Strategic Links: Aligning Organizational Culture, Business Strategies and Performance Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Strategic Links: Aligning Organizational Culture, Business Strategies and Performance Management

Description:

Job Description. Provides basis for establishing activities. Agency Values ... Alerts supervisors to differences in how performance is viewed ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: larry156
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strategic Links: Aligning Organizational Culture, Business Strategies and Performance Management


1
Strategic Links Aligning Organizational
Culture, Business Strategies and Performance
Management
  • Idealist.org
  • National Nonprofit Human Resources Conference
  • Portland, Oregon
  • June 4, 2004
  • 1030 a.m. to 1200 noon

2
Why Implement Performance Evaluations?
  • Theyve been used at every organization Ive ever
    worked.
  • To substantiate differences in pay increases
    and/or personnel actions.
  • To promote behaviors that are aligned with our
    organizational values and culture.
  • To establish, monitor and assess achievement of
    work activities that support our strategic plan.
  • All or several of the above.

3
What Results Are You Getting From Performance
Evaluations?
  • Weve gone through the annual torture-fest
    all for a lousy 3 raise!
  • My boss must be getting ready to fire me all
    she talked about was every little mistake I made
    this year.
  • I had a really productive discussion with my
    boss about the things I do well, some new
    projects Ill take on and some training to help
    build my technical ability.

4
Objectives of An EffectivePerformance Management
System
  • Stimulates productivity by establishing clear
    performance standards and priorities at the
    beginning of the performance cycle
  • Promotes good employee relations by providing
    opportunities for timely feedback
  • Strengthens supervisors ability to manage staff
    by giving a rational, objective basis for
    evaluating performance and encouraging them to
    identify ways to improve future performance

5
Performance Management System Model
  • Performance Planning
  • Establish and define
  • Key responsibilities
  • Objectives
  • Expected outcomes
  • Priorities
  • Behavioral factors
  • Performance Monitoring
  • Timely, relevant feedback
  • Maintain log
  • Mid-Year review
  • Refine responsibilities/objectives
  • Revisit priorities
  • Development Follow Up
  • Identify interests and needs to enhance
    performance
  • Establish training plan
  • Review job description
  • Identify new challenges
  • Performance Appraisal
  • Compile/review data
  • Request self-appraisal
  • Prepare draft appraisal
  • Review with next-level supervisor
  • Finalize appraisal
  • Meet with employee

6
Essential Design Considerations
  • What does your organization do?
  • What goods or services are produced?
  • What kinds of people do you hire?
  • Can/Do you measure progress or achievement?
  • What does your organization value?
  • Individual contributions to the strategic plan?
  • Quality of internal interactions?
  • Nature and quality of external interactions?
  • What is level of organizational commitment?

7
Do Revenue Streams Matter?
  • Fixed funding sources government contracts,
    grants, fees-for-service
  • Charitable contributions individual donations,
    corporate underwriting, events
  • Provision of goods and/or services program
    delivery, educational services, memberships, etc.
  • Varied sources combinations of the above

8
Timing of Annual Reviews
  • Anniversary Date
  • Each employee reviewed around anniversary of
    employment/promotion
  • Common Review Date
  • All employees reviewed after year-end program and
    financial results are in

9
Anniversary Date
  • Advantages
  • Each employees performance is reviewed on an
    individual basis
  • Supervisor better able to focus on individual
    accomplishments and development needs
  • Payroll increases are spread out over the year,
    reducing the impact of a single jump in salaries
    on cash flow
  • Disadvantages
  • Ratings may be influenced by temporary up- or
    downswings in program or fiscal results
  • May not establish clear link between individual
    and organizational performance

10
Common Review Date
  • Advantages
  • All employees evaluated on overall achievement of
    program, operational or fiscal results
  • Provides consistent basis for comparing
    contributions of individual employees in relation
    to others
  • Less of an administrative burden on managers and
    HR, and increases can be based on year-end fiscal
    results
  • Disadvantages
  • Time required of supervisors to complete several
    appraisals at the same time
  • Individualized coaching or development
    opportunity may be lost in shuffle
  • Cash flow impact can be significant when all
    increases occur simultaneously

11
Weighting Goals
  • Provides employee and supervisor with common
    understanding of which are most important to
    success
  • Helps in monitoring activities that are critical
    to organizational goals
  • Priorities may change during course of the year

12
How Many Rating Levels To Use
The number of ratings you use can vary, depending
on your organizations culture and the kinds of
performance you evaluate.
  • Four (or More)
  • Focus more on tangible results produced
  • Supervisors are comfortable using consistent,
    clearly-defined criteria to note variances in
    employee performance.
  • Fewer than Four
  • Focus on behavioral factors and interactions
    soft results.
  • Supervisors have difficulty identifying criteria
    for noting variances in performance among
    employees.

