The Future of Kuala Lumpur: Draft KL City Plan 2020 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

The Future of Kuala Lumpur: Draft KL City Plan 2020

Description:

The Future of Kuala Lumpur: Draft KL City Plan 2020 What will be the future of Kuala Lumpur from a sustainable development perspective for a liveable city? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:447
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: TehCh8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Future of Kuala Lumpur: Draft KL City Plan 2020


1
The Future of Kuala Lumpur Draft KL City Plan
2020
2
  • What will be the future of Kuala Lumpur from a
    sustainable development perspective for a
    liveable city?

What can you and I do ?
3
What is Draft KL City Plan 2020?
  • It contains detailed information on land use and
    development, the environment, infrastructure and
    open spaces in the city.
  • It is required by law to be consistent with the
    policies of the Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan 2020
    Section 13(6) and the National Physical Plan.
  • (Malay Mail, 14 May 2008)

4
How does it affect you?
  • The plan should check potential abuse in terms of
    changing land use, increasing built- up areas and
    increasing density. It should be used to keep
    unsustainable development in check.
  • (Malay Mail, 14 June 08)

5
What do people say about the draft KLCP?
6
KLites said
  • Insufficient time to analyse and respond to the
    plan
  • Is hard to understand the plan
  • Short project objection hearings
  • Lack of information on proposed projects
  • Once gazetted, it cannot be questioned
  • (Malay Mail, 16 May 08)

7
KL plan fatally flawed
  • The fundamental flaw of the plan is that it is
    being prepared on the basis that it has to cater
    for an additional 600,000 people in the Federal
    Territory by 2020, said Derek Fernandez, a local
    government expert.
  • It is in contrast with the policies in the
    National Physical Plan (NPP) which is legally
    binding on the Federal Territory which provides
    sufficient land to cater for a total population
    growth of 8.5 million in Kuala Lumpur, Klang
    Valley and Seremban combined.
  • (The Star, 26 May 08)

8

(The Star, 26 May 08)

9
National Physical Plan
  • NPP is the legally binding blueprint for
    sustainable development under the Federal
    Territory Planning Act
  • The NPP provides that the density of KL is to be
    reduced to the minimum sustainable figure of 25
    people per hectare.

(The Star, 26 May 08)
10
National Physical Plan
  • In fact, the NPP identifies that the gross
    density of KL is higher than 25 nevertheless it
    is mandatory that 25persons/ha is applicable to
    KL.
  • On the contrary, the KL plan attempts to increase
    the density to a ridiculous figure of
    95persons/ha.
  • (The Star, 26 May 08)

11
  • Architect David Mizan There are many errors,
    some incomplete information and elements which
    contradicted existing development conditions.
  • (The Star, 26 May 08)

12
  • Despite the plans imperfections, David Mizan is
    confident that if the city is able to provide
    easy accessibility, enough open space, and
    maintain adequate green areas KL will be able to
    sustain a large population.
  • (The Star, 26 May 08)

13
Does the plan promote sustainable development?
  • In KL, some believe the increase in density is
    the source of problems of poor quality of life,
    traffic jams, flooding, loss of green areas, lack
    of space, pollution, congestion and even
    unemployment.
  • One indicator of non-sustainable development is
    the small amount of public recreation space
    available.
  • (The Star, 26 May 08)

14
  • Not only does the local plan violates this, it
    arbitrarily imposes a 11sq metre per person by
    2020, and even has the audacity to suggest 23 of
    this has got to be made up of private open spaces
    because there is not enough public land.
  • (The Star, 26 May 08)

15
Strengthen existing laws to prohibit the
de-gazetting of forest reserves
  • The gazetted open spaces, recreational and
    sports facilities in KL in 2000 accounts for
    6.52 of the total KL land use, said MNSs
    vice-president, Datuk Dr Hashim Abdul Wahab.

Concerned ones Panel of speakers at the KL Green
Lung seminar organised by Malaysian Nature
Society. (The Star, 16 June 08)
16
  • However, if we were to add in the unused green
    areas or ungazetted land, the figure would
    increase up to 36 this will be most suitable
    towards reaching a world-class city status,
    Datuk Dr Hashim Abdul Wahab added.
  • (The Star, 16 June 08)

17
Transparency in the hearing process?
  • Who comprises the Public Opinion Hearing
    Committee (POHC)?
  • What were the selection criteria?
  • Who comprises the Final Decision-making Body?
  • How is the public assured that the final
    decisions are objective and independent?

18
City folks allege conflict of interest
  • CITY folks are shocked that the mayor of Kuala
    Lumpur has appointed Datuk Esa Mohamed as
    chairman of the Public Opinion Hearing Committee
    (POHC) that will hear the objections pertaining
    to the Draft KL City Plan 2020.

Esa He was one of the leading consultants hired
by the DBKL to draw up the draft plan.
19
  • Esa, a town planner and architect, was one of the
    leading consultants hired by the DBKL to draw up
    the the draft plan and he is also a City Hall
    Advisory Board member. The public is questioning
    the legality of the POHC and the Decision-making
    Committee.
  • Many fear that the people who made the proposals
    to the draft plan are ironically going to be the
    ones who decide on the hearing. They fear that
    this will lead to prejudice.
  • (The Star, May 21, 2008)

20
What do others say?
  • Local government expert Derek Fernandez said in
    other states the Town and Country Planning Act
    1976 (TCPA) is clear on the point that the person
    who proposes the draft is not the person who
    decides on it.
  • (The Star, May 21, 2008)

21
  • Town Planning expert Dr Kamaruzaman Ujang felt
    there is no conflict of interest at this stage.
    It is just an objection hearing and what is
    important is the appeal stage. People should be
    more concerned about this. If the same people are
    sitting there, than we have a problem.
  • (The Star, May 21, 2008)

22
So, lets see what we can do. ?
23
  • Tell your friends and neighbours or anyone who
    loves KL to
  • BEFORE 28 August 2008 contact
  • Coalition to Save Kuala Lumpur
  • (CSKL) secretariat
  • Thevi 012 221 2906
  • thevi.thevi_at_gmail.com
  • to sign the Draft KL Plan Objection Form. The
    more forms, the louder our voices!

24
This information was brought to you by
  • EMPOWER
  • (Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor)
  • Tel 03 7770 1475/ 03 7784 4977
  • Fax 03 7784 4978
  • Email empower05_at_gmail.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com