Title: Managed Breeding for Conservation: Sustainability of Ex Situ Populations
1Managed Breeding for ConservationSustainability
of Ex Situ Populations
- Kevin Zippel - CBSG/WAZA
- Amphibian Program Officer
Materials produced by
R. Andrew Odum, Curator Department of
Herpetology Toledo Zoological Society
2Why do we maintain records?
3Records are kept
- To manage a collection
- To manage multiple collections in coordination
(population management) - To learn about the animals in our charges (Do
Science)
4Records are kept
Records are kept as part of our
responsibilities for the animals in our charges
5Data for Collection Management
- Identifiers
- Sex
- Parentage
- Where are they
- Who are they with
- What they did while they were here
- Husbandry
- Medical
6Data for population management
- Genetic
- parentage
- Demographic
- Sex
- Location
- Immigration
- Emigration
- Births
- Deaths
7Records for Population Management
You guys sound like a bunch of treefrogs! They
are both important!
Genetic data is most important!
- Genetic Data
- Demographic Data
No! Demographic data is most important!
8Minimal Data Set
- How Obtained (demographic)
- Arrival Data (demographic)
- Sex (demographic)
- Birth Date (demographic)
- Parents (genetic)
9Minimal Data Set
- Death date (demographic)
- Departure data (demographic)
- Specimen Identification (acc. , pit tag,
photograph, etc.)
10Why do we cooperatively manage populations?
- For preservation of genetic diversity (GD) for
the future (The Ark) - For future reintroduction
- To efficiently utilize captive resources
11Preserve Gene Diversity
- Maintain a specific amount of Gene Diversity (GD)
for a specific amount of time - e.g. 90 for 100 years
THE ARK
12SPARKS
13PM-2000
14Managed vs. Unmanaged
- Arabian oryx
- N 13 in 1965
- 10 founders
- N 416 in 1995
- Stable
- 92 gene diversity
- Ne/N 0.30
- Mean Inbreeding0.07
- Markhor
- N 35 in 1965
- 11 founders
- N 81 in 1995
- Unstable
- 86 gene diversity
- Ne/N 0.07
- Mean Inbreeding0.19
15All populations fluctuatestable populations
fluctuate little.
- 100 _at_ 10 100 _at_ 50
- x 0.90 90 x 0.50 50
- x 1.10 99 x 1.50 75
- x 0.90 89 x 0.50 38
- x 1.10 98 x 1.50 56
- x 0.90 88 x 0.50 28
- x 1.10 97 x 1.50 42
Good years dont cancel bad years
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18Projection of dolphin population Initial N
100 K 200
19Projection of dolphin population Initial N 10
K 20
20Carrying Capacity (N)
Founders
Time
Expansion Phase
Maintenance Phase
N
21Factors that effect N from one census to the next
Tomorrow
Today
22Loss of Gene Diversity by DriftThe problem with
small populations
Unrelated Animals
Allele C is lost
23Loss of gene diversity due to drift
1000
500
250
Gene Diversity
100
N
50
10
Generation
24Inbreeding
I love my cousin
- Mating between relatives
- Reduces gene diversity (GD)
- Greatly increases probability of expressing
deleterious alleles - Reversible
25Inbreeding
26Inbreeding Depression
X is a rare deleterious allele
27Inbreeding reduces fitness
Look What I Made Now!
28Inbred vs. Non-Inbred Crested Wood Partridges at
MN Zoo
- 8 reduction in egg volume
- 10 reduction in egg weight
- 20 reduction in hatch rate
- 51 reduction in 30 day survival
- Inbred birds have 41 more medical notes than do
their non-inbred counterparts!
29Inbreeding is Reversible
- If an inbred animal is bred with an unrelated
animal, the resulting offspring are not inbred
Outbreeding
30Outbreeding
8 is not inbred, but GD is lost
31The Bad vs. The Good
- Small populations
- Few breeders
- Isolationist, possessive management
- Little or no genetic management
- Poor records
- Larger populations
- More breeders
- Cooperative management
- Careful genetic management
- Good records
32Population Management Goals
- Maintain 90 gene diversity for 100 years
- Defined target population size
- Founders vs. offspring
- Stable numbers
- Stable age distribution
- Avoid inbreeding, drift
- Maximize Ne/N
33How is managed breeding achieved?
- data collected
- compiled at institution - ARKS IV
- compiled internationally - ISIS (future ZIMS)
- polished by studbook keeper - SPARKS
- management recommendations - PM2000
- population modeling - VORTEX
34Data to collect
- Provenance
- Genetic
- Parentage
- Demographic
- Gender
- Birth/capture date
- Immigration
- Emigration
- Births/Breeding behavior/Development
- Deaths
35(No Transcript)
36Studbooks
- 300 Population Management Plans (PMPs)
- Designated Population Manager keeps studbook and
makes management recommendations - 90 Species Survival Plans (SSPs)
- Species Coordinator Management Group
- elected committee, outside advisors
- Established genetic goals for 50-100 years
- Participation required of AZA member zoos
- Field Conservation integral to program
371. Quantify InbreedingThe Inbreeding Coefficient
(F)
How to Make Breeding Recommendations?
- F probability that homologous alleles at a
random locus are identical by descent
38Inbreeding Coefficient
392. Select breeding pairs using the principle of
inbreeding coefficient to determine relatedness
How to Make Breeding Recommendations?
40How related are we?Kinship
413. Calculate Mean Kinship the average of all
the kinships of an animal to the rest of the
population
How to Make Breeding Recommendations?
42MK of PedigreeALL ANIMALS LIVING
MK0.225
MK0.4125
MK0.3375
MK0.05
MK0.3875
MK0.2275
7 is the most important animal
43Mean Kinship
- Determines Best Pairings
- Determines Animals to Surplus
44(No Transcript)
45(No Transcript)
46(No Transcript)
47Incomplete data
- May remove animals from analysis process
- May create errors in analysis
- May prevent analysis
48Incorrect data
- May create significant errors in analysis
- Usually hurts captive population
49The Future Applying Our Knowledge
- Cooperation among institutions
- Larger populations, backup
- More breeders
- Careful genetic management
- Population planning
- Group management
- Good records
50Population Management is Balanced on Good Records
Demography
Genetics
GOOD RECORDS
Husbandry