Mathematical models for mass and heat transport in porous media - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

Mathematical models for mass and heat transport in porous media

Description:

In fact, Brenner showed how Darcy's experimental law and the permeability tensor ... 1.The Darcy's law (3.13) gives the global flow field in the periodic porous ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:549
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: Semp5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mathematical models for mass and heat transport in porous media


1
Mathematical models for mass and heat transport
in porous media
  • Stefan Balint and Agneta M.Balint
  • West University of Timisoara, RomaniaFaculty of
    Mathematics- Computer ScienceFaculty of Physics
  • balint_at_balint.uvt.ro balint_at_physics.uvt.ro

2
  • The presentation is focused on the mathematical
    modeling of mass and heat transport processes in
    porous media.
  • Basic concepts as porous media, mathematical
    models and the role of the model in the
    investigation of the real phenomena are
    discussed.
  • Several mathematical models as ground water flow,
    diffusion, adsorption, advection, macro transport
    in porous media are presented and the results
    with respect to available experimental
    information are compared.

3
TOPICS
  • MATHEMATICAL MODELING
  • POROUS MEDIA
  • FLUID FLOW IN A POROUS MEDIA
  • GROUNDWATER FLOW
  • MASS TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA
  • COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS TESTED AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL
    RESULTS
  • HEAT TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA
  • COMPUTED CONDUCTIVITY FOR THE HEAT TRANSPORT IN
    POROUS MEDIA TESTED AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

4
1.MATHEMATICAL MODELING
  • Mathematical modeling is a concept that is
    difficult to define. It is first of all applied
    mathematics or more precisely, in physics applied
    mathematics.
  • According to A.C. Fowler Mathematical Models in
    the Applied Sciences, Cambridge University Press,
    1998
  • Since there are no rules, and an understanding
    of the right way to model there are few texts
    that approach the subject in a serious way, one
    learns to model by practice, by familiarity with
    a wealth of examples.

5
  • Applied mathematicians have a procedure, almost a
    philosophy that they apply when building models.
  • First, there is a phenomenon of interest that one
    wants to describe and to explain. Observations of
    the phenomenon lead, sometimes after a great deal
    of effort, to a hypothetical mechanism that can
    explain the phenomenon. The purpose of a
    mathematical model has to be to give a
    quantitative description of the mechanism.
  • Usually the quantitative description is made in
    terms of a certain number of variables (called
    the model variables) and the mathematical model
    is a set of equations concerning the variables.
  • In formulating continuous models, there are three
    main ways of presenting equations for the model
    variables.
  • The classical procedure is to formulate exact
    conservation laws. The laws of mass, momentum and
    energy conservation in fluid mechanics are
    obvious examples of these.
  • The second procedure is to formulate constitutive
    relations between variables, which may be based
    on experiment or empirical reasoning (Hook law).
  • The third procedure is to use hypothetical laws
    based on quantitative reasoning in the absence of
    precise rules (Lotka-Volterra law).
  • .

6
  • The analysis of a mathematical model leads to
    results that can be tested against the
    observations.
  • The model also leads to predictions which, if
    verified, lend authenticity to the model
  • It is important to realize that all models are
    idealizations and are limited in their
    applicability. In fact, one usually aims to
    over-simplify the idea is that if the model is
    basically right, then it can subsequently be made
    more complicated, but the analysis of it is
    facilitated by having treated a simpler version
    first.

7
2. POROUS MEDIA
  • Example 1. The soil
  • Soil consists of an aggregation of variously
    sized mineral particles (MP) and the pore
    spaces (PS) between the particles. ( MP green,
    PS red)

  • Figure 1.
  • When the pore space is completely full of
    water, then the soil is saturated.
  • When the pore space contains both water and
    air, then the soil is unsaturated.
  • In exceptional circumstances, soil can become
    desiccated. But, usually there is some water
    present.

8
  • Exemple 2. The column of the length 2m, filled
    with a quasi uniform quartz sand, of mean
    diameter 1.425 mm used by Bues and Aachib in the
    experiment reported in
  • Influence of the heterogeneity of the
    solutions on the parameters of miscible
    displacements in saturated porous medium,
    Experiments in fluids, 11, Springer Verlag,
    25-32, (1991).
  • is a porous media.
  • Definition 1. A porous media is an array of a
    great number of variously sized fixed solid
    particles possessing the property that the volume
    concentration of solids is not small. (Soil).
  • Often it is characterized by its porosity F (i.e.
    the pore volume fraction) and its grain size d.
    The latter characterizes the coarseness of the
    medium.
  • Definition 2. A periodic porous media is a
    porous media having the property that the fixed
    solid particles are identical and the whole media
    is a periodic system of cells which are replicas
    of a standard (representative) cell (experimental
    column).

