Will there soon be an anti-Jewish genocide in Israel ? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loading...

PPT – Will there soon be an anti-Jewish genocide in Israel ? PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 3fa58f-MzM4Y



Loading


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

Will there soon be an anti-Jewish genocide in Israel ?

Description:

www.hirhome.com Will there soon be an anti-Jewish genocide in Israel ? Francisco Gil-White, Ph.D. (Anthropology, UCLA) Editor HISTORICAL and INVESTIGATIVE RESEARCH – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:546
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 126
Provided by: Francisco114
Learn more at: http://www.hirhome.com
Category:

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Will there soon be an anti-Jewish genocide in Israel ?


1
Will there soon be an anti-Jewish genocide in
Israel ?
www.hirhome.com
  • Francisco Gil-White, Ph.D. (Anthropology, UCLA)

Editor HISTORICAL and INVESTIGATIVE RESEARCH
gilwhite_at_comcast.net
Foundation for the Analysis of Conflict, Ethnic
and Social
2
Warning
  • Whenever you see a blue triangle in the lower
    right of the screen
  • this means you must move the presentation
    forward by clicking the left mouse button or else
    the right cursor.
  • Well done.
  • If you dont see the blue triangle
  • then the presentation advances by itself
  • and you must wait for the animation to end
  • and for the blue triangle to appear again

3
In order to understand the present, we must have
the proper context.
  • In other words, we must know something about the
    past.

4
History of attacks against the Jewish people
The crusaders massacre communities in the
Rhineland.
The Romans exterminate the Jewish people (First
Jewish War)
The Romans exterminate the Jewish people (Second
Jewish War)
(Saint) Ambrose issues a call to burn all the
synagogues many are.
The Jews are massacred in Alexandria
5
History of attacks against the Jewish people
The Russian Czars begin a process of slow
genocide against their Jewish subjects.
Great pogroms against the Jews in Eastern Europe,
and then the horrific Nazi genocide.
Crusaders (once again) massacre Jewish
communities in the Rhineland.
The Jews are blamed for the plague (Black
Death). Some 300 European Jewish communities are
wiped out. Massacred in Seville pogroms all
over Iberia.
The Spanish Inquisition. Many Jews are murdered.
More than 150,000 are expelled from Spain.
The Inquisition becomes a pan-European phenomenon.
Forced conversions of Jews all over Europe
NEVER AGAIN?
Great pogroms (pillage and murder) against the
Jews in Eastern Europe.
The Inquisition continues
6
Israel A death camp?
  • Israel is surrounded by mortal enemies.
  • To the North, Lebanon, Hezbollah, and Syria.
  • To the South, Egypt.
  • To the East, Saudi Arabia.
  • It is unlikely that Jordan will remain neutral in
    a conflict, and in any case it is easily overrun.
  • The Iranians are saying they wish to exterminate
    the Israelis, and as soon as US troops leave
    Iraq, they will control it completely.
  • This gives them a land corridor all the way to
    the northern border of Israel, because they
    already control Syria, Lebanon, and Hezbollah.

http//www.hirhome.com/iraniraq/iraq-general-intro
.htm
7
Israel A death camp?
  • The enemy is also inside Israel.
  • Israelis are being told that a PLO state will
    bring peace to Israel.
  • But what will a PLO state really bring?

peace?
or more insecurity for the Israelis?
8
A PLO state can be armed to the teeth by the Arab
states (plus the rest of the Muslim world)
9
A PLO state will be the greatest disaster for the
State of Israel
  • HIR has documented that the PLO was created with
    the explicit purpose of exterminating the Jewish
    people.
  • HIR has documented that the PLO is supported by
    the government of the United States.
  • Therefore, a PLO state in Israel (which is being
    achieved as we speak), is a mortal danger for the
    Jewish people.

10
We will now document this
  • But what we have documented will amaze and
    surprise you.
  • First, therefore, a few words about how we got
    here.

11
How did we get here?
  • In World War II, the Serbs defended the Jews like
    nobody else, risking and giving their
    lives. http//www.hirhome.com/yugo/ihralija3.htm3
    1b
  • Francisco Gil-White discovered the work of
    independent investigators who were exposing the
    lies against the Serbs in the recent civil wars
    in Yugoslavia, and began investigating this too.
  • Eventually, this work led him to study the
    Arab-Israeli conflict.

12
In order to understand what happens in Israel
  • one must first comprehend what happened in
    YUGOSLAVIA.
  • First, therefore, a few words about Yugoslavia.

13
What happened in Yugoslavia during the 1990s?
  • The Western media said that the Serbs were
    murdering Bosnian Muslims, Albanians, and Croats.
  • In reality, as HIR has documented, it was fascist
    forces within the Bosnian Muslim, Albanian, and
    Croat populations who were murdering Serbs.
  • How did the international media turn the world
    upside down?

14
Perhaps you remember this photograph
15
About that photo
This is unbelievable. Can you even get
dressed in less than 20 minutes? Obviously,
they were waiting already for this photograph, to
use it in a political campaign that had been
decided beforehand.
  • It was taken from a video shot by ITN, a British
    television company.
  • ITN said, and the rest of the media repeated,
    that this photo showed Bosnian Muslim prisoners
    in a Bosnian Serb death camp.
  • Less than 20 minutes after the photo was
    published, president Bush Sr. changed his foreign
    policy, and authorized the use of force against
    the Serbs.
  • less than 20 minutes after ITNs report was
    broadcast on American television, President Bush
    changed his policy towards Serbia.
  • Source Sunday Times, August 9, 1992, Sunday,
    Overseas news, 1013 words, Death-camp scoop made
    the world sit up, by Jonathan Miller

16
NATO and the media said
  • that the skinny man in front was a Bosnian
    Muslim prisoner in a Bosnian Serb death camp.
  • However,
  • the man smiled for the camera
  • 2) he didnt have his shirt on because he didnt
    want to he is holding it in his hand (it was
    summer).
  • 3) The fence supposedly keeping him prisoner is
    a chicken-wire fence that a child would have
    destroyed with a kick.
  • 4) He is the only one in the photograph who
    looks too skinny.

