MicroRNA Inhibition of Translation Initiation in Vitro by Targeting the CapBinding Complex eIF4F - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

MicroRNA Inhibition of Translation Initiation in Vitro by Targeting the CapBinding Complex eIF4F

Description:

... important is the vitro system can faithfully recapitulate the property of miRNA. ... translation system faithfully recapitulate the properties of miRNAs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: FRIE151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MicroRNA Inhibition of Translation Initiation in Vitro by Targeting the CapBinding Complex eIF4F


1
MicroRNA Inhibition of Translation
Initiation in Vitro by Targeting the Cap-Binding
Complex eIF4F
  • Liang kai wei
  • Du tian peng

Oct.31
2
  • Background of miRNA
  • Plant and animal genomes contain an
    aboundance of small genes that produce RNAs of 22
    nucleotides in length
  • which were dubbed as microRNAs.These newly found
    endogenous RNAs may participate in a wide range
    of genetic regulatory pathways and play an
    important role in the development..

Fig.1
3
MicroRNAs control gene expression in three ways
  • 1lead to the degradation of the target mRNA
  • 2 Inhibit translation
  • 3 Proteolysis of the nascent polypeptide

Flash
4
Limitation of microRNA inhibiting of translation
control
  • In vivo studies ,the outcome of mRNA
    silencing has been examined hours or days after
    the initial mRNA target recognition.So the
    development of an vitro system is necess -ary to
    understand the biochemistry of miRNA function
    ,especially the early steps after the recruitment
    of RISC to the mRNA.

5
To solve the problem
  • Chose an in vitro translation system which can
    support efficient translation and exhibit many
    endogenous and viral translation control
    mechanism ,and the most important is the vitro
    system can faithfully recapitulate the property
    of miRNA.

Better chose the mouse Krebs-2 ascites
cell extract
6
Concept
  • Report gene renilla luciferase
  • RL
  • RL-6xB

used as control
contains six target sites for let-7 miRNA
  • RL-6xBMut contains mutated site which let-7

can not recognize
Let-7miRNAs have many types,including let-7a
and let-7f miRNA
7
Part1Experiments show the target mRNA
repression is sensitive to the relative
concentrations of the mRNA and miRNA
  • EXP1. mRNAs were translated at concentrations
    varying from 3 pM to 3nM.At the lowest
    concentration (3pM),RL-6xB mRNA translation was
    only 25of RL mRNA.

8
EXP2.A decrease in translation was not observed
at an mRNA concentration of 3nM with a limiting
concentration of let-7 miRNA
S1
9
EXP3.The same degree of translation inhibition
was observed when Rluc activity was observed when
Rluc activity was normalized against firefly
luciferase(Fluc) activity(expressed from Fluc
mRNA used as an internal control)
?
10
EXP4.RL and RL-6xB mRNAs were translated with
similar efficiency in a wheat gem extract when
let-7 is absent.
11
Part2Experiments address the specificity of the
inhibition of RL-6xB mRNA translation by let-7
  • .
  • Exp1.Supplement the Krebs-2 ascites extract with
    an antisense 2-O-methyl(2-O-Me)
    oligoribonuclotide complementary to

let-7 miRNA.This resulted in an 2.5-fold increase
in translation of RL-6xB mRNA.

12
Exp2.Translation of a reporter mRNA containing
mutations (RL-6xBMut) was almost as efficient (90
) as RLmRNA.This exp shows the importance of the
let-7 seed region (six target site) for
inhibition of mRNA expression for inhibition of
mRNA expression
13
  • Part1 and part2 indicate that the Krebs-2 ascites
    cell-free translation system faithfully
    recapitulate the properties of miRNAs establishde
    in vitro.

14
Part3 Experiments indicate that mRNA degradation
is not responsible for the inhibition mediated by
let-7 seen as early times
  • Exp1.Kinetics of let-7 mediated inhibition
    revealed a decrease(25)in translation of RL-6xB
    mRNA relative to RL mRNA,frist detected after 15
    min of incubationa stronger inhibition occurred
    at later times.

Fig7
Exp2
15

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
Fig.2
35
Fig3
36
Fig4
37
Fig5
38
Fig6
39
Fig7
40
Fig.1
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com