A Performance Evaluation of ACORN (Agent-based Community Oriented Retrieval Network) Architecture Virendra C. Bhavsar* Ali A. Ghorbani Faculty of Computer Science University of New Brunswick Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3 Canada Steve Marsh Institute for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A Performance Evaluation of ACORN (Agent-based Community Oriented Retrieval Network) Architecture Virendra C. Bhavsar* Ali A. Ghorbani Faculty of Computer Science University of New Brunswick Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3 Canada Steve Marsh Institute for

Description:

A Performance Evaluation of ACORN (Agent-based Community Oriented Retrieval Network) Architecture Virendra C. Bhavsar* Ali A. Ghorbani Faculty of Computer Science – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Performance Evaluation of ACORN (Agent-based Community Oriented Retrieval Network) Architecture Virendra C. Bhavsar* Ali A. Ghorbani Faculty of Computer Science University of New Brunswick Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3 Canada Steve Marsh Institute for


1
A Performance Evaluation of ACORN (Agent-based
Community Oriented Retrieval Network)
ArchitectureVirendra C. BhavsarAli A.
GhorbaniFaculty of Computer ScienceUniversity
of New BrunswickFredericton, NB, E3B
5A3CanadaSteve MarshInstitute for Information
TechnologyNational Research Council, Ottawa
Canada
2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • ACORN Multi-Agent System
  • Multiple Autonomous Virtual Users
  • Adaptation of ACORN for Testbed
  • Experimental Results
  • Future Work
  • Conclusions and Future Work

3
IntroductionACORN Agent-Based
Community-Oriented Retrieval Routing Network
  • ACORN is a multi-agent based system for
    information diffusion and (limited) search in
    networks
  • In ACORN, all pieces of information
  • searches
  • documents
  • images, etc.
  • are represented by semi-autonomous
    agents...
  • Intended to allow human users to collaborate
    closely (while providing automated message
    forwarding, search, etc., but keeping user
    control)

4
Degrees of Separation
  • In the 1960s, Stanley Milgram showed that
    everyone in the US was personally removed from
    everyone else by at most six degrees of
    separation
  • In communities, such as a research community,
    this is clear to all members
  • if you want to know something, you ask someone.
  • If they dont know, they may know someone else to
    ask...
  • and so on
  • This also works when you have something to tell
    people...
  • if you want someone relevant to know, you tell
    people you know will be interested...
  • and they forward the information to people they
    know will be interested..
  • and so on

5
Relation to Other Work
  • Search Engines
  • Alta Vista, Excite, Yahoo, InfoSeek, Lycos,
    etc...
  • We dont aim to search the Web
  • If the user has to search, its because the
    information diffusion is
  • not fast enough
  • not accurate enough
  • Recommender Systems
  • Firefly (Maes), Fab (Balabanovic)
  • Content-based or Collaborative
  • ACORNs agents are a radical new approach, and a
    mixture of both...
  • ACORN is distributed
  • ACORN levers direct human-human contact knowledge
  • Matchmakers
  • Yenta (Foner)
  • Very close to the ACORN spirit, lacking in
    flexibility of ACORN

6
Other Work, continued
  • Web Page Watchers and Push Technologies
  • Tierra, Marimba, Channels
  • ACORN is a means of pushing new data, reducing
    the need to watch for changes
  • it does not require explicit user input to
    forward information to relevant users...
  • Filtering Systems
  • The filtering in ACORN is implicit in what is
    recommended by humans
  • If a document is judged unsuitable by a human, it
    will not be forwarded
  • In addition, the owner of the document can
    control who sees it (via the migration process)
  • Knowbots
  • Softbots (Washington, Etzioni, Weld), Nobots
    (Stanford, Shoham)
  • mobile agents for internet search
  • ACORN provides diffusion also
  • if search is necessary on existing information,
    these are of use
  • ACORN does not (as yet) aim to search existing
    information...

7
ACORN
  • Using communication between agents representing
    pieces of information, ACORN automates some of
    the processes
  • Anyone can create agents, and direct them to
    parties they know will be interested
  • in addition, an agent carries other information,
    such as a list of owner interests (which may be
    different from the documents subject)
  • The agents proceed to the suggested readers, who
    in turn can recommend others (notice this is
    human recommendation)
  • In addition, agents can communicate with each
    other regarding owner interests and individual
    agent topics, and if matches are found, can
    direct each other to relevant humans (this is
    agent recommendation)
  • Clearly, agent recommendation can relieve humans
    of much of the process of finding/directing
    agents to interested parties, although it may not
    be as precise

8
The ACORN Mobile Agent
  • represents a unit of information
  • structure

Mobile Agent Name (Unique ID, timestamp) Owner
Address Dublin Core Metadata Visited Recommende
d Known
Lists of users (humans) and/or cafés the agent
has visited, is due to visit, or knows of
9
The Dublin Core
  • The Dublin Core is a Metadata element set, first
    developed at a workshop in Dublin, Ohio
  • Includes author, title, date
  • Also includes
  • keywords
  • publisher
  • type (e.g. home page, novel, poem)
  • format (of data)
  • and others
  • The Dublin Core presents a powerful structured
    medium for distributing human (and machine)
    readable metadata
  • It also presents an interesting query formulation
    tool
  • The DC home page can be found at http//purl.org
    /metadata/dublin_core

10
Agent Lifecycle
  • A mobile agent in ACORN (one which represents
    information) undergoes several stages in its
    lifecycle
  • Creation
  • Distribution
  • Visiting a user
  • Mingling with other agents
  • Going to next site
  • Return

