Regional and Global Preparedness for Global Warming Consequences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


PPT – Regional and Global Preparedness for Global Warming Consequences PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 4f72bc-YTI3N


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation

Regional and Global Preparedness for Global Warming Consequences


Regional and Global Preparedness for Global Warming Consequences Kentaro Tamura, Ph.D. United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) ASEAN Day for Disaster Management ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1631
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: anch3
Learn more at:


Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regional and Global Preparedness for Global Warming Consequences

Regional and Global Preparedness for Global
Warming Consequences
Kentaro Tamura, Ph.D. United Nations
Environmental Programme (UNEP)
  • ASEAN Day for Disaster Management (ADDM) Seminar
    Challenges Ahead and the Way Forward
  • 24-25 September 2007
  • Bangkok, Thailand

  • Problem Statement
  • Mitigation and Adaptation
  • Asias Vulnerability to Climate Change
  • Global Preparedness
  • International Climate Regime
  • Adaptation Work in UNFCCC/Kyoto Protocol
  • Regional Preparedness
  • Issues and Status of Mainstreaming in Asia
  • Way Forward

Part 1 Problem Statement
Mitigation and Adaptation
  • Prompt and serious efforts to reduce GHG
    emissions can mitigate the magnitude of negative
    impacts of climate change.
  • However,
  • Even the most stringent mitigation efforts cannot
    avoid severe impacts of climate changes in next
    few decades.
  • Thus,
  • We urgently need to
  • avoid the unmanageable (through mitigation), and
  • manage the unavoidable (through adaptation).

Goal of Adaptation
  • To improve capacity to cope with
  • Current climate hazards (e.g., floods, droughts,
  • Established changes in climate (e.g., increasing
    temperature, decreasing precipitation)
  • Specific anticipated changes in climate (e.g., 30
    cm sea-level rise by 2025)
  • Unspecified anticipated changes (e.g., decreased
    revenues from tourism at the coastal zone or
    mountainous area)

Asias vulnerability to climate change (1) (SPM
WG II, IPCCC, 2007)
  • Climate change is projected to impinge on
    sustainable development of most developing
    countries of Asia.
  • Freshwater availability particularly in large
    river basins is projected to decrease. It could
    adversely affect more than a billion people in
    the 2050s.
  • Increase in agricultural water demand by 6-10 or
    more for every 1 centigrade rise in temperature

Asias vulnerability to climate change (2)
  • The risk of hunger is projected to remain very
    high in several countries. Crop yields could
    decrease up to 30 in Central and South Asia.
  • Coastal areas will be at greatest risk due to
    increased flooding from the sea and in some
    mega-deltas flooding from the rivers.
  • Loss of 2500 km2 mangroves in Asia with 1m sea
    level rise

Asias Vulnerability to Climate Change (3)
Percentage of Estimates
Source CSIRO, 2006
Based on 186 studies
Asias vulnerability to climate change (4)
  • The design and implementation of adaptation
    measures to address the needs of vulnerable
    countries has become more and more pressing.
  • ? A key challenge
  • How and to what extent have international
    community and Asian countries been preparing for
    addressing climate change consequences?

Part 2 Global Preparedness
International Climate Regime (1)
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
  • Review scientific research and offer assessments
    of climate change and its impacts
  • 4 Assessment Reports
  • UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
  • Overall framework for intergovernmental efforts
    to tackle the challenge posed by climate change
  • Near universal membership of 191 countries having
  • Ultimate goal is to prevent dangerous human
    intervention with the climate system
  • Kyoto Protocol to UNFCCC
  • Legally-binding emission reduction commitments
    for Annex I Parties (developed countries)
  • First commitment period (2008-2012)
  • Discussions on post-2012 regime

International Climate Regime (2)
  • Group of Eight (G8) Summit
  • Climate change became a prime agenda for the
    Gleneagles Summit (2005)
  • Gleneagles Dialogue
  • Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and
    Climate (APP)
  • Launched in 2005
  • US-led initiative, consisting of 6 countries
    (Australia, China, India, Japan, South Korea, and
    U.S.) producing half of the worlds GDP
  • technology-oriented public-private partnership
  • Various multilateral, regional and bilateral

Climate Regime at a Glance
1988 1990 1992 1994 1995
1997 2001 2004
US-led Initiatives
Climate Regime at a Glance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
2011 2012
Other forums
EU-ETS (Phase I)
EU-ETS (Phase II)
Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and
Climate (APP)
Other multilateral / bilateral / local initiatives
Adaptation-related Articles in UNFCCC (1)
  • Article 4.1 (b), (e), and (f)
  • Commitments for all Parties consider the impacts
    of climate change in social, economic and
    environmental policies and actions.
  • Article 4.1 (g), (h), and (j)
  • Requests for all Parties to cooperate, exchange
    and communicate information related to
  • Articles 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.7, 4.8, and 4.9
  • Funding to assist developing countries in meeting
    various commitments of Article 4.1
  • Funding incremental costs of developing
    countries implementation of adaptation measures

Adaptation-related Articles in UNFCCC (2)
  • Articles 4.8 and 4.9
  • Support for small island developing countries,
    countries with low-lying coastal areas, countries
    prone to natural disasters, drought and
    desertification etc. and LDCs
  • Article 12.3
  • Request for developed countries to incorporate
    details of measures taken under Article 4.3, 4.4,
    and 4.5 in their National Communications.
  • Article 21
  • Global Environment Facility (GEF) serves as the
    financial mechanism of the UNFCCC for both
    mitigation and adaptation.

