Academy of Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Academy of Management

Description:

To attenuate the risks. Multiple sources. Multiple researchers. Insider/ outsider / peer review ... To attenuate the concerns. Exhaustive documentation of analysis ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: richar570
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Academy of Management


1
Academy of Management Pre-Registration
PDW Researching and Publishing
in Strategy-as-Practice 5 August,
2007 9.00-11.50 Welcome!
2
Strategy-as-Practice PDW Schedule
9.00-9.40 Introducing SAP Richard
Whittington How to Research SAP Ann
Langley Publishing in Journals Julia
Balogun Discussion All 9.40-11.00 Paper
Round-tables Facilitators Coffee Cambridge
Univ. Press 11.00-11.50 Editors
Panel Martha Feldman (Org Sci) Steve
Floyd (JMS) Royston Greenwood (SO)
3
Introducing Strategy-as-Practice
Strategy is something people do
- not just a property of organizations
Strategy as an activity implies close attention
to - the processes of strategy formation
praxis, practices, practitioners - the
content of strategies routines, capabilities,
practices - micro, meso and macro outcomes
e.g.performance of practitioners, spread and
impact of practices, accomplishment of
praxis
4
Some Theoretical Resources for SAP
Macro
Social Theories of Practice Philosophical Pragmat
ism
Institutionalist Theories
Actor Network Theory
Content
Process
Carnegie Tradition Sensemaking and Routines
Situated Learning
Micro
Source Johnson, Langley, Melin Whittington,
Strategy-as-Practice Research Directions
and Resources, Cambridge University Press, 2007
5
Publishing the Theoretical Challenge
Discovery Mode
Explanatory Mode

Routines matter Practices common Practitioners
influential
when, when not? where, where not? how,
how not? and so on
6
How do we research strategy as practice?
  • Ann Langley, HEC Montréal
  • Academy of Management PDW
  • Philadelphia, August 2007

7
Methodological ResourcesEmphasis on Qualitative
Data
  • Observations of strategy practices (retreats
    conversations meetings shadowing)
  • Interpretations of strategy practices
    (interviews diaries focus groups
    questionnaires)
  • Artefacts of strategy practice (minutes of
    meetings plans reports flip-charts)

8
Some interesting methods for capturing
Strategy-as-Practice
  • Collect  practice narratives  of strategists at
    regular intervals over long periods of time
  • Diaries - e.g., respondents note down their
    reactions - Balogun Johnson (2005).
  • Videos, photographs - e.g., film meetings and ask
    for informants interpretations Stronz (2005)
  • Trace strategy document versions and what happens
    between them (paper or electronic)
  • Become an apprentice strategist and note down
    experiences, learnings and feelings
  • Conversation analysis of interactions among
    strategists in meetings Samra-Fredericks (2003)

9
Practical challenges of research on
Strategy-as-Practice 1
  • Units of analysis
  • Limits of focusing only on activity labelled
     strategic  ? one might miss the practices that
    really constitute strategy
  • But then, what is not strategic?
  • Access and its price
  • Sensitivity of  strategic  issues/discussions
  • Ethical practical issues of involvement/
    neutrality

10
Practical challenges of research on
Strategy-as-Practice 2
  • The usual suspects
  • Subjectivity/credibility how to sustain the
    credibility of approaches that often rely on the
    researcher as instrument?
  • Contribution how to get beyond pure description
    to generate valuable insight?
  • Generalizability how to justify the relevance of
    results to others - given the stickiness and
    contextuality of practical knowledge?

11
Illustrative Papers Help us to see how to meet
the challenges
  • Barley, S. J., (1986). Technology as an Occasion
    for Structuring Evidence from Observations of
    CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology
    departments, ASQ, 31, 78-108
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) Making fast decisions
    in high velocity environments, AMJ, 32, 543-76
  • Langley, A. (1989). In Search of Rationality The
    Purposes Behind the Use of Formal Analysis in
    Organizations. ASQ, 34, 598-631
  • Gioia, D. A., and Chittipedi, K, (1991).
    Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change
    Initiation, SMJ, 12, 433-48
  • Oakes, L., Townley, B., Cooper, D. J. (1998).
    Business planning as pedagogy Language and
    institutions in a changing institutional field.
    ASQ, 43, 2, 257-292
  • Samra-Fredericks, D (2003). Strategizing as Lived
    Experience and Strategists Everyday Efforts to
    Shape Strategic Direction, JMS, 40, 1, 141-174
  • Balogun, J and Johnson, G, (2004).
    Organizational Restructuring the Impact of
    Middle Manager Sensemaking AMJ, 47, 4, 523-549
  • PT Bürgi, CD Jacobs, J. Roos (2005), From
    Metaphor to Practice in the Crafting of Strategy,
    JMI, 14, 1, 78-94

