SMEs, Growth, and Poverty Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirg - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

SMEs, Growth, and Poverty Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirg

Description:

BE, SME have substantial measurement error. All of these problems justify recourse to IV ... dummies for LAC, Transition, Africa) are correlated with BE, SME ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: aar113
Category:
Tags: asli | beck | demirg | growth | poverty | sme | smes | thorsten

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SMEs, Growth, and Poverty Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirg


1
SMEs, Growth, and PovertyThorsten Beck, Asli
Demirgüç-Kunt, Ross Levine
  • Discussion by Aart Kraay
  • The World Bank
  • October 14, 2004

2
What the Paper Does
  • Measures of importance of SMEs, and quality of
    overall business environment (BE)
  • Which matters more for growth SME or BE?
  • Which matters more for changes in inequality
    SME or BE?

3
What I Liked About the Paper
  • Paper asks a great question!
  • Very useful questioning of conventional wisdom
  • 10 bn is a lot of money to spend without benefit
    of evidence!
  • Heroic efforts at cross-country data collection!

4
What We Need More of
  • High-quality evidence from micro data on role of
    firm size
  • but this is hard to doand hard to generalize
  • Example 1 Firm Size and Productivity
  • TFP is Production / Inputs Q/L
  • We measure Revenue / Costs (PxQ)/(WxL)
  • OK if all firms face same P, W
  • But they dont! Market power gt Upward bias for
    large firms
  • Example 2 Firm Size and Job Creation
  • SME birth creates lots of jobs but SME death
    destroys lots of jobs too
  • To capture this you need a census that credibly
    tracks entry and exit (including possibly into
    the informal sector)
  • This kind of data hard to find in developing
    countries

5
What I Didnt Like Identification Strategy
  • Paper rightly is concerned with direction of
    causation
  • do SMEs cause growth or does growth create
    opportunities for SMEs?
  • does BE spur growth or do perceptions of BE
    reflect growth?
  • Lots of possible omitted variables
  • BE, SME have substantial measurement error
  • All of these problems justify recourse to IV

6
Identification Strategy, Contd
  • Proposed instruments (ethnic diversity, dummies
    for LAC, Transition, Africa) are correlated with
    BE, SME
  • But it is very hard to believe exclusion
    restriction required to validate the instruments!
  • Ethnic diversity matters for growth only through
    worse BE?
  • Only reason transition economies grew slowly in
    1990s is because they had fewer SMEs?
  • Africas difficult geography and bad institutions
    dont matter for growth?
  • What about all the other endogenous RHS variables
    (including initial income by construction)?
  • selective instrumentation does not deliver
    consistent estimates of any of the coefficients
    of interest

7
Taking IV Seriously
  • Table 4 Business Environment and Growth
  • OLS ? 0.73
  • IV ? 2.72
  • Four possible explanations for IV gtgt OLS
  • Perverse reverse causation
  • Peculiar omitted variables
  • Enormous measurement error in BE
  • Invalid exclusion restrictions

8
Taking IV Seriously, Contd
  • Perverse Reverse Causation
  • Conventional wisdom (growth raises BE) implies IV
    lt OLS
  • To justify IV gtgt OLS need high growth to cause
    much worse BE why might this be?
  • Peculiar Omitted Variables
  • Many likely candidates (e.g. good institutions)
    raise growth and improve BE, this implies IV lt
    OLS
  • To justify IV gtgt OLS need omitted variables that
    raise growth and lower BE, or vice versa what
    could they be?

9
Taking IV Seriously, Contd
  • Enormous Measurement Error in BE
  • Attenuation bias
  • ?(OLS) ? VAR(True BE)/VAR(Measured BE)
  • ?(IV) 3 x ?(OLS) implies variance of
    measurement error in BE is twice variance of true
    BE
  • This means BE measures are virtually
    uninformative! e.g. suppose observed BE is 1 SD
    above the mean, best forecast of true BE is that
    it is only 0.33 SD above mean

10
Taking IV Seriously, Contd
  • Invalid Exclusion Restriction
  • True model is
  • Growth ? BE e
  • BE ? ELF v
  • Instrumental variables regression delivers
  • ?(IV) ? (COV(e, ELF)/VAR(ELF))/ ?
  • Bias is slope of regression of structural error
    (e) on the instrument (ELF), scaled by ?
  • Does ELF matter for growth holding constant BE?
    Quite plausibly (higher inequality, higher social
    conflict, many other channels)

11
Summary
  • Great question very relevant for policy!
  • Firm-level data will help to get closer to
    definitive answers on role of SMEs in growth and
    poverty but doing this right will be hard
  • Identification in cross-country (or
    cross-anything) regressions is hard. Useful to
  • take it as seriously as possible
  • recognize that there is only so much orthogonal
    and independent variation across countries in the
    things we care about (so many good things go
    together across countries!)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com