in claims!
Ped Emer care. 200512(3)165-9
29
Pediatric EM Claims
  • 16 yr study from Physician Insurers Assoc. of
    America. All closed claims to EDs and UCs from
    1985-2000
  • 2283 claims from age 0-17
  • EM physicians were in 443
  • Cases involved boys (59), age lt2 (26)
  • Fractures, meningitis, and appendicitis most
    common diagnoses

Diagnostic error most commonly found
cause Followed by no medical error!
Selbst S, et al. Epidemiology and Etiology of
malpractice Suits. Ped emer care 2005 21(3).
165-169
30
Common Misdiagnoses from PIAA in Pediatrics
  • For Appendicitis gastroenteritis, URI, otitis,
    sinusitis, PID
  • For meningitis Viral infection/influenza
    (35.6), other(24.5), OM, gastroenteritis, UTI,
    post op infection, migraine, febrile seizure
  • Non teratogenic anomalies developmental
    dysplasia of the hip (DDH)

McAbee et al. Pediatrics 2008122e1282-e1286
31
More Starve points for Pediatrics
  • Recognize that meningitis and appendicitis may
    evolve over time
  • Limitations in diagnostics, particularly with
    fractures need to be addressed with the patients
    caregivers, and documented appropriately
  • Explain any and all procedures, their risks and
    outcomes (both expected and adverse)
  • Follow up or encouragement to RIW is the rule
    rather than exception
  • Communication is key!

32
Starve Points when considering cases of
diagnostic uncertainty
  • Was that abdominal pain really gastroenteritis?
  • Was that Chest Pain really noncardiac?
  • Did the history and physical exam really exclude
    appendicitis?
  • Could there be a foreign body even after a
    thorough washout?

Dont pigeon - hole yourself. Many EM
diagnostic codes are designed for diagnostic
uncertainty Use them
33
Examples of coding when diagnosis is unclear
  • Shortness of Breath (786.05)
  • Chest Pain NOS (786.59), (aka atypical,
    muscular)
  • Note at rest (786.50), cardiac, and with normal
    angiography are all the same beware as a d/c
    diagnosis
  • Abdominal Pain, other specified site (789.09),
    acute generalized (789.07), LLQ (-.04), (RLQ
    -.03)
  • Fever of undetermined origin (780.60)
  • Headache, acute (784.0) includes around eyes,
    front and back of head, occipital or aching
  • (orgasmic is 339.82 fyi)

Starve Point Review your billing codes make
sure the charts reflect your level of confidence
in the diagnosis
34
Castillo-Monterroso v Rhode Island Hospital
Rhode Island
Facts A one week old was taken to the ED by
ambulance. The triage nurse took the history from
the Spanish family via broken English and hand
gestures. At one point the family said they had
tapped on the chest but when asked if the child
stopped breathing, replied, I dont know. No
translator was obtained. A first year pediatric
resident saw the patient and did not feel a
translator was needed. The infant was discharged
shortly after. Within hours she stopped breathing
and died 4 days later.
35
Castillo-Monterroso v Rhode Island Hospital
Rhode Island
  • Plaintiff You failed to diagnose rsv and apnea
    due to poor communication
  • Defense None
  • Result Verdict for 400,000
  • Note This is being seen more frequently in the
    medical-legal literature. It is optimal to get
    translators and sign language personnel involved
    to optimize patient care. Sign language case..
  • Starve point Make sure that your patient
    understands you Use a translator and document
    it.

36
(No Transcript)
37
Bessenyei v Raiti
A patient had paint thinner injected into his
thumb and presented to the ED. Hand surgeon,
who was not on call, was consulted by the ED
doctor because he was always amongst the most
willing colleagues to help. The hand specialist
recommended antibiotics and pain meds. The
patient was given those, had tetanus updated and
was discharged to return if worse. The thumb did
get worse and required partial amputation.
From G. Moore. Edited from Beware! The New
Hotbed of litigation. ACEP Scientific Assembly,
general lecture series 10/2011
38
Bessenyei v Raiti (cont.)
The patient sued both physicians claiming they
negligently failed to realize the seriousness of
a high pressure injection and appropriately
incise and debride. The hand physician claimed
no relationship he simply provided advice. The
judge held the ED physician solely liable. The
ED MD had direct contact with the patient, could
override the consultant by accepting or rejecting
his recommendations and made the final decision.
From G. Moore. Edited from Beware! The New
Hotbed of litigation. ACEP Scientific Assembly,
general lecture series 10/2011
39
Consultants
  • In general, a consultant over the phone does
    not have a physician patient relationship
    established
  • Most courts require an actual exam by the
    physician to establish a relationship or a very
    specific and affirmative action by the physician
    that establishes that they agree to be involved
    in the patients care.
  • Courts are hesitant to have mere conversations
    establish a formal relationship as it would chill
    the normal communication of professionals that
    usually facilitates optimal patient care, even
    when they areon call.
  • Starve point Get it in writing. Documentation
    of consultation is critical

40
Summary Points to Reduce Risk of Successful
Litigated Claims (and perhaps Claims)
  • For Adults Chest pain, AMI, appendicitis, and
    missed or complicated fractures found most
    commonly in database
  • For kids add meningitis, testicular torsion, and
    PNA to the high risk ddx
  • Errors in diagnosis, failure to perform,
    identify, or delays are primary reasons for
    litigation. Detail these errors in advance to
    your patients
  • Outline your management strategy to your
    patients, consultants. Let them know of the
    limitations to your tests and the probability of
    success
  • Beware of the young (provider, patient, hospital
    (system))
  • Think in terms of a health warranty (not
    guarantee)
  • Remember the 4 Cs Communicate, Consult, Coach,
    Chart

41
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com