Successful Models for Treatment of Depression David Katzelnick January 17th, 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Successful Models for Treatment of Depression David Katzelnick January 17th, 2006

Description:

Source: MacArthur Foundation Midlife in the U.S. Survey 'Competing Demands' PCP ... MacArthur Website. Relevant articles, tools and manuals are available at: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: davi958
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Successful Models for Treatment of Depression David Katzelnick January 17th, 2006


1
Successful Models for Treatment of Depression
David KatzelnickJanuary 17th, 2006
2
  • If there be a hell upon earth, it is to be found
    in a melancholy mans heart.
  • Robert Burton, 1621

3
Hows everything?
4
NCQA HEDIS MeasuresCommercial Plans
Acute Phase Antidepressant
Continuation Phase Antidepressant
Clinician Follow-up
Percent
Measurement Year
5
One person in the U.S. dies by suicide every 17
minutesNational Center for Suicide Statistics
1997
6
Quality of Care for Depressive and Anxiety
Disorder in US
  • National telephone survey
  • 1636 adults with depression or anxiety
    disorder - 83 saw health care provider - 30
    received some treatment - 19 received
    guideline recommended treatment

Young A Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001
7
(No Transcript)
8
Who Treats People with Major Depression in U.S.?
Source MacArthur Foundation Midlife in the U.S.
Survey
9
Competing Demands
PCP
10
How can depression care be improved?
  • Lessons from Randomized Clinical Trials

11
Effectiveness Studies
12
Core Elements of Effective Treatment
  • Screening
  • Patient Self-Management
  • Clinician education
  • Simple treatment algorithm
  • Treatment coordinator
  • Mental Health Clinician availability

13
(No Transcript)
14
Simon GE
15
Gilbody Systematic Review
  • Successful Depression Interventions
  • Complex including
  • Clinician education
  • Nurse care management
  • Integration of primary and secondary care
  • Simple guideline implementation and education
    strategies generally ineffective

Gilbody JAMA 2003
16
Meta-Analysis of Disease Managemenent Programs
(DMP) for Depression
  • DMP significantly enhanced the quality of care
    for depression
  • DMP had relative risk of 0.75 on depression
    severity
  • Cost per QALY 9,051 to 49,500
  • Need longer studies and more studies outside
    managed-care systems

Neumeyer-Gromen, Medical Care December 2004
17
Screening for Depression in Primary Care
  • US Preventive Services Task Force recommends
    screening for depression in practices able to
    then actively manage patients who screen positive
  • 2-question depression screen
  • Over the past 2 weeks, have you felt down or
    hopeless?
  • Over the past 2 weeks, have you felt little
    interest in doing things?
  • A yes to either question is a positive screen
    for depression

Pignone MP, et al. Ann Intern Med.
2002136765-776.
18
Collaborative Care Studies
  • Randomized trial of primary care patients with
    major depression
  • Collaborative Care by Primary care and mental
    health specialty clinicians
  • Group Health Cooperative Pugent Sound

19
Collaborative Care
  • Major Depression Patients
  • ? adherence adequacy of antidepressants (90
    days)

20
Collaborative Care
Improved Depression Outcomes (SCL) 50 Reduction
of symptoms at 4 months
21
www.improving chroniccare.org
22
Dissemination Projects
23
RESPECT TrialRe-engineering systems for the
treatment of depression in primary Care
  • Research Goals
  • To test the effectiveness, sustainability and
    dissemination potential of an evidence-based
    clinical model and dissemination approach
    designed to improve the quality of depression
    care.
  • Test effectiveness of indirect implementation
    through an intermediary organization

Dietrich A BMJ 2004
24
RESPECT-D Response Rate(50 Drop in HSCL)
25
MacArthur Website Relevant articles, tools and
manuals are available at www.depression-primaryc
are.org
26
Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough
Series
  • Funded by National program for Improving Chronic
    Illness Care ( Robert Wood Johnson Foundation)
  • 23 ethnically and geographically diverse health
    care organizations
  • 15 Bureau of Primary Care sites
  • 13 month program
  • 2000 patients initiated treatment

Katzelnick Joint Commission J Quality and
Patient Safety July 2005
27
Depression is also recurrent and frequently
chronic illness
  • Can we transfer improvements made in the care of
    Diabetes and Congestive Heart Failure to the care
    of Depression?

28
(No Transcript)
29
PHQ-9 Symptom Checklist
PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
TOTAL 16
Kroenke K, et al. J Gen Intern Med.
200116606-613.
30
Depression Faculty Initial Recommendations
  • Depression registry
  • Structured depression diagnosis
  • Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)
  • Care manager
  • Proactive systematic follow up of depression
  • Depression Severity (PHQ)
  • Medication/ psychotherapy adherence

31
Depression Faculty Initial Recommendations II
  • Collaborative care plan using Mac Arthur tool
    kit www.depression-primarycare.org
  • Utilize outcome data to refer complex and
    non-responding patients to Mental health
    specialists

32
(No Transcript)
33
IHI Depression Breakthrough Series Outcomes
34
Breakthrough Series Conclusions
  • Research has shown that systematic programs can
    dramatically improve outcomes for people with
    depression
  • Many breakthrough teams were able to achieve
    outcomes similar to successful depression
    randomized trials.

35
Can clinicians agree on a common self-rated
depression severity metric that can do for
depression what HgbA1c has done for Diabetes ?
36
AAFP/APA/ACP Initiative to Improve Depression Care
37
Phase I Selecting Instruments for Diagnosis and
Assessment of Depression Severity
  • Expert Meeting October 8th 2002 on
  • Reviewed all currently available depression
    severity instruments
  • Concluded that PHQ-9 best met criteria
  • QIDS as alternative instrument

Phase I supported by an unrestrited research
grant from Wyeth Pharmaceticals
38
Phase II and III Implementation of Systematic
Depression Severity Assessment in Primary and
Psychiatric Care
  • Plan two parallel Breakthrough Series Model
    Improvement Collaboratives
  • Introduce PHQ-9 and other tools for monitoring
    depression severity
  • Evaluate feasibility in routine practices using
    quantitative and qualitative methods

Phase II supported by an unrestrited research
grant from Forest Pharmaceticals
39
Project Overview
  • 12 month Quality improvement project
  • Conducted in professional organizations practice
    research networks
  • 20 primary care (10 internal med and 10 family
    practice) and 20 psychiatric practices

Supported by Astra Zeneca , Forest, Lilly,
Pfizer, Sanofi and Wyeth,
40
Summary
  • Treatment of Depression currently is suboptimal
    in both primary care and psychiatric settings
  • Depression outcomes can be substantially improved
  • Implementation of Chronic Care Model
  • Standardized depression monitoring (PHQ-9)
  • Integration of primary and secondary care
  • Alignment of reimbursement with evidence based
    care

41
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com