How to get your work published in Englishlanguage intl journals - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

How to get your work published in Englishlanguage intl journals

Description:

Publishing house. Peer review. John Wiley & Sons ' ... Publishing house. Editor-in-chief. Managing editor. Receiving editors. Regional editors ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: blackwellp1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How to get your work published in Englishlanguage intl journals


1
How to get your work publishedin
English-language intl journals
  • Hou Mingxin ???
  • Commissioning Editor
  • Nov. 6th, 2008, Xiamen

2
  • Introduction
  • Why publish publish where?
  • Writing submitting
  • Publishing house
  • Peer review

3
John Wiley Sons
  • 400 Best Big Companies in America - 2007, 2008
    Forbes
  • One of the 20 Best Book Publishing Companies to
    Work For - 2007, Book Business magazine
  • 100 Best Companies to Work For 2005, 2006
    Fortune

4

1807-2008
5
Wileys core businesses
  • STMS Publishes journals, books, major reference
    works, databases, and laboratory manuals, in a
    variety of scientific and medical fields, offered
    in print and electronically.
  • Professional / Trade Publishes professional,
    general interest non-fiction and subscription
    products. Subject areas include business,
    architecture, professional culinary, psychology,
    education, travel, health, religion, pets, etc.
  • Higher Education Acquires, develops, markets,
    and sells educational materials in a variety of
    media for colleges and universities, and online
    learning.

6
Wiley-Blackwell (STMS)
  • In 2007, Wiley acquired Blackwell
  • Over 1,400 journals, 2 in journal publishing
    segment
  • 77 journals vs. 23 books
  • Online platform ( www.interscience.wiley.com )

7
(No Transcript)
8
1799-2008
Merged on July 1st with Blackwell-Synergy
  • gt 30 mio. visits/month
  • gt 15 mio. fulltext accesses/ month (growth
    rates 20)
  • 30 mio. end users have access to fulltext
  • ca. 3,2 mio. articles from journals (gt1400
    journals, 500 with archives)
  • ca. 0.5 mio articles from books, references
    databases

9
  • Introduction
  • Why publish where to publish
  • Writing submitting
  • Publishing house
  • Peer review

10
The Journal
  • A specialised periodical
  • containing scientific content
  • written by the scholars or researchers of that
    content themselves
  • edited by an academic expert in the field
  • its content peer reviewed by the community
  • A forum for the exchange of ideas in a subject
    area
  • A point of community focus
  • A brand

Info courtesy of Michael Mabe, CEO of STM
11
The invention of journal publishing
Henry Oldenburg (1618-1677)
  • Born in Bremen, Germany
  • Resident London from 1652
  • Indefatigable correspondent with major scientists
    of his day
  • Appointed (joint) Secretary to the Royal Society
    in 1663
  • Created (as editor and commercial publisher) the
    first scientific journal in 1665

Info courtesy of Michael Mabe, CEO of STM
12
First Scientific Journal
  • 6th March 1665 Philosophical Transactions
  • First true scholarly journal

Info and Photo courtesy of Michael Mabe, CEO of
STM
13
Why publish?
  • Disseminate information, enable scientific debate
    - Science originates in dialogue
  • Show first publication date
  • Acceptance in a high quality journal enhances
    author reputation

14
Publish or Perish
15
Where to publish
Ian Rowlands and Dave Nicholas. New Journal
Publishing Models An international survey of
Senior Researchers. A CIBER Report for the
Publishers Association and International
Association of STM Publishers. 2005
16
Impact Factor
Impact Factor2007
_________________________________
Number of citations in 2007 to articles published
in 2005 and 2006
Number of source items published in 2005 and 2006
Cited window
Citing window
Example
Journal of publishes 75 articles in 2005 and 83
articles in 2006. In 2007 it receives a total
of 344 citations to these articles in all the
other published journals. The journals Impact
Factor for 2007 is 344 ? (75 83) 2.18
2002
2002
2003
2003
2004
2004
2005
2005
2006
2006
2007
2007
17
Going for a journal with a high Impact Factor
  • Advantages
  • Prestige
  • Academic advancement
  • Disadvantages
  • High rejection rate
  • Papers triaged
  • Some have idiosyncratic style
  • Delay due to time before final rejection

18
Choosing the right journal
  • Seek advice from your advisors, colleagues
  • Read the Instruction for Authors and Aim and
    Scope
  • Read titles/abstracts of other papers
  • Dont aim too high go one level up.
  • In general, publications in English attract more
    attention worldwide than those in any other
    language.
  • Page charges? Usually no. But will charge
    additional pages, color pages

19
Impact Factor 5.330
2.340
3.502
3.446 0.714
2.825
10.031
2.597
2.914
20
Submitted Communications China 1998 2008
Number
Year
extrapolated
21
Submitted Communications East Asia 1998 2008
Number
Year
extrapolated
22
Rejected Communications1986 2007
73
69
68
63
Number
62
59
56
54
48
44
42
30
Year
In 2007 ca. 20 of the Communications were
rejected directly (without refeering)!
23
  • Introduction
  • Why publish publish where?
  • Writing submitting
  • Publishing house
  • Peer review

