Title: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language
1Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006
The evolution of language
Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN)Ivo Tateo
(Hauptstudium, TN)Brigitte Knocke Martina
Kleinebreil (Grundstudium, TN/LN)Frauke
Skrobaschewsky (Hauptstudium, TN/LN)
2Table of Contents
- The Study of Language
- Language Origin
- The Evolution of Language
- The Emerge of Rule
- The Expansion of Language
- Diffusion of Language
3The Study of Language
4Theories
- language must have evolved between 100,000 to
50,000 years ago some researchers date the
evolving around 250,000 years ago - Different ludicrous views
- Noahs Ark view Chinese as primitive language
was spoken in the Ark and so survived the flood - Lord Monboddo people learned different skills
from different animals ? to sing and speak from
birds by imitating
5Theories a bird-like skill
- ? only shows that parallel systems can
emerge independently
6Evidences
- external clues from outside human
language - ? evolutionary theory, archaeology, anatomy and
physiology, ethology, psychology, anthropology - internal information from languages itself
- ? provided by linguistics
- ? pidgins and creoles are valuable sources
7The Amoeba Question
- Did language elaborate from a simple outline?
- Did a mish-mash become neat and orderly?
- bow-wow theory
- hunters imitated the sounds of animals they
wanted to track down - Rousseau/ Jespersen
- first languages were singable and more
passionate became simple and methodical - spaghetti junctions
- various possibilities existed and were used in
the long run certain features were more likely to
be chosen
8The Rabbit-out-of-hat problem
- language emerged fairly suddenly (like a rabbit
out of a hat) - mutation in hominid gene pool
- extra use for already enlarged brain
- but
- language evolved slowly over millennia
9Why do languages differ?
- new appearances could not be handled with
properly (e.g. (new) thoughts could not be
expressed properly) - differences between and within languages are
signs of a flexible and adjustable system - Tower of Babel
10Why do languages differ?
- Swiss army knife view specialized linguistic
system, which allows variation - human mind as gadget with numerous specialized
devices - humans acquire language through a
language-handling mechanism - difference of language according to an inherited
degree of flexibility - Auntie Maggies remedy view languages differ
because human general intelligence
produced them - language is one of many different tasks children
have to encounter use the mind to sort out the
way it works - tasks can be encountered in different ways
11Why do languages differ?
- hard-wired - pre-programmed
- - do not have to be learned
- - instinctive
- - (Swiss army knife)
- soft-wired - can be acquired
- - have to be learned
- - Auntie Maggies remedy
- past nature nurture hard soft instinct
learning controversies - present innately guided behaviour
12Conclusion
- many theories scientific or non-scientific
were propounded - Amoeba Question and the rabbit-out-of-hat problem
- differing - Swiss Army Knife vs. Auntie
Maggies remedy hard-wired vs. soft-wired - - innately guided behaviour
13The origin of language
14The Humans history of evolution
- 175,000 BP
- 300,000 BP
- 1,5 m BP
- 2 m BP
- 3 m BP
- 4 m BP
- 4,5 m BP
- Homo sapiens sapiens (modern humans)
- Archaic Homo sapiens
- Homo erectus (upright man)
- Homo abilis (handy man)
- Homo (man)
- Australopithecus afarensis
- Australopithecus ramidus
15The principle of Natural Selection
In 1859 Charles Darwin published the book On the
origin of species in which he demonstrated that
Humans are the result of a long evolution. He
explained the principle of Natural Selection with
these words Any variation, if profitable to
an individual of any species will tend to the
preservation of that individual, and will be
generally inherited by its offspring. I have
called this principle by the term of Natural
Selection .
16How did Language emerge?
- Language emerged suddenly, as a rabbit out of a
hat. This would be possible because humans are
endowed with an innate language faculty (Chomsky).
- Language is the result of a long process,
creeping upwards in complexity over millennia,
like a snail creeping up a wall. Language
capacity increased very slowly.
- Language evolution alternated between periods of
stasis (stagnation) and periods of fast
development (Eldredge and Gould).
- The most accredited theory is that of a
language bonfire. After this theory, sparks of
language have been flickering for a long time
before language begun a fast evolution and then
stabilized around 50,000 years ago.
17Representation of the Language Bonfire on a
graph
Complexity of language
18The development of Language
Key properties of Language
Interaction
Persuasion
The Grooming Theory grooming is for animals a
factor of social interaction as language for
humans. Maybe language is a substitution for
grooming, since - Humans are naked apes with
little hair for grooming - Great groups of
primates tend to abandon grooming
19The development of Language
Key properties of language
Interaction
Persuasion
The theory of mind The ability to deceive may be
an important prerequisite for language, which is
not only confined to humans. This process (we
may also talk about lying) implicates that the
individual is able to put himself into another
persons shoes and act to his own advantage.