Compare it to the great fence at Dachau, which
was not only formidable but electrified.
17
The media lied
  • The supposed death camp was in fact a refugee
    camp for displaced Bosnian Muslims.
  • It was a refugee camp, not a death camp.
  • The Serbs were helping their Bosnian Muslim
    neighbors who wanted to live in peace and who
    were fleeing Alija Izetbegovic, anti-Serb Muslim
    terrorist.
  • How do we know this?
  • Because the same day that ITN shot the video from
    which the famous photo on the TIME cover was
    taken, a Serbian television team was also
    present, and it filmed the British team shooting
    its video.
  • Jared Israel and Petar Makara, Emperors Clothes
    editors, have reproduced the Serbian footage in
    their documentary film JUDGMENT!

18
What does JUDGMENT! show?
  • The skinny man in front had a deformity, and his
    friends made fun of him. Thats why he smiles
    (hes embarrassed).
  • Everybody else looks well fed.
  • Penny Marshall, the ITN reporter, tried several
    times to get the men to say that they were
    mistreated prisoners, but they replied each time
    that they were being treated very well, that this
    was a refugee camp.

19
What does JUDGMENT! show?
  • There were no soldiers.
  • People came in and out of the building as they
    pleased.
  • They were receiving medical attention, food,
    etc., under difficult conditions.
  • There were no fences.

20
And the chicken-wire fence?
  • Only about 5 meters remained of a chicken-wire
    fence that had once protected a tiny tool shed.
  • Penny Marshall went out of her way to position
    her TV equipment behind this surviving bit of
    fencethe rest was broken and fallen down.
  • Marshall then proceeded to interview the refugees
    across this remaining bit of fence!
  • When she discovered the skinny man in the back,
    she asked that he come forward so that she could
    get a close up of him

21
And the chicken-wire fence?
In this way, Penny Marshall attempted to create
the impression of a death camp.
To read more about the lies that were said to
accuse the Bosnian Serbs http//www.hirhome.com/y
ugo/ihralija1.htm
22
But
  • If the photo is obviously not a photo of a death
    camp.
  • Why did people believe that it was?
  • Because ALL OF THE WESTERN MEDIA said that it was
    a death camp.
  • (the power of suggestion, when you assume that
    the media is honest, is quite powerful)
  • And because the ITN video was never shown (only
    the photo).

23
The other accusations against the Serbs followed
the same pattern
  • The media said that Serbian president Slobodan
    Milosevic had incited the Serbs to commit
    genocide against their neighbors, causing the
    civil war.
  • But the speech in which he supposedly did that is
    an ode to brotherhood and tolerance. http//www.hi
    rhome.com/yugo/milospeech.htm
  • They said that the Serbian security services had
    massacred Albanian civilians in the town of
    Racak, in Kosovo.
  • This was NATOs excuse to begin bombing the
    Serbs.
  • But the accusation was an elaborate hoax.
  • http//www.hirhome.com/yugo/ranta.htm
  • And NATOs own forensic scientists were unable to
    find even one Albanian civilian massacred by the
    Serbs in Kosovo (you read correctly).
  • http//www.hirhome.com/yugo/freezer1.htm

24
The one who lied about Racak
  • Helena Ranta, finish forensic.
  • Sent by NATO to investigate the accusation of a
    massacre in Racak.
  • Her investigation demonstrates that there was no
    massacre.
  • But her report was kept secret for two years!
  • Meanwhile, Ranta said Massacre! to the press.
  • NATO used her statements as an excuse to begin
    bombing Serbia. http//www.hirhome.com/yugo/ranta.
    htm

25
The link between Serbia and Israel
  • The Serbs were falsely accused of committing a
    massacre in Racak.
  • The Israelis were falsely accused of committing a
    massacre in Jenin (West Bank).
  • Each time, the accusers wanted to send Helena
    Ranta.

26
Jenin
  • In April 2002 all the international media, with
    one voice, accused the Israeli Defense Forces of
    having committed a massacre of Arab civilians in
    the West Bank town of Jenin.
  • Now the accusers have confessed that there was no
    massacre, but this was obvious from the start.
  • The UN refugee camp, in Jenin, had a bombs-making
    factory, and weapons-making factory, and it was
    from Jenin that the great majority of suicide
    bombers were being sent.
  • The Israelis tried to put an end to this and a
    firefight resulted between the PLO terrorists and
    the Israeli soldiers, with casualties on both
    sides. http//www.hirhome.com/yugo/ranta.htm
  • The UN wanted the accusation of massacre in
    Jenin investigated by Helena Ranta

27
When we noticed this, the light bulb finally
turned on
  • Up until this moment, we had not investigated the
    Arab-Israeli conflict.
  • Now we had a good reason to think that perhaps
    the same strategy that was being used against the
    Serbs was being used against the Israelis.
  • This hypothesis has been confirmed over and over
    again.

28
The consequence?
  • Prof. Francisco Gil-White, because he
    documented
  • the truth about the civil wars in Yugoslavia and
  • the truth about the Arab-Israeli conflict,
  • was fired from the University of Pennsylvania.

29
The slides that follow document the danger to
Israel
30
What will be the consequence of a PLO state in
the West Bank and Gaza?
Answering this question requires us first to
understand the goals of the PLO.
31
What does the PLO really want?
  • If the PLO wants a state in the West Bank and
    Gaza, then peace is possible.
  • But if what the PLO wants is the destruction of
    Israel, then a PLO state is the prelude to a
    disastrous war.
  • Let us examine, then, what the PLO says that its
    goals are.

32
The PLO Covenant (1968)
  • In other words, the PLO considers that the only
    way to liberate Palestine is to kill Jews.
  • In the context of an obligatory armed
    struggle, the synonyms of purge are the
    following
  • rid, eliminate, remove, eradicate, do away with,
    clear.
  • When the Nazis spoke of liquidating the Jews,
    what they meant was EXTERMINATION.
  • Given that the only way to liberate Palestine,
    according to the PLO, is killing Jews
  • when the PLO says that the liberation of
    Palestine will liquidate the Zionist presence,
    it is referring to the extermination of the
    Jewish people.
  • NOTE The 1968 constitution is current. A lot
    of people think that the articles we quote at
    left have been revoked. They have not been.
  • (But even if they had been, there would be no
    reason to take that seriously).
  • Article 9. . .says that armed struggle is the
    only way to liberate Palestine.
  • Article 15 says it is a national duty to repulse
    the Zionist imperialist invasion from the great
    Arab homeland and to purge the Zionist presence
    from Palestine.
  • Article 22 declares that the liberation of
    Palestine will liquidate the Zionist and
    imperialist presence and bring about the
    stabilization of peace in the Middle East.
  • Translation The Associated Press, December 15,
    1998, Tuesday, AM cycle, International News,
    1070 words, Clinton meets with Netanyahu,
    Arafat, appeals for progress, By TERENCE HUNT,
    AP White House Correspondent, EREZ CROSSING,
    Gaza Strip

33
The PLO is
Al Fatah
By 1970the PLO had experienced less a
revival than a total reincarnation of membership
and purpose under the leadership of Yasser
Arafat. Consisting ostensibly of representatives
of all guerilla organizations, the PLO in its
resurrected form was almost entirely
Fatah-dominated, and Arafat himself served as
president of its executive. Source Sachar, H.
1982. A history of Israel From the rise of
Zionism to our time. New York Knopf. (p.698)
  • The most important faction within the PLO, and
    the one that calls all the shots, is Al Fatah.
  • Around 1970, Al Fatah swallowed the PLO, keeping
    the name.