9
  • Figure 2. Periodic porous media

10
3. FLUID FLOW IN A POROUS MEDIA
  • An incompressible viscous fluid moves in the
    pore space of a porous media, according to the
    Navier-Stokes equations

  • (3.1)
  • satisfying the incompressibility condition

  • (3.2)
  • where is the fluid flow velocity p
    is the pressure, ? is the fluid density, µ is the
    fluid viscosity and is the density of the
    volume force acting in the fluid.
  • It is important to realize, that eqs. (3.1),
    (3.2) are valid only in the pore space (x
    belongs to the pore space). They can be
    obtained from the mass and momentum conservation
    laws and constitutive relations characterizing
    viscous fluids.

11
  • On the boundary of the fixed solid particles the
    fluid flow velocity has to satisfy the non slip
    condition


  • (3.3)
  • Unfortunately, the boundary value problem (3.1),
    (3.2), (3.3) even in the case of a very slow
    stationary flow (Stokes flow), can not be solved
    numerically in a real situation due to the great
    number of the boundaries of fixed solid
    particles.
  • Consequently, the mathematical model defined by
    the eqs. (3.1), (3.2), (3.3) can not be analyzed
    numerically in a real case and can not be tested
    against the observations.
  • Several models for flow through porous media are
    based on a periodic array of spheres.
  • Hasimoto H. in On the periodic fundamental
    solution of the Stokes equations and their
    application to viscous flow passed a cubic array
    of spheres, J.Fluid Mech.,5, 317-328 (1959).
  • obtained the periodic fundamental solution to
    the Stokes problem by Fourier series expansion,
    and applied the results analytically to a dilute
    array of uniform spheres.
  • Sangani A.S., Acrivos A. in Slow flow
    through a periodic array of spheres, Int.J.
    Multiphase Flow, 8(4), 343-360 (1982)
  • extended the approximation of Hasimoto to
    calculate the drag force for higher concentration.

12
  • - Zick A.A. and Homsy G.M. in Stokes flow
    through periodic arrays of spheres, J.Fluid
    Mech.,115, 13-26 (1982). use Hasimotos
    fundamental solution to formulate an integral
    equation for the force distribution on an array
    of spheres for arbitrary concentration. By
    numerical solution of the integral equation,
    results for packed spheres were obtained, for
    several porosity values.
  • - Continuous variation of porosity was examined
    only when the particles are in suspension.
  • - Strictly numerical computations have been made
    earlier, based on series of trial functions and
    the Galerkin method, for cubic packing of spheres
    in contact
  • Snyder L.J. and Stewart W.A. Velocity and
    pressure profiles for Newtonian creeping flow in
    regular packed beds of spheres, A.I.Ch.J.,12(1),
    167-173 (1966).
  • Sorensen J.P. and Stewart W.E. Computation of
    forced convection in slow flow through ducts and
    packed beds. II. Velocity profile in a simple
    cubic array of spheres, Chem.Engng.Sci., 29,
    819-825 (1974).
  • A general model for the flow through periodic
    porous media has been advanced by Brenner in an
    unpublished manuscript cited in
  • Adler P.M. Porous Media Geometry and Transports,
    Butterworth-Heinemann. London (1992)
  • Brenner H. Dispersion resulting from flow
    through spatially periodic porous media,
    Phil.Trans.R.Soc. London, 297 A, 81-133 (1980).
  • In fact, Brenner showed how Darcys experimental
    law and the permeability tensor can in principle,
    be computed from a canonical boundary value
    problem in a standard (representative) cell.

13
  • In the following we will present briefly this
    model.
  • Consider a periodic porous media which is a union
    of cells (cubes) of dimension l which are
    replicas of a standard (representative) cell. Let
    P0 the characteristic variation of the global
    pressure P which may vary significantly over the
    global size L of the porous media. Thus the
    global pressure gradient is of order O(P0 /L).
    Let the two size scales be in sharp contrast, so
    that their ratio is a small parameter e l/Lltlt1.
    Limiting to creeping flows, the local gradient
    must be comparable to the viscous sheers so that
    the local velocity is UO(P0 l 2/µL), where µ
    is the viscosity of the fluid. Denoting physical
    and dimensionless variables respectively by
    symbols with and without asterisks, the following
    normalization may be introduced in the
    Navier-Stokes equations (3.1), (3.2)


  • (3.4)
  • with i 1,2,3.
  • Two dimensionless parameters would then appear
    the length ratio
  • e l/L and the Reynolds number


  • (3.5)
  • which will be assumed to be of order O(e).
  • By introducing fast and slow variables, xi and Xi
    e xi and multiple-scale expansions, it is
    then found that the leading order p(0) pore
    pressure depends only on the global scale (slow
    variables), p(0) p0(Xi).

