Public sector performance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Public sector performance

Description:

Public Administration Institute for Turkey and the Middle East (TODAIE), Ankara, Turkey ... Chatelaine Press, Burke, 1993, p. 361-397. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: vannu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public sector performance


1
Public sector performance
  • Productivity and performance management in the
    public sector
  • PROFESSOR GEERT BOUCKAERT (Leuven, Belgium)
  • Public Administration Institute for Turkey and
    the Middle East (TODAIE), Ankara, Turkey
  • 17 October, 2006

2
  • PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT MODELS
  • DEFINING KEY RELATIONS IN GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
    MACRO, MESO AND MICRO
  • CONDITIONS FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT MEASURING,
    INCLUDING, USING

3
  • 1. PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT MODELS

4
Four Models of Performance (Bouckaert
Halligan,2006)
5
Performance and Management
6
Ideal Types and OECD Country Systems
7
  • 2. DEFINING KEY RELATIONS IN GOVERNMENT
    PERFORMANCE MACRO, MESO AND MICRO

8
2. DEFINING KEY RELATIONS IN GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE MACRO, MESO AND MICRO
9
  • Education
  • Health
  • Law and Order
  • Public Administration
  • Overall Performance
  • Methodological Problems

10
  • EDUCATION
  • Overall effectiveness of education systems
  • -Achievement tests
  • -Reading skills
  • -Mathematical skills
  • -Scientific literature
  • -Educational attainment, 25-34 age group
  • -Lower secondary or non (negative weight)
  • -Higher
  • (Social and Cultural Planning Office, The Hague,
    2004)

11
  • EDUCATION

12
  • EDUCATION

13
HEALTH
Several composite indices
(SCP, 2004)
14
HEALTH
15
  • HEALTH

16
LAW AND ORDER
17
LAW AND ORDER Composite crime per 100 and
confidence
18
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Subjective quality in
government (2003) and expenditure per capita on
general public services (2001, in Euro)

19
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Confidence in the Civil
Service (2000) and expenditure per capita on
general public services (2001, in Euro)
20
OVERALL PERFORMANCE Overall performance of
countries and corrected government expenditures
21
GENERAL PROBLEMS IN MEASURING AND COMPARING
  • Institutional differences
  • -differences in definitions
  • -differences in registration procedures
  • -longitudinal inconsistencies
  • -incorrect data
  • -preliminary data
  • -inconsistent data
  • -incomplete data

22
GENERAL FRAMEWORK TO DEFINE LINKS BETWEEN
RESOURCES, OUTPUTS AND EFFECTS
23
2. DEFINING KEY RELATIONS IN GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE
  • Efficiency or Productivity as expressions of
    Input-Output relations
  • What is the difference between productivity and
    efficiency

24
2. DEFINING KEY RELATIONS IN GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE
  • Five ways to improve the productivity numbers

25
2. DEFINING KEY RELATIONS IN GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE
26
DETERMING LEVELS OF ANALYSIS TO ASSESS PERFORMANCE
  • Macro government wide
  • Meso policy field or level
  • Micro single organisation
  • -Macro versus Meso versus Micro Levels

27
PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE THE MICRO LEVEL
28
PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE MESO
29
  • Meso level

- Output, effects and causality at meso-level
30
PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE MACRO
31
DETERMING LEVELS OF ANALYSIS TO ASSESS PERFORMANCE
32
ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH PUBLIC SERVICES, DO YOU
TRUST THE PUBLIC SECTOR? (WADO IV, 2006)
33
  • 3. CONDITIONS FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
  • MEASUREMENT
  • INCLUSION
  • USE
  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT POLICY

34
3. CONDITIONS FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
35
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT POLICY
  • Measurement Policy Question cluster one
  • -1.Shall you focus on productivity, or on input
    or output inefficiency, on effectiveness, on
    trust? And why? How are they related?
  • -2.What are comparable clusters to compare
    efficiency/effectiveness/trust data?
  • -3.How does this connect to responsibility/account
    ability profiles?
  • Measurement Policy Question cluster two
  • -4.Which level will you focus upon
    (micro/meso/macro) and for what reason? Who is
    responsible/accountable? How are these levels
    audited?
  • -5.How do you integrate the different levels? Who
    is responsible/accountable? How is the
    integration audited?

36
  • Measurement Policy Questions cluster three
  • -6.What are the minimal features of a good
    indicator? Do you have performance auditing?
  • -7.What is the strategy to improve the
    performance measurement system? Who is
    responsible for performance auditing?
  • -8.How are you coping with the most important
    (potential) pathologies of measurement?
  • Measurement Policy Question cluster four
  • - 9.Are you going to integrate performance
    information in financial documents, contracts,
    policy documents?
  • - 10.How are you going to use this information as
    part of an improvement process?

