Techniques for Evaluating Insecticide Resistance in Filth Flies Resistance Profiles: Which Test To Use? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Techniques for Evaluating Insecticide Resistance in Filth Flies Resistance Profiles: Which Test To Use?

Description:

Resistance Profiles: Which Test To Use? Phil Kaufman Entomology and Nematology Dept. University of Florida Background Resistance is genetic, therefore inherited ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:513
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: afpmbOrgs
Learn more at: https://www.afpmb.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Techniques for Evaluating Insecticide Resistance in Filth Flies Resistance Profiles: Which Test To Use?


1
Techniques for Evaluating Insecticide Resistance
in Filth FliesResistance Profiles Which Test
To Use?
  • Phil Kaufman
  • Entomology and Nematology Dept.
  • University of Florida

2
Background
  • Resistance is genetic, therefore inherited
  • Return to susceptibility not guaranteed
  • Speed of return is quite variable
  • Resistance is a population phenomenon
  • All sampling methods are biased
  • All testing methods are biased
  • We must identify our needs. and choose according
    to our abilities

3
Susceptible Individuals Predominate
InsecticideApplication
InsecticideApplication
4
Resistant Individuals Predominate
Susceptibles still present, few in number
5
How to evaluate?
  • Biochemical/Immunological (Genotypic) methods
  • Molecular tools targeting physiological processes
  • Genetic mapping - Sequencing/gene expression
  • Phenotypic methods
  • Exposure followed by death counts

6
Treat and Count
  • Technical or Formulated?
  • Technical much more precise
  • Very precise results
  • Eliminate effect of formulation shifts
  • Eliminate concentration problems of formulations
  • Formulated often much easier
  • Loss of precision - more variables
  • Can compare different formulations
  • Provides a real world result

7
Insect issues..
  • Lab reared or Field collected?
  • Lab provides a more even comparison
  • No parasites, healthy
  • Similar sized/aged organisms
  • Genetic bottleneck?
  • Field
  • No rearing issues
  • Faster turnaround
  • Variable size/age/health

8
Insect issues.cont.
  • What stage to use?
  • Often the stage that is pestiferous - Adult
  • Insect sex
  • Important differences between sexes
  • Size, metabolism, longevity
  • Insect age
  • Can greatly influence survival

9
Insect issues.cont.
  • Insecticide susceptible strain?
  • Where to get one?
  • What is your testing interest?
  • LD-50 or Resistance Ratio (RR)
  • Colony?
  • Who keeps one for your insect?
  • Use WHO standard?
  • No Susceptible comparison.
  • Reduces comparative values
  • Alright if using a diagnostic dose?

10
Testing methods - Direct vs. Indirect
  • Direct
  • Microapplicator
  • Tiny drop applied to individual insects
  • Cumbersome - Most accurate
  • Dip method
  • Insect submerged into a solution of known strength

11
Testing methods - Direct vs. Indirect
  • Indirect
  • Treated glass
  • Most common and oftenbest method
  • Treated organics
  • Treating filter papers, cloth, wood
  • May have adsorption issues, especially formulated

12
Treated Board Studies
13
Holding patterns.
  • How long to expose insects to insecticide?
  • 1 hr, 4 hr, 24 hr?
  • Irrelevant - pick one, dose will be adjusted
  • When to count the dead?
  • Post-treatment count?
  • OR
  • 24 or 48 hr after exposure?
  • Allows for kdr-resistant resistance detection.

14
Resistance Profile vs. Diagnostic Dose
  • Resistance Profile
  • Profile requires increasing doses
  • Usually predates use of Diagnostic Dose
  • Single dose or Diagnostic dose
  • Often used with formulated materials
  • Label Rate or a Given level exposure
  • Replication vs. Psuedoreplication
  • All steps must be repeated
  • Includes weighing and mixing all solutions

15
Analysis
  • Control mortality
  • Critical
  • Many blood-feeding Diptera survive poorly off
    host
  • Often use Abbotts Formula
  • Probit (logistic regression)
  • Generates mortality line
  • Used for Lethal Dose (LD) calculation
  • Often used to identify 50 or 99 mortality value

16
Real-world Data
  • House flies from 8 NY poultry and 4 dairy farms
    surveyed
  • Many formulations tested
  • Multiple active ingredients
  • Residual contact, feeding and larvicide assays
  • Take home Variations between sites, chemicals,
    methods, insecticide source.

17
Experimental Compound
18
Methomyl (Feeding)
19
Dimethoate
20
Tetrachlorvinphos
21
Cyfluthrin
22
Permethrin
23
Permethrin
24
Tetrachlorvinphos
25
Dimethoate
26
Ectiban EC
27
Ectiban WP
28
Which one to use? Needs based.
  • To rapidly identify resistance
  • Field collected
  • Lab reared
  • Precision
  • Technical
  • Formulated
  • Deployed situations
  • Technical
  • Formulated
  • Control failures
  • Technical
  • Formulated

29
WHO - Test Kits
www.who.int/whopes/resistance/en/
30
Purchasing Kits
31
Filth Flies
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com