14
  • By expressing the solution for in
    the following form


  • (3.6)


  • (3.7)
  • where depends on Xi only, the
    coefficients kij(xi, Xi) and Sj(xi, Xj) are
    found to be governed by the following canonical
    Stokes problem in the standard (representative)
    cell O
  • in ?

    (3.8)
  • in ?

    (3.9)
  • with
  • kij 0 on G

    (3.10)
  • kij, Sj are periodic on ??
    (3.11)
  • Here G and ?? are respectively the fluid-solid
    interface and the boundary of the standard cell.

15
  • Equations (3.8)-(3.11) constitute the first cell
    problem. For a chosen granular geometry, the
    numerical solution of (3.8)-(3.10) replaced in
    (3.6), (3.7) gives the local velocity and
    pressure fluctuation in terms of the global
    pressure gradient
  • Let the volume average over the standard cell be
    defined by


  • (3.12)
  • where Of is the fluid volume in the cell.
  • Then the average of eq.(3.6) gives the law of
    Darcy


  • (3.13)
  • where lt kij gt is the so called hydraulic
    conductivity tensor, which is the permeability
    tensor lt Kij gt divided by µ.
  • For later use, we note that in physical variables
    (marked by ) the symmetric hydraulic
    conductivity tensor is given by



  • (3.14)

16
  • Comments
  • 1.The Darcys law (3.13) gives the global flow
    field in the periodic porous media in function of
    the global pressure field acting on the media. It
    is important to realize that this field exists
    not only in the pore space, but everywhere in
    the media, i.e. also in the space occupied by the
    solid fixed particles. The answer to the question
    What represents this flow in the space occupied
    by the solid and fixed particles? can be found
    in
  • Tartar L. Incompressible Fluid Flow in a Porous
    Medium. Convergence of the Homogenization Process
    in Non-Homogeneous Media and Vibration Theory
    Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol.127, 368-377
    Springer Verlag, Berlin 1980.
  • where it is shown that for tending to zero,
    the flow field in the pore space prolonged by
    zero in the space occupied by the solid and fixed
    particles tends to the global flow field given by
    the Darcys law (3.13).
  • The Darcys law is written in the form



  • (3.15)
  • and it is shown that the flow is incompressible
    i.e. .
  • Therefore, if the hydraulic conductivity tensor
    is constant (constant permeability), then we have

17


  • (3.16)
  • 2. The particularities of the porous media
    porosity, shape of the solid and fixed particles
    are incorporated in the permeability tensor lt Kij
    gt. Numerical results for permeability were
    obtained by
  • Lee C.K., Sun C.C., Mei C.C. Computation of
    permeability and dispersivities of solute or heat
    in a periodic porous mediaInt.J.Heat Mass
    Transfer,39,4 661-675 (1996)
  • The computed values for the Wigner-Seitz grain
    (grain is shaped as a diamond) are compared with
    those given by the empirical Kozeny-Carman
    formula


  • (3.17)
  • which is an extrapolation of measured data.
    Within the range of porosities 0.37lt F lt 0.68
    the computed results are consistent and in trend
    with. Outside this range of porosities the
    deviation increases.
  • The computed results for uniform spheres of
    various packing agree remarkably well with those
    obtained by Zick and Homsy, when the porosity is
    high.
  • 3. The method, used for the deduction of the new
    model (eqs.(3-15), (3-16)) of the fluid flow in a
    porous media is called the method of
    homogenization. Basically, the two phase non
    homogeneous media is substituted by a homogeneous
    fluid, which flow is not anymore governed by
    the Navier-Stokes equation.

18
4. GROUNDWATER FLOW
  • The groundwater flow is one that has immense
    practical importance in the day-to-day management
    of reservoirs, flood prediction, description of
    water table fluctuation.
  • Although there are numerous complicating effects
    of soil physics and chemistry that can be
    important in certain cases, the groundwater flow
    is conceptually easy to understand.
  • Groundwater is water that lies below the surface
    of the Earth. Below a piezometric (constant
    pressure) surface called the water table, the
    soil is saturated, i.e. the pore space is
    completely full of water. Above this surface, the
    soil is unsaturated, and the pore space
    contains both water and air.
  • Following precipitation, water infiltrates the
    subsoil and causes a local rise in the water
    table. The excess hydrostatic pressure thus
    produced, leads to groundwater flow.
  • The flow satisfies the Darcys law presented
    above


  • (4.1)

is the pressure gradient in the groundwater and
satisfies
19


  • (4.2)
  • which is the incompressibility condition in the
    case of groundwater flow
  • k is the permeability tensor for simplicity has
    the form


  • (4.3)
  • with k gt 0. The constant k is called permeability
    too and has the dimension of (length)2.
  • Typical value of the permeability of several
    common rock and soil types
  • Eqs. (4.1) (4.2) define the simplest model of the
    incompressible groundwater flow through a rigid
    porous medium.