34
The Fatah Covenant
  • Al Fatah speaks plainly in its own Covenant.
    Article 12 demands
  • The complete liberation of Palestine and
    eradication of Zionist economic, political,
    military and cultural existence.
  • And how will Al Fatah eradicate the Zionist
    economic, political, military, and cultural
    existence?
  • Expelling or killing those who practice that
    culture.

http//www.middleeastfacts.com/middle-east/the-fat
ah-constitution.php
35
The Fatah Covenant
  • What follows?
  • That Al Fatah, and the PLO it controls, do not
    want to negotiate peace.
  • PLO/ Fatah will never be satisfied with a
    Palestinian state next door to a Jewish state
    that is still standing.
  • Al Fatahs Covenant says, in article 19, that
  • Armed struggle is a strategy and not a tactic
    and the Palestinian Arab people's armed
    revolution is a decisive factor in the liberation
    fight and in uprooting the Zionist existence, and
    this struggle will not cease unless the Zionist
    state is demolished and Palestine is completely
    liberated.

36
The PLO and Al Fatah mean what they say
  • We will now demonstrate this

37
Where does the name Palestine come from?
  • The Romans renamed Judah (land of the Jews), as
    Judea (land of the Jews), when they conquered it.
  • Then, when Emperor Hadrian completed a long
    extermination of the Mediterranean Jews, he
    renamed it Syria-Palestina and forbade Jews to
    enter it. The point was to wipe out any
    connection between this area and the Jewish
    people, after having wiped out the Jews.
  • Palestine means Land of the Philistines. But
    the Philistines had long ceased to exist, and the
    land that the Philistines had once occupied,
    anyway, was much smaller (more or less the Gaza
    Strip).
  • It was the Turkish Ottoman Empire that governed
    the Middle East for centuries before 1918.
  • In all that time the Ottomans never bothered to
    specify the boundaries of any Palestine.

http//www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov2.htm
38
How does the PLO define Palestine?
  • The 1968 PLO Covenant (the current one) says
  • Article 1 Palestine is the homeland of the
    Arab Palestinian people.
  • Article 2 Palestine, with the boundaries it
    had during the British Mandate, is an indivisible
    territorial unit
  • 1) How can there be a Palestinian Arab people
    whose supposedly ancestral homeland was defined
    by the British colonialists?
  • 2) Why does the PLO say that Palestine is
    indivisible when this land was divided, first,
    by the British, and then by the PLO?

THERE ARE TWO CONTRADICTIONS HERE
http//www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/plocov.h
tm
39
The division of Palestine
  • Before 1921, the British defined as Palestine
    all of the British Mandate territory.
  • In other words, before 1921, what the map at
    right calls Palestine, and also what it calls
    Transjordan, together, were Palestine.
  • So, in 1921, Great Britain divided Palestine in
    two, and from then onwards Palestine was less
    than half its previous size.

If the PLO means it that Palestine is
indivisible, then it ought to be protesting
this division. s
40
?
?
?
  • If the PLO means it that Palestine is
    indivisible, then
  • it ought to be demanding Transjordan (today, the
    Kingdom of Jordan).
  • But it doesnt
  • WHY NOT?

?
41
?
?
?
  • When Great Britain reduced Palestine to less
    than half its size, this was in order to forbid
    Jewish settlement in the territory that
    henceforth received the name of Transjordan.

The Balfour Declaration said that the Jews had a
right to settle in the territory called
Palestine. In 1921, the British reduced the
borders of Palestine.
42
?
?
?
Is this why the PLO does not demand Transjordan
(now Jordan)? Because there arent any Jews
there for them to kill?
?
This hypothesis is supported by the text of the
PLO constitutions. We will now demonstrate this.
43
The PLO also divided Palestine
West Bank
  • As we saw, in the 1968 PLO Covenant (the current
    one), the PLO states that Palestine has the
    borders established by the British in 1921.
  • This territory includes the West Bank and Gaza.
  • But in the original, 1964 PLO Covenant, the PLO
    does not demand the West Bank and Gaza!

Gaza Strip
44
The PLO also divided Palestine
  • In the original PLO Covenant of 1964, the PLO
    stated, with great clarity, that the West Bank
    and Gaza were not part of Palestine.
  • Article 24 This Organization does not exercise
    any territorial sovereignty over the West Bank in
    the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, on the Gaza
    Strip or in the Himmah Area.
  • What happened between 1964 and 1968 was the Six
    Day War (1967).
  • This war was provoked by the Arab states
    neighboring Israel, which, as they had done in
    the past, tried to exterminate the Israeli Jews.
  • http//www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally.htm1967
  • But the Arab states lost and Israel ended up in
    control of West Bank and Gaza.
  • (Before 1967, these territories were
    occupiedillegallyby Jordan and Egypt)
  • After 1967, Jews began settling in the West Bank
    and Gaza.

Why did the PLO modify its charter in 1968 in
order to include in Palestine, for the first
time, the West Bank and Gaza?
What happened between 1964 and 1968?
http//www.un.int/palestine/PLO/PNA2.html
45
Palestine doesnt exist
  • In other words, for the PLO the words to
    liberate Palestine are synonymous with to kill
    Jews.
  • Therefore, the borders of this supposed
    Palestine must correspond to the land on which
    Jews live in the Middle East.
  • Palestine is a territory created by the British
    colonialists after the First World War ended in
    1918.
  • In order to reduce the area where the Jews could
    settle, The British redefined Palestine in
    1921, reducing it to less than half its previous
    size.
  • The State of Israel, between 1948 and 1967, was
    even smaller, and did not include the West Bank
    and Gaza.
  • So before 1967, the PLO defined Palestine as
    having the borders Israel then had (without the
    West Bank and Gaza)
  • After 1967, when Israel ended up in control of
    the West Bank and Gaza, the PLO quickly rewrote
    its Covenant so that Palestine would once again
    have the borders that capture the Jews.
  • Why?
  • Because, as the PLO explains in article 9 of its
    1968 Covenant (the current one) armed struggle
    is the only way to liberate Palestine.
  • And as it explains in article 22, the liberation
    of Palestine will liquidate the Zionistpresence.

