Metrics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loading...

PPT – Metrics PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 4291b4-NWY3N



Loading


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

Metrics

Description:

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN METRICS July 2011 FOR MORE INFORMATION Visit the Oakland Schools website at www.oakland.k12.mi.us Contact Danelle Gittus, APR ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 99
Provided by: Shelle68
Learn more at: http://www.oakland.k12.mi.us
Category:

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Metrics


1
Continuous improvement plan
  • Metrics

July 2011
2
Strategic Directions
  1. Maximize learning
  2. Increase collaborative opportunities
  3. Build the capacity for continuous improvement
  4. Close gaps and reduce inequities
  5. Advocate for public education
  6. Foster communication and engagement

3
Maximize learningGoal 1.1
  • Raise Oakland County students participation and
    achievement in pre-K-12 and post-secondary
    education by meeting the needs of students with
    diverse backgrounds and educational goals.

4
Metrics for goal 1.1
  • The percent of students who meet standards on
    pre-K-12 standardized tests that are used
    county-wide (for example, MEAP, MME, ACT, CFE
    certification exams, etc.) will improve.

5
Oakland County reading performance has been flat
over the past six years and math results have
steadily improved. The Learning Achievement
Coalition - Oakland (LAC-O) has goals aimed at
improving both literacy and math achievement.
MEAP Reading and Math
6
MEAP Reading Oakland County students score
above Michigan each year. Fall 2010 scores were
down in each grade compared to Fall 2009 Reading
scores.
7
MEAP Math Oakland County students score above
Michigan each year. Fall 2010 math scores were
up slightly in five grades and down a bit in 4th
grade.
8
MEAP Writing Oakland County students score
above Michigan each year, and have been trending
up, especially in 7th grade.
Fall 2010 Writing is not directly comparable to
previous writing assessments.
9
MEAP Science Oakland County students score
above Michigan each year and have been
maintaining at the same level.
10
MEAP Social Studies Oakland County students
score above Michigan each year and have been
level over time.
11
MME Oakland County students score above
Michigan each year and have trended up in
reading, stayed about the same in math, science
and writing, and have trended down in social
studies.
12
Oakland County ACT results from 2007 to 2010 have
trended up slightly.
13
Number of students earning technical certificates
for each cluster at each of the four Oakland
Schools Technical Campuses.
14
Metrics for goal 1.1
  • Four, five and six-year high school graduation
    rates will improve.

15
The Oakland County graduation rate has been four
to six percentage points above the Michigan rate
for the classes of 2007 through the class of 2010.
16
Oakland County Special Education students
graduation rate exceeds that of Michigan each
year.
17
Metrics for goal 1.1
  • The percent of exiting students planning to enter
    post-secondary education or training will
    increase.

18
About 90 of Oakland County 10th grade students
intend to pursue post-high school studies.
19
In 2009-10 among Oakland County 10th graders, 37
plan to attend four year colleges and 41 plan
postgraduate studies.
20
Metrics for goal 1.1
  • The percent of students who have completed
    post-secondary education or training five years
    after high school graduation will increase.

21
In order to assess this goal, districts will need
to conduct follow-up surveys of their graduates
five or six years after graduation. In order to
create countywide summaries, some parts of their
surveys would need to be consistent. If these
data are to be collected, each district would
have to agree to participate.
Example of key information that might help
monitor progress on this metric
22
Maximize learningGoal 1.2
  • Improve the positive, constructive conditions for
    learning that support diverse students with
    varying learning styles and cultural backgrounds
    in all buildings and classrooms in Oakland
    County.

23
Metrics for goal 1.2
  • The percent of schools that report they have
    implemented the Michigan School Accreditation and
    Accountability System (MISAAS) performance
    indicators for positive school culture and
    climate for learning will increase.

24
94 of schools using the School Improvement
Framework report they have created an
environment conducive to learning.
25
95 of schools using the AdvancEd Standards
report they have created an environment conducive
to learning.
26
Metrics for goal 1.2
  • The percent of students who report that positive,
    constructive conditions for learning exist in
    their classrooms will improve.