11
Creation
  • Creation
  • similar to creation of electronic mail messages
  • other information is requested and can be
    suggested
  • the system needs keywords for the
    information/query
  • it also uses (as with email) a list of addresses
    to approach
  • Once created, the agent is free to go on its own
    way
  • migration to other sites
  • approaching relevant users to distribute
    information
  • and to expand list of users to approach
  • mingling with other agents
  • to expand the list of users to approach

12
Migration
  • Agent migration makes use of the ACORN Servers
    located at each site
  • similar to a web server or a mail server
  • each server constantly listens for communication
    from others
  • Migration
  • agent informs local server (where it now resides)
    of need to migrate
  • local server contacts agents home server, sends
    a copy of agent core
  • home server (via contact with agent owner/client)
    authorizes migration
  • authorization is necessary before migration can
    be carried out
  • If authorized
  • home server passes back agent state copy
  • local server contacts remote server (where the
    agent wishes to go)
  • local server gives reference version of agent
    state to remote server
  • remote server instantiates agent at its site,
    agent continues
  • local server removes agent from its site

13
Visiting Users
  • The purpose of an agent is to distribute
    information
  • To do this, it visits users and presents them
    with that information
  • This process, for ease of integration with users
    workflow, is akin to mail being sent and arriving
  • The users interface to ACORN (the Client) can
    filter incoming agents according to predefined
    user requirements/interests
  • Users can
  • file agent details
  • fetch files represented by agents (if any)
  • ascertain who the agent has visited (if any)
  • give feedback to the agent (explicit relevance
    feedback)
  • forward the agent to other users (implicit
    relevance feedback?)

14
Getting User Recommendations
  • Automatically
  • When an agent arrives, the users Client can
    automatically
  • examine the agent
  • determine if it knows of any other relevant users
  • these are obtained via user interaction, and from
    data gathered by agents arriving at this Client
  • share that data with the agent
  • send the agent on its way, retaining a copy for
    the user to examine
  • Personally
  • When the user examines the agent, they can
  • recommend other users to visit (forward)
  • recommend cafés to visit
  • send the agent on its way

15
The Café - Agent Recommendations
  • User recommendations are not the only way an
    agent can expand its list of people to visit
  • Each site can have (between zero and many) cafés
  • A café is simply a meeting place for agents
  • Cafés can be generic or have specific topics
    (agents can be filtered before entering)

16
Cafés revisited
  • In a café, at set intervals, agents present are
    compared, and relevant information exchanged
  • at present, all information is public
  • if you dont want to share, dont enter the café
  • there is no provision for caching agent data as
    yet (so that agents can arrive, give data, and
    leave)
  • this may be added at a later date
  • agents reside at cafés for set lengths of time
    (currently we have a default, but intend to make
    the length of time owner selectable)
  • The café represents a unique method of automating
    community based information sharing

17
tom_at_ucsd.edu
ucsd.edu
ymasrour_at_ai.it.nrc.ca
ai.it.nrc.ca
S e r v e r
bob_at_ai.it.nrc.ca
dick_at_ucsd.edu
steve_at_ai.it.nrc.ca
anwhere.else
foo_at_anywhere.else
cs.stir.ac.uk
meto.gov.uk
joan_at_meto.gov.uk
Clients
jane_at_meto.gov.uk
wibble_at_cs.stir.ac.uk
graham_at_cs.stir.ac.uk
anne_at_cs.stir.ac.uk
18
Security
  • The system requires agent migration to other
    sites
  • where there are interested parties
  • At all times, the information agents are under
    the control of their owners
  • Owners can deny an agents migration to another
    site, or a specific person, since agents can be
    instructed to ask their owners permission to
    migrate
  • Also, we achieve persistence by having agents
    send copies of themselves back to their owners at
    each migration
  • In future, we will be adding some encryption
    capability to agents

19
Testing and Deployment
  • A working implementation of ACORN in Suns Java
    language
  • Stress testing the architecture using large
    numbers of real users - problems
  • Multiple artificial users on a simulated network

20
Multiple Autonomous Virtual Users
  • Test-bed Several Autonomous Servers, each
    serving autonomous virtual users
  • Virtual User - capable of creating agents
  • - picks up a topic from
    a client cores interest
  • - migrates to other
    servers
  • - potential destinations

21
Adaptation of ACORN
  • ACORN gt100 Java classes
  • Adaptation
  • Removal of user interaction classes
  • Removal of client behavior clases
  • Removal of other extraneous classes
  • Simulation of multiple client-server
    architecture run more than one server on a
    single machine
  • Possibility of using multiple processor machines
  • Addition of a SiteController Class

22
Adaptation of ACORN (cont.)
  • SiteController Class
  • handles all communication between servers on a
    single machine
  • resolves agent migration requests
  • handles communication between different machines
  • Streamer Class
  • provides transport of agents across IP
  • Benefits
  • Removal of the need for continuous user
    interaction
  • Batch mode runs
  • Only 30 Java classes

23
Experimental Results
  • Virtual User
  • two key phrases for user interests
  • four key phrases about the document or search
    area
  • two recommended user address in an agent
  • four key phrases for specifying interests of
    each recommended user
  • Porting of ACORN to many machine architectures
  • O(n2) agent interactions in a Café, n - number of
    agents

24
Experimental Results (cont.)
25
Conclusion and Future Work
  • ACORN- multi-agent system for intranet/internet
  • Allows the creation and distribution of any form
    of information (images, text, etc.)
  • Performance Evaluation of ACORN on single and
    multiple servers
  • Novel Idea Autonomous Virtual Users
  • Adaptation of ACORN
  • Porting to different machines
  • Further work Adaptation to Multi-processor
    machines at a single as well as multiple sites to
    exploit CANETIII
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com