Studying AGN with high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Studying AGN with high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy

Description:

Studying AGN with high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy Jelle Kaastra SRON Nahum Arav, Ehud Behar, Stefano Bianchi, Josh Bloom, Alex Blustin, Graziella Branduardi ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: jellek
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Studying AGN with high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy


1
Studying AGN with high-resolution X-ray
spectroscopy
  • Jelle Kaastra
  • SRON
  • Nahum Arav, Ehud Behar, Stefano Bianchi, Josh
    Bloom, Alex Blustin, Graziella Branduardi-Raymont,
    Massimo Cappi, Elisa Costantini, Mauro Dadina,
    Rob Detmers, Jacobo Ebrero, Peter Jonker, Chris
    Klein, Jerry Kriss, Piotr Lubinski, Julien
    Malzac, Missagh Mehdipour, Stéphane Paltani,
    Pierre-Olivier Petrucci, Ciro Pinto, Gabriele
    Ponti, Eva Ratti, Katrien Steenbrugge, Cor de
    Vries

2
IntroductionThe influence of AGN outflows
  • Dispersal heavy elements into IGM ICM
  • Ionisation structure IGM
  • ??evolution host galaxy
  • How created? Structure? Mass energy?
    Confinement?
  • Crucial to understanding central engine
  • Accretion process
  • Energy budget

3
AGN outflows in a nutshell
  • Photo-ionised gas
  • v -100 to -1000 km/s
  • Seen through line and continuum absorption
  • Spectrum ? ionic column densities ? ionization
    parameter ?L/nr²
  • Kaastra et al. 2000

4
Photoionisation modelling
  • Radiation impacts a volume (layer) of gas
  • Different interactions of photons with atoms
    cause ionisation, recombination, heating
    cooling
  • In equilibrium, ionisation state of the plasma
    determined by
  • spectral energy distribution incoming radiation
  • chemical abundances
  • ionisation parameter ?L/nr2 with L ionising
    luminosity, n density and r distance from
    ionising source ? essentially ratio photon
    density / gas density

5
Question 1Structure outflow
  • Is it more like rather uniform density clouds in
    pressure equilibrium?
  • Or is it more like coronal streamers, with
    lateral density stratification?

6
Absorption measure distribution
Discrete components
Emission measure Column density
Continuous distribution
Ionisation parameter ?
Temperature
7
Separate components in pressure equilibrium?
  • Not all components in press. eq. (same ?)
  • Division into ? comps often poorly defined
  • ? Continuous NH(?) distribution?
  • Others fit discrete components
  • What's going on?

Steenbrugge et al. 2005
8
Question 2 Where is the gas?
  • Photo-ionization modeling ? ?L/nr²
  • L obtained from spectrum
  • ? only the product nr² known, not r or n
  • Is gas accelerating, decelerating?

9
Density estimates line ratios
  • C III has absorption lines near 1175 Å from
    metastable level
  • Combined with absorption line from ground (977 Å)
    this yields n
  • ? n 3x104 cm-3 in NGC 3783 (Gabel et al. 2004)
    ? r1 pc
  • Only applies for some sources, low ? gas
  • X-rays have similar lines, but sensitive to
    higher n (e.g. O V, Kaastra et al. 2004) no
    convincing case yet

10
Density estimates reverberation
  • If L increases for gas at fixed n and r, then
    ?L/nr² increases
  • ? change in ionisation balance
  • ? column density changes
  • ? transmission changes
  • Gas has finite ionisation/recombination time tr
    (density dependent as 1/n)
  • ? measuring delayed response yields tr?n?r

11
Reverberation NGC 3783
  • RGS data (Behar et al. 2003) no change in
  • Warm absorber ? nlt300 cm-3, rgt10 pc.
  • EPIC data (Reeves et al. 2003) change in
  • Warm absorber (larger columns) ? ngt108 cm-3,
    rlt0.02 pc.

12
Observation campaign Mrk 509
  • Core 10 x 60 ks XMM, spaced 4 days (RGS, EPIC
    OM all used!)
  • Simultaneous Integral 10 x 120 ks
  • Followed by 180 ks Chandra LETGS, simultaneous
    with 10 orbits COS (HST)
  • Preceded with Swift (UVOT, XRT) monitoring
  • Supplemented with ground-based (WHT, Pairitel)
    photometry grism
  • Period 4 Sept 13 Dec 2009 (100 days)
  • 7 papers submitted/accepted, 8 in progress

13
General data analysis issues
  • Excellent quality ? many new steps developed
  • RGS full usage multi-pointing mode, refinements
    combining spectra with variable hot pixels,
    ?-scale, effective area, reducing response 2Gb?8
    Mb, rebinning) See Kaastra et al. 2011 see
    auxilary programs in SPEX distribution
    www.sron.nl/spex
  • PN Triggered by our campaign improved gain cal
  • OM extended wavelength range optical grism
  • HST/COS extensive efforts to improve data
    analysis for this high-quality spectrum
  • SPEX allows simultaneous fitting high-res UV
    X-ray spectra

