Radical Islamic Terrorists and The US in the 21st Century - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Radical Islamic Terrorists and The US in the 21st Century

Description:

Radical Islamic Terrorists and The US in the 21st Century PO 483: The Politics of Terrorism History of Radical Islamic Terrorist Attacks on the USA Real Beginning ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:137
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: dfos7
Learn more at: https://www.vmi.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Radical Islamic Terrorists and The US in the 21st Century


1
Radical Islamic Terrorists and The US in the 21st
Century
  • PO 483 The Politics of Terrorism

2
History of Radical Islamic Terrorist Attacks on
the USA
  • Real Beginning Takeover of US Embassy in Tehran,
    1979 signal of animosity
  • Arab Muslim community
  • Bombing of US Marine Barracks in Beirut, October
    1983
  • Bombing of Berlin Nightclub, April 1986
  • Bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, December 1988
  • Truck Bombing of WTC, February 1993
  • Attack on Khobar Towers, June 1996
  • Car Bombing of US Embassies in Africa, August
    1998
  • Bombing of USS Cole, October 2000

3
Patterns Before 9/11/01
  • Pan-Arab movement (not confined to one state)
  • State Sponsorship common at outset, but declines
  • All attacks perpetrated on US soldiers/citizens
    abroad
  • Casualties often high, but subject to ceiling
    (about 300)
  • American ambivalence in response
  • Retribution against governments when state
    sponsorship suspected
  • Prosecution
  • Haphazard responses (Embassy bombings), no
    responses (USS Cole) common
  • Nuisance, not direct threat
  • Sense of security (Gulf War)

4
Al-Queda
  • Association with Salafis
  • Abandonment of true path by Muslim governments
  • Reincarnation of Muhammads war to rid Islam of
    idolaters
  • US as universal enemy
  • Prop for illegitimate rulers
  • Poisoning of traditional society (cultural
    imperialism)
  • Presence in Saudi Arabia during Gulf War
  • Unification of various Salafiyya movements
  • Organization Complex (both cell structure and
    evidence of strict hierarchy
  • Bin Laden Unifier
  • Financial Means
  • Fatwas

5
Al-Queda (continued)
  • OVERALL GOAL Elicit reversion to traditional
    society by targeting sponsor of and influence
    over governments embodying flawed Islam (US).
    They do not aim for military defeat of the US,
    but for one of two outcomes
  • Impose enough costs to get US to reconsider
    Middle East policy (withdraw), thereby destroying
    support for Islamic governments
  • Force US to engage in war that alienates the
    majority of the umma, who will then engage in
    terrorist activity to impose enough costs on the
    US to get them to stop the war OR rise up and
    overthrow existing governments

6
9/11/01
  • Obviously, most spectacular attacks
  • Highly coordinated (planning, acquiring necessary
    skills, dry runs, coordination on day of attack)
  • Not all terrorists involved knew it was to be a
    suicide mission
  • 4 planes hijacked with box cutters and knives
    crashed into WTC and Pentagon
  • Symbolism evident, but inflicting destruction and
    loss of life was the primary motivation
  • Establishment of symbiotic relationship with
    other groups claiming Islam as secondary
    motivation

7
The US Response
  • Fixing the Immediate Problem Airline Security
  • Increase in number of people flying led to
    confusion, lax security, flyer-friendly
    accommodation allowed terrorists to make dry
    runs, get aboard
  • No major attack on US planes in 13 years
  • Security on Ground
  • Military in airports (deterrent, rapid response)
  • Security checks/rules changes
  • More stringent ID, screening, weapons searches
    for employees
  • Passenger screening (security risks)
  • Security in Air
  • Flight Marshals
  • Arming Pilots
  • Reinforcement of cockpit doors, changes in rules
    allowing opening of doors and acquiescence to
    hijackers
  • Transponder/communications automation
  • Panic Button

8
Fundamental Shift in Doctrine Homeland Security
  • Extensive existing counterterrorist system
    though full prevention impossible, could be
    improved (augment, not abandon danger of
    instituting ad hoc measures)
  • 9/11 considered intelligence failure vague
    warnings, obscured by other information, fear of
    false alarm
  • Decline of element of surprise, but terrorists
    are strategic actors and can act to circumvent
    measures
  • Takes extremely large investments to marginally
    decrease probability of large attacks

9
Homeland Security
  • Suggested Measures
  • Lower criteria for entry into CT forces
  • More people who speak vernacular dialects of
    Arabic
  • Individuals to map out novel attack schemes
    (think outside box)
  • Better analysis but, more importantly, more
    efficient distribution and action upon that
    analysis
  • Facilitation of extensive clandestine
    surveillance (legal)
  • Increase security of borders, major
    industrial/infrastructure sites, track cargo
  • Issuance of ID cards, stricter INS implementation
    (legal)
  • Sense of Urgency
  • No Silver Bullet

10
Legislative Measures
  • USA PATRIOT
  • Give intelligence/combat functions capacity to
    succeed
  • Implementation of constraints (Betts not on
    dissent, but on privacy)
  • Immigration
  • Department of Homeland Security
  • Elimination of red tape
  • Reorganization of all facets under one
    directorate (overdue after expansion of
    community)
  • Brings FBI, CIA, State, etc. assets together
  • Addresses bureaucratic infighting (primacy of
    DoD)
  • Problems
  • Quick fix?
  • Prior Experience
  • Benefits of Separation

11
The International Dimension
  • Counterterrorist infiltration abroad
  • Carrot and Stick to gain support
  • Sanctions/Withhold Aid
  • Withhold Political Support
  • Threat of invasion
  • Issue linkage Revising Stances
  • Use of force abroad Two main strategies
  • Punish/Remove governments harboring terrorists
  • More traditional IR response
  • Vast extension of traditional retaliatory policy
    (implication)
  • Afghanistan Signal to others
  • Preemptive removal of threats
  • WMD Iraq
  • Questions New Doctrine? Al-Quedas goal?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com