Net Neutrality: A must in a free society - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Net Neutrality: A must in a free society

Description:

... Behind the Movement for Net Neutrality. Retrieved from http://www.heartland.org/publications/policy%20studies/article/26061/ 12. Preston, Jason ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: fgcu
Learn more at: http://ruby.fgcu.edu
Category:
Tags: free | net | neutrality | society

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Net Neutrality: A must in a free society


1
Net Neutrality A must in a free society
  • Joseph Haynes
  • Greg Belle
  • Nick Dzierzeski

2
Definition of the Internet
  • A system connecting networks around the world
    using TCP/IP, which stands for Transmission
    Control Protocol/Internet Protocol, a set of
    standards for transmitting and receiving digital
    data. The Internet consists primarily of the
    collection of billions of interconnected
    computers (Economides 2008).

3
How the Internet Works
As you can see, your ISP is what connects your
computer to the internet, which other computers
and servers connect to via their ISP. There are
several ways to connect to the ISP, which include
using a dial-up modem over a phone line, cable,
or satellite.
4
Definition of Net Neutrality
  • Net Neutrality is a network design paradigm that
    argues for broadband network providers to be
    completely detached from what information is sent
    over their networks.

5
This chart shows the worlds Internet
restrictions. Internet black holes mean that data
information is really sucked up in a void meaning
that it is there but it will just keep coming and
coming. A lot of smaller under developed
countries surveillance their Internet like Iran
that blocks twitter feeds because of the recent
Iran elections. Some countries as you can see
have minor or no restrictions on the Internet.
6
Our Stance on Net Neutrality
  • We, as a group, are for net neutrality, keeping
  • the internet the same as it was since its
  • inception.

7
Table of Contents
  • History of the Internet
  • History of Net Neutrality
  • Seven Reasons Why the Internet should be Neutral
  • Politics and Net Neutrality
  • Economy and Net Neutrality
  • Religion and Net Neutrality
  • Philosophy and Net Neutrality
  • Culture and Net Neutrality
  • Legality and Net Neutrality
  • Arguments against Net Neutrality

8
History of the Internet
  • In 1934 the Communications Act became law. First
    attempt to regulate phone lines by FCC.
  • Vannevar Bush first proposed the basics of
    hypertext in 1945.
  • In 1958, Bell System announced its Data Phone
    service using regular phones circuits (Anderberg
    2007).
  • In 1962, DARPA lead the way in developing the
    Internet.

9
History of Internet Pt. 2
  • In 1969, the network known as ARPANET was created
    to connect 4 databases owned by universities in
    the southwestern U.S.
  • In 1989, the Internet grew in popularity as its
    host amount breaks 100,000.
  • Hypertext Markup Language (First Version of HTML)
    was formally published on June 1993.
  • In 1994, the Internet grew by 341,634

10
History of Internet Pt. 3
  • In 2003, the phrase network neutrality was
    coined when Law Professor Tim Wu presented a
    paper at the Silicon Flatirons conference in
    Boulder Colorado.
  • In 2004, the FCC gained control of the
    telecommunication industry, introduced the Four
    Freedoms
  • In 2006, Net Neutrality hit mainstream with the
    musician Moby appearing at a Capitol Hill press
    conference

11
History of Internet Pt. 4
  • In 2006, a bill was struck down when the House
    voted 269-152 to reject Representative Ed
    Markeys net neutrality amendment to the COPE
    telecom reform bill, HB 5252.
  • In 2007, the Internet giant Google finally flexed
    its muscles with its hiring of former MCI
    lobbyist Rick Whitt.
  • In 2008, the FCC made a critical decision when it
    found by a 3-2 vote Comcast guilty of violating
    Internet principles. In September of the same
    year, Comcast filed an appeal to the FCCs
    actions.

