Reducing the Complexities of Reading Comprehension: A Simplifying Framework PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 53
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reducing the Complexities of Reading Comprehension: A Simplifying Framework


1
Reducing the Complexities of Reading
Comprehension A Simplifying Framework
  • Charles Perfetti

2
Overview
  • Critical Preliminaries
  • The comprehension problem
  • What is comprehension?
  • Building mental models word by word
  • Comprehensive Comprehension
  • Processes, knowledge, and strategies
  • A medium-grain cognitive framework
  • Simplifying Frameworks
  • Pressure points
  • A simplified framework
  • Implications

3
The comprehension problem
  • National Assessment of Educational Progress
    (NAEP)
  • 1 of 3 fourth-graders and 1 of 4 eighth-graders
    cannot read at the basic level. That is, when
    reading grade appropriate material, these
    students do not understand what they read ---IES
    Reading for Understanding

4
Even adults can have trouble understanding
written texts
  • "By God, for a minute there it suddenly all made
    sense."

5
What do we mean by comprehension?
  • Comprehension is defined as intentional thinking
    during which meaning is constructed through
    interactions between text and reader (Harris
    Hodges, 1995). Thus, readers derive meaning from
    text when they engage in intentional, problem
    solving thinking processes.
  • ---National Reading Panel 2000

6
A simpler idea learning to read with
comprehension is learning to understand writing
as well as one understands spoken language
  • We can expect the comprehension of written
    language to approximate the comprehension of
    spoken language. When that happens, then reading
    comprehension has developed, for practical
    purposes, to its limiting or asymptotic level.
    All other limitations are imposed by linguistic
    abilities, relevant knowledge, and general
    intelligence. If we make things more complex than
    this, we push onto the concept of reading
    comprehension all these other important aspects
    of cognition, with the muddle that results from
    conceptual conflation.
  • ----Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., Oakhill, J.
    (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension
    skill. In M. J. Snowling C. Hulme (Eds.), The
    science of reading A handbook (pp. 227-247).
    Oxford Blackwell.

7
Too simple?
  • We accept, approximately and in an idealized
    form, the assumption that reading comprehension
    is the joint product of printed word
    identification and listening comprehension, an
    idea famously asserted by Gough and Tunmer (1986)
    as a simple view of reading. However, we also
    must assume that learning to read with
    comprehension brings additional complexities
  • ----Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., Oakhill, J.
    (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension
    skill. In M. J. Snowling C. Hulme (Eds.), The
    science of reading A handbook (pp. 227-247).
    Oxford Blackwell.

8
The text and the mind
  • researchers working in the area of reading
    comprehension have shown repeatedly that meaning
    does not exist in text.
  • --Alvermann Eakle, p. 14 (in Sweet Snow,
    Rethinking reading comprehension 2003)

9
Well, yes but
  • The application of the symbolic principle (a
    language form is a symbol for meaning) is
    constrained by the language that implements it.
  • The dog bit the man
  • The man bit the dog
  • Likud members will not react favorably to the
    Presidents speech.
  • Likud members will react favorably to the
    Presidents speech

10
A definition that includes the text
  • Reading comprehension the process of
    simultaneously extracting and constructing
    meaning through inter- action and involvement
    with written language. It consists of three
    elements the reader, the text, and the activity
    or purpose for reading.
  • ---p.viii, Report of Rand Reading Study Group,
    2002.

11
Building a mental model from a text
  • Comprehension occurs as the reader builds a
    mental representation of a text message.
  • ----Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., Oakhill, J.
    (2005).

12
Text messages are understood (and mental models
are built) word by word
Mental model
Each word is fit into mental models (multiple
structures) to the extent possible
Word 1
13
Text messages are understood (and mental models
are built) word by word
Mental model
Each word is fit into mental models (multiple
structures) to the extent possible
Word 2
14
Text messages are understood (and mental models
are built) word by word
Mental model
Each word is fit into mental models (multiple
structures) to the extent possible
Word 3
15
Text messages are understood (and mental models
are built) word by word
Mental model
Each word is fit into mental models (multiple
structures) to the extent possible
Word 4
16
2. Comprehensive Comprehension More than we need
for some purposes?
  • The complex processes of comprehension Three
    non-independent aspects
  • Processes
  • Knowledge
  • Strategies

17
What are reading comprehension strategies?
  • Reading Comprehension Strategies Theories,
    Interventions, and technologies (Danielle
    McNamara, Ed.) Erlbaum/ Taylor Francis, 2007)
  • Many interesting chapters on comprehension
    strategies
  • Definition of reading comprehension strategy A
    cognitive or behavioral action that is enacted
    under particular contextual conditions with the
    goal of improving some aspect of comprehension.
    Art Graesser, page 6.

