Title: Exploring mathematical models using technology and its impact on pedagogical mathematics knowledge by Jennifer Suh George Mason University
1Exploring mathematical models using technology
and its impact on pedagogical mathematics
knowledgeby Jennifer SuhGeorge Mason
University
- Presentation at Association for Mathematics
Teacher Educators - Irvine, California - January 2007
2Developing highly qualified mathematics teachers
by
- Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge
- subject matter knowledge,
- pedagogical knowledge, and
- knowledge of context.
- "from being able to comprehend subject matter for
themselves, to becoming able to elucidate subject
matter in new ways, reorganize and partition it,
clothe it in activities and emotions, in
metaphors and exercises, and in examples and
demonstrations, so that it can be grasped by
students" - (Shulman, 1987 13).
3Why is modeling mathematics concepts important in
developing pedagogical content knowledge ?
- PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE is knowing the
- most useful forms of representation of these
ideas, the most powerful analogies,
illustrations, examples, explanations, and
demonstrations-in a word, the ways of
representing and formulating the subject that
make it comprehensible to others" (Shulman, 1987,
p. 9).
4Mathematical Teaching Knowledge
5Why are mathematical models so important?
- Provide real life context
- Help students build a network of mathematical
relationships. - Consider what ideas or models might be the most
accessible to students) - Plan the developmental progression of models (how
models evolve)
6Effective Representational Models have
- Transparency how easily can the idea be seen
through the representation - Efficiency Does the representation support
efficient communication and use? - Generality Does the representation apply to
broad classes of objects or concepts? - ClarityIs the representation unambiguous and
easy to use - Precision How close it the representation to the
exact value? - From National Research Council (2002) Adding it Up
7Importance of mathematical modeling and
representations
- Although 43 of the US teachers successfully
calculated 1 ¾ / ½ , almost all failed to come up
with a representation of division by fractions. - Among 23 teachers, 6 could not create a story and
16 made up stories with misconceptions. - From Liping Mas (1999), Knowing and Teaching
Mathematics
8Five important consideration for technology
integration(Garofalo, et al., 2000, p. 66)
- Introduce technology in context
- Address worthwhile mathematics with appropriate
pedagogy - Take advantage of technology
- Connect mathematics topics
- Incorporate multiple representations
9Research Question
- How does activities with mathematical modeling
and representations of virtual manipulative
facilitate the development of pedagogical math
content knowledge? - What experiences can increase teachers
competence and confidence in integrating
technology and working with manipulative models
in mathematics? - How are technology applets implemented into
lessons as concept tutorial/models, tools for
investigations or free explorations in teaching
and learning mathematics?
10Methods
- Participants
- Twenty-one preservice teachers in Elementary
Mathematics Methods classroom - Data sources
- Teacher surveys with likert scale open ended
questions - Artifacts from class activities
- Technology lesson plans
11Procedure Mathematical modeling activities
- Process 1 Relearning the mathematics content as
a teacher. - Process 2 Selecting and evaluating for
appropriate mathematical models - Process 3 Implementing the mathematics model in
a lesson
12PROCESS ONE Relearning the mathematics content
as a teacher
- Define the mathematical essence in a lesson
(Knowledge maps) - Developing relational understanding through
lesson study
13PROCESS ONE Relearning the mathematics content
as a teacher
- Define the mathematical essence in a lesson
(Knowledge maps) - Developing relational understanding through
lesson study
14PROCESS ONE Relearning the mathematics content
as a teacher
- Define the mathematical essence in a lesson
(Knowledge maps) - Developing relational understanding through
lesson study
15PROCESS TWO Mathematical modeling activities
- Selecting and evaluating for appropriate
mathematical models (math model evaluations) - What are the different uses of these models?
- How are students developmental needs supported
by the different uses of these models? - Is there a developmental progression for these
models? Are some used of the model precursors to
others? - What role does the model play in helping students
visualize different strategies? - How might one represent a given strategy with
each model?
16Modeling perimeter and area
http//www.shodor.org/interactivate1.0/activities/perm/index.html http//nlvm.usu.edu/en/nav/frames_asid_281_g_2_t_4.html?openactivities
http//www.funbrain.com/cgi-bin/poly.cgi http//www.mathplayground.com/InteractiveGeometry.html
17Modeling ten-ness
18Modeling ten-ness
19build deeper understanding through multiple
representations
- Example of Mathematical Model to teach density of
numbers
20from tools to represent thinking into models for
thinking
21PROCESS THREE Implementation phase
- Implementing the mathematics model in a lesson
(lesson design creating a task sheet to guide
learning)
22Preservice teachers reported that the virtual
manipulatives website were
- New ways to model math ideas
- Strategy for students to use for collaborative
knowledge construction - User-friendly and handy visual model for visual
learners - Tools to entice reluctant learners and special
ed. students who could not focus on work with
manipulatives
23Technology integration survey
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31Path to pedagogical content knowledge
- American educators assume that you need to know
content knowledge before you can plan lessons.
Chinese teachers think you learn content
knowledge by planning lessons. - from Liping Mas (1999) Knowing and Teaching
Elementary Mathematics
32In its 2001 report, the National Council for
Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE, p. 7)
calls for an integration of technology as
summarized below
- QUESTION To what degree are higher education
institutions meeting their responsibility for
preparing tomorrows classroom teachers? - ANSWER Bluntly, a majority of teacher
preparation programs are falling far short of
what needs to be donecolleges and universities
are making the same mistake that was made by K-12
schools they treat technology as a special
addition to the teacher education curriculum
requiring specifically prepared faculty and
specially equipped classrooms but not a topic
that needs to be incorporated across the entire
education programTeachers rarely are required
to apply technology in their courses and are
denied role models of faculty employing
technology in their own work.
33Methods classes and professional development
training
- In the student approach, preservice teachers use
the same technology their future students will be
using. They explore concepts via the aid of
technology, and then decide how they will use
that same technology to explore those concepts
with their future students.
34Implications for teacher educators
- Within the context of their content and methods
courses, preservice teachers utilize technologies
they would use with their own future students - Meaningful activities and technologies are
selected purposefully (not just technology for
technologys sake) - Technology integration occurs throughout the
teacher preparation program, not just one
semester, for example and - Faculty use technology as a means for modeling
and for representing content and pedagogy