37
  • Measurement Policy Questions cluster five
  • -11.On what issues are you not ready to measure
    performance? Is this subject to audit?
  • -12.What concrete strategy and tactics will you
    use in your organization to start measuring
    performance? Who is accountable for this?
  • Performance Management Policy
  • Measurement policy Inclusion Policy Policy of
    Using

38
SOME REFERENCES
  • Bouckaert Geert, Halligan John (2006,
    forthcoming) Performance and Performance
    Management. Peters B. Guy and Pierre Jon (Eds)
    Handbook of Public Policy. Sage London.
  • Pollitt Christopher, Bouckaert Geert (2004)
    Public Management Reform A Comparative Analysis.
    Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 345.
  • Bouckaert Geert (2004) Institutionalising
    Monitoring and Measurement Systems in the Public
    Sector. In Benz Arthur, Siedentopf Heinrich,
    Sommermann Karl-Peter (Hrsgb) Institutionenwandel
    in Regierung und Verwaltung, Duncker Humblot,
    Berlin, 2004, pp.455-466.
  • Van de Walle Steven, Sterck Miekatrien, van
    Dooren Wouter, Bouckaert Geert, and Pommer Evert
    (2004) Public Administration. In SCP (Social and
    Cultural Planning Office). Public Sector
    Performance. SCP, The Hague, p.234-270
  • Bouckaert Geert, van Dooren Wouter (2003)
    Performance Measurement and Management in Public
    Sector Organisations. In Bovaird Tony Löffler
    Elke (Eds) Public Management and Governance.
    Routledge, London, p.127-136.
  • Bouckaert Geert, B. Guy Peters (2002) Performance
    Measurement and Management The AchillesHeel in
    Administrative Modernization. In Public
    Performance Management Review (Sage, London)
    25(2002)4359-362.

39
  • Bouckaert Geert (1998) Public Sector Performance
    Measurement in a Principal Agent Context. In
    Halachmi A. Boorsma P. (1998) Inter and Intra
    Government Arrangements for Productivity, An
    Agency Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers
    Boston, p.137-145.
  • Bouckaert G. and Halachmi A.(1996) The Range of
    Performance Indicators in the Public Sector
    Theory vs Practice. In Halachmi A. and Grant D.
    (Eds.) Reengingeering and Performance Measurement
    in Criminal Justice and Social Programmes. IIAS,
    Ministry of Justice, Perth (Western Australia),
    1996, 91-106.
  • Bouckaert G. (1996) Measurement of Public Sector
    Performance Some European Perspectives. In
    Halachmi A. and Bouckaert G. (Eds.)
    Organizational Performance and Measurement in the
    Public Sector. Greenwood Publishing Group,
    Westport, 1996, 223-238.
  • Bouckaert G. (1995) Improving Performance
    Measurement. In Halachmi A. and Bouckaert G.,
    (Eds.) The Enduring Challenges in Public
    Management, Surviving and Excelling in a Changing
    World. Jossey Bass, San Fransisco, 1995,
    p.379-412.
  • Bouckaert G. (1995) Measuring Quality (Ch.2),
    Concluding reflections (Ch.12). In Pollitt Chr.
    and Bouckaert G., (Eds.) Quality Improvement in
    European Public Services, Concepts, Cases and
    Commentary. Sage, London, 1995, p.20-32,
    p.162-173.

40
  • Bouckaert G. (1995) Remodeling Quality and
    Quantity. In Halachmi A. and Bouckaert G., (Eds.)
    Public Productivity through Quality and Strategic
    Management. IOS, Rotterdam/ IIAS, Brussels, 1995,
    p.21-38.
  • Bouckaert Geert (1994) New information
    technology (NIT) and productivity measurement 
    Changes and consequences. International Journal
    of Public Administration, (Jossey Bass, San
    Fransisco). 17(1)59-82.
  • Bouckaert G. (1993) The History of the
    Productivity Movement. Holzer, M., Halachmi, A.
    (Eds.) Competent Government Theory and Practice.
    The Best of Public Productivity Management
    Review 1985-1993. Chatelaine Press, Burke, 1993,
    p. 361-397.
  • Bouckaert Geert (1993) Efficiency measurement
    from a management perspective a case of the
    Civil Registry Office in Flanders. International
    Review of Administrative Sciences, (Sage,
    London), 59(1)11-27.
  • Bouckaert Geert (1993) Measurement and
    Meaningful Management. Public Productivity and
    Management Review, 17(1)31-43.
  • Bouckaert G. (1992) Productivity Analysis in the
    public sector  the case of the fire service.
    International Review of Administrative Sciences,
    (Sage, London), Vol.58, 1992, 175-200.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com