18
Comprehension ProcessesStrategies
  1. Making connections
  2. Questioning
  3. Visualizing
  4. Inferring
  5. Determining importance
  6. Synthesizing
  1. Monitoring
  2. Metacognition
  3. Answering questions
  4. Recognizing story structure
  5. Summarizing

19
Strategies that can be taught effectively
(according the NRP)
  • NRP report (2000) identified 16 categories of
    text comprehension instruction 7 concluded to
    have a solid scientific basis
  • Comprehension monitoring
  • Cooperative learning (where children learn
    reading strategies together)
  • Graphic and semantic organizers
  • Question answering
  • Question generation
  • Story structure
  • Summarization

20
A possible advantage of strategies that focus
attention on what the text says?
  • McKeown Beck IES study (J Ed Psych, in press)
  • Strategies
  • Predicting
  • Summarizing
  • Making inferences
  • Generating questions
  • Comprehension monitoring
  • Content focus Questioning the Author
  • Content focus produced better comprehension

21
Frameworks for reading comprehension
  • Caveat frameworks vs models
  • Grain size issues
  • Useful frameworks range between 3 and 20
    components
  • Trade-offs of completeness with simplicity

22
One with 4 Components Rand Ready Study Group
Report (2002)
A heuristic for thinking about reading
comprehension
23
A cognitive framework
  • An (almost) consensual framework of medium grain
    size
  • Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written
    language A blueprint of the reader. In C. Brown
    P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of
    language (pp. 167-208). Oxford University Press.
  • Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., Oakhill, J.
    (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension
    skill. In M. J. Snowling C. Hulme (Eds.), The
    science of reading A handbook (pp. 227-247).
    Oxford Blackwell.

24
Linguistic and Writing System Knowledge
Linguistic System
Orthographic System
Phonology, Syntax, Morphology
Mapping to phonology
Comprehension Processes
Parser
Meaning and Form Selection
Word Identification
Inferences
NonLinguistic (conceptual) knowledge
Perfetti (1999) Perfetti, Landi Oakhill, 2005
25
Linguistic and Writing System Knowledge
Linguistic System
Orthographic System
Phonology, Syntax, Morphology
Mapping to phonology
Word Identification
NonLinguistic (conceptual) knowledge
Perfetti (1999) Perfetti, Landi Oakhill, 2005
26
Linguistic and Writing System Knowledge
Linguistic System
Orthographic System
Phonology, Syntax, Morphology
Mapping to phonology
Comprehension Processes
Control Processes Attention Strategies Monitoring
Parser
Meaning and Form Selection
Word Identification
Inferences
NonLinguistic (conceptual) knowledge
Perfetti (1999) Perfetti, Landi Oakhill, 2005
27
3. Simplifying frameworks
  • To highlight broad components that are pressure
    points for comprehension problems

28
Pressure Points
  • Processes
  • Word Identification
  • Word Meaning Selection
  • Sentence meaning
  • Text integration
  • Successive sentences
  • Global Text Meaning
  • Gist (summaries)
  • Knowledge sources
  • Word form
  • Word meaning local text meaning
  • Word meaning syntax
  • Sentence meaning referential word meaning
  • All relevant knowledge from text

29
A focus on word meanings
30
N. Landi dissertation (University. of Pittsburgh
adult sample)
Word knowledge and Comprehension
N 799
  • 23 below median on comprehension component but
    above median on lexical component
  • 9 had the reverse pattern Above median on Comp,
    below on Lexical

Lexical Component
Comprehension Component
Scatter Plot of subjects normalized component
scores following factor analysis and rotation
31
Word knowledge
  • Lexical Quality and Comprehension (Perfetti
    Hart, 2001 2002 Perfetti 2007)
  • General relationships between comprehension and
    knowledge of both
  • Word meaning
  • Word form
  • Meaning Word learning
  • Skilled comprehenders (ERPs) show stronger
    recognition of a word learning episode (Perfetti,
    Wlotko, hart, 2005)
  • Meaning Word to text integration
  • Skilled comprehenders (ERPs) show stronger
    integration of word meanings across sentences in
    text (Perfetti, Yang, Schmalhofer (2008)
  • Form Stability of orthographic word
    representations

32
Spelling instability in adult readers
Is this a correct spelling, yes or no?
33
Simplification Options Processes or Knowledge
  • Process
  • Decoding
  • Meaning selection
  • Proposition extraction
  • Mental model building
  • Knowledge
  • Orthography
  • Linguistic Knowledge
  • Word knowledge
  • Nonlinguistic (Conceptual) knowledge