27
LAC-O has a goal to improve the relationships
between students and teachers. A survey was
administered to representative samples of 2,500
8th grade students during the 2009-10 school
year. 72 of students reported they had positive
relationships with their teachers.
28
Increase collaborative opportunitiesGoal 2.1
  • Expand the technological, educational and
    resource infrastructure for anywhere, anytime
    teaching, learning, collaboration, and
    communication.

29
Metrics for goal 2.1
  • The technical infrastructure availability will be
    maintained at 99.9 and available to all
    districts, teachers, students, and staff.

30
(No Transcript)
31
Metrics for goal 2.1
  • District participation in the use of Oakland
    Schools hosted resources will increase.

32
LEA participation in Oakland Schools hosted
services is steadily increasing.
33
Metrics for goal 2.1
  • Countywide participation in hosted services will
    increase cost-savings for LEAs.

34
Technology Services savings to districts rose
from 3.6 million in 2008-09 to 3.9 million in
2009-10.
35
Increase collaborative opportunitiesGoal 2.2
  • Increase opportunities to standardize, centralize
    or regionalize district operations and
    instructional services that result in resource
    efficiencies and overall cost-savings.

36
Metrics for goal 2.2
  • How many districts, offices or staff engaged in
    standardization, centralization or
    regionalization?

37
1,319 students in 28 LEAs participated in the
Oakland Schools Homeless Student Education
Program in 2009-10
38
The Foundation Allowance for the 1,511 students
served by Oakland Schools Homeless Program
translates into over 13,000,000 in revenue to
Oakland districts.
39
230 Students in 23 LEAs were served by the
Oakland Schools Wraparound Program in 2009-10
40
The Foundation Allowance for the 117 students
served by Oakland County Wraparound Program and
25 students in Pregnant and Parenting Teen
Wraparound program translates into over
1,000,000 in revenue to Oakland County districts.
Oakland County Wraparound
41
Oakland Schools Truancy Team has handled more
than 1,000 cases in each of the last three years
and served 1,242 middle school students in its
Back to School Program in 2009-10.
42
The Truancy Team provided 3.8 million of
services to Oakland County LEAs in 2009-10.
Truancy cases are valued at 2,500 Back to
School at 1,000
43
The Oakland County JobLink Service Center served
over 1,000 youth in 2010.
44
Partnering for Lasting Upward Success (PLUS)
serves in-school youth.
45
26 Districts the Oakland Schools Technical
Campuses are using Pearson Inform to analyze data
about student achievement. Teachers
administrators logged a total of 29,000 hours in
the tool through the first quarter of 2011.
46
27 districts and 27 non-public schools
participated in the Michigan Green Schools
Program in 2010-11
47
18 districts participated in the Oakland Human
Resources Consortium (OHRC), a consortium of
Oakland County school districts dedicated to the
recruitment, selection, employment, and
professional growth of quality educators and
other school district employees.
48
26 of the 28 LEAs used Production Printing
Graphics in 2009-10.
49
Metrics for goal 2.2
  • Dollars saved through standardization,
    centralization and/or regionalization.

50
  • In 2009-10, savings and enhancements brought
    Oakland County districts approximately
    73,150,000.
  • SUPPORT SERVICESINSTRUCTIONAL SERVICESDIRECT
    SERVICES TO STUDENTS, STAFF AND DISTRICTS
  • District Service Report

51
Metrics for goal 2.2
  • There will be an increase in the number of
    education/business/agency/community partnership
    projects (including grants) that produce improved
    outcomes for participants.

52
grants brought in 113,662,752 in FY10
  • General Fund - 5,774,825
  • Special Education Fund - 57,540,330
  • Vocational Education Fund - 1,820,996
  • Other - 48,526,601 (includes JobLink and
    one-time ARRA grants of 1.7M)

53
Build capacity for continuous improvementGoal 3.1
  • Increase the skills, knowledge and attitudes
    within districts and schools that improve their
    capacity to operate more efficiently and
    effectively.

