Climate Change Tilting at windmills - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Climate Change Tilting at windmills

Description:

Atmospheric concentration of CO2 has increased from pre-industrial value of ... the test put forward by Mr Drabble [for Greenpeace], 'something has gone clearly ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: jonath46
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Climate Change Tilting at windmills


1
Climate Change Tilting at windmills?
  • Jonathan Clay
  • 2-3 Grays Inn Square
  • London

2
Is it happening at all?
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007
    states
  • Atmospheric concentration of CO2 has increased
    from pre-industrial value of 280ppm to 380 ppm in
    2005.
  • The primary source of increased atmospheric CO2
    results from use of fossil fuel with a further
    contribution from land use changes.
  • Atmospheric CO2 already far exceeds the natural
    range over the last 650,000 years.(180-300 ppm)
  • IPCC scientists consider 9/10 likelihood that
    current warming is due (at least in part) to the
    effect of human activities, in particular the
    burning of fossil fuels.

3
Effects of Climate Change
  • Global average temperature increase of 1 degree
    since 1900.
  • Largest increase in the last 40 years
  • Global sea level rising
  • Snow cover reduced
  • Melting of ice caps and glaciers
  • Changes in precipitation amounts, ocean salinity,
    wind patterns, incidence of extreme weather wind
    patterns, droughts, heat waves, intensity of
    tropical cyclones

4
Governments Response
  • PPS 22 Renewable Energy 2004
  • Energy Review 2006
  • Consultation Draft PPS Planning and Climate
    Change (supplement to PPS1) November 2006
  • Code for Sustainable Homes December 2006

5
PPS22 Renewable Energy
  • 15 page Policy Statement
  • 182 page Companion Guide!
  • Renewable energy covers those energy flows that
    occur naturally and repeatedly in the environment
    wind, water, movement of oceans, sun and
    biomass.

6
PPS 22 continued
  • Relevant technologies
  • Onshore wind
  • Hydro
  • Photovoltaics
  • Passive solar
  • Biomass and energy crops
  • Energy from waste (but not energy from mass
    incineration of domestic waste) and landfill
  • Sewage gas.
  • But note principles for waste management
    decisions in PPG 10

7
PPS 22 continued
  • 8 key principles
  • Renewable energy developments capable of being
    accommodated throughout England.
  • RSS and LDD s should promote, not restrict
    development of renewables.
  • No policies which rule out or even place
    constraints on renewables development.
  • Wider environmental and economic benefits of all
    renewable energy projects should be given
    significant weight whatever their scale.
  • Do not make technical assumptions about locations
    technology may change.
  • Do not reject applications because output levels
    are small
  • Ensure early engagement and involvement of
    affected communities.
  • Development proposals must demonstrate
    environmental, social and economic benefits and
    how environmental and social impacts have been
    minimised.

8
PPS 22 Continued
  • Other features
  • Targets - expressed as a minimum
  • Monitoring of targets
  • If target is likely to be met, increase it!
  • Criteria based policies, not site allocations.
  • Protection of Internationally and nationally
    designated sites and Green Belts.
  • Locally designations do not justify refusal.
  • Criteria based site selection
  • No sequential assessment

9
PPS 22 Continued
  • Key Material Effects
  • Landscape and visual effects
  • Cumulative effects
  • Noise
  • Odour
  • Transport
  • Aviation and radar

10
Energy Review July 2006
  • Main objective - to reduce carbon emissions
  • Stated to be material consideration, adding
    support to existing planning policy.
  • Strategy based on commitment to the Renewables
    Obligation
  • Clear statement on nuclear power
  • Reform of the Planning System which takes in
    principle decision out of the public inquiry
    process, leave the PI system to focus on local
    planning and environmental issues or how the
    specific local impacts of construction and
    operation of the plant can be minimised

