Tackling Early School Leaving 6 September 2013 Naples Dr. Ilona Murphy ICF-GHK Early Warning Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Tackling Early School Leaving 6 September 2013 Naples Dr. Ilona Murphy ICF-GHK Early Warning Systems

Description:

Context of our work. Europe 2020 headline target to bring down the share of early school leavers to below 10% by 2020. Council Recommendation of 28 June 2011 on ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: virgilioq
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tackling Early School Leaving 6 September 2013 Naples Dr. Ilona Murphy ICF-GHK Early Warning Systems


1
Tackling Early School Leaving 6
September 2013NaplesDr. Ilona Murphy
ICF-GHKEarly Warning Systems
2
Context of our work
  • Europe 2020 headline target to bring down the
    share of early school leavers to below 10 by
    2020
  • Council Recommendation of 28 June 2011 on
    policies to reduce ESL
  • Highlights the need for comprehensive policies
    (prevention, intervention and compensation)
  • European Commission Thematic Working Group on
    Early School Leaving (ESL) established Dec 2011

3
TWG policy context and activities
  • Activities include
  • Two Peer Learning Activities (Netherlands and
    France)
  • Peer Review on policies to reduce ESL
  • Mapping exercises (data collection, early warning
    systems, cost of ESL)
  • Report on comprehensive policies against ESL

4
Early school leaving in Europe scale of the
problem
  • In 2012, 12.9 18 to 24 years old had not
    completed upper secondary education and no longer
    in education and training
  • Represents 5.5 million young people
  • More young men than young women are ESL
  • ESL major problem for disadvantaged minorities
  • More pronounced in VET
  • Wide disparities among European countries and
    regions
  • Unemployment rate amongst early school leavers
    was 40.1 in 2012 - economic crisis is having
    diverging impacts on ESL

5
ESL rate 2012, Europe 2020 target and national
targets
6
Early warning systems (EWS) in Europe mapping
exercise
  • EWS broad term, taking different forms -
    definition and characteristics are tentative
  • EWS collect and use data on students to identify
    risk factors and trigger follow up
  • Aim is to warn school staff of young people at
    risk
  • EWS typically integral to mainstream school
    monitoring and management systems
  • A small number of countries have developed
    separate systems, others have no such systems in
    place

7
Variations in approach
EWS largely driven by national legislation but
implementation tends to be local
8
EWS signals
Schools and teachers play an important role in
recognising early signs of disengagement
9
Other methods to identify youth at risk country
examples
Collaboration
Austria youth coaches work with young people
Hungary Person employed with responsibility for child/youth welfare
Sweden All school personnel obliged to report person identified at risk
Belgium Teachers involved in mediation
Ireland School Completion Programme to help young people in disadvantaged areas
Research and data
UK England Risk of NEET indicators
Student registration systems
Belgium, Estonia, Lithuania and Slovakia systems assist in identification of EWS through recording absences and academic achievement
10
Responses to EWS
Responses should be accompanied by clear and
timely support
Some countries impose fines, sanctions and
prosecution
11
Impact of EWS
  • Little evidence of the impact of EWS
    evaluations are rare, difficult to identify
    causality between trends
  • Eurostat and national data show reductions in ESL
    view that EWS have contributed to reduction
  • More resources and evaluation of approaches
    required
  • How are EWS defined in different European
    countries?
  • When schools or local authorities report absences
    what is the outcome of this activity?
  • What is the data used for? Does it inform policy
    making? How accessible is it to users?
  • What distinguishes EWS from being a bureaucratic
    exercise from systems that address EWS?
  • How do countries determine different EWS?
  • How is collaboration and partnerships working in
    practice?

12
Key lessons, success factors and challenges
  • Key lessons and success factors
  • Important role of teachers
  • Importance of individual support and guidance for
    students
  • Cooperation between schools, supporting systems,
    professionals
  • Challenges
  • Budget cuts, ensuring legal responsibilities
    related to EWS are implemented, need for
    user-friendly data systems, lack of training on
    ESL, lack of coordination, establishing buy-in,
    unwillingness of some schools

13
Concluding remarks
  • Clear definition of EWS
  • A comprehensive list of EWS must be broader than
    monitoring absenteeism alone (social, family
    related issues)
  • EWS should be evidenced based and operate through
    a process of identification/assessment of signals
    intervening - monitoring
  • EWS must be accompanied by clear and timely
    support
  • EWS must be evaluated and monitored to ensure
    efficiency and effectiveness within the context
    of the school

14
  • Thank you for your attention
  • Ilona.murphy_at_ghkint.com

15
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com