34
Linguistic and Writing System Knowledge
Linguistic System
Orthographic System
Phonology, Syntax, Morphology
Mapping to phonology
Comprehension Processes
Parser
2
Meaning and Form Selection
Word Identification
1
Inferences
3
4
NonLinguistic (conceptual) knowledge
35
Linguistic and Writing System Knowledge
Linguistic System
Orthographic System
Phonology, Syntax, Morphology
Mapping to phonology
2
1
Comprehension Processes
3
Parser
Meaning and Form Selection
Word Identification
Inferences
NonLinguistic (conceptual) knowledge
4
36
A simplified process framework of reading
comprehension
Word Identification
Proposition Extraction
Meaning Selection
Situation Model Building
37
A Simplified Knowledge Framework of Reading
Comprehension
Linguistic Knowledge
Word knowledge
Conceptual knowledge
38
The Simplified Knowledge Framework of Reading
Comprehension
Linguistic Knowledge
Word knowledge
Attention
Conceptual knowledge
39
The Simplified Knowledge Framework of Reading
Comprehension
text
Linguistic Knowledge
Word knowledge
Attention
Conceptual knowledge
40
The Simplified Knowledge Framework of Reading
Comprehension
text
Linguistic Knowledge
Text knowledge
Word knowledge
Attention
Conceptual knowledge
41
What about spoken language?
  1. Correlations of spoken and written language
    increase with educational levels approaching .9
    in adult sample
  2. Spoken language is the source of much of the
    relevant knowledge

42
What about Comprehension Strategies?
  • They are implicit in the framework Attention and
    control processes are about strategies.
  • The central strategy is active engagement with a
    text with the intention of understanding.
  • This can include comprehension monitoring,
    question asking, question answering,
    summarization, and others

43
Engagement vs Mindless reading
  • Engagement The reader is motivated to understand
    the text and seeks to do so.
  • High Standard for Coherence (van den Broek et al,
    1995)

44
Mindless reading evidence that cognition is
altered
  • Cognitive processes partially control
    eye-movements
  • Reichle Schooler research
  • Adult readers Jane Austens Sense and
    Sensibility. 50 chapters, 7-17 pages per chapter
    up to 25 lines per page. Self Paced reading.
    Trained to hit the Z key when they caught
    themselves thinking about something else
  • In 12-15 hours of reading, readers caught zone
    outs 8-36 times (ave 23)
  • Highly accurate in self-catching Experimenter
    controlled Probes produced average of 9
    additional zone out reports

45
Mindless reading results
Normal Self-caught ZO
No. of fixations 37.7 28.1
Off text fixations 0.2 2.6
Length effect 0
Frequency effect 0
46
Attention
  • So the framework needs attention and control
    otherwise the cognitive part doesnt work
  • Comprehension monitoring is the central strategy
    for controlling attention

47
Limitations What complexities are needed?
  • Knowledge must not be inert.
  • Support for using knowledge
  • Complex text environments
  • Multiple texts
  • Using texts for arguments and problem solving

48
4. Implications of Simplification
  • The basics of comprehension
  • Word knowledge
  • Form and meaning
  • Language knowledge
  • Conceptual knowledge
  • Text knowledge
  • A habits of mind
  • High standards for coherence and engagement

49
Implications of Simplification
  • Focus on fewer problems
  • But must understand the underlying complexities
  • Hypothesize privileged pressure points
  • Word meaning and conceptual knowledge
  • Engagement
  • Others
  • May encourage research that leads to educational
    improvement

50
Variability in word episodes Evidence for a
pressure point
  • Hart, B., Risley, R. T. (1995). Meaningful
    differences in the everyday experience of young
    American children. Baltimore Paul H. Brookes.

Words heard per hour Words heard per week Words heard per year 4 years
Welfare 616 62,000 3 million 13 million
Working Class 1,251 125,000 6 million 26 million
Professional 2,153 215,000 11 million 45 million
51
IES Reading Initiative
  • The Reading for Understanding Research Initiative
    (Reading Initiative) is intended to support
    applied basic research to (a) identify underlying
    processes that are malleable and potential
    targets for intervention, (b) develop and
    evaluate interventions (e.g., instructional
    approaches, curricula, technology, teacher
    professional development programs) to improve
    reading comprehension for students in
    prekindergarten through Grade 12, and (c) develop
    and validate assessments of reading
    comprehension.

52
Simplicity is a mixed virtue
  • For every complex problem there is an answer
    that is clear, simple, and wrong.
  • --H.L.Mencken

53
An engaged reader
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com