54
Metrics for goal 3.1
  • Increase the percent of schools with improvement
    plans that meet state requirements.

55
All Oakland County public schools submit their
school improvement plans online
  • The State of Michigan now requires that public
    schools submit their School Improvement Plans
    online.
  • 100 of Oakland County schools submit their
    School Improvement plans.

56
Metrics for goal 3.1.2
  • Increase direct support to schools and districts
    for sustained success.

57
Professional learning opportunities specifically
intended to develop leadership abound.
Page 1 of 3
58
Professional learning opportunities specifically
intended to develop leadership abound.
Page 2 of 3
59
Professional learning opportunities specifically
intended to develop leadership abound.
Page 3 of 3
60
Metrics for goal 3.1.3
  • Increase the percent of people who participate in
    Oakland Schools-sponsored professional
    development or consultation.

61
The number of participants in PD for individual
districts remained at about 21,000 in 2008-09 and
2009-10.
62
Professional Development
  • In addition to the 31,459 participants who
    attended 1,385 events in 2009-2010, an additional
    23,061 participants attended 679 more events
    (these participants attended other countywide and
    multi-district professional development events in
    which they were not identified by individual
    district).

63
The number of participants in professional
development for multiple districts was about
10,000 in 2009-10, down from about 12,000 in
2008-09. Please note that these data represent
only those programs that were offered to all
districts. PD delivered to a single district is
reported in metric 3.1.2.
64
Instructional Services consultants logged 12,433
hours of consultation with districts and 4,971
points of contact during the 2009-10 school year.
The number of contacts is almost identical to the
previous year and the hours of consultation were
up almost 50.
65
Close gaps and reduce inequitiesGoal 4.1
  • Close the gaps between groups of students in
    achieving state learning standards.

66
Metrics for goal 4.1
  • There will be a decrease in the difference
    between the percent of African American,
    Hispanic, students eligible for free or reduced
    price lunch, English Language Learners and
    special education students who meet state
    learning standards as measured by statewide
    assessments and the percent of all students who
    meet state standards.
  • To learn more about the Learning Achievement
    Coalition-Oakland, visit www.lac-o.org.

67
The Learning Achievement Coalition of Oakland
(LAC-O) is working toward the goal of reducing
the achievement gaps for African American
students. The gap has narrowed for math and
reading.
68
The gaps have not changed substantially in either
subject area at grade 11.
69
Oakland Schools is working toward the goal of
reducing the achievement gaps for Hispanic
students. The gap has narrowed for math and
reading.
70
The gaps have narrowed in both subject areas at
grade 11.
71
The Learning Achievement Coalition of Oakland
(LAC-O) is working toward the goal of reducing
the achievement gaps for students eligible for
free or reduced price lunch. The gap has
narrowed for math and reading.
72
The gaps have narrowed slightly in both subject
areas at grade 11.
73
Oakland Schools is working toward the goal of
reducing the achievement gaps for English
language learners. The gap has not changed for
math and narrowed after increasing for reading.
74
The gap has widened for math and has not changed
for reading at grade 11.
75
The Learning Achievement Coalition (LAC-O) of
Oakland is working toward the goal of reducing
the achievement gaps for students with individual
education plans (IEPs). The gap has narrowed for
math and reading.
76
The gap for math has widened slightly but has not
changed for reading at grade 11.
77
LAC-O has a goal aimed at increasing the percent
of 9th grade students who have successfully
completed Algebra I. The gaps between groups of
students in Algebra I are very similar to the
MEAP and MME gaps.
78
Close Gaps and reduce inequitiesgoal 4.2
  • Improve allocation of human and financial
    resources in ways that meet the instructional
    needs of individual schools, districts and
    service areas.

79
Metrics for goal 4.2
  • The distribution of instructional resources will
    be based on data reflecting the unique needs of
    schools and districts.

80
2009-10 Instructional Services consulting time is
correlated with of economically disadvantaged
students.
81
(No Transcript)
82
Advocate for public education goal 5
  • Increase Oakland County citizens support of
    public education.

83
Metrics for goal 5.1
  • Increase the number of positive responses to
    survey questions about the quality, relevance and
    effectiveness of public education in Oakland
    County.
  • This metric is under development for FY 2012.