13
Numeric Rating Levels
  • Generally used to calculate points scored for
    each activity or behavior
  • Often uses numeric weight to establish relative
    priority
  • Establishes range of points associated with
    overall performance ratings

14
Example
15
Lettered Rating Levels
  • Uses letter(s) to denote rating level for each
    area of performance evaluated
  • Priority or weight can be described as
    percentage or by narrative descriptor
  • Supervisor counts up ratings given to each
    activity and behavior factor and determines
    average overall rating.

16
Example
17
Sample Organization 1
  • Small social service agency
  • Employs primarily caseworkers and administrative
    staff
  • Revenues generated primarily by government
    funding and limited fees-for-service
  • Success measured by quality of interactions and
    numbers of clients served
  • Culture is egalitarian were all in this
    together
  • Everyone gets common annual increase

18
Sample Construct 1
Job Description Provides basis for establishing
activities
Agency Values Provides basis for determining
desired behaviors
  • Performance Plan
  • Establishes expectations for performance
    throughout the year
  • Provides qualitative basis for annual performance
    appraisal

19
Sample Construct 1 (Continued)
  • Annual Appraisal Design Will Include
  • Assessment of quality of activities and desired
    behaviors
  • Summary of strengths and areas to be enhanced
  • 3 rating levels
  • Usually exceeds expectations
  • Fully meets expectations
  • Partially meets expectations
  • Common annual increase, if performance is at
    meets expectations level or better

20
Sample Organization 2
  • Mid-sized educational service organization
  • Employs varied staff curriculum developers,
    trainers/ program delivery staff, marketers,
    customer support representatives and
    administrative/operational staff
  • Revenues generated by combinations of government
    contracts, foundation/corporate funding and sales
    of services with emphasis on expanding sales
    revenue
  • Success measured by quality of programs,
    increased numbers of programs delivered, sales
    revenue and client development and retention
  • Culture is results-oriented, with all departments
    having clear understanding of how they support
    achievement
  • Annual increases based on individual performance

21
Sample Construct 2
Job Description Provides basis for establishing
activities
Agency Values Provides basis for determining
desired behaviors
Strategic Plan Provides basis for establishing
results goals
  • Performance Plan
  • Establishes expectations for individual results
    that result from activities and behaviors
    throughout the year
  • Encourages ongoing discussion of organizational
    progress more inclusive line of sight
  • Provides quantitative and qualitative basis for
    annual performance appraisal

22
Sample Construct 2 (Continued)
  • Annual Appraisal Design Will Include
  • Quantitative evaluation of results qualitative
    assessment of activities and desired behaviors
  • Summary of strengths and areas to be enhanced
  • Uses 1 to 10 rating scale
  • 10 Exceptional performance
  • 5 Expected performance
  • 1 Unsatisfactory performance
  • Gradations allow more discussion of relative
    contribution and opportunities for development.
  • Greater pay opportunities for high-performing
    staff

23
Employee Self-Appraisal
  • Engages employee as partner in managing
    performance
  • Alerts supervisors to differences in how
    performance is viewed
  • Provides source of information about
    organizational or operational issues that
    influence performance

24
Professional Development Plan
  • While growth opportunities may be limited, it is
    important to develop staff skills and provide
    experiences that will enrich their professional
    lives
  • Development goes beyond formal training courses
    may include cross-training, temporary project
    assignments, on-the-job training and mentoring
  • Should include timetable for learning skill and
    how it will apply in the employees job
  • May include indicator of priority

25
Does One Size Fit All?
  • Consider if one evaluation form should/can be
    used for all employees, or if separate forms
    should be used, based on
  • Staff level
  • Nature of work performed
  • Business unit
  • Union/non-union status

26
Other Issues
  • Include upward/360o feedback?
  • Ensure management buy-in and participation
  • Determine level of staff involvement in
    developing and testing the system
  • Provide adequate training and opportunities for
    ongoing discussion of system
  • Review evaluations to ensure they reflect
  • Consistent approach to establishing performance
    expectations
  • Common understanding of rating levels
  • Assess system effectiveness and revise as
    necessary

27
Questions Answers
  • ?
  • Contact Larry Beers
  • James E. Rocco Associates,
    Inc.
  • 914-925-3412
  • LFBeers_at_JERoccoAssociates.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com