12
The Seven Reasons for N.N.
  1. Economic Recovery and Prosperity
  2. Free Speech
  3. Civic Participation
  4. Marketplace of Ideas
  5. Social Justice
  6. Rise of Telecom companies
  7. Political Opportunity

13
Senator Ted Stevens
  • Senator Ted Stevens (Chairmen of commerce) which
    means he is in charge of commerce over the
    internet. He has a limited understanding of the
    Internet and Net Neutrality (Stevens 2009). John
    Stewart explains the epic failure that is Ted
    Stevens
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vgfga4bFIUoc

14
Politics Net Neutrality
  • Most democrats agree with net neutrality and
    republicans disagree with it. Republicans are
    telling Obama that net Neutrality laws are
    harmful (Karr 2009). Let it be known the net was
    neutral since its beginning. The way the internet
    is now is the way it always has been. Our stance
    is it should stay this way.

15
Economic Contributions Against Net Neutrality
These are companies that have shown top
contributions of money to representative
republican Joe Barton of Texas for fighting
against net neutrality. These are the top
companies who help run the Internet.
16
Economics
  • Net Neutrality is the building block of the
    abundance-based economy on the Internet.
    Significantly effecting the dollars that we would
    have back in our pockets, online publishers
    would, under Net Neutrality be able to raise
    its cost of publishing back to its former level.
    When Net Neutrality ends, the monopoly begins
    again. Sites like West Seattle Blog are
    profitable because of this reason.

17
Economics Continued..
  • The nightmare situation of having to pay a
    company like Comcast to keep the Blog would
    effectively put the blog out of business. As of
    now, publishing is essentially free. The only
    thing that you need is a monthly internet
    service. If the old economics come back to the
    forefront, preferential treatment will come from
    customers who pay. Only larger news organizations
    would be able to afford the cost of ensuring
    website in peoples homes (Preston 2009).

18
Religion Net Neutrality
  • Relating to the economics of Net Neutrality, the
    religious aspects of Net Neutrality would be
    extremely affected if legislation is not passed.
  • Under the Bush administration, the religious
    right blog and evangelical social networking
    lines were withering away.
  • Without Network Neutrality, leaders of all
    religions would have harder times reaching out to
    people outside their normal congregation
    (Religious 2009).

19
Religion Net Neutrality Continued..
  • Huge controversy was unleashed when Comcast
    blocked the King James Bible. Comcast was also
    accused for suppressing Christians in China by
    blocking online programs and other organizations
    from reaching Chinas people (Jones 2008).

20
Philosophy Net Neutrality
  • The philosophy of Net Neutrality is broken up
    into three course beliefs.
  • First, Digital technology, if unshackled is a
    powerful means for creating an egalitarian
    society.
  • Secondly, the end-to-end design of the Internet
    is open to innovation.

Continued on Next Page
21
Philosophy Net Neutrality Continued.
  • Third, and lastly, market players should not
    control the Internet (Cleland 2009). Those who
    believe in Network Neutrality generally have a
    strong stance on the freedom of speech. The
    people on Network Neutrality also want to make it
    clear that they do not want to force ISPs to
    avoid differentiating themselves. What they
    dont want is for them to do it in ways that is
    determined out of bounds (Anderson 2009).

22
Culture Net Neutrality
  • Our culture is a very dynamic one. Throughout
    the years it has seen many changes in fact our
    culture has drastically changed even in the past
    100 years. Although many cultural changes are
    brought about by world events, even more changes
    are brought by technological innovations, such as
    the internet.

23
Culture Net Neutrality Continued
  • The way our culture communicates has been
    changed by the internet. Never before has
    instant communication from countries from all
    over the world been possible in such a new way.
    This opens the issue of Net Neutrality with
    countries who wish to censor or silence their
    populace.

24
Culture Net Neutrality Continued
  • One recent example that immediately comes to
    mind was the debated Iranian election. Public
    outrage ensued when Mahmoud Ahmadi Nejad was
    re-elected in what seemed to be a rigged vote.
    The public of Iran rushed to the Internet posting
    pictures and videos from their phones from the
    protests. This was regarded as one of the first
    time a major protest was displayed in such a way.
    Thousands of people in Iran posted up to the
    minute updates on their Twitter pages,
    detailing police brutalities among other things.
    This is where net neutrality comes in, as the
    government started shutting down access to the
    Internet to quiet the public.