Evolving Focus on Adaptation (1)
  • Compared with mitigation, adaptation is much less
    developed as an intl policy response in various
  • Definition
  • Policy objectives
  • Standard measures
  • Base year/baseline
  • Legal, institutional structures

Evolving Focus on Adaptation (2)
  • However,
  • Emergence of adaptation as a policy priority at
    the intl level
  • 2001 Third Assessment Report of IPCC
  • Climate change impacts are already becoming
  • 2001 (COP7) Creation of funds
  • Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF) to finance
    both adaptation and mitigation activities
  • Least Development Countries Fund (LDCF) to
    finance the preparation and implementation of
    national adaptation programmes of action (NAPAs)
  • Adaptation Fund to finance adaptation project
    and programmes in developing countries ratifying
    the Kyoto Protocol

Evolving Focus on Adaptation (3)
  • 2002 (COP8) Delhi Declaration on Climate Change
    and Sustainable Development
  • Adaptationis of high priority for all countries.
  • 2004 (COP10) Buenos Aires programme of work on
    adaptation and response measures
  • 2006 (COP12) Nairobi work program on impacts,
    vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change

Evolving Focus on Adaptation (4)
  • A series of modest steps in terms of efforts to
    improve understanding of vulnerability, impacts
    and adaptation
  • A question of how to implement and finance
    adaptation projects remains as a challenge.
  • Investments needed for adaptation are likely to
    be tens of billions of dollars per year several
    decades from now.
  • Less likely to raise sufficient amounts,
    especially if contributions are voluntary.

Adaptation Costs Some Estimates
  • Costs of climate-proofing investments in
    developing countries USD 9-41 bn/yr (World Bank)
  • Minimum costs of adaptation USD 50 bn/yr (Oxfam)
  • Additional costs
  • Scaling up NGO community-based initiatives 7.5
  • Scaling up urgent adaptation needs 8-33 bn
  • Other hidden costs
  • USD 28-67 bn in 2030 (Smith, UNFCCC Dialogue on
    Long-term Cooperative Action)

Financial Availability in the Current Regime
Status as of April 2007 Type of committ Total funds mobilized Unpaid contribu-tions and pledges Cumula-tive funds collected
1. Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF) voluntary US62.1m US9.1m US53.0m
2. Least Developed Countries Fund (LDC Fund) voluntary US115.8m US53.6m US62.2m
3. Strategic Priority on Adaptation (SPA funded by GEF Trust Fund) voluntary US50m US50m
4. Adaptation Fund A share of proceeds from CDM projects Best estimate of US450m by 2012
Part 3 Regional Preparedness
How to prepare? Mainstreaming
  • What is mainstreaming?
  • Integration of concerns on adaptation to current
    and future impacts of climate change in on-going
    sectoral and development planning and
  • Why is mainstreaming necessary?
  • To ensure that current projects are no longer at
    risk from climate change
  • To ensure that future projects are consciously
    aimed at reducing vulnerability
  • To use resources effectively and efficiently
  • To ensure consistency between national/local
    priorities and adaptation needs

Approaches for Mainstreaming
  • Entry points
  • National Communications, NAPAs
  • Incorporating adaptation concerns in national
    Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP),
    National Environmental Action Plans (NEAP), and
    Millennium Development Goal (MDG) plans
  • Integrating in national economic planning and
    budgetary processes
  • Strengthening coordination on adaptation issues
    among sectors
  • Linking adaptation strategies with disaster risk

Progress on Mainstreaming
  • Most National Communications are strongly skewed
    towards GHG inventories/mitigation.
  • NAPA process in some LDCs (e.g., Bangladesh)
    seems to have served as catalyst in mainstreaming
    adaptation concerns at least in planning stages
  • Development agencies have just begun to support
    mainstreaming efforts (WB, GTZ, OECD, JBIC etc)

Coverage on adaptation policies and measures as
reflected by number of pages in National
Communications of selected Asian countries
Source Ancha Srinivasan 2006
Mainstreaming Gaps and Concerns (1)
  • Lack of awareness among policy makers about
    climate change impacts and their economic and
    social implications in each sector.
  • Mismatch between the temporal and spatial scales
    of climate change projections and information
    needs of sector planners
  • Very few climate models can predict rainfall
    patterns in Asian countries with certainty or on
    timescales relevant to policy makers

Mainstreaming Gaps and Concerns (2)
  • Institutional fragmentation and resulting
    communication barriers among ministries
  • Different ministries are involved in
  • vulnerability and adaptation assessment,
  • disaster risk management,
  • rural development,
  • poverty alleviation, and
  • land-use regulation
  • Lack of ownership of an adaptive approach to
    future risks due to donor-driven projects

So, what is the statue of preparedness?
  • Increasing attention has begun to be paid to
    adaptation, while the current international
    climate regime is largely geared toward
    mitigation so far.
  • To move forward, several challenges remain.
  • Negotiation challenges
  • Financing challenges
  • Mainstreaming challenges

Way Forward (1)
  • Climate regime should enhance the focus on
    adaptation to a similar level, if not more, as
    that of mitigation.
  • Mobilising additional resources for adaptation
  • Building human and institutional capacity
  • Strengthening support for more detailed
    vulnerability assessment
  • Practical, on-the-ground demonstrations on
    promising mainstreaming options, rather than
    theoretical approaches
  • Supporting efforts to document such
    demonstrations as a way to promote capacity
  • Database on Local Coping strategy at UNFCCC site

Way Forward (2)
  • UNFCCC and other organisations to play catalytic
    role in exchange of experiences, and in
    facilitating the development of region-wide and
    sector-wide approaches
  • Promoting synergies among climate, development
    and disaster risk management mechanisms to
    develop seamless, efficient efforts to deal with
    climate hazards
  • International level
  • Domestic level

Thank You.
Projected Emissions from Annex I and Non-Annex I
Parties and Stabilization Paths
Note Calculated by AIM
Large reduction in global GHG emissions are
All Sectors and regions have the potential to