20
  • Consider now the problem of determining the rate
    of leakage through an earth fill dam built on an
    impermeable foundation. The configuration is as
    shown in Fig.3 where we have illustrated the
    (unrealistic) case of a dam with vertical walls
    in reality the cross section would be
    trapezoidal.
  • Figure 3. Geometry of dam seepage problem
  • A reservoir of height h0 abuts a dam of width L.
    Water flows through the dam between the base y
    0 and a free surface (called phreatic surface) y
    h, below which the dam is saturated and above
    which it is unsaturated. We assume that this free
    surface provides an upper limit to the region of
    groundwater flow.

21
  • We therefore neglect the flow in the unsaturated
    region, and the free boundary must be determined
    by a kinematics boundary condition, which
    expresses the idea that the free surface is
    defined by the fluid elements that constitute it,
    so that the fluid velocity at y h is the same
    as the velocity of the interface itself

  • (4.4)
  • where d/dt is the material derivative for the
    fluid flow.
  • In the two-dimensional configuration, shown in
    Fig.3, we therefore have to solve


  • (4.5)






  • (4.6)
  • where with boundary conditions
    that




  • (4.7)

22
  • These conditions describe the impermeable base at
    y0, the free surface at y h, hydrostatic
    pressure on x 0 and atmospheric pressure at x
    L (the seepage face). The free boundary is to be
    determined as part of the solution.
  • In order to solve the problem (4.5), (4.6), (4.7)
    we nondimensionalize the variables by scaling as
    follows


  • (4.8)
  • all for obtain various obvious balances in the
    equations and boundary conditions. The
    Dupuit-Forchheimer approximate solution is
    obtained when h0 ltlt L.
  • In this case we define and the
    equations become





23
  • with


  • (4.7)
  • Since we proceed by expanding
  • The leading order approximation for p is
    just


  • (4.9)
  • This fails to satisfy the condition at x 1,
    where the boundary layer is necessary to bring
    back the x derivatives of p, unless there is no
    seepage face, that is h(L) 0.
  • However, we also note that if
    , then , which suggests that

  • constant

24
  • Alternatively, we realize that
    simply indicates that the timescale of relevance
    to transient problems is longer than our initial
  • guess , so
    that we rescale t with .
  • Putting (and subsequently omitting
    the over bar) we rewrite the kinematical boundary
    condition as


  • (4.10)
  • Now we seek expansions


  • (4.11)
  • and we find successively


  • (4.12)
  • and


  • (4.13)

25
  • whence


  • (4.14)
  • so that eq. (4.10) gives


  • (4.15)
  • dropping the subscript, we obtain the nonlinear
    diffusion equation


  • (4.16)
  • Notice, that this equation is not valid to x 1,
    because we require p 0 at x 1, in
    contradiction to eq. (4.12). We therefore expect
    a boundary layer there, where p changes rapidly.
  • Eq. (4.16) is a second order equation, requiring
    two boundary conditions. One is that


  • (4.17)
  • but it is not so clear what the other is. It can
    be determined by means of the following trick.
  • Define

    (4.18)
  • and note that the flux q is given by

  • (4.19)

26
  • Furthermore


  • (4.20)
  • and therefore we have the exact result


  • (4.21)
  • In a steady state, , so q is
    constant, and therefore


  • (4.22)
  • The steady solution (away from x 1) is
    therefore


  • (4.23)
  • And there is (to leading order) no seepage face
    at x 1.
  • In fact, the derivation of eq. (4.22) applies for
    unsteady problem also. If we suppose that q does
    not jump rapidly near x 1, then we can use
    Dupuit-Forchheimer approximation
    in eq. (4.21) and an integration yields


  • (4.24)
  • as the general condition.
  • The boundary layer structure near x 1 can be
    described as follows
  • near x 1 we have
    and so we put

27


  • (4.25)
  • and we choose


  • (4.26)
  • to bring back the x derivatives in Laplaces
    equation, we get


  • (4.27)
  • with


  • (4.28)
  • Exact solutions of this problem can be found
    using complex variables, but for many purpose the
    D-F approximation is sufficient, together with a
    consistently scaled boundary layer problem.