14
Broad-band spectrum variability(Mehdipour et
al., Petrucci et al., talks this afternoon)
15
Fe-K line variability(Ponti et al. talk
Petrucci et al.)
Line Intensity
  • Broad and neutral Fe K emission well correlated
    with continuum emission on few days time-scales.
  • No relativistic profile
  • Origin outer disc or inner BLR

3-10 keV flux
.
16
OM Grism spectrum
17
UV-optical variability(OM, Swift)
  • Source was in outburst (0.1 dex in UV) right in
    the middle of ourt campaign!

18
ISM absorption(talk Pinto et al. on Monday)
19
Abundances(Steenbrugge et al., poster G45)
20
COS FUSE UV Absorption lines in Mrk 509(Kriss
et al., talk this afternoon)
  • O VI,Lyß, Ly? from FUSE (Kriss et al. 2000)
  • 14 velocity components seen in COS UV spectrum
  • C IV doublet split by only 500 km/s, so grey
    regions cant be used for optical-depth
  • Red lines velocities X-ray absorbers
    XMM-Newton/RGS
  • Blue lines velocities X-ray absorbers
    Chandra/LETGS

21
LETGS COS data(Ebrero et al., poster G14)
  • X-rays outflow with 3 distinct ionization phases
    in form of multi-velocity wind. UV spectra
    absorption system with 13 kinematic components
  • Analysis kinematic properties column densities
    absorbers ? UV-absorbing gas co-located with
    embedded in lower density high-ionization X-ray
    absorbing gas

22
Stacked RGS spectrum
  • Galactic O I edge
  • Several narrow absorption lines
  • Detection 31 individual ions
  • Tight upper limits column densities 18 other ions
  • Two main velocity components (40 and -300 km/s)
  • Highly ionised ions in general higher velocity

23
No O I from host galaxy
O I host galaxy (not detected, NHlt5x1018 cm-2)
24
X-ray analysis in more detail
  • Fit spectra using a power law modified
    blackbody (or even a spline) continuum
  • Where needed, add emission lines BLR or NLR
    X-ray lines (no relativistic lines needed)
  • Fit warm absorber using a model ? ionic or total
    column densities
  • Using photo-ionisation model, derive absorption
    measure distribution NH(?)
  • Spectral fits done with SPEX, global fits

25
Sample high-resolution spectra
26
Example of broad emission lines
O VIII Lya
O VII triplet
27
Photoionisation modelling RGS spectrum(Detmers
et al. 2011)
Mehdipour et al. 2011
  • Use time-averaged SED
  • Test dependence on SED
  • Proto-solar abundances
  • Multiple ionisation, 3 velocity components
  • Same ion may be present in more than one
    velocity/ionisation component!

28
Discrete versus continuous absorption measure
distribution?
  • Column densities well approximated by sum of 5
    components (see table)
  • Higher column for higher ionisation parameter
  • But what about a continuous model?

E
D
C
A
B
29
Continuous model
  • Fitted columns with continuous (spline) model
  • Surprise comps C D pop-up as discrete
    components!
  • Upper limits FWHM 35 80
  • Component B ( A) too poor statistics to prove if
    continuous
  • Component E also poorer determined correlation ?
    and NH.

D
E
C
B
30
Where is the gas?
  • Needs t-dependent model
  • For each of the 5 components if L increases, ?
    must increase (as ?L/nr2)
  • From 10 continuum model fits ? predicted ? change
    for each of 10 observations, compared to average
    spectrum
  • If gas responds immediately, transmission outflow
    changes immediately

31
Expected response absorbers for 0.1 dex
luminosity increase
32
Time-dependent photo-ionisation
  • Time evolution ion concentrations ni
  • dni/dt Aij(t) nj
  • Aij(t) contains t-dependent ionisation
    recombination rates

33
Location photoionised gas(work in progress)
  • Component A Rotating, low ionisation disk high
    velocity outflow, 3 kpc (direct imaging O III
    5007, Philips 1986)
  • Component C gt10 pc (lack of response)
  • Component E gt 1 pc? (lack of response?)
  • See also Kriss (talk this afternoon) and poster
    Ebrero

34
Mass loss through the wind
v (km/s) -100 -1000
?1 0.001 0.0001
?1000 1.0 0.1
35
Conclusions
  • Deep, multi-wavelength monitoring campaigns (AGN)
    are rewarding
  • High quality spectra, not limited by statistics
  • Continuous light curves, allowing to monitor
    the variations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com