Collaborative Filtering and Recommender Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Collaborative Filtering and Recommender Systems

Description:

Recommender Systems Brian Lewis INF 385Q Knowledge Management Systems November 10, 2005 Presentation Outline Collaborative filtering and recommender systems defined ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:374
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: BrianL66
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Collaborative Filtering and Recommender Systems


1
Collaborative Filtering and Recommender Systems
  • Brian Lewis
  • INF 385Q
  • Knowledge Management Systems
  • November 10, 2005

2
Presentation Outline
  • Collaborative filtering and recommender systems
    defined
  • Novel example
  • Readings - overview key concepts
  • Glance, Arregui Dardenne (1997)
  • Konstan, Miller, et al. (1997)
  • Proctor McKinlay (1997)
  • Conclusions
  • References

3
Collaborative Filtering defined
  • "Based on the premise that people looking for
    information should be able to make use of what
    others have already found and evaluated." (Maltz
    Ehrlich, 1995)
  • "Technique for dealing with overload in
    information environments" (Procter McKinlay,
    1997)

4
Recommender systems defined
  • Systems that evaluate quality based on the
    preferences of others with a similar point of view

5
Hobo symbols from http//www.slackaction.com/signr
oll.htm
6
Hobo symbols as RS?
  • Specific to a community
  • Implicit and explicit signs
  • Filtered through encoding
  • Cold-start problem?

7
Compare to today
  • Recommend
  • Don't recommend

8
Glance, Arregui Dardenne (1997)
  • Knowledge Pump
  • Designed for use with an electronic repository
  • Document management and recommendation
  • Community-centered collaborative filtering
  • Characteristics
  • Social filtering
  • Content-based filtering

9
Glance, Arregui Dardenne (1997)
  • User-item matrix of ratings

10
Konstan, Miller, et al. (1997)
  • GroupLens
  • Pilot study - Usenet news
  • Rating system
  • Integrate into an existing system/existing users
  • Use existing applications - open architecture
  • Characteristics
  • High volume / high turnover
  • High noise information resource
  • Sparse set of ratings
  • Predictive utility cost/benefit

11
Konstan, Miller, et al. (1997)
  • Predictive utility
  • Risk - costs of misses andfalse positives
  • Benefit - values of hits and correct rejections
  • Usenet has high predictive utility
  • High volume
  • Value of correct rejection is high
  • Risk of a miss is low

12
Konstan, Miller, et al. (1997)
  • Challenges
  • Ratings sparsity
  • "first-rater" problem
  • Partition articles into clusters
  • Capture implicit ratings
  • Filter bots
  • Performance challenges
  • System architecture
  • Composite users

13
Proctor McKinlay (1997)
  • Social Affordances and Implicit Ratings
  • How implicit approaches might be improved
  • Sources of rating and recommendation data
  • Context of ratings and recommendations
  • Real and virtual groups
  • Privacy and accessibility

14
Proctor McKinlay (1997)
  • Characteristics
  • Explicit ratings systems
  • Reader ratings based approach is expensive
  • How do you deal with trust issues?
  • Implicit ratings systems
  • Free to users
  • How do you capture context?

15
Proctor McKinlay (1997)
  • Social Affordances
  • "making the potential for social (inter)action
    visible."
  • How can activities be made visible? (explicitly)
  • Web bookmarks
  • Sharable annotations
  • How can activities be made visible? (implicitly)
  • Copy browsing behavior of experts (virtual
    groups)
  • Documents context in a group of documents
    (discourse analysis)
  • Temporal coherence

16
Proctor McKinlay (1997)
  • Extracting implicit ratings from web behavior
  • Virtual group proxies
  • Proxy cache analysis
  • Nominal rating
  • Frequency
  • Sequential accountability
  • Distributional accountability
  • Sources
  • Topical coherence
  • Temporal coherence
  • Privacy Issues

17
Conclusions
  • Many different issues
  • Diverse domains / communities
  • Diverse content needs
  • Context dependent
  • Nature of information
  • Predictive utility
  • Very creative solutions to draw from

18
References
  • Glance, N., Arregui, D., Dardenne, M. (1997).
    Knowledge Pump Community-centered collaborative
    filtering. 5th DELOS workshop on filtering and
    collaborative filtering, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Konstan, J., Miller, B., Maltz, D., Herlocker,
    J., Gordon, L. and Riedl, J. (1997), Applying
    collaborative filtering to usenet news,
    Communication of the ACM, 40(3), 77-87.
  • Maltz, D. and Ehrlick, K. (1995). Pointing the
    way active collaborative filtering. CHI '95, ACM
    Press.
  • Procter, R. and A. McKinley (1997). Social
    affordances and implicit ratings for social
    filtering on the Web. DELOS workshop on
    collaborative filtering, Budapest, Hungary.

19
Questions
  • Questions live here
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com