28
5. MASS TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA
  • We present the mass transport in porous media as
    it is described by
  • Auriault I.L. and Lewandowska J. in Diffusion,
    adsorption, advection, macrotransport in soils,
    Eur.J.Mech. A/Solids 15,4, 681-704, 1996.
  • The pollutant transport in soils can be studied
    by means of a model in which the real
    heterogeneous medium is replaced by the
    macroscopic equivalent (effective continuum) like
    in the case of the fluid flow. The advantage of
    this approach is the elimination of the
    microscopic scale (the pore scale), over which
    the variables such as velocity or the
    concentration are measured.
  • In order to develop the macroscopic model the
    homogenization technique of periodic media may be
    employed. Although the assumption of the periodic
    structure of the soil is not realistic in many
    practical applications, it was found reasonably
    model to real situations. It can be stated that
    this assumption is equivalent to the existence of
    an elementary representative volume in a non
    periodic medium, containing a large number of
    heterogeneities. Both cases lead to identical
    macroscopic models as presented in
  • Auriault I.L., Heterogeneous medium, Is an
    equivalent macroscopic description possible?
    Int.J.Engn,Sci.,29,7,785-795, 1995.

29
  • The physical processes of molecular diffusion
    with advection in pore space and adsorption of
    the pollutant on the fixed solid particles
    surface can be described by the following mass
    balance equation


  • (5.1)


  • (5.2)
  • where c is the concentration (mass of pollutant
    per unit volume of fluid), Dij is the molecular
    diffusion tensor, t is the time variable is
    the flow field and is the unit vector normal
    to G. The coefficient a denotes the adsorption
    parameter (a gt 0). For simplicity it is assumed
    that the adsorption is instantaneous, reversible
    and linear.
  • The advective motion (the flow) is independent of
    the diffusion and adsorption. Therefore the flow
    model (Darcys law and the incompressibility
    condition)


  • (5.3)


  • (5.4)
  • which has been already presented in the earlier
    sequence, will be directly used.

30
  • The derivation of the macroscopic model is
    accomplished by the application of homogenization
    method using the double scale asymptotic
    developments. In the process of homogenization
    all the variables are normalized with respect to
    the characteristic length l of the periodic cell.
    The representation of all the dimensional
    variables, appearing in eqs. (5.1) and (5.2)
    versus the non-dimensional variables is
  • where the subscript c means the characteristic
    quantity (constant) and the superscript
    denotes the non-dimensional variable.
  • Introducing the above set of variables into eqs.
    (5.1)-(5.2) we get the following dimensionless
    equations

31
  • In this way three dimensionless numbers appear
  • the
    Péclet number
  • the
    Damköhler number
  • The Péclet number measures the convection/diffusio
    n ratio in the pores.
  • The Damköhler number is the adsorption/diffusion
    ratio at the pore surface.
  • Pl represents the time gradient of concentration
    in relation to diffusion in the pores.
  • In practice, Pel and Ql are commonly used to
    characterize the regime of a particular problem
    under consideration.
  • In the homogenization process their order of
    magnitude must be evaluated with respect to the
    powers of the small parameter .
  • Each combination of the orders of magnitude of
    the parameters Ql , Pl , and Pel corresponds to a
    phenomenon dominating the processes that take
    place at micro scale and different regime
    governing migration at the macroscopic scale.

32
i). Moderate diffusion, advection and adsorption
  • the case of
  • The process of homogenization leads to the
    traditional phenomenological dispersion equation
    for an adsorptive solute


  • (5.8)
  • where -the effective diffusion tensor Dij is
    defined as


  • (5.9)
  • and the vector field is the solution of
    the standard (representative) O cell problem
  • is periodic

    (5.10)


  • (5.11)


  • (5.12)


  • (5.13)

33
  • -the coefficient Rd, called the retardation
    factor, is defined as

  • (5.14)
  • with the total volume of the
    periodic cell
  • the volume of the fluid in
    the cell
  • Sp the surface of the solid in
    the cell
  • In terms of soil mechanics

  • (5.15)
  • with F the porosity
  • as the specific surface of the
    porous medium defined as the global surface of
    grains in a unit volume of soil .
  • -the effective velocity is given by
    the Darcys law.

34
ii) Moderate diffusion and adsorption, strong
advection
  • the case
  • The process of homogenization leads to two
    macroscopic governing equations that give
    succeeding order of approximations of real
    pollutant behavior.


  • (5.16)


  • (5.17)
  • where - the macroscopic dispersion tensor is
    defined as


  • (5.18)
  • and the vector field is the
    solution of the following cell problem


  • (5.19)


  • (5.20)

35
  • is periodic
    (5.21)



  • (5.22)
  • -the coefficient Rd is given by (5.14) or
    (5.15)
  • -the effective velocity is given
    by the Darcys law.
  • In order to derive the differential equation
    governing the average concentration lt c gt,
    equation (5.16) is added to equation (5.17)
    multiplied by e. after transformations the final
    form of the dispersion equation is obtained that
    gives the macroscopic model approximation within
    an error of O(e2).