46
But. . .
  • This interpretation of the Oslo Peace
    Process is the one that PLO leaders defend when
    they speak to their constituency in Arabic.
  • We demonstrate this next.
  • If the PLOs only purpose is to kill Jews, then
    the famous Oslo Peace Process must really be a
    Trojan Horse.
  • In other words, by means of the Oslo Peace
    Process Israeli Jews have been made to think that
    peace can be achieved with the PLO.
  • The truth, however, is that Oslo has been a
    strategy to give the PLO a base inside Israel,
  • improving in this way its opportunities for
    killing Jews
  • and allowing the PLO to prepare the platform for
    the destruction of Israel.

47
Said by Yasser Arafat
In 1980, King Fahd of Saudi Arabia gave a
clear definition What is meant by jihad is a
united, comprehensive, integrated Arab-Islamic
confrontation in which we place all our resources
and our spiritual, cultural, political, material
and military potential in a long and untiring
Holy War against Israel, of course, who
else? Source Evening Standard (London) May
19, 1994 SECTION Pg. 9 LENGTH 907 words
HEADLINE A NEW KIND OF JIHAD
  • A tape-recording has surfaced of PLO leader
    Yasser Arafat speaking to Moslem followers Mr.
    Arafat was exhorting his followers to prosecute a
    jihad ... to liberate Jerusalem. Mr. Arafat
    does not deny the tapes authenticity His
    followers would have taken it to mean that the
    peace process was just a stratagem a Trojan
    Horse which should now be exploited with maximum
    violence.
  • Source Evening Standard (London) May 19, 1994
    SECTION Pg. 9 LENGTH 907 words HEADLINE A
    NEW KIND OF JIHAD

48
Yasser Arafats Plan of Phases
  • Shortly after signing the Declaration of
    Principles and the famous handshake between PLO
    leader Yasser Arafat and Israeli prime
    minister Yitzhak Rabin on the White House lawn,
    Arafat was declaring to his Palestinian
    constituency over Jordanian television that Oslo
    was to be understood in terms of the PLOs
    Palestine National Councils 1974 decision. This
    was a reference to the so-called Plan of Phases,
    according to which the Palestine Liberation
    Organization PLO would acquire whatever
    territory it could by negotiations, then use that
    land as a base for pursuing its ultimate goal of
    Israels annihilation.

SOURCE Levin, K. 2005. The Oslo syndrome
Delusions of a people under siege. Hanover, NH
Smith and Kraus. (p.ix)
49
Said by Faisal Husseini in 2001
  • Source The Baltimore Sun, July 11, 2001
    Wednesday, FINAL EDITION, Pg. 1A, 1574 words,
    Israelis taking darker view of Palestinian
    intentions Many see existence of Jewish state at
    risk, Mark Matthews.
  • Faisal Husseini, the top PLO official in
    Jerusalemwas quoted as likening the Oslo
    accords to a Trojan horse. the weekly Al-Arabi
    quotes Husseini as calling the Oslo accords just
    a temporary procedure, or just a step towards
    something biggerthe liberation of all historical
    Palestine from the (Jordan) river to the
    (Mediterranean) sea, even if this means that the
    conflict will last for another thousand years or
    for many generations.

50
The new PLO boss, Mahmoud Abbas
  • He is also known as Abu Mazen
  • He has always been quite important.
  • He is one of the authors of the Trojan Horse
    strategy.
  • His doctoral thesis explains how to destroy the
    Israelis by making them think that the PLO wants
    to negotiate peace.
  • This strategy culminated in the famous Oslo
    Peace Process, which was signed by Mahmoud
    Abbas, not by Yasser Arafat.

http//www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm2005
51
But, Why does the PLO want to destroy Israel?
  • Because Al Fatah, the most important and largest
    group within the PLO, was created by a leader of
    Adolf Hitlers Final Solution for the purpose of
    finishing the extermination of the Jewish people.

52
Hajj Amin al Husseini
  • Before this meeting, Hajj Amin had a great deal
    of experience with anti-Jewish terrorism.
  • The British colonialists had made him Grand Mufti
    of Jerusalem in 1920, after he organized a
    terrorist riot against innocent Jews.
  • He organized other terrorist waves in British
    Mandate Palestine (with the approval and
    cooperation of the British), in 1921, 1929, and
    1936-39.
  • When he and Hitler met they had lots to talk
    about
  • The Führer then made the following statement to
    the Mufti Hajj Amin, enjoining him to lock it
    in the uttermost depths of his heart
  • in the Middle East, Germanys objective
    wouldbe solely the destruction of the Jewish
    element residing in the Arab sphere
  • Source Germany. Auswärtiges Amt Foreign
    Ministry. Title Documents on German foreign
    policy, 1918-1945, from the archives of the
    German Foreign Ministry. Akten zur deutschen
    auswärtigen Politik. English Publisher
    Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1949-
    Description Book v. fold. maps. 24 cm. Series
    D, Vol. XIII no. 515. NOTE

In 1941 Hajj Amin al Husseini met with Adolf
Hitler
http//www.hirhome.com/israel/muftihitler.htm
http//www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov4.htm
53
Hajj Amin al Husseini
  • In the photograph you can see Hajj Amin making
    revision of his Nazi troops, created out of tens
    of thousands of Bosnian Muslim volunteers whom he
    recruited himself, and who committed genocide all
    over Yugoslavia against Serbs, Jews, and Roma
    (Gypsies).
  • Hajj Amin also played an important role in
    getting 800,000 Hungarian Jews to the Auschwitz
    death camp, where they were practically all
    murdered.

54
Hajj Amin al Husseini
  • The caption above the photo reads
  • A Muslim volunteer hangs a portrait of the
    Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Hajj Amin al Husseini

http//emperors-clothes.com/bosnia/svijet.htm
55
Hajj Amin inspecting his SS Handzar Division
troops
  • Source The Marshall Cavendish Illustrated
    Encyclopedia of World War II, Vol. 10, page 2812.
  • The caption under the photograph reads
  • One of the more bizarre aspects of the SS the
    Grand Mufti of Jerusalem visiting Muslim SS
    troops.