84
Metrics for goal 5.2
  • Achieve public policy and legislation which
    improves the adequacy, equity, predictability,
    and stability of public education funding in
    Michigan at all levels.

85
Tri-County Alliance, Michigan Association of
School Boards, Michigan School Business
Officials, Michigan Association of School
Administrators and Middle Cities Education
Association have been working cooperatively to
address the school funding crisis in Michigan. We
believe that Michigan needs a comprehensive
statewide school funding plan based on data,
which will address systemic change in school
finance and education reform. Citizens Research
Council of Michigan (CRC), a well respected,
non-partisan public policy research organization
has conducted a statewide school finance and
reform study.  The study, Education in Michigan
Finance and Reform, provides comprehensive and
much needed data to both quantify and clarify the
school funding debate.
86
Advocate for Public Educationgoal 5.3
  • Expand alliances with federal representatives,
    the Michigan Legislature, Michigan department of
    Education, and other organizations and state
    agencies that result in legislative and policy
    decisions that positively impact school districts
    and their students.

87
Metrics for goal 5.3
  • Oakland Schools will be part of a number of
    national, state and local alliances aimed at
    improving public education policy.

88
Oakland Schools is part of many state and
national alliances aimed at improving public
education.
  • We communicate with and provide legislative
    services to local education organizations
    including
  • Oakland Schools Board of Education
  • Oakland County Superintendents Association (OCSA)
  • Oakland County Superintendents Association
    Legislative Action Committee (OCSA LAC)
  • Oakland County School Boards Association (OCSBA)
  • Oakland County School Boards Association
    Legislative Committee
  • Oakland County School Business Officials (OCSBO)
  • Oakland County Human Resource Association (OCHRA)
  • Oakland County School Public Relations
    Association (OCSPRA)
  • Oakland County Teaching Learning Council (TL)
  • Tri-County Alliance (TCA)

89
Foster communication and engagementgoal 6.1
  • Improve timely two-way communication and
    engagement among educators and other relevant
    stakeholders.

90
Metrics for goal 6.1
  • Multiple venues, including technology and social
    media, are used to communicate and engage with
    stakeholders.

91
Using multiple venues (e.g., Moodle, Twitter,
Facebook, Wikis) is a growing practice in
Oakland Schools, but we have not yet implemented
a mechanism to collect, track and report
comprehensive data regarding the extent of this
emerging way of connecting and engaging with our
stakeholders.
Social media are being used at Oakland Schools,
but
92
Metrics for goal 6.1.2
  • Stakeholder satisfaction with the quality and
    types of products, services and resources offered
    by Oakland Schools will be maintained at high
    levels.

93
2008 OS Customer Satisfaction SurveyHow well are
we doing what we do?
Survey data have shown that stakeholder
satisfaction with Oakland Schools services is
high.
  • Across the 82 services, programs or products
    rated by districts (27 of 28), the percent of
    Very Well (4) ratings to Not at All (1) ratings
  • 4 3 2
    1 N
  • Very Somewhat Not Very
    Not at All Not Sure

  • or
    Unaware
  • 42.3 29.4 9.7
    2.1 16.5
  • 65 services, programs or products were rated by
    20 (75) or more of the districts (i.e., treating
    Not Sure or Unaware as missing data), of those
  • 61 (93.8) had 75 or more positive ratings
    (Somewhat or Very Well)
  • 1 (1.5) had 30 or more negative ratings (Not
    Very or Not at All)

94
Metrics for goal 6.1.3
  • Maintain highly engaged referent groups around
    Oakland Schools products, services and resources.

95
Oakland Schools maintains many highly engaged
referent groups.
96
Oakland Schools maintains many highly engaged
referent groups.
97
Oakland Schools maintains many highly engaged
referent groups.
98
For more information
  • Visit the Oakland Schools website at
    www.oakland.k12.mi.us
  • Contact Danelle Gittus, APR, Communication
    Services Manager at 248.209.2181 or
    danelle.gittus_at_oakland.k12.mi.us
About PowerShow.com