INTERTANKO Seminar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

INTERTANKO Seminar

Description:

INTERTANKO Seminar The Tanker World Today Tokyo 10 November 2004 Peter M. Swift The changing maritime landscape Politicization of technical regulation Threat to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Maris179
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: INTERTANKO Seminar


1
INTERTANKO Seminar The Tanker World Today Tokyo
10 November 2004 Peter M. Swift
2
The Tanker Industry THE POLITICAL SCENE
3
The changing maritime landscape
  • Politicization of technical regulation
  • Threat to authority of IMO
  • Threat to international law
  • Criminalisation of companies and seafarers

4
Regulations have contributed to improvement in
maritime safety...
5
..protection of life at sea
Source Lloyds Register Fairplay
6
and environmental protection
Quantity of oil spilled
Source International Tanker Owners' Pollution
Federation
7
...notwithstanding growth in size of maritime
trade
Source Fearnleys Review
8
Our AIMS / Key industry goals
  • Regulatory environment which supports safe
    shipping operations, environmental protection and
    adherence to internationally adopted standards
    and procedures
  • Properly considered international regulation of
    shipping
  • Global regulation for a global industry

9
Tanker industry
10
Increasing politicization of regulation
  • Examples
  • Phase out of single hull tankers
  • West European Particularly Sensitive Sea Area
  • Moves to open up CLC/FUND and link with
    substandard shipping
  • Maritime security (e.g hijacking of AIS)
  • Why? Port states versus flag states, and reduced
    influence of maritime constituency

11
HOW IT WAS Examples of positive regulatory
developments (the IMO spirit)
  • ISM Code and STCW (training)
  • post Estonia passenger ferry measures
  • IMO bulk carrier safety package
  • Development of ILO Super Convention
  • Outcomes broadly based on technical merits of
    arguments put forward. Industry viewpoint
    understood, if not always accepted.

12
HOW IT IS The Challenges Today
  • More political drivers and less consideration of
    the technical, operational, and commercial
    interests
  • More unworkable, inconsistent and illogical
    regulation and less consideration of the
    practical aspects
  • More pressure for local / regional regulation and
    less willingness to adopt and apply international
    regulation

13
Threat to authority of IMO
  • Global industry needs global regulation
  • IMO agreed to acceleration of single hull
    phase-out (twice), but under duress
  • EU Directives going beyond MARPOL
  • Interference of UN in New York genuine linkage
    to flag

14
CHALLENGES TO INDUSTRY GOVERNANCE International
vs. local, national and regional
  • Liability EU Penal Sanctions vs. International
    Conventions
  • Safety Environment EU (Post Erika Prestige)
    vs. IMO/Marpol SOLAS
  • Sulphur Levels / Air Emissions EU, USA vs. IMO
  • Security MTSA vs. ISPS
  • Ballast Water Management US et al vs. IMO

15
Threat to international law
  • Escorting of single hull tankers out of EEZ by
    Spain, France et al, in contravention of MARPOL
    and UNCLOS obligations
  • Detention of seafarers, e.g. in Spain and
    Pakistan in contravention of UNCLOS
  • European Commission suggestion that UNCLOS might
    be revised to alter the balance between flag
    states and coastal states.
  • Willingness of EU to implement measures in
    conflict with MARPOL

16
Criminalization
  • Imprisonment of seafarers (Captain Mangouras)
  • Activities of US Department of Justice (bounty
    for whistle blowers)
  • EU Directive on Criminal Sanctions (including
    accidental damage)
  • SUA (Suppression of Unlawful Acts) Convention

17
Action in Brussels
  • Dutch Presidency, New Commissioner and Commission
    staff, New Parliament and MEPs
  • Sulphur levels in fuels still a major issue
  • EMSA Double Hull panel making progress ?
  • New Maritime safety Package under discussion
    Erika III

18
Brussels - The main players
Commission (The executive)
EMSA
European Parliament (Direct election)
Council (Member States)
19
Interacting with the Commission
Jacques Barrot Commissioner for Transport
Francois Lamoureux
Director General
Director for maritime policy
M. Burgelle-Vernet S. Tostman Van Vreckem
Unit staff members
20
EU Maritime Safety Package
  • Marine Casualty Investigations in the EU
  • Amendment to Directive on Vessel Traffic
    Monitoring and Information
  • Liability and Compensation
  • Flag State Initiative
  • Recasting of Legislation on Port State Control
  • Maritime Labour Standards
  • But how about earlier programmes Places of
    Refuge, Ratification of Conventions, Alignment of
    EU Regulations with IMO revisions ?

21
Action in the US
  • Increasing support for signing UNCLOS
  • Presidential support for ratification of Annex VI
  • Overturning of proposals for escort tugs
  • BUT
  • Pressure at state and federal level for
    regulation of Air emissions, Ballast Water
    controls, Spill response and more
  • Massachusetts State Law

22
Action at the International Level
  • Ratification of Key Conventions
  • HNS / Bunker Convention / HNS-OPRC Protocol /
    AFS
  • Action on
  • Places of Refuge / Port Reception Facilities /
    Annex VI
  • Support for FLAG STATE AUDIT

23
Domo arigato Thank you ??????????
www.intertanko.com www.shippingfacts.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com