20The search for the missing link
How did language get started? Many support the
gestural theory, which claims that sign language
is the missing link between the primate
communication and human language. These
supporters emphasize four reasons
- The gestural origin of speech
- Sign language is easier than speech
- The idea that gestures are universal
- Neurological connection between speech and
movements
21Basic requirements for human language
b Sound-producing b Sound-receiving b
Sound-planning b Sound-interpreting
The human voice-box or larynx is more streamlined
than that of other primates it is also
positioned lower than in other primates. The
particular position of the larynx, the complexity
of the muscular tongue and the possibility to
produce vowels via mouth, allow the human beings
to produce three fairly extreme
vowels i a u
22Conclusion
Language appeared about 200,000 years ago and
developed very fast between 100,000 and 75,000
years ago (language bonfire theory) Language
probably emerged to satisfy a need of interaction
or to influence other individuals Language
probably developed from gesture. Sign language
has been the intermediate between the two
Primate communication
Sign language
Human language
Sound-producing, sound-receiving, sound-planning,
sound-interpreting mechanisms and the particular
position of the larynx, among others, allow the
human beings to produce sounds which are unique
to our species.
23The evolution of language
- The emergence of rules -
- Brigitte Knocke
24The emergence of rules
- A language needs rules. Communication would
break down if there were no agreed ways of
combining linguistic units. - In theory there are nearly endless possibilities
to combine words and sounds. However, any full
language has narrowed down the range of
possibilities to a few allowable combinations - gt the grammar.
25How could grammar have arisen in the evolution of
language?
- Simple rules have two requirements
- different types of basic units must exist
- ways of combining the units must be agreed
26 - Different types of basic words
- Nouns are the basic words, which arose before
other types of words were developed - Nouns and verbs together constituted the first
grammar gt humans could mentally distinguish
things and people from actions and events for a
long time before establishing them as nouns and
verbs. - Nouns and verbs are regarded as the universal
categories of all languages.
27The combination of words as a requirement for the
emergence of grammar
- Grammar emerged when noun-type words were
combined with verb-type words. - Two possible ways by which nouns and verbs could
have been combined -
- 1. build-up-route
- 2. re-analysis -route
28The build-up route
- ....assumes that a large number of single words
accumulated. These were words of different types,
some involving things, others actions. At a later
stage these words were combined. -
- e.g. child mummy open as a request for
Mummy please open this
29The re-analysis route
- ...assumes that words, mainly nouns, were
already being combined, but that sometimes more
than one interpretation was possible -
- e.g. the word singsing in Tok Pisin (pidgin,
Papua New Guinea) - (singsing any festival which involves dancing
and singing) - ð mi singsing means I went to the song and
dance festival or I sang and danced
30Consistent ordering of words
- There are several possibilities as to how a firm
word order might have happened in the evolution
of languages - the signing of chimps
- the utterances of Vincent, a child of deaf
parents - the predispositions of the human mind
311. The signing of chimps - Nim Chimpsky
- At first sight Nims signing was quite unordered.
- However Nim had some preferences
- -- food was placed first grape eat, banana Nim
eat, apple - me eat
- --more at the beginning more eat, more
tickle, more drink,.. - --his own name at the end
- --repetition of words eat Nim eat, Nim eat
Nim - ð Nims ordering resembles the process found
when a language acquires new word-order rules -
- mild stylistic preferences change into strong
preferences which stabilize, become a habit and
form a pattern which influences the formation of
others.
322. The utterances of Vincent, child of deaf
parents
- Vincent hearing child of deaf parents who taught
him sign language. He did not speak and heard
sounds only by watching television. He was first
exposed to speak English when he was over three
years old. - at first his speech was barely intelligible and
only slowly his speech became clear - short utterances You uh-oh
- limited vocabulary puter was a general,
all-purpose verb. - You several meanings you, he, she
- tendency to copy-around a word, to put one form
on both sides of another You house you
33- The way Vincent put words together was bizarre.
- However when his repeats and copying around were
omitted, a clear word ordering preference
appeared - gt he constructed many sentences according to a
basic, but private, plan
34- gt Both the chimp and the child show that an
optional word order can become a preferred order
which later becomes a certain rule.
353. Human mind set
- Our human-mind set dictates how we see the world
and create the language. - Ontological categories, such as people,
things, actions, events, provide a universal
initial structure of the language of thought on
which language is based. - The innate thought structure also covers the way
in which words may be combined. -
- e.g. The cat sat on the mat. The dog lay under
the table. - not The mat lay under the cat. The table stood
over the dog. -
- gt The location of small onto large may be due
to the human mind-set. Human thoughts run along
certain routes, which are likely to affect the
order of participants in a grammar.