Notice the Nazi salute
56
As important, or more important, than Eichmann
  • According to Dieter Wisliceny, one of Adolf
    Eichmanns chief lieutenants in the Final
    Solution
  • The Mufti Hajj Amin is a sworn enemy of the
    Jews and has always fought for the idea of
    annihilating the Jews. He sticks to this idea
    always, also in his talks with Adolf Eichmann
    ... The Mufti is one of the originators of the
    systematic destruction of European Jewry by the
    Germans, and he has become a permanent colleague,
    partner and adviser to Eichmann...in the
    implementation of this programme.

http//www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov4.htm
Hajj Amin al Husseini
57
The father of the PLO was
Hajj Amin
in February 1967 the PLO leader Ahmed
Shukeiry was wounded in an assassination
attempt. For the while, as a result, the
organization was at least partially immobilized
by factional intrigues. Not so a rival, and even
more radical Palestinian group in Syria, the
Fatah (Arab Liberation Movement), organized
several years earlier by veterans of the Muftis
Hajj Amins former Arab Higher
Committee. Source Sachar, H. 1982. A history
of Israel From the rise of Zionism to our time.
New York Knopf. (p.698)
By 1970 the PLO in its resurrected
form was almost entirely Fatah-dominated, and
Arafat himself served as president of its
executive Source Sachar, H. 1982. A history
of Israel From the rise of Zionism to our time.
New York Knopf. (p.698)
YASSER ARAFAT Were they able to
replace our hero Hajj Amin al-Husseini? ... There
were a number of attempts to get rid of Hajj
Amin, whom they considered an ally of the Nazis.
But even so, he lived in Cairo, and participated
in the 1948 war, and I was one of his
troops. Said by Yasser Arafat to the
London-based pro-PLO puiblication Al Sharq al
Awsat, and republished in the Palestinian daily
Al Quds, 2 Agosto, 2002. Translated from Arabic
by Palestinian Media Watch http//www.pmw.org.il/b
ulletins-050802.html
The mufti Hajj Amin barely escaped trial
for war crimes by fleeing to Egypt in 1946.
There he made young Yasser Arafat, then living in
Cairo, his protégé. The mufti secretly imported a
former Nazi commando officer into Egypt to teach
Mr.. Arafat and other teenage recruits the fine
points of guerrilla warfare. Mr.. Arafat learned
his lessons well the mufti was so proud of him
he even pretended the two of them were blood
relations. Source Washington Times August 9,
2002 "Yasser Arafat Nazi trained", by David N.
Bossie.
As weve seen, before the World War began, the
Mufti Hajj Amin was organizing anti-Jewish
terrorist waves in British Mandate
Palestine. For the last one the terrorists
organized themselves as Hajj Amins Arab Higher
Committee, with weapons furnished by Hitler. It
was this same Arab Higher Committee that gave
birth to Al Fatah.
Soon, Al-Fatah came to own the PLO. In
consequence, Al Fatahs leader, Yasser Arafat,
became the leader of the PLO.
Yasser Arafats mentor and hero was Hajj Amin al
Husseini.
58
The PLO is descended from the Nazis
  • For those who understand this, it is hardly a
    surprise that the PLO wants to exterminate the
    Jews.
  • The intelligence services of the United States,
    naturally, understand perfectly the PLOs Nazi
    history, and its genocidal project.
  • Why then does the US support the PLO against
    Israel?

59
The early 80s
  • President Ronald Reagan was pushing for a PLO
    state in Israeli territory the West
    Bank. http//www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm
    1981
  • At the same time, the PLO terrorists were
    attacking Israeli civilians from their bases in
    Lebanon.
  • ...the PLO shifted its bases to Lebanon and
    continued its attacks on Israel. The PLO's
    relations with the Lebanese were tumultuous, and
    the organization soon became embroiled in
    Lebanon's sectarian disputes and contributed to
    that country's eventual slide into civil war.
  • http//www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm1982

60
The early 80s
  • Because the PLO was murdering Israeli civilians,
    Israel invaded Lebanon and launched a
  • campaign that Israel said would wipe out the
    PLO as a political and military force and open
    the way for true peace in the Middle East.
  • But when the Israeli troops were getting ready to
    deliver the final blow to the PLO, the US
    intervened to save the PLO and send it to Tunis.
  • The Washington Post took note of the contrast
    between the PLOs earlier exit from Jordan and
    this exit from Lebanon
  • From Amman Jordan, the PLO troops left
    unheralded, in ridicule. From Beirut Lebanon,
    they left in a compromise negotiated by the
    United States, waving their Kalashnikov rifles.
    Arafat left not in the middle of the night but
    with an emotional dockside sendoff from the
    Lebanese prime minister, a French Navy escort and
    U.S. air cover.

61
The early 80s
  • Before the Israeli invasion, the American
    diplomats in Beirut had their security provided
    for bythe PLO!
  • In other words, the Nazi PLO terrorists were the
    bodyguards of the American diplomats.
  • "The Lebanese occupation by Israel caused the
    Palestinians to have to leave Lebanon
    eventually...They had been the protectors for the
    American diplomatic community in Beirut...There
    was liaison with the PLO, and the Americans were
    depending on them for their security."
  • Source Vincent Cannistraro, Director of
    National Security Council Intelligence from 1984
    to 1987.
  • http//www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm1982

62
The early 80s
  • Although the US saved the PLO in 1982, the PLO
    was defeated anyway, because from Tunis it was
    very difficult to kill Israelis.
  • But the US government undertook to fix this for
    the PLO, and went quite out of its way to revive
    this antisemitic terrorist organization.

63
1991 The United States forces Israel to accept
the PLO inside the Jewish state
  • President George Bush (Sr.)

and his Secretary of State James Baker III
threatened the Israelis for 8 months with the
denial of all economic aid, until they forced the
Israelis to participate in what became the Oslo
process, the purpose of which was to bring the
PLO from exile, where it was defeated, and into
the heart of the Jewish state.
http//www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm1991
64
The ultimate purpose of Oslo
  • From the beginning, everybody understood that the
    final goal of Oslo would be the creation of a PLO
    state in the West Bank and Gaza.
  • This is now being achieved.
  • However, the United States knew from the
    beginning that giving the West Bank and Gaza to
    Israels enemies would spell the destruction of
    Israel.
  • We demonstrate this next.