25
Legal Issues
  • Who has the right to hold the reigns to the
    Internet? Do the telecommunication companies own
    the Internet?
  • The answer is no. Telecommunication companies
    are merely a means to an end. In other words,
    they are merely the gateway to the Internet they
    dont own the Internet themselves.
  • Telecommunication companies should be concerned
    with providing the best product to their
    customers rather than limiting their output. If
    they decide to change the current system,
    assuredly the people would not stand for it,
    nobody wants a regulated Internet (Press 2006).

26
Legal Issues Continued
  • For fair market competition, internet service
    providers should be able to facilitate a similar
    experience for a similar price across the board,
    otherwise connecting to the internet will become
    a monopoly scheme directed towards the highest
    bidding telecommunication company that provides
    the best plan.

27
Arguments Against Net Neutrality
  • Argument
  • Net Neutrality would keep broadband access
    providers from offering more than one service
  • Rebuttal
  • With Net Neutrality, you are offered a choice.
    If the internet was not neutral you would be
    forced to utilize certain products dictated by
    the service provider, to illustrate this
    metaphorically, this would be like being forced
    to use Pepsi or Coke depending on the restaurants
    (internet service provider) you are utilizing.
  • But the difference between Internet service
    providers restaurants is that you have the
    freedom to go to a different restaurant or store
    to obtain your preferred soda. If where you live
    determines what service provider you use, or if
    the government of your country is running the
    internet, there is no where for you to turn to
    get the products or services you desire
    (websites, etc.)

28
Arguments Against Net Neutrality Continued
  • ATT claims that 5 of its users use over 50 of
    the bandwidth. Sandvine reports that over 44 of
    its Internet traffic comes from file sharing.
    While these numbers may sound drastic, they still
    do not justify discrimination on the Internet.
    Claiming the fears of people to be irrational,
    those who oppose Network Neutrality do not look
    at the possible scenarios of a broadband future
    (Davis 2009).

29
Concluding Statements
  • In conclusion, the Internet should be a neutral
    place for all of its users. Not all cars are
    created are the same, but all should be allowed
    on the highway. The same is true with Internet
    traffic. File sharing and increased usage, as
    well as profits are all issues to the Internet
    corporations. What this is about, though, is the
    consumer. Its the consumer that the corporations
    should cater too, and its the consumer that
    counts.

30
This Presentation was brought to you by.
31
Works Cited
  • 1. Anderberg, Anthony (2007). History of the
    Internet and Web. Retrieved 10/10/09
    from http//www.anderbergfamily.net/ant/history/
  •  
  • 2. Anderson, Nate (2009) Network Neutrality or
    Network Neutering. Retrieved from
    http//arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/09/ed
    itorial-network-neutrality-or-network-neutering.ar
    s
  •  
  • 3. Cicconi, Jim (2008) Net Neutrality A
    Historical Timeline Sidecut Reports. Retrieved
    10/10/09 from http//www.sidecutreports.com/2008/1
    1/16/net neutrality-a-historical-timeline/
  •  
  • Cleland, Scott (2009) Neutralism Identifying the
    Commons Ideology behind Net Neutrality. Received
    from http//docs.google.com/gview?avqcache3AAG
    iK2dDJVsgJ3Awww.n tcompetition.org2FNeutralism_t
    he_ideology_behind_net_neutrality.pdfm aningbehi
    ndnetneutralityhlenglussigAFQjCNHiOFb4JPbU
    Km2I VuRBAxWqgMncApli1
  • 5. Davis, Christopher (2009) Net Neutrality
    Good for a few, Bad for most. Retrieved from
    http//wistechnology.com/articles/6649/
  •   
  • 6. Economides, Nicholas (2008). "Net
    Neutrality", Non-Discrimination and
    Digita Distribution of Content Through the
    Internet . Retrieved 10/10/09, from
    aei brookings.org
  •   
  • 7. Howe, Walt (2009). A Brief History of the
    Internet. Retrieved 10/10/09. From http//www.walt
    howe.com/navnet/history.html
  •   

