The development of ultrasonic technologies for solving subsea condition monitoring challenges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

The development of ultrasonic technologies for solving subsea condition monitoring challenges

Description:

The development of ultrasonic technologies for solving subsea condition monitoring challenges Our subsea CEM will be availiable different configurations. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: KOTHARIPR63
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The development of ultrasonic technologies for solving subsea condition monitoring challenges


1
The development of ultrasonic technologies for
solving subsea condition monitoring challenges
2
Going Subsea means new challenges
  • Subsea Trees
  • Subsea Pumps
  • Subsea Processing
  • Subsea Manifolds
  • Subsea Templates
  • Subsea
  • ROV Tie-in Systems
  • Risers
  • Pipelines

3
ClampOn
  • Ultrasonic Intelligent Sensors
  • Sand Monitoring
  • PIG Detection
  • Leak Monitoring
  • Vibration Monitoring
  • Condition Monitoring
  • Corrosion-Erosion Monitoring
  • Well Collision Detector

4
Design Life 30 years
  • The systems are installed down to thousands of
    meters water depth
  • It costs a fortune in lost production if a sensor
    breaks down
  • So how should a reliable system be designed?

5
ClampOns Subsea Philosophy
Titanium body Jumper interface High pressure
chamber with silicon oil Glass-metal
penetrator Atmospheric chamber Electronic beam
weldings No o-rings, gaskets or mechanical
seals!
6
Working Principle Passive Acoustic sensors
  • An advanced microphone picking up signal at
    specific frequencies
  • Filters out noise not related to signal of
    interest(i.e. flow, mechanical noise etc.)
  • Non-intrusive design can be retrofitted
  • Immediate results real time readings
  • Used for sand, pig and leak detection

7
Sand Monitoring
  • Keep sand production under control!(planned or
    unplanned)
  • Optimize production (ref. MSFR and MASR)
  • Minimize sand removal cost
  • Avoid erosion issuesSafety, Maintenance cost,
    Environmental consequences
  • Avoid reservoir damageor even well collapse?
  • Always subsea on subsea trees!

8
What can a sand detector do?
  • Qualitative MeasurementNo need for other input
    Standalone system
  • Sand AlarmFirst sand production, screen failure
    etc.
  • Sand production trendingFinding Maximum Sand
    Free Rate (MSFR)
  • Quantitative Measurement Requires input of flow
    data / flow speed
  • How much sand are you producing
  • Finding Maximum Acceptable Sand Rate (MASR)

9
Example Subsea vs. Topside
A comparison of the signals from the subsea- and
the topside sensors - shows a significant
difference in both signal amplitude and time!
10
Challenging data?
11
ClampOn SandQ
  • Makes quantification of sand possible without
    external flow information input
  • Uses active transmission to measure velocity

12
SandQ Subsea
  • SandQ will have the same basic design layout as
    the DSP Compact
  • Rated for 3000 Meters
  • SandQ subsea with same specifications as topside
    model
  • Simultaneous measurement of Particles, Flow and
    Vibration 3D
  • Designed for installation in existing funnel/clamp

13
Subsea PIG Detector
Deepwater version Compact version
14
ClampOn DSP PIG Detector
  • Real time detection of PIG passing.
  • Can monitor the debris in-front / after the PIG
    when passing.
  • Indicates the efficiency of the PIG cleaning
    operation.

15
ClampOn DSP Leak Monitor
  • Identification of leaks from critical areas,
    primarily valves.
  • Quantifies leaks
  • Detects internal leaks in a valve
  • Can also be used on flanges, bends, joints etc.

Picture 1, A Leak Monitor mounted on a PSV in the
pressure bench at Statoils Kollsnes Refinery.
16
Case
  • Challenge
  • Two subsea 20 ball valves that have not been
    operated for 25 years!
  • The two flow lines have different pressure rating
  • Client need to increase the export in the flow
    line
  • The cross over should be closed and no cross-flow
    should be present acceptance criteria was 5
    SCM/h (similar to a new valve!)
  • The installation is at 200 meters water depth and
    all operations should be ROV operable

17
Tampen Link
18
ClampOn Leak Detector w/data logger and Battery.
Operates for 45 days. Dual element system 4
data point stored every minute Pressure tested
to 200 Bar
19
Field results from cross over.
Signal after removing ROV and bleeding off gas
activity - what we have left is the leak
signature.
The leak rate is then calculated from this raw
value level _at_ 32 dP Bar ?gt8 -lt32 SCM/h
Conclusion A minor leak in valve B
20
ClampOn DSP Vibration Monitor 3D
  • Measure G-forceDC 1024 Hz3 axis X - Y - Z
  • Measure Acoustic Noise1 262 kHz

