Title: UW Strategic Roadmap for Information Management and Administrative Systems Roadmap Working Team Meeting Action Plan April 24, 2008
1UW Strategic Roadmap forInformation Management
and Administrative SystemsRoadmap Working Team
MeetingAction Plan April 24, 2008
- Sara Gomez
- Interim Vice Provost/CIO
- Office of Information Management
2Overview
Slides
- The Challenge 3-7
- The Future 8-13
- Roadmap Process 14-17
- What Others Are Doing 18-22
- The Strategic Roadmap 23-35
- Budget Estimates 36-38
- Invest in the Future 39-41
Overview - Sara
3The Challenge
The Challenge - Sara
4Why is an associate professor who is
predominantly involved in research activities so
concerned about the business systems of the
University?
- the reason is that inefficiencies at all
levels in the business operations of the
University negatively affect my ability to
perform research.
Roger E. Bumgarner, Associate Professor Department
of Microbiology
4
5Our Systems Cannot Support the UWs Future
- We cannot get the information we need to support
effective decision making - We cannot support our 21st century business and
information needs - We have under-invested in administrative systems
and have fallen behind
The Challenge - Sara
6The Status Quo is Not Acceptable
- This is the clearest message weve heard from UW
community
The Challenge - Sara
7Why Now?
- Because postponing will mean
- Slow erosion of our competitive edge
- Lack of information needed to increase efficiency
and accountability - Harder to keep our systems running
- Paying more later
- Falling further behind
The Challenge - Sara
8The Future
The Future - Sara
9UW Goals
- Offer an outstanding student learning experience
- Advance our research strength
- Provide exceptional health care
- Foster an agile, interdisciplinary approach
- Extend our global reach
- Promote environmental sustainability
The Future - Sara
10Roadmap Goals
- Provide accurate, useful information for
decision making - Replace the base (aging legacy systems) with
flexible business systems - Implement ongoing core system improvements
- Redesign business processes
- Make strategic choices to maximize our
investments
The Future - Sara
11What Will The Future Look Like?Information for
Decision Making
The Vision
Problem
- Quick and easy access to information to do your
job - Deans and others can project future budget
scenarios - Can track actual expenditures against budgets
- Cant get information necessary to manage
multiple research grants - Lack common definitions
- Lack trends and life cycle data for strategic
analysis - Cant make accurate budget projections
- Cant identify how much money you have
The Future - Sara
12What Will The Future Look Like? Replace the Base
The Vision
Problem
- Flexible new systems effectively support UW
business operations - UW makes a significant investment in software and
systems for business operations - Continuous technology renewal allows us to keep
up with changing business needs
- Data structures of our aging legacy systems cant
meet business and information needs - Long-term under-investment in business systems
means significant inefficiencies and daily heroics
The Future - Sara
13What Will The Future Look Like?Make Strategic
Choices to Maximize Investments
The Vision
Problem
- Strategic decision-making guided by Roadmap
- Systems developed holistically for common needs
- Systems work together to meet our business needs
- Fragmented decision making and resource
allocation - Proliferation of redundant systems and
reinvention of the wheel
The Future - Sara
14Roadmap Process
Roadmap Process Jeanne Marie
15Current Status
Roadmap Process Jeanne Marie
16Roadmap Process
- Formed eight task groups Over 170 participants
- Evaluated current state
- Whats working and not working risks
- Researched trends
- Defined a vision for the future
- Developed action plans
- Roadmap Working Team
- Developed overall priorities and sequencing
Roadmap Process Jeanne Marie
17Project Structure
Roadmap Process Jeanne Marie
18What Others Are Doing
What others are doing Jeanne Marie
19What Others Are Doing
Approach Example Organizations
Vendor Solution Vendor Solution Vendor Solution
Banner Illinois (finance, HR, student) 180m
Oracle Michigan (finance, HR, student) Minnesota (finance, HR, student) Indiana (HR, student) 100m-125m 125m-150m 100m
SAP MIT (finance, payroll) 200m
Consortium Consortium Consortium
Kuali Indiana, UC schools, Cornell, U of Arizona (finance) UC Berkeley (student) Not available 10m-15m
Homegrown Homegrown Homegrown
Legacy mainframe UCLA, UCSD Not available
What others are doing Jeanne Marie
20State of Washington
Approach Example Organizations
Vendor Solution Vendor Solution Vendor Solution
SAP HR/Payroll (65,000 FTEs see note) 67m
SAP Financials under consideration 150m-200m
Homegrown/Legacy Homegrown/Legacy Homegrown/Legacy
Legacy mainframe AFRS (current financial systems) Not available
Note The UW has 28,000 FTEs
What others are doing Jeanne Marie
21University of Washington
- I-MAC funding
- 12.5 million since 2004
- USER projects (UIF funded)