12
Issues of "subjectivity" during qualitative data
collection
Access tosituations Rapport withpeople


Qualityof data
  • To attenuate the risks
  • Multiple sources
  • Multiple researchers
  • Insider/ outsider / peer review
  • Make biases explicit

Proximity tophenomenon


-
Risk of contamination (effect ofthe
researcheron thephenomenon)
Risk of "going native" (becomingsocialized
tothe point ofnot seeing things)
Risk ofpoliticalalignment (loss ofneutrality)
13
Issues of "subjectivity" during data analysis
interpretation
Richness and depth of qualitativedata
Credibilityofinterpretation
Saturation andauthenticity
14
Making a contribution - reaching beyond
description?
  • Suggestion design to compare
  • Compare incidences/ people to create typologies
  • Compare cases to show generality or explain
    differences/ outcomes
  • Compare data with theory (ies) or received
    views
  • Compare sub-units within cases (issues org
    sub-units)
  • Compare time periods to replicate dynamics

15
Different approaches to generalizability in
qualitative research
  • Transferability The important thing is to
    provide sufficient in-depth contextual
    information so that the reader can judge
    transferability to another situation
  • Accent on analytic generalizability (to theory)
    rather than empirical generalizability (to
    population). Each case provides a complete test
    of a theory (much like an experiment)
  • Replication on polar cases if the same
    phenomenon occurs in very different situations,
    it is more likely to be general
  • Generalizability is not relevant qualitative
    research is interested in the particular, not the
    general

16
Publishing in JournalsLearning Points from the
HR SI on SAPJulia Balogun
17
Typical Problems with SAP Research
  • Connecting detail of practices with
    organisational (or other) outcomes
  • Use of theory (or rather lack of it)
  • Inadequate explanation of data analysis
  • Lack of linkage through theory ? method ? data /
    story presentation ? conclusions
  • Explaining the journey rather than the conclusions

18
Typical Problems with SAP Research
  • Connecting detail of practices with
    organisational (or other) outcomes

19
Typical Problems with SAP Research
  • Connecting detail of practices with
    organisational (or other) outcomes
  • Use of theory (or rather lack of it)

20
Typical Problems with SAP Research
  • Connecting detail of practices with
    organisational (or other) outcomes
  • Use of theory (or rather lack of it)
  • Inadequate explanation of data analysis

21
Typical Problems with SAP Research
  • Connecting detail of practices with
    organisational (or other) outcomes
  • Use of theory (or rather lack of it)
  • Inadequate explanation of data analysis
  • Lack of linkage through theory ? method ? data /
    story presentation ? conclusions

22
Typical Problems with SAP Research
  • Connecting detail of practices with
    organisational (or other) outcomes
  • Use of theory (or rather lack of it)
  • Inadequate explanation of data analysis
  • Lack of linkage through theory ? method ? data /
    story presentation ? conclusions
  • Explaining the journey rather than the conclusions

23
Round-Tables Royston Greenwood Barley, S. J.,
(1986). Themes Theory from the single case
mixing qualitative and quantitative data. Gerry
Johnson Balogun, J and Johnson, G, (2004).
Themes Responding to reviewers intimate
qualitative research Richard Whittington Burgi
P., Jacobs C. and Roos J. (2005), Themes
publishing action research non-traditional data
reporting Leif Melin Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989)
Themes comparative case studies systematic
qualitative data display Julia Balogun Gioia,
D. A., and Chittipedi, K, (1991). Themes using
theory to link micro activity with organizational
outcomes sense-making Paula Jarzabkowski
Langley, A. (1989). Themes comparative case
studies micro-practices mixed qualitative and
quantitative data display techniques Eero
Vaara Oakes, L., Townley, B., Cooper, D. J.
(1998). Themes Institutional levels of analysis
longitudinal case study. Ann Langley Samra -
Fredericks, D (2003). Themes discourse analysis
intimate qualitative research methodologies.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com