24
Paper writing
25
Submitting online
  • Instruction for Author
  • Cover letter?

26
Submitting online
27
Submitting online
28
Notice to authors
29
Notice to Authors
30
Cover letter
  • Why need a cover letter?
  • What should be involved?
  • Significance
  • Why journal selected
  • Suggesting/excluding referees (Wiley journal
    co-authors in the past 5 years ? referees)
  • Submit to one journal ONLY ?
  • Have ALL the co-authors read the last edition of
    the manuscript?
  • Authorize the journal to publish your paper

31
  • Introduction
  • Why publish publish where?
  • Writing Submitting
  • Publishing house
  • Peer review

32
Publishing Cycle
AGENT
finalized journal issues
PUBLISHER
Copyediting / proofing
LIBRARY
author
access to electronic or paper journals
submission
decision/ revision
JOURNAL
accepted peer reviewed mss
reader
editorial office
editor
Info and Photo courtesy of Michael Mabe, CEO of
STM
scholarly community
peer review process
referee
33
Publishing house
  • Editor-in-chief
  • Managing editor
  • Receiving editors
  • Regional editors
  • Editorial advisory board members
  • Referees (reviewers)

34
What do editors do?
  • Monitoring of latest developments in the field
  • Acquisition of articles reviews, highlights etc.
  • Assessing manuscripts and selection of referees
  • Assessing referee reports
  • Decisions on acceptance and rejection
  • Dealing with appeals

35
What else do editors do?
  • Language polishing and copy editing
  • Optimizing the graphical material
  • Enhancing the electronic content
  • Increasing the visibility of content
  • Testing and implementing new technology

36
What does editing mean?
Check completeness, check logic, consistency
(text, illustrations, data), clearness of
presentation (the editor as first reader),
language, nomenclature, uniformity (formula,
abbreviations, names, charts, references),
correct outline, check proofs, imprimatur,
metadata for which parts?, PDF/XML?, (re)write
(graphical) abstracts, edit for the table of
contents, is the headline correct?, which
keywords?, prepare index, for various abstracting
services (e.g. ISI...), for own alerting
services, for EarlyView (DOI), for the printed
version (page numbers), linking of supporting
material (videos, internal, external), edit for
the national archiving (print, electronic),
standards, checklists, homepages, press
releases...etc. etc.
37
  • Introduction
  • Why publish publish where?
  • Writing Submitting
  • Publishing house
  • Peer review

38
Peer review purpose
  • To select high quality papers accurate, original
  • Peer recognition impact

39
Peer review process
  • Open review/Single blind /Double blind review
  • Editorial board with occasional further review
  • In-house staff plus external review
  • Reviewers chosen by Journal, author could also
    nominate or warn against those with conflicting
    interest
  • Reviewers are asked to comment on different
    aspects of paper, depending on the journal
  • Typically originality, novelty, technical
    accuracy, reproducibility, within scope of
    journal

40
Peer review report
  • Two reports one to author, one to editor
  • Expect 2-4 sets of comments
  • Typical recommendations accept, accept with
    minor modifications, accept with major revisions,
    reject but encourage re-submission, reject.

41
Referee Report Submission
?
?
?
?
?
42
Referees and Referee Reports
A scientist is a mimosa when he himself has made
a mistake, and like a roaring lion when he
discovers a mistake of others. Albert Einstein
This manuscript must be either drastically
reduced or fully oxidized. Anonymous Referee
This is yet another example of a nanoscience
paper with nanonovelty and nanocontent. Anonymous
Referee
43
Common complaints
  • The language is obscure, I do not have time to
    try and understand the science we already have
    more than enough good papers, so I will have to
    reject straight away.
  • This is not original, its just like his last
    paper.
  • The authors obviously did not read the journal
    before submitting its out of scope.
  • Just contradicting the reviewers is not helpful
    we chose them for their expertise and expect
    their comments to be given due consideration.

44
Responding to comments
  • Comments are submitted in the spirit of scholarly
    communication take them in that spirit
  • Be polite, avoid personal attack and defensive
    behavior
  • Take comments into consideration
  • Explain which changes have been carried out
  • If suggestions/additional experiments were not
    incorporated explain why
  • Argue with scientific evidence
  • If you really do not agree with making the
    changes proposed, you need to argue with editor
  • Or withdraw your paper and submit to another
    journal

45
Paper accepted
  • Submit final version, production data, figure
    quality, size and (file) format as instructed
  • Publishers such as Wiley-Blackwell will copyedit
    your manuscript
  • Grammatical errors, inconsistencies, spelling
    mistakes will be removed
  • References checked double check prior to
    submission complete and accurate?
  • Proofs sent to you for checking often in PDF
    format
  • Change errors only, do not re-write.

46
(No Transcript)
47
Publication
  • Online version usually in advance of print e.g
    EarlyView on Interscience
  • Production time will depend on frequency of
    journal, and pipeline of papers waiting to be
    published
  • Finally, enjoy your feeling of success

48
Manuscript Timeline (Top 50)
ACES Meeting July 18, 2008
49
Questions?
  • Hou Mingxin, ???, commissioning editor
  • mhou_at_wiley.com
  • Cynthia Chiang, ???, account manager
  • cchiang_at_wiley.com

50
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com