21
Vibration WHY?
  • High wellhead pressure
  • Slugging / flow conditions
  • Subsea Pumps
  • Subsea Processing
  • Drill-thru operations at existing subsea wellhead
  • Collision or different loading conditions
  • Condition Monitoring
  • Separate sensor or added function to other
    ClampOn instrument

22
DSP Corrosion-Erosion Monitor
  • Working Environment
  • Uniform/General corrosion
  • Pitting corrosion
  • Erosion due to sand or chemicals
  • Crevice corrosion
  • Selective attack/leaching corrosion

23
History
  • 2004 First Version
  • Piezoelectric transducers
  • Transducers glued onto flow line
  • 2007 Second Version
  • EMAT transducers
  • No coupling between transducers and flow line
    (dry contact)
  • 2010 Subsea Version
  • Second version marinized

24
What Does it do?
  • Real-time monitoring of average wall thickness
  • Covers up to 60 of measuring area
  • Measures up to 56 individual paths
  • Detects changes larger than 1 of WT

25
How does it work?
  • Non intrusive, dry contact transducers
  • Electro Magnetic Acoustic (EMAT)
  • Acoustic Guided Lamb Waves (AGLW)

26
(No Transcript)
27
Signal interpretation Coverage area
  • The CEM does not only measure the wall thickness
    directly in-between the two transducers a wider
    area is monitored.
  • Coverage area is dependent on transducer
    separation, wall thickness, frequency and sound
    velocity.

28
Subsea configurations
  • Pre installed
  • ROV installed
  • Fully interfaced
  • Battery powered
  • Internal data storage
  • Charged by ROV
  • Wireless communication

29
Pre installed
  • Transducers installed topside
  • Main unit (processor) installed/retrieved by ROV

30
Retrofit
  • All components installed by ROV

31
Field case Retrofit subsea sand monitoring
  • Challenge
  • The existing intrusive system is not working
  • The field starts producing particles
  • Water Depth 600 meters

32
ROV operable basket with Clamp/funnel, harness,
battery and data logging
33
High Flexibility
  • Non-intrusive, cost-effective installation
  • ROV Retrofit
  • Designed for 4500 meters depth
  • Battery pack internal logging
  • Multifunctional (Sand, PIG, vibration etc.)

34
(No Transcript)
35
Questions?
  • Olav Brakstad
  • Sales Manager
  • ClampOn AS

olav_at_clampon.com www.ClampOn.com
36
ClampOn Ultrasonic Spectrum Analyzer Well
Collision Detector
37
Experience
  • Previous experience has proven that ClampOn
    topside sensors can detect down hole events. One
    example would be the detection of perforation
    guns firing at depths of 13,000 to 15,000 feet
  • The collision risk mitigation procedure was also
    recently put into operation by a major operator
    in the Gulf of Mexico with great success

38
Procedural Goals
  • Prevent drill bit from colliding with existing
    well casing during sidetrack drilling operations
  • Give engineers physical proof of drill strings
    proximity to existing wells
  • Prevent environmental damages caused by collision
  • Help to increase safe drilling speed and decrease
    downtime caused by collisions

39
Installation
  • Easy non-invasive installation of hardware
  • No hot work permit required
  • Intrinsically safe sensor
  • No production shut-down to install
  • Minimal impact to daily operations on the
    platform
  • Mounted on conductor pipe

40
Operation
  • Topside sensor monitors ultrasonic signals
    generated by drill string
  • Sensors are mounted on existing wells which will
    be in close proximity to drill bit
  • Ultrasound is digitized allowing for frequency
    analysis in real-time

41
Establishing a Base Line
  • Raw value readings are monitored throughout
    drilling operation
  • ClampOn techs establish base line values as
    drill string progresses
  • The lowest values will be seen prior to milling
    operations

42
Milling Operations - Base Line Readings
  • Significantly higher raw value signals will be
    detected as the mill cuts through the casing
  • Data collected at this point will be vital in
    determining the drill bits proximity to existing
    wells

43
Sidetrack Drilling Begins
  • Raw value signal will decrease after completion
    of milling operation
  • ClampOn techs begin 24 hour monitoring as
    drilling continues
  • Dramatic increases in raw value readings will be
    closely monitored

44
Drill Bit Approaches Existing Well
  • Topside sensors mounted on the existing well will
    begin to detect higher ultrasonic noise
  • Raw value signals will begin to increase
  • ClampOn techs can now notify drillers of
    collision risk level

45
Collision Averted
  • Real time generated trends from frequency data
    are closely compared to engineers normal risk
    mitigation calculations
  • Raw value trends are analyzed and collision seems
    possible
  • When the signal continues to increase, drilling
    is halted
  • After further analysis the drill bit is
    repositioned to veer away from the corresponding
    well and drilling is resumed and possible
    collision averted
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com