  • (5.23)


  • In this equation the dispersive term as well as
    the transient term is of the order e.

36
iii) Very strong advection
  • the case
  • The process of homogenization applied to this
    problem leads to the following formulation
    obtained at e -1 order


  • (5.24)


  • (5.25)
  • Eq. (5.24) rewritten as


  • (5.26)
  • shows that there is no gradient of concentration
    c0 along the streamlines. This means that the
    concentration in the bulk of the porous medium
    depends directly on its value on the external
    boundary of the medium. Therefore, the
    rigorous macroscopic description, that would be
    intrinsic to the porous medium and the phenomena
    considered, does not exist. Hence, the problem
    can not be homogenized. This particular case will
    be illustrated when analyzing the experimental
    data.

37
iv) Strong diffusion, advection and adsorption
  • the case
  • The homogenization procedure applied to this
    problem gives for the first order approximation
    the macroscopic governing equation which does not
    contain the diffusive term. Indeed, it consists
    of the transient term related to the microscopic
    transient term as well as the adsorption and the
    advection terms


  • (5.27)
  • where Rd is given by (5.14).
  • The next order approximation of the macroscopic
    equation is


  • (5.28)

38
  • where the symbol lt gt G means


  • (5.29)
  • The local boundary value problem for determining
    the vector field is the following

  • (5.30)


  • (5.31)
  • is periodic

    (5.32)


  • (5.33)
  • Remark that depends not only on the
    advection, as it was in the case of , but
    also on the adsorption phenomenon. Moreover, in
    this case the pollutant is transported with the
    velocity ltvgt equal to the effective fluid
    velocity divided by the retardation factor.

39
  • The tensor D is expressed as


  • (5.34)
  • and depends on the adsorption coefficient a too.
    Therefore D may be called the
    dispersion-adsorption coefficient.
  • Remark that the second term in (5.27) represents
    the additional adsorption contribution defined as
    the interaction between the temporal changes of
    the averaged concentration field lt c0gt and the
    surface integral of the macroscopic vector field
    lt gtG .
  • Finally, the equation governing the averaged
    concentration lt c gt can be found by adding
    eq.(5.27) to eq.(5.28) multiplied by e.

  • (5.35)
  • where


  • (5.36)
  • If eq. (5.35) is compared with eq.(5.23) it can
    be concluded that the increase by one in the
    order of magnitude of parameters Pl and Ql
    causes that the transient term
    in the macroscopic
  • equation becomes of the order one.

40
v). Large temporal changes
  • the case
  • This is also a non-homogenizable case and in this
    case the rigorous macroscopic description, that
    would be intrinsic to the porous medium and the
    phenomena considered, does not exist.

41
6. COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS TESTED AGAINST
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
  • Experimental results obtained when the sample
    length is L150 cm, the solid particle diameter
    is dp0.35 cm and the porosity F0.41 are
    reported in
  • Auriault J.L., Heterogeneous medium, Is an
    equivalent macroscopic description possible?
    Int.J.Engn,Sci.,29,7,785-795, 1995.
  • If the characteristic length associated with the
    pore space in the fluid-solid system is defined
    (after Whitaker 1972) as


  • (6.1)
  • then, the small homogenization parameter is


  • (6.2)
  • According to the theoretical analysis presented
    in sequence 5, a rigorous macroscopic model
    exists if the Péclet number, which characterizes
    the flow regime, does not exceeds
  • In terms of the order of magnitude, this
    condition can be written as


  • (6.3)

42
  • Therefore a dispersion test
    through a sample of the length
  • L150 cm (dp0.35 cm) is correct from the
    point of view of the homogenization approach,
    provided the maximum Péclet number is much less
    than . If the Péclet number
    approaches , then the problem
    becomes non-homogenizable and the experimental
    results are limited to the particular sample
    examined.
  • In the case considered by
  • Neung -Wou H., Bhakta J, Carbonell R.G.
    Longitudinal and lateral dispersion in packed
    beds effect of column length and particle size
    distribution, AICHE Journal, 31,2,277-288 (1985)
  • the range of the Péclet number was 102 -104 which
    is practically beyond the range of the
    homogenizability.
  • In order to make the problem homogenizable, the
    flow regime should be changed, namely the Péclet
    number should be decreased. If however, we want
    the Péclet number to be, for example Pe 103,
    then the sample length L should be greater than
    240 cm. Moreover, almost all the previous
    experimental measurements quoted in the above
    paper exhibit the feature of non-homogenizability.
    For this reason the results obtained can not be
    extended to size conditions.

