Goals and objectives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Goals and objectives

Description:

... (Media Com) Lionel Florit (Cisco) Marco Mascitto (Canoga) Mark Sylor (Exfo) Matt Hartling ... (SOAM Requirements & Framework) MEF 10.2 (Ethernet ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:115
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: KrishnanPa
Learn more at: https://www.ieee802.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Goals and objectives


1
Goals and objectives
  • Project(s) Service OAM MIB
  • Purpose of the contribution Status update of the
    Service OAM MIB project
  • Abstract The SOAM MIB project work began after
    the Los Angeles 2010 Q1 meeting. Much work has
    been done on the TC and FM MIBs.
  • Motion Yes, two motions one for an approved
    draft and one to initiate a straw ballot

2
SOAM MIB StatusMiami (was Prague) Q2 2010
Steve Mood Omnitron Sytems
3
SOAM MIB Status - Participation
  • Conference call participation THANKS!

Steve Mood (Omnitron) Abel Tong (Omnitron)
Andrew Chagnon (Broadcom) Andy Mayer
(Telcordia) Bill Bjorkman (Verizon) Brian
Hedstrom (CableLabs) Brian Rose (Cox) Bruno
Giguere (EXFO) Carl Moberg (Tail-f) Charles
Cathey (Comcast) Chris Cook (Transition) Dan
Martin (IBM) David Ball (Cisco) Doug Baar
(Omnitron) Eugene Nechamkin (Broadcom) Jack
Pugaczewski (Qwest) Jimmy Hu (Ciena)
John Lemon (Adtran) Jozef Soroka (Media
Com) Lionel Florit (Cisco) Marco Mascitto
(Canoga) Mark Sylor (Exfo) Matt Hartling
(Broadcom) Mehmet Toy (Comcast) Mike Bencheck
(Verizon) Roger Williams (Comcast) Scott
Mansfield (Ericsson) Sharfuddin Syed (Infinera)
Sri Gangula (Adva) Thomas Clack (Broadcom)
Zhengping You (AFORE)
4
SOAM MIB Status - Calls
  • 17 conference calls were held
  • February
  • Project Kickoff, Review MEF 7.1 object models,
    discuss document outline
  • March
  • Review TC and FM MIB comments submitted, discuss
    and review SNMP Notifications
  • April
  • Discuss open items, review new draft MIB
    document, review liaisons and status presentation
    for Prague
  • May
  • Discuss/incorporate additional review comments

5
SOAM MIB Status
  • Work first focused on the goals of the project
  • Initial MIBs were submitted by Brian Hedstrom of
    CableLabs
  • The Textual Conventions MIB (ETH-SERVICE-OAM-TC-MI
    B)
  • The SOAM FM MIB (ETH-SERVICE-OAM-FM-MIB)
  • The SOAM PM MIB (ETH-SERVICE-OAM-PM-MIB)

6
SOAM MIB Status
  • 11 Revisions of the TC MIB were made during the
    quarter
  • 16 Revisions of the FM MIB were made during the
    quarter
  • 4 Revisions of the PM MIB were made during the
    quarter
  • Initial text of the Service OAM MIB has been
    completed and submitted as contribution 33104_001

7
SOAM MIB Status
  • Baseline documents used to create the MIBs
  • IEEE 802.1ag CFM MIB
  • MEF 7.1 EMS-NMS Information Model)
  • MEF 17 (SOAM Requirements Framework)
  • MEF 10.2 (Ethernet Service Attributes)
  • MEF SOAM-FM draft spec
  • MEF SOAM-PM draft spec
  • ITU-T Y.1731 (OAM functions and mechanisms)
  • ITU-T Q.840.1 (NMS-EMS management interface)

8
SOAM MIB Status
  • The TC (Textual Convention) and FM (Fault
    Management) MIB modules were discussed and
    updated
  • The preliminary SOAM MIB document has been
    created and is ready to be reviewed.
  • There was not enough time to finish the PM
    (Performance Monitoring) MIB during the quarter
    and will be reviewed during next quarter
  • The stretch goal of reviewing the YANG model was
    not done during the quarter

9
SOAM MIB Status
  • Open Items to work on during the next quarter
  • Review the SOAM PM MIB
  • Review and resolve comments from the Straw Ballot
    (if the motion is passed)
  • Looking for feedback on SNMP Notifications
  • Review, update, and incorporate comments into the
    Service OAM MIB document
  • Need to coordinate with other ongoing work such
    as Availability work (MEF 10.2.1), Hybrid NID,
    etc.
  • Other work status will not slow down progress of
    this project
  • Review YANG Model

10
SOAM MIB Document Structure
  • The SOAM MIB Project team proposes to split the
    MIBs into two separate documents
  • SOAM TC and FM MIB
  • SOAM PM MIB
  • This aligns well with the SOAM FM and PM IA
    documents being separate
  • TC and FM MIBs could Letter Ballot well before PM
    MIB thus providing Service Providers with FM MIB
    implementations much earlier
  • Is there any disagreement to this approach?

11
SOAM MIB Status - Timeline
  • 1Q-Present 2010 Project Launch
  • Numerous calls were held and a draft FM document
    has been created
  • 2Q 2010 Move FM for SB
  • Conference calls between 2Q-3Q resolve all straw
    ballot comments
  • Review SOAM PM MIB
  • Produce SOAM PM MIB draft document
  • 3Q 2010 Move FM for LB PM for SB
  • 4Q 2010 Move PM for LB

12
Motion 1 (Assuming 2 MIB docs)
  • Approve contribution 33104_001 as Approved Draft
    1 of the Service OAM FM MIB Technical
    Specification
  • Motion
  • Second
  • Voting
  • Yes
  • No
  • Abstain

13
Motion 2 (Assuming 2 MIB docs)
  • Initiate Straw Ballot on Approved Draft 1 of
    Service OAM FM MIB Technical Specification (based
    on 33104_001)
  • Motion
  • Second
  • Voting
  • Yes
  • No
  • Abstain

14
Motion 1 (Assuming 1 MIB doc)
  • Approve contribution 33104_001 as Approved Draft
    1 of the Service OAM MIB Technical Specification
  • Motion
  • Second
  • Voting
  • Yes
  • No
  • Abstain

15
Motion 2 (Assuming 1 MIB doc)
  • Initiate Straw Ballot on Approved Draft 1 of
    Service OAM MIB Technical Specification (based on
    33104_001)
  • Motion
  • Second
  • Voting
  • Yes
  • No
  • Abstain
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com