11
Energy Review under challenge
  • Greenpeace v DTI 2007 EWHC 311 (Admin) per
    Sullivan J.
  • "Where a public authority has issued a promise or
    adopted a practice which represents how it
    proposes to act in a given area, the law will
    require the promise or practice to be honoured
    unless there is good reason not to do so." (see
    per Laws LJ at paragraph 68 of R (Nadarajah and
    Abdi) v Secretary of State for the Home
    Department 2005 EWCA Civ 1363)
  • In R v North East Devon Health Authority, ex
    parte Coughlan 2001 QB 213, Lord Woolf MR
    giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal said
    in paragraph 108 It is common ground that,
    whether or not consultation of interested parties
    and the public is a legal requirement, if it is
    embarked upon it must be carried out properly. To
    be proper, consultation must be undertaken at a
    time when proposals are still at a formative
    stage it must include sufficient reasons for
    particular proposals to allow those consulted to
    give intelligent consideration and an intelligent
    response adequate time must be given for this
    purpose and the product of consultation must be
    conscientiously taken into account when the
    ultimate decision is taken R v Brent London
    Borough Council, Ex p Gunning (1985) 84 LGR 168."

12
Energy Review under challengeGreenpeace v DTI
continued
  • " It is an accepted general principle of
    administrative law that a public body undertaking
    consultation must do so fairly as required by the
    circumstances of the case " see per Auld LJ at
    paragraph 90 of Edwards.
  • The consultation exercise was very seriously
    flawed. Adopting the test put forward by Mr
    Drabble for Greenpeace, "something has gone
    clearly and radically wrong."
  • There could be no proper consultation, let alone
    "the fullest public consultation" as promised in
    the 2003 White Paper
  • There was therefore procedural unfairness, and a
    breach of the claimant's legitimate expectation
    that there would be "the fullest public
    consultation" before a decision was taken to
    support new nuclear build.
  • Declaration a breach of the claimant's
    legitimate expectation to fullest public
    consultation that the consultation process was
    procedurally unfair and that therefore the
    decision in the Energy Review that nuclear new
    build "has a role to play ..." was unlawful.

13
Consultation Draft PPS Planning and Climate
Change Nov. 2006
  • Aim to set a framework for achieving zero
    carbon development
  • Builds on policies in PPS1
  • Ensure that development plans contribute to
    global sustainability by addressing the causes
    and impacts of climate change.
  • Seven key planning objectives

14
Consultation Draft PPS Planning and Climate
Change Nov 2006
  • 1. Make full contribution to delivering
    Government climate change programme
  • 2. Secure highest viable standards of resource
    and energy efficiency in new development
  • 3. Make fullest possible use of sustainable
    transport
  • 4. Secure new development and shape places
    resilient to climate change
  • 5. Sustain biodiversity
  • 6. Reflect development needs and interests of
    communities
  • 7. Respond to concern of business and encourage
    technical innovation.

15
Consultation Draft PPS Planning and Climate
Change Nov 2006
  • Integration with Building Regulations
  • Important to be clear about distinction between
    role of planning policy and building regulations
  • DPDs will set policies for provision of low
    carbon and renewable sources of energy to
    provide the platform to secure increased
    efficiency required by Building Regs
  • In interim (before plans adopted) planning
    authorities should require standard of 10 .
  • Where there are local opportunities for requiring
    higher levels of building performance these
    should be set out in a DPD.

16
Code for Sustainable Homes
  • Not planning policy guidance
  • Voluntary code, but house builders should follow
    it because the Government is considering making
    the Code mandatory.
  • Based on BREs Eco Homes System which has been
    used especially for social housing development.
  • Sits alongside the planning system which guides
    sustainability in broader locations and aesthetic
    issues.
  • Provides a scoring system sustainability
    rating in design categories such as energy,
    water, materials, surface water run off, waste,
    pollution, health and well being, management,
    ecology.
  • Star ratings from to (1 to 6 stars) 1
    10 better than Part L 2006 6 zero carbon.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com