43
  • Bues M.A. and Aachib M. studied in 1991 in the
    paper
  • Influence of the heterogeneity of the solutions
    on the parameters of miscible displacements in
    saturated porous medium, Experiments in fluids,
    11, Springer Verlag, 25-32, (1991).
  • the dispersion coefficient in a column of length
    2 m, filled with a quasi uniform quartz sand of
    mean diameter 1.425 mm. The investigated range of
    the local Péclet number was 102-104.
    Concentrations were measured at intervals of 20
    cm along the length of the column. The
    corresponding parameter e (ratio of the mean
    grain diameter to the position x) for each
    position was 1.3610-2 4.6710-3 2.810-3
    2.0210-3 1.5710-3 1.2910-3 1.0910-3
    1.0110-3 8.910-4 7.910-4 respectively.
    The order of magnitude O(e-1) corresponds to 75
    214 357 495 636 775 917 990 1123 1266
    respectively.
  • It can be seen that the condition Pel ltltO(e-1) is
    roughly fulfilled at the end of the column when
    the flow regime is Pel 240.
  • The experimental data presented in the above
    paper show the asymptotic behavior of the
    dispersion coefficient that reaches its constant
    value for
  • x 180.5 cm.
  • Thus, one can conclude that the required sample
    length for the determination of the dispersion
    parameter in this sand at Pel 200 is at least
    2 m.

44
7. HEAT TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA
  • An interesting example of heat transport in
    porous media by convection and conduction
    represents the relatively recent discovered
    black smokers on the ocean floor. They are
    observed at mid-ocean ridges, where upwelling in
    the mantle below leads to the partial melting of
    rock and the existence of magma chambers. The
    rock between this chambers and the ocean floor is
    extensively fractured, permeated by seawater, and
    strongly heated by magma below. Consequently, a
    thermal convection occurs, and the water passing
    nearest to the magma chamber dissolves sulphides
    and other minerals with ease, hence the often
    black color. The upwelling water is concentrated
    into fracture zones, where it rises rapidly.
    Measured temperatures of the ejected fluids are
    up to 3000C.

45
(No Transcript)
46
  • Another striking example of heat transport in
    porous media is offered by geysers, such as those
    in Yellowstone National Park. Here meteoric
    groundwater is heated by subterranean magma
    chamber, leading to thermal convection
    concentrated on the way up into fissures. The
    ocean hydrostatic pressure prevents boiling from
    occurring, but this is not the case for geysers,
    and boiling of water causes the periodic eruption
    of steam and water that is familiar to tourists.

47
  • FAMOUS GEYSERS

48
(No Transcript)
49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
  • The heat transport in soil can be studied by
    means of a model in which the real heterogeneous
    medium is replaced by the macroscopic equivalent
    (effective continuum) like in the case of mass
    transport.
  • In order to develop the macroscopic model the
    homogenization technique of periodic media may be
    employed. It can be shown that the assumption of
    periodic media is equivalent to the existence
    of an elementary representative volume in a non
    periodic medium, containing a large number of
    heterogeneities.
  • The starting basic equations for diffusion and
    convection of heat according to
  • Mei C.C. Heat dispersion in porous media by
    homogenization method, Multiphase Transport in
    Porous Media, ASME Winter Meeting, FED
    vol.122/HTD vol.186 11-16 (1991).
  • Lee C.K., Sun C.C., Mei C.C. Computation
    of permeability and dispersivities of solute or
    heat in periodic porous media Int.J.Heat and
    Mass Transfer 19,4 p.661-675 (1996).
  • are given by


  • (7.1)


  • (7.2)

53
  • where
    denote respectively the
    temperatures, densities, thermal conductivities,
    specific heats and partial volumes of the fluid
    and solid in the O standard (representative)
    cell. On the solid fluid interface G, the
    temperatures and heat flux must be continuous

  • (7.3)

  • (7.4)
  • where nk represent the components of the unit
    normal vector pointing out of the fluid. In eqs.
    (7.1) and (7.2) energy dissipation by viscous
    stress has been neglected, which is justifiable
    for low Reynolds numbers.
  • It was assumed that the flow is independent of
    the temperature. Therefore, in
    eq. (7.1) represents the Darcys flow.
  • The derivation of the macroscopic model is
    accomplished by the application of homogenization
    method.
  • The macroscopic model is defined by the equation

  • (7.5)

54
  • where-the macroscopic conductivity tensor K is

  • (7.6)


  • -the function a(y) is given by

  • (7.7)
  • -the functions ?j belong to HY defined
    as

  • (7.8)
  • and satisfy
    (7.9)


  • The function space which appears in relation
    (7.8) is the Sobolev space used in
  • Sanchez-Palencia E., Lecture Notes on
    Physics.,vol.127, Springer, Berlin, 1980.

