Finding Funding in Medical Research Dr Liesl Osman NDM Research Facilitation http://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/page/research-facilitation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Finding Funding in Medical Research Dr Liesl Osman NDM Research Facilitation http://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/page/research-facilitation

Description:

Finding Funding in Medical Research ... look at funding opportunities Research Councils Charities Government bodies Foundations Project grants Fellowships Funder ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:431
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: los81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Finding Funding in Medical Research Dr Liesl Osman NDM Research Facilitation http://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/page/research-facilitation


1
Finding Funding in Medical ResearchDr Liesl
Osman NDM Research Facilitationhttp//www.ndm
.ox.ac.uk/page/research-facilitation
  • NDM Research Facilitation
  • Dr Catherine Moyes
  • Dr Liesl Osman
  • Ms Claudia Alen Amaro

2
Todays talk
  • Understanding the funding framework
  • The review process in funding decisions what
    you need to know
  • Computer search tools for identifying funding
    sponsors
  • Fellowships and the career window
  • What makes a high quality application

3
  • Important funders for NDM researchers
  • MRC
  • BBSRC
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Royal Society
  • Gates Foundation
  • Cancer Research UK (CRUK)
  • Diabetes UK
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Arthritis Research Council
  • UK Department of Health (NIHR, HTA)
  • EC/European Research Council
  • NIH (USA)

Research Councils
Foundations
Charities
Government bodies
4
Funding things to think about, questions to ask
Funder priorities- have you shown how your
project fits? Have you got a realistic time line
which clearly describes goals? Have you shown
the possible pitfalls and explained how you
would deal with them
Project grants
Fellowships
Not just good science have you got a real
career strategy?
5
Planning!
  • Expect several months from when you think of
    making an application to actually putting it in.
  • Then, more time to review and decision
  • Then, more time to when the award is activated
  • At least 12 months all told. If you miss an
    application deadline this may delay you by 6
    months to a year

6
Complexity of application deadlines
  • Wellcome Trust 4 panels per year
  • MRC project grants - 3 panels per yr (Jan, May,
    September)
  • fellowships once a year, Jan/Feb
  • BBSRC project grants - 4 panels per year (Jan,
    April, July, October)
  • fellowships once a year
  • NIHR/HTA Efficacy of treatments can put
    suggestions in, specific calls any time
  • EU/ERC Independent Investigator Grant - July
  • NIH (USA) Any time
  • CRUK - 4 panels per year (Jan, April, July,
    October)
  • fellowships once a year (May)
  • Diabetes UK - 2 panels per yr ( June december0
  • B H F project grants - 6 panels per yr,
    fellowships 4 panels per yr
  • A R C project grants 3 panels per yr,
    fellowships 1 panels per yr

7
The review process
  • APPLICATION COMES IN TO FUNDER.
  • First round - In house removes apps which dont
    fit criteria.
  • Second round Proposal sent out to external
    reviewers
  • Third round short listed proposals go to panel.
    Panel members (2 or 3) are assigned to act as
    presenter of the proposal.
  • PANEL MEETING (may last 1-2 days)
  • About 10 minutes per proposal, presented by
    assigned member
  • Panel members discuss and vote give another
    score.
  • Proposals ranked funding cut off then decided
    dependent on funds.
  • Proposals above the cut off are funded

8
How reviewers make their ratings
  • Importance
  • Is research in this area needed?
  • Is there a good medical or scientific rationale
    for pursuing the questions or gaps in knowledge
    that are being addressed? Is success likely to
    lead to significant new understanding?
  • Does the proposal realistically set out the
    ultimate potential benefits with respect to
    improving human health?
  • To what extent will it contribute, directly or
    indirectly, to relieving the burden of disease?
  • How important it is to do the work now?
  • Is there similar or complementary research
    underway elsewhere? Are the proposals
    competitive?
  • Scientific potential
  • How innovative are the proposals?
  • Are the experimental plans realistic, given the
    aims of the research and the resources?
  • Are the methods and study designs competitive
    with the best in the field?
  • Have major scientific, technical or
    organisational challenges been identified, and
    will they be tackled well?
  • In the case of grants for pilot or proof of
    principle work, how will the workbe developed and
    how feasible are the subsequent proposals
  • Environment and people

9
Imagine you are a panel member!
  • You will be reviewing dozens of applications
  • You will be mostly influenced by the reviewers
    judgements
  • But what will encourage you to give a little bit
    higher score for an application?

10
Application tips
  • Do your homework. Be prepared it takes time to
    draw up a good application (i.e. 6 months).
  • There is a crucial window of opportunity for
    early and mid career fellowships they all have
    restrictions on time since doctorate awarded,
    dont miss your chance.
  • Early career 3 to 6 years
  • Mid career - 3 to 8 years
  • If your career plans include going for a
    fellowship you MUST start thinking about this at
    4-5 years post doc

11
Wellcome Trust Career Path Diagram
Post doc, eligibility usually three years .
Must have own publishing record with some first
author papers
Not many of these for basic scientists early post
doc more chance if you are a clinician
12
Tools for finding funding
  • Researchresearch.com
  • Flexible, international
  • Not user friendly, complex, needs training
  • RDInfo
  • Easy to use
  • Limited flexibility

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
Final digression
  • Funding myths Its not worth applying to the
    MRC/British Heart Foundation/Royal Society
    because
  • They dont like funding Oxford
  • They are cutting back in funding
  • etc etc
  • Reality Average award rate for Oxford is
    comparable with other high quality research
    institutions 25-30.

17
What makes a high quality application?
  • You answer the requirements specified in the
    application form and guide. READ THE
    INSTRUCTIONS
  • You dont assume that the panel knows the details
    of your research area. You do assume that they
    are highly experienced researchers who can spot
    waffle at 100 paces.
  • You dont attempt to glide over obvious
    criticisms you acknowledge these and answer
    them.
  • Think of your proposal as a story make it
    interesting for the reader

18
Research Facilitation - Support which increases
the scientific value of research done in the
department
  • Support for project/programme applications of
    PIs.
  • Strategic Planning support
  • Support of applications which need departmental
    commitment/involvement
  • John Fell Fund
  • NIHR applications, and other senior fellowship
    applications where the funder asks for continuing
    salary commitment
  • Organisation of mock interviews for shortlisted
    career development fellows
  • Preparing prize nominations for PIs, for major
    international awards
  • Career development through
  • Seminars and workshops for skills building in
    making applications
  • One to one sessions to develop CVs, look at
    funding opportunities

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com