- 20 million over 10 years
- HR/Payroll (OPUS, OWLS, ESS)
- Financial Desktop
- Grants Contracts
What others are doing Jeanne Marie
22UW Options for Legacy System Replacement
Business Area Possible Solutions
Financial Higher education consortium Kuali Vendor solution SAP, Banner, Oracle
HR/Payroll Vendor solution SAP, Lawson, Oracle, Banner
Student Higher education consortium Kuali Vendor solution Banner, Oracle
What others are doing Jeanne Marie
23The Strategic Roadmap
Strategic Roadmap Jeanne Marie
24Strategic Roadmap
Redesign Processes
Enhance Renew Systems
Information for Decision Making
Stakeholder Success
Replace the Base
Strategic Roadmap Jeanne Marie
25Information for Decision Making
Define data (definitions, access) develop
infrastructure and tools provide standards and
training for users
- Provide information for decision making
- Make data integration easier
- Provide training and tools for users across the UW
Information for Decision Making
Strategic Roadmap Jeanne Marie
26Replace the Base
Replace our aging legacy systems Finance,
HR/Payroll, Student
- Provide better information for decision making
- Improve operational efficiency
- Provide more agile and flexible core systems
Information for Decision Making
Replace the Base
Strategic Roadmap Jeanne Marie
27Redesign Processes
Redesign business processes in conjunction with
the legacy system replacement efforts
Redesign Processes
- Design processes to maximize impact of new
systems - Streamline work
- Manage change
Information for Decision Making
Replace the Base
Strategic Roadmap Jeanne Marie
28Enhance Renew Systems
Invest in ongoing enhancement and technology
renewal of administrative systems
Redesign Processes
Enhance Renew Systems
- Keep up with changing business needs
- Develop missing research functionality
- Upgrade alumni facilities systems
- Make high-value interim upgrades to legacy
systems
Information for Decision Making
Replace the Base
Strategic Roadmap Jeanne Marie
29Stakeholder Success
Develop a transparent decision-making process
and a mature portfolio management framework
enable collaborative projects across units
- Prioritize projects
- Make commitments
- Maximize investments
Redesign Processes
Enhance Renew Systems
Information for Decision Making
Stakeholder Success
Replace the Base
Strategic Roadmap Jeanne Marie
30Strategic Roadmap
Redesign Processes
Enhance Renew Systems
Information for Decision Making
Stakeholder Success
Replace the Base
Strategic Roadmap Jeanne Marie
31Replace the BaseReplace our aging legacy systems
Replace the Base Bill Shirey
32Redesign ProcessesMaximize efficiencies
Redesign Processes Bill Shirey
33Enhance and Renew SystemsMake ongoing system
improvements
Note Only includes projects planned to start in
2008-09. Projects will be re-assessed and
prioritized annually.
Enhance/Renew Bill Shirey
34Stakeholder SuccessMake strategic choices to
maximize our investments
Stakeholder Success Bill Shirey
35Information for Decision MakingAccess to
information anytime, anywhere
Info for Decision Making Bill Yock
36Budget Estimates
Budget Estimates - Sara
37Overview of Initiatives for 2008-09
Enhance Renew Systems
Redesign Processes
Financial Systems Processes
Appointment Data, Salary Analyzer Research Data
Consolidation Stewardship Data Collection Space
Enhancements, Facilities Upgrade
Information for Decision Making
Data Management Data definitions data
warehouse reporting tools Standards Training
Training guidelines Tools Infrastructure
Workflow, portal security tools
Stakeholder Success
Replace the Base
Financial Systems Scoping Kuali Student
Development
Revamp I-MAC proposal process Portfolio
management PMO Enable collaborative projects
across units
Budget Estimates - Sara
38Short-Term Budget Requests 2008-2009
Initiative Low High
Replace the Base (Note 1) 1,300,000 1,800,000
Redesign Processes (Note 2) 457,000 686,000
Enhance Renew Systems (Note 3) 2,412,000 3,617,000
Stakeholder Success (Note 4) 415,000 460,000
Information for Decision Making (Note 5) 2,429,000 3,643,000
TOTALS 7,013,000 10,206,000
Note 1 Involves 1m per year commitment for 5
years Note 2 Includes 125,000-187,000 of
business owner/user subject matter expert
time Note 3 Includes 508,000-762,000 of
business owner/user subject matter expert time
includes 359,000-394,000 of ongoing
costs Note 4 Includes 415,000-460,000 of
ongoing costs Note 5 Includes 1,329,000-1,993,0
00 of ongoing costs
Budget Estimates - Sara
39Invest in the Future
Invest in the Future - Sara
40Recommended Approach
- Move forward with financial system replacement
- Explore partnership with state
- Continue to look at Kuali financial
- Fund Kuali student partnership
- Invest in high-value, incremental enhancements
for FY 08-09
Invest in the Future - Sara
41Funding Options
- UW budget sources
- Internal reallocation (user fees, tax on unit
budgets, etc.) - Gifts
- Tuition
- Other revenue
- State budget request
- Capital funds (institution bonds)
- Note This is not a revenue source need to
determine how to pay back debt issued via UW
budget sources
Invest in the Future - Sara