55
  • Equation (7.5) is similar to the equation
    obtained in
  • Prasad V., Convective Heat and Mass Transfer in
    Porous Media, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
    Dodrecht, 1991, p.563
  • and for is similar to the eq.
    presented in
  • Mei C.C., Auriault J.L., Ng C.O. Advances in
    Applied Mechanics vol.32, Academic Press, New
    York, 1996 p.309.

56
8. COMPUTED CONDUCTIVITY FOR THE HEAT TRANSPORT
IN POROUS MEDIA TESTED AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL
RESULTS
  • Lee C.C., Sun C.C. and Mei C.C. Computation of
    permeability and dispersivities of solute or heat
    in periodic porous media Int.J.Heat Mass
    Transfer col.39,4 p.661-676 (1996).
  • compute and compare conductivity for heat
    transport in porous media with experimental
    results. In the following we will present these
    results.
  • With the mean flow directed along the x-axis, the
    longitudinal and transverse conductivities KL and
    KT for heat were computed for Péclet numbers Pe
    up to 300 for two porosities F 0.38 and F
    0.5 the thermal properties for fluid and solid
    phases were assumed to be equal kf ks and ?s
    cs ?f cf. They were compared with some
    experimental results for randomly packed uniform
    glass spheres in water with roughly comparable
    thermal properties reported in
  • Levec J. and Carbonell R.G. Longitudinal and
    lateral thermal dispersion in packed beds. II.
    Comparison between theory and experiment
    A.I.Ch.E.J. 31, 591-602 (1985)
  • Green D.W., Perry R.H. and Babcock R.E.
    Longitudinal dispersion of thermal energy
    through porous media with a flowing fluid
    A.I.Ch.E.J. 10,5, 645-651 (1960).

57
  • In the limit Pe 0, both (KL, KT) approach unity
    because the composite medium is homogeneous and
    there is no distinction between Of and Os for
    pure diffusion.
  • For a simple cubic packing of spheres with F
    0.48 and ks kf 2
  • Sangani A.S. and Acrivos A. The effective
    conductivity of a periodic array of spheres
    Proc.R.Soc. Lond. A.386, 262-275 (1983)
  • give KT 1.46.
  • As a check Lee et al. have also calculated the
    effective conductivities with F 0.5 and the
    same ratio of conductivities ks, kf and obtain
    KT 1.458. The small discrepancy is again due to
    different grain geometries.
  • Computation in the relatively high Pe region show
    that the dispersivities KL, KT increase with
    decreasing porosity as in the case of passive
    solute. This is again due to increased micro
    scale mixing in the pore space caused by
    increased velocity gradient for smaller porosity
    value. The same trend has been observed for 2D
    array of cylinders in
  • Sahrani M. and Kavary M., Slip and no slip
    temperature boundary conditions at the interface
    of porous media convection, Int.J.Heat Mass
    Transfer 37, 1029-1044 (1994)

58
  • The experimental data for KL show a growth of
    (Pe) m , where m has been estimated to be 1.256
    by
  • Levec J. and Carbonell R.G. Longitudinal and
    lateral thermal dispersion in packed beds. II.
    Comparison between theory and experiment
    A.I.Ch.E.J. 31, 591-602 (1985)
  • and 1.4 by
  • Green D.W., Perry R.H. and Babcock R.E.
    Longitudinal dispersion of thermal energy
    through porous media with a flowing fluid
    A.I.Ch.E.J. 10,5, 645-651 (1960).
  • The discrepancy between theory and experiments
    must be again attributed to the difference in
    packing.
  • To see the effect of ks/kf, were calculated KL
    and KT for two porosities F 0.38 and F 0.5
    and two conductivity ratios, ks/kf 0 and 1. At
    the higher Péclet number, the longitudinal
    conductivity KL is greater, although the
    difference is small. This increase is due to heat
    diffusion in the solid phase. When the thermal
    gradient is in the direction of the mean flow,
    diffusion through the solid phase augments
    dispersion Kxx in the fluid when ks/kf ? 0. But
    for Kyy which is associated with the thermal
    gradient normal to the flow, transverse
    dispersion is weakened by the loss of heat into
    solid. Quantitatively, the effect of ks/kf1 on
    either KL and KT appears to be significant only
    at relatively low Péclet number. This result is
    reasonable since for high Pe dispersion by
    convection must be dominated and diffusion in the
    solid must become immaterial.

59
  • Thank you for your attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com