36Preferences and pre-linguistic rules
- animate first preference
- It is more normal to say Patsy was hit on the
head by a ball than A ball hit Patsy on the
head - gt The animate first preference is not due to
any obvious linguistic factor, but the human
mind-set plays an important role. - The animate first preference is linked to an
actor first principle, because in real life
animates act on lifeless things more often than
the other way round. - The preferences are based on pre-linguistic
mind-sets, which explain why so many languages
show similarities.
37Summary
- Language began when words were combined.
- There are several theories on how grammar could
have arisen - -out of build-ups putting individual words
together, - -out of re-analyses of combined nouns.
- At first many word combinations were possibly
repetitive and inconsistent. - The examples of the chimp and the child Vincent
show how rules may have became fixed optional
orders became strong preferences which later
became rules. - The original preferences were probably on
pre-linguistic mind-sets gt explains why so
many languages show similarities
38The evolution of language
- The expansion of language
- Martina Kleinebreil
39First steps
- - Humans named themselves - parts of body- the
immediate environment
40Inwards and OutwardsInwards and Outwards
- The human body, and the space surrounding it,
presumably formed the basis of further meaning
extensions.
41Outwards
- Humans body-parts move outwards to features of
environment.e.g.Tok Pisin (Papua New Guinea)
42- het headhet bilong diwai - top of a treehan
handhan bilong diwai branch of a treehan
bilong pik front legs of a pigOr even in
English head of state
43Inwards
- Outer behaviour is a regular source for talk
about the inner mental self.e.g. Physical sight
expressionsI see what Helen means.Peter is
still in the dark.
44Physical holding - mental grasping
- - Did you grasp what he meant?- Did you get
this?- Paul hold on to his point of view.
45Adpositions (Pre- Postpositions)
- - a limited number of prepositions- re-apply of
the old ones, instead of inventing new ones.
46- Tok Pisinmi go long taun I go to townmi kam
long town I come from townmi stap long haus
I stayed at homemi paitim dok long stik I
hit the dog with a stick
47- Nouns durable dog, skyVerbs rapid change
swim, go, hit properties hot day, green
houseproperties are less time-stable than
nouns, but more time-stable than most verbs
48 1st possibility
- Subdivision into stative and non- stative
verbsnon-stative kill, shootstative be-green,
be-ill(Mandarin Chinese, Yoruba)
492nd possibility
- adjectives as an extra category border-line
between nouns/adj.and verbs/adj. seems
arbitrarye.g. a gold watch ? noun a
lasting peace ? verb
50- In the early days verbs and adjectives were
probably indistinguishable.To reach a clear
distinction later word- endings were added.
51- But a language is still not complete with just a
few parts of speech, and various attachements for
its verbs.
52- So from this point on its still a long way to
todays language
53Diffusion
54Moving outwards
- roughly 75.000 years ago humans moved out of
Africa and into Asia - first to Asia Minor
- then westwards to Europe
- eastwards to the Far East and Australia
55(No Transcript)
56- the last continent to be populated was America
- crossed from northeastern Siberia into northwest
Alaska - went by boat via the Bering Strait
- smalls groups
- probably spoke dialects of the same language
57(No Transcript)
58The hunt for Universals
- language universals features which occur in all
languages - any human can learn any language, so something
must link all languages together - a possible list of narrow absolute universals
59All languages
- 1) have consonants and vowels
- 2) combine sounds into larger units
- 3) have nouns ? words for people objects
- 4) have verbs ? words for actions
- 5) can combine words
60All languages
- 6) can say who did that to who
- 7) can negate utterances
- 8) can ask questions
- 9) involve structure-dependance
- 10) involve recursions
61- finding absolute linguistic universals is hard
because they differ in details from language to
language
62Constraints
- language must have constraints which prevent it
from flying apart in different directions - constraints are hard to find ? promising approach
is the search for constraining links - language constructions are often linked tp one
another in implicational chains - Noam Chomskys paramter setting
? best known implicational theory
63- Chomskys parameter setting
- children have an inbuilt knowledge of some basic
language principles - in addition they are instinctively aware of some
key either/or options - they need to find out which options their own
language selects - the extra information follows automatically
64The future
- there are about 6.000 languages spoken today
- in this century 90 of all languages will cease
to exist - 3.000 languages are moribund no longer learned
as a first language by the new generation of
speakers - the few languages that will remain will spread
across the world
65Sources
- Aitchison, John. The seeds of speech Language
origin and evolution. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge 1996. - http//www.ucl.ac.uk/alumni/get-involved/world-map
/world-map.gif