32
Works Cited
  • 8. Jones, Lawrence (2008) Christian Coalition
    Backs New Neutrality at FCC Hearing. Retrieved
    from http//www.christianpost.com/article/20080420
    /christian-coalition-backs net-neutrality-at-fcc-h
    earing/index.html
  •  
  • 9. Karr, Tim (2009) Seven Reasons Why We Need
    Net Neutrality Now. Retrieved 10/12/09 from
    http//www.huffingtonpost.com/timothy-karr/seven-r
    easons-why we-need_b_250175.html
  •   
  • 10. Kristula, Dave (2001) The History of the
    Internet. Retrieved 10/10/09 from http//www.daves
    ite.com/webstation/net-history.shtml
  •  
  • 11. Lakely, James (2009) The Strange Philosophy
    Behind the Movement for Net Neutrality.
    Retrieved from http//www.heartland.org/publicatio
    ns/policy20studies/article/26061/
  •  
  • 12. Preston, Jason (2009) Why the Future of New
    Brands Hinges on Net Neutrality.Retrieved from
    http//eatsleeppublish.com/why-thefuture of-
    news-brands-hinges-on-net-neutrality/
  •   
  • 13. Singel, Ryan, September 21, 2009 GOP
    Senators Move to Stop Obama Net Neutrality Rules
    http//www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/09/republican
    net-neutratlity-amendment/
  •  
  •  
  • 14. (2009) Religious Connections. Retrieved
    From http//www.baptistplanet.com/2009/09/net
    -neutrality-and-religion.html
  •  
  • 15. March 17, 2009, www.Youtube.com, Ted Stevens
    Tubes http//www.youtube.com/watch?vgfga4bFIUoc
  •  
  • 16. United Press (2006) Experts speak out
    against Network Neutrality. Retrieved from
    http//www.physorg.com/news70725523.html

33
Charts and Graphs
34
  • This graph explains the different bit rates
    experienced by countries with different laws on
    net neutrality. Japan, as you can see puts their
    top priority on the speed of their internet.

35
(No Transcript)
36
  • This graph shows the growing interest of those
    seeking the topic choice of net neutrality. The
    increased awareness caused by celebrities such as
    Moby have brought it to the forefront. Now, it is
    the subject of much debate.

37
(No Transcript)
38
  • As stated previously, the video downloading
    amount has largely increased with the increase in
    bandwidth. This graph illustrates the growing
    demands of the internet and the pressures of
    companies such as Comcast and ATT to limit
    bandwidth usage.

39
(No Transcript)
40
  • Once again, the failure of the United States to
    keep a competent, high speed internet is
    realized. Net Neutrality along with a better
    broadband infrastructure will help the US compete
    in the global Internet race.

41
(No Transcript)
42
  • Effectively showing why those who oppose Net
    Neutrality are misinformed, daily internet
    traffic by 95 of internet users falls in the
    middle of the graph while the remaining few fall
    below or above in the heavy users area in the top
    right corner. This shows there is no reason to
    limit bandwidth. Instead, the United States
    should build a faster internet that keeps up with
    the countries demands.

43
(No Transcript)
44
  • This Verizon ad shows the works of those who seek
    to limit the amount of internet usage. With the
    less expensive plan, a small amount of
    downloadable information is aloud while the more
    expensive plan offers more but a still limited
    download plan.

45
(No Transcript)
46
  • To clear up rumors, this graph breaks down
    internet usage with the use of a pie chart. The
    information shows that while fire sharing carries
    29 of the usage, this is not a reason to allow
    companies to sabotage our internet rights.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com