65
The Six Day War
  • In 1967, the Arab countries neighboring Israel,
    as they had done in the past, provoked a war
    whose goal was the extermination of the Israeli
    Jews.
  • http//www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally.htm1967
  • The Arab states lost, and they lost also some
    territory.
  • The Pentagon which is to say, the US military
    carried out a study in the same year of 1967 in
    order to examine the situation of the Jewish
    state.

The Pentagon study was not conducted in order to
inform Israel. On the contrary, it was kept
secret and was not released until the year 1984.
66
The Six Day War
This study concludes that From a strictly
military point of view Israel would require the
retention of some captured Arab territory in
order to provide militarily defensible
borders. Specifically Israel cannot survive
without the West Bank, Gaza, and the Golan
Heights.
67
The Pentagon study says
  • Israel needs to retain the greater part of the
    West Bank because,
  • This border area along the West Bank has
    traditionally been lightly held by military
    forces and defenses consisting mainly of small,
    widely separated outposts and patrols and,
    therefore, afforded an area where launching of
    saboteurs and terrorists into Israel was
    relatively easy...

68
The Pentagon study says
  • On the Syrian border,
  • Israel must hold the commanding terrain east of
    the boundary of 4 June 1967 which overlooks the
    Galilee area.
  • This is a reference to the Golan Heights, from
    which the Syrians had been shelling Israeli
    farmers in the Galilee.
  • As the Pentagon study says During the period
    January 1965 to February 1967, a total of 28
    sabotage and terrorist acts occurred along this
    border.

69
The Pentagon study says
  • Concerning Jerusalem, the Pentagon study states
    that
  • To defend the Jerusalem area would require that
    the boundary of Israel be positioned to the east
    of the city to provide for the organization of an
    adequate defensive position.

70
The Pentagon study says
  • And about the Gaza strip, the Pentagon study
    states that,
  • The Strip, under Egyptian control, provides a
    salient into Israel a little less than 30 miles
    long and from four to eight miles wide. It has
    served as a training area for the Palestine
    Liberation Army... Occupation of the Strip by
    Israel would reduce the hostile border by a
    factor of five and eliminate a source for raids
    and training of the Palestine Liberation Army.

71
The Pentagon study says
  • This document was declassified in 1984, and the
    Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
    published it then http//www.jinsa.org/articles/p
    rint.html?documentid496
  • It was also published by the Journal of
    Palestine Studies http//www.hirhome.com/israel/pe
    ntagon.pdf

72
The Pentagons conclusions are not difficult to
understand
  • First, find the West Bank Border.
  • Notice that the West Bank is hills, whereas the
    most populated zone in Israel, Tel Aviv, is a
    lowland to its side.
  • And Jerusalem is almost completely surrounded by
    the West Bank.
  • The Israelis are trapped in a lowland between the
    hills and the sea. And their capital city is
    surrounded.

73
The Pentagons conclusions are not difficult to
understand
  • The situation is better appreciated when you
    consider the distances, which are really quite
    small.
  • From the West Bank hills to the sea, in the
    Tel-Aviv-Yafo area, the most densely populated in
    Israel, there are no more than 11 miles.
  • Many people who take care of their health jog
    this distance every morning.

74
Analysis
  • Given
  • that the US government determined that Israel
    cannot survive without the West Bank and Gaza,
  • and that the US government forced Israel to
    participate in Oslo, whose objective is to wrest
    the West Bank and Gaza away from Israel,
  • and that this territory is being given to the
    PLO, an organization created by the top leader of
    the Nazi anti-Jewish extermination.

Can it be possible that the US ruling elite,
running the world superpower, is trying to
destroy the tiny Jewish state?
75
It is possible
  • HIR has produced a book that documents US foreign
    policy toward the Jewish state from the 1930s
    until the present.
  • It is practically impossible to find a year in
    which the foreign policy of the United States was
    not anti-Jewish.
  • The book is regularly updated but the following
    years are already documented
  • 1930s, 1930-45, 1945, 1947-48, 1949-53, 1955,
    1955-65, 1958, 1964, 1964-1967, 1967, 1969, 1970,
    1973, 1974-75, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1981,
    1982-83, 1985, 1987-88, 1989, 1991, 1994, 2005.

http//www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally.htm
76
But
What Israel gets is very little if it is
considered in context, against the financial aid
that the enemies of Israel receive. For
example, Egypt gets only slightly less than
Israel from the United States, and all that money
goes to buying weapons.
We need also to compare this to what the
enemies of Israel get. There is no country in
the world that gets more military hardware from
the United States than Saudi Arabia, whose king
explained to us the importance of destroying
Israel.
Let us suppose that a friend offers you a
million dollars, but on condition that you allow
a hired assassin, whose job is to kill you, to
live in your own house. Seem like a friendly
offer? We have seen already that the financial
aid Israel gets from the United States was on
condition that Israel bring the PLO (the Nazis)
inside.
  • What about the economic aid that Israel receives
    from the United States?
  • And does Israel receive so much?
  • But, What about the weapons Israel gets from the
    United States?

77
BUT!
Of course they do say it, and it is very easy
to say. And the repetition of it convinces a
lot of people. But think about it What is the
effect of this? If everybody is upset with US
foreign policy, then, if they are told that it is
all being done for the Jews, what is being
promoted is ANTISEMITISM!
  • Don't US officials say all the time that the
    United States supports Israel?
  • And dont they explain to everybody that
    supporting Israel is precisely what defines their
    foreign policy?

78
(No Transcript)
79
What will be the consequence?
80
Predicting catastrophe
  • Some catastrophes are preceded by signs that
    announce them.
  • For example, a Hawaiian website dedicated to
    tsunamis warns
  • If you are at the beach and youobserve a rapid
    withdrawal of the seahead for higher ground
    immediately. http//www.tsunami.org/faq.htm
  • Why this warning?
  • Because when the sea retreats to the horizon,
    what is coming is a massive, destructive wave.
  • Therefore, if a person stays at the beach after
    noticing that the sea suddenly retreats, this
    person doesnt know a thing about tsunamis.

81
Predicting catastrophe
  • If this person should nevertheless somehow
    survive the tsunami, we logically would expect
    this person to have learned something.
  • The next time the ocean retreated to the horizon,
    therefore, this person would not stay at the
    beach.
  • Otherwise we would have to suppose that this
    person is insane, or else wishes to commit
    suicide.

82
The recent Jewish Catastrophe
  • The Holocaust would have been impossible if
    millions of Christians had not first been made to
    believe that the Jews supposedly wanted to
    destroy them.
  • Why?
  • Because the extermination of an entire people is
    something that only people who believe they are
    defending themselves will do.
  • Otherwise they wont.
  • During World War II, the Jewish people suffered a
    great Catastrophe.
  • It was preceded by dramatic signs.
  • The most important of these was a hysteria all
    over Europe and the United States.
  • People were made to believe that the Jews in
    secret controlled the Western governments and
    were planning to use their clandestine power to
    destroy Christian civilization.

83
The recent Jewish Catastrophe
Its important to understand this propaganda,
because it is once again very popular.
84
The Protocols of Zion
  • At the turn of the 20th century, a hoax produced
    by the Russian Czars secret police, the Okhrana,
    began to be eagerly distributed in the West.
  • It bore the name Protocols of the Learned Elders
    of Zion
  • It pretended to be the minutes from a meeting of
    super-powerful Jews who in secret controlled all
    the Western governments and wished to destroy the
    Christians.

Nazi pamphlet Roosevelt betrays America! The
Nazis caricatured a Jew controlling the American
president as his puppet. http//www.calvin.edu/aca
demic/cas/gpa/
85
The Protocols of Zion
  • The Czarist government was trying to distract the
    oppressed Russian masses from their real
    problems, in this way hoping to convince them
    that everything that was wrong was the fault of
    the Jews.

Nazi pamphlet Roosevelt betrays America! The
Nazis caricatured a Jew controlling the American
president as his puppet. http//www.calvin.edu/aca
demic/cas/gpa/
86
The Protocols of Zion
  • In 1921, Phillip Graves, from The Times of
    London, demonstrated on the first page
  • that that the conversations between the supposed
    super powerful Jews had been cut and pasted from
    the conversations that Joly invented between
    Machiavelli and Montesquieu.
  • The title of Maurice Jolys book is Dialogues in
    Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu.
  • It has got nothing to do with Jews.

Nazi pamphlet Roosevelt betrays America! The
Nazis caricatured a Jew controlling the American
president as his puppet. http//www.calvin.edu/aca
demic/cas/gpa/
http//emperors-clothes.com/antisem/times-pdf.htm
87
This demonstration was not necessary
  • The overwhelming majority of Jews were quite
    poor and lived in villages called shtetl.

88
The Protocols of Zion
  • But many people believed the propaganda in The
    Protocols
  • This did not stop the Russian Revolution from
    happening, as the Czar was hoping, but The
    Protocols did help instigate horrific pogroms
  • episodes of arbitrary sacking and killing in
    Jewish communities all over the Russian Empire.
  • Phillip Graves demonstration in 1921 had zero
    effect on the public the multitudes continued to
    believe the anti-Jewish slanders.
  • After, the Nazis (along with Henry Ford) became
    the main disseminators of the anti-Jewish
    propaganda in The Protocols

Nazi pamphlet Roosevelt betrays America! The
Nazis caricatured a Jew controlling the American
president as his puppet. http//www.calvin.edu/aca
demic/cas/gpa/
http//emperors-clothes.com/antisem/protocols-1.ht
m
89
The Protocols of Zion
  • The Protocols became a bestseller all over the
    West.
  • Westerners ended up feeling a profound fear of
    the Jews.
  • This fear is what allowed Adolf Hitler to carry
    out his genocide of the Jewish people.

Nazi pamphlet Roosevelt betrays America! The
Nazis caricatured a Jew controlling the American
president as his puppet. http//www.calvin.edu/aca
demic/cas/gpa/
90
The Protocols of Zion
  • Phillip Graves investigation is not the only
    thing that showed The Protocols to be a hoax.
  • The Holocaust itself was a demonstration.
  • If the Jews had really controlled the Western
    governments, these governments would have
    intervened to save them.
  • What these governments did instead was cooperate
    with the Final Solution.

http//www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally.htm1939
91
(No Transcript)
92
Are we back in the 1930s?
The European Union initially suppressed the
report! But others published it and eventually
so did the EU. Nevertheless, it did not receive
much publicity, and it is quite obvious that few
Jews understand just how alarming their situation
has become.
  • In the year 2003, The European Union produced an
    investigation on the state of antisemitism.
  • This investigation establishes that there has
    been an alarming (and violent) growth in
    antisemitism all over Europe.

http//emperors-clothes.com/docs/eurepantisem.htm
93
The absurd Nazi propaganda is back
We are not talking (only) of obscure and
extreme right-wing leaders.
  • There is an effort to convince people of the same
    absurdity
  • that the Jews supposedly control everything in
    secret in order to hurt us.
  • But though this is absurd it hardly means that
    people are not believing it. In World War II
    millions believed it.
  • Their leaders told them it was so, and they are
    telling them again.

94
Ralph Nader, candidate for president of the
United States
The Washington Post quotes Nader and then, for
comparison, it quotes what the National Alliance,
a neo-Nazi organization in the United States,
says "Bush also repeated the catch-phrase . .
. 'committed to the security of Israel as a
Jewish state,' which is repeated almost
word-for-word again and again by Israel's
sycophants and Capitol Hill puppets."
Ralph Nader sounds just like the neo-nazis.
But he is supposed to be A LEFTIST!
  • "The days when the chief Israeli puppeteer comes
    to the United States and meets with the puppet in
    the White House and then proceeds to Capitol
    Hill, where he meets with hundreds of other
    puppets, should be replaced."

Source Washington Post http//www.washingtonpost
.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64028-2004Aug13.html
95
Hugo Chávez, president of Venezuela
Hugo Chávez is also, supposedly, a
leftist. Todays leftists sound exactly like
the Nazis.
  • In a televised Christmas speech (December 2005),
    Hugo Chávez said
  • the descendants of those who crucified Christ
    have possessed themselves of the worlds riches
    and have concentrated them in a few hands.

http//www.noticierodigital.com/forum/viewtopic.ph
p?t49379
96
Ex-prime minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Mohammed
  • In 2003, Mahathir accused Jews of having
  • invented democracy, communism, socialism and
    human rights
  • This is precisely what the German Nazis charged
    the Jews were supposedly behind everything they
    disliked.
  • The only difference is that the German Nazis also
    accused the Jews of having invented capitalism!
  • Mahathir also said the Jews constitute a world
    conspiracy with the purpose of humiliating
    Gentiles (especially Muslims). 

http//www.mathaba.net/gci/news/mahathir.htm
97
Mahathir said
  • Is it true that 1.3 billion people can exert no
    power to save themselves from the humiliation and
    oppression inflicted upon them by a much smaller
    enemy?
  • Can they only lash back blindly in anger?
  • Is there no other way than to ask our young
    people to blow themselves up and kill people and
    invite the massacre of more of our own people?
  • It cannot be that there is no other way.
  • 1.3 billion Muslims cannot be defeated by a few
    million Jews.

http//www.mathaba.net/gci/news/mahathir.htm
98
Mahathir said
Mahathir is saying that the Jews supposedly
want to exterminate 1.3 billion Muslims! This
is how the Nazis also talked they said that the
Jews supposedly wanted to destroy non-Jews.
  • We are actually very strong. 1.3 billion people
    cannot be simply wiped out.
  • The Europeans killed six million Jews out of 12
    million. But today the Jews rule this world by
    proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.

http//emperors-clothes.com/docs/eureport.htm
99
Mahathir said
Adolf Hitler also said that the Germans
needed to defend themselves from the Jews.
  • We need guns and rockets, bombs and warplanes,
    tanks and warships for our defense. But because
    we discouraged the learning of science and
    mathematics, etc, as giving no merit for the
    akhirat i.e., the hereafter, today we have no
    capacity to produce our own weapons for our
    defense.

Over the past 50 years of fighting in Palestine
we have not achieved any result. We have in fact
worsened our situation...We must think. We are
up against a people who think. They survived
2,000 years of pogroms not by hitting back, but
by thinking.
http//emperors-clothes.com/docs/eureport.htm
100
Mahathir said
Adolf Hitler also spoke of the Jews as if
they were a parasite that survived every attack.
Over the past 50 years of fighting in Palestine
we have not achieved any result. We have in fact
worsened our situation...We must think. We are
up against a people who think. They survived
2,000 years of pogroms not by hitting back, but
by thinking.
http//emperors-clothes.com/docs/eureport.htm
101
Mahathir made these statements at a summit
attended by all chiefs of state in the Muslim
world.
When he finished, they gave him a standing
ovation.
102
What was the Western reaction?
  • The Western reaction is quite informative.
  • If Western leaders wished to counteract what
    Mahathir said, then
  • They would explain to the public that what
    Mahathir said is the same old Nazi propaganda
  • And they would demonstrate why these are lies.
  • If, on the contrary, Western leaders want to
    promote antisemitism, then
  • they will remain silent or
  • they will criticize Mahathir weakly, timidly, and
    uselessly or
  • they will make statements echoing those of
    Mahathir

103
Jacques Chirac, French president
  • A French diplomat, who asked not to be named,
    said while Chirac disagreed with Mahathir's
    strident views, he argued that an EU European
    Union summit declaration 'would not have been
    appropriate.
  • Source Associated Press Worldstream October
    19, 2003 Sunday Section International News
    Distribution Asia England Europe Britain
    Scandinavia Middle East Africa Length 326
    Words Headline Malaysian Leader Says France's
    Chirac 'Understands' His Remarks About Jews
    Dateline Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohammad
    i.e., Mahathir today expressed his gratitude to
    French President Jacques Chirac for his
    'understanding' of the OIC chairman's speech at
    the opening of the 10th Organization of the
    Islamic Conference Summit here.
  • Source New Straits Times (Malaysia) October
    19, 2003, Sunday Section Nation Pg. 3
    Headline Dr M expresses gratitude to Chirac for
    his 'understanding'

104
George W. Bush, president of the United States
And Hitlers identical statements?

Were they also divisive?
  • George Bush Jr. did not call Mahathirs
    statements antisemitic.
  • He did not call them outrageous.
  • He did not call them a direct echo of the German
    Nazis.
  • He did not say they were an incitement to
    genocide.
  • Instead, George Bush called Mahathirs
    statements divisive.

Divisive!
105
George W. Bush, president of the United States
In other words, according to Mahathir, Bush
did not rebuke him, but on the contrary
apologized for having had to make his weak and
useless criticism, which Bush called strong.
And what was Bushs reaction to Mahathirs
accusation that Bush is a liar?
  • Mahathir denied that Bush had rebuked him
  • It's the biggest lie. If he had rebuked me I'm
    quite sure I would have rebuked him also,
    Mahathir was quoted as saying when he arrived
    home after a series of visits to neighboring
    countries.
  • Mahathir said it was common for someone who
    could lie about the existence of weapons of mass
    destruction in order to go to war (in Iraq) to
    lie about what he had said, the agency reported.
  • The prime minister told reporters that from what
    he remembered Bush had pulled him aside at an
    Asia-Pacific summit in Bangkok last week only to
    explain why he had made such a strong statement
    over Mahathir's remarks about Jews.
  • Source Agence France Presse English October
    25, 2003 Saturday SECTION International News
    LENGTH 371 words HEADLINE Bush did not rebuke
    me Mahathir DATELINE KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 25

According to the same Agence France Presse
report, George Bush agreed with Mahathir! I
said about Mahathirs statements, 'they're
divisive and unnecessary.' I didn't yell at him,
I just told him, the US president told reporters.
106
George W. Bush, president of the United States
If the Jews really controlled the Western
governments, Bush would not be repeating
Mahathirs statements. He would make a very
public speech, and would accuse Mahathir of
reviving Nazi ideology.
  • Just one month after Mahathirs speech, Bush
    said this
  • "Israel should freeze settlement construction,
    dismantle unauthorized outposts, end the daily
    humiliation of the Palestinian people, and not
    prejudice final negotiations with the placements
    of walls and fences."
  • Source -- Text of President Bush's Speech,
    Associated Press Online, November 19, 2003
    Wednesday, INTERNATIONAL NEWS, 3930 words

I remind you that Mahathir had said in his
speech Is it true that 1.3 billion people can
exert no power to save themselves from the
humiliation and oppression inflicted upon them by
a much smaller enemy?
107
The claims in the The Protocols are very
popular today
  • If the Jews control the United States, then
  • Why is the Jewish state ceding territory under
    pressure from the United States to Nazis who
    want to exterminate the Jews?
  • And if the Jews control the media, then
  • Why is the media eagerly promoting the lie
    which already produced a genocide before that
    the Jews supposedly control the US government?
  • For example, quite a few people believe that
  • the Jews control the media
  • the Jews control the United States, the world
    superpower
  • Thes
About PowerShow.com