Constitutional Law - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Constitutional Law

Description:

No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a ... Abrogation of the 5th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination through grants of immunity ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: kenj3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Constitutional Law


1
Constitutional Law
  • Chapter 7
  • Compulsory Self-Incrimination

2
5th Amendment
  • No person shall be compelled in any criminal case
    to be a witness against himself
  • 5th Amendment 1791

3
Objectives
  • The difference between testimonial and physical
    evidence
  • The 3 prerequisites for application of the 5th
    Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
    compulsion, testimony, and self-incrimination
  • The functioning of the 5th amendment in judicial
    proceedingsincluding trials, grand jury
    hearings, and administrative hearings

4
Objectives Cont..
  • Abrogation of the 5th Amendment privilege against
    self-incrimination through grants of immunity
  • Absence of the need of the Miranda warning before
    compelling participation in procedures such as
    fingerprinting, photographing, participation in
    line-ups, taking of blood samples etc, etc.

5
Objectives Cont..
  • The difference between appearance and bodily
    evidence
  • 4th amendment requirements for securing
    appearance evidence and for compelling suspects
    to give bodily evidence

6
Testimonial vs Physical Evidence
  • Testimonial Evidence involves communication of
    thoughts of information in response to questions
    or interrogations
  • Physical Evidence includes all evidence other
    than testimony
  • A suspects body can be two different kinds of
    evidence (appearance and bodily evidence)
  • Appearance evidence refers to evidence obtained
    for bodily characteristics such as voice,
    physical appearance, handwriting, and fingerprints

7
Testimonial Evidence Cont..
  • Bodily evidence refers to physical evidence
    obtained from a suspects body by
  • Searching parts not normally exposed to the
    public
  • Seizing biological materials
  • Seizing foreign substances on or inside the
    suspects body

8
5th Amendment Protection Against Testimonial
Self-Incrimination
  • 5th Amendment is violated if a suspect is
    compelled to disclose testimonial evidence that
    can later be used against a person in court
  • The self-Incrimination clause applied both inside
    and outside the court room in all proceedings,
    civil and criminal, formal or informal

9
Two levels of protection by the 5th Amend
  • Suspects enjoy the absolute right to remain
    silent during custodial interrogations and at
    their trial

10
Level of Protection Cont..
  • In all other situations, citizens can be
    compelled to appear and testify, but have the
    absolute privilege to answer specific questions
    that may incriminate them

11
Prerequisites for 5th Amendment Violations
  • Testimony- The 5th only applies to testimony and
    nothing else
  • Communication may be oral on inferred from the
    persons conduct
  • Handwriting and voice characteristics are forms
    of physical evidence and do not violate the 5th
    amendment
  • The 5th does not protect the accused from
    producing self-incriminating physical evidence

12
Prerequisites for 5th Amendment Violations Cont..
  • Self-Incriminating physical evidence evidence
    takes the form of fingerprints, handwriting, hair
    samples, voice exemplars, to participate in
    line-ups, demonstrate speech and other physical
    characteristics, to submit to a blood alcohol,
    Breathalyzer, or urine tests, etc.

13
Prerequisites Cont.
  • Compulsion- to make someone disclose
    involuntarily any information, triggers 5th
    amendment protection
  • Compulsion is present if the government demands
    disclosure with the threat of a sanction
  • Physical retaliation, job loss, or actual
    threatened harm of a serious nature

14
Prerequisites Cont..
  • Self-Incrimination refers to information that is
    compelled from someone whereas the information
    can expose the person to a criminal prosecution
  • Suspects in custody cannot invoke protection in
    response to booking questions such as name,
    address, age, social security, date of birth,
    height, weight, eye color etc..

15
Prerequisites Cont..
  • Suspects are compelled to answer questions about
    crimes they have already been tried
  • The Government cannot prosecute them again so
    there is no protection
  • Persons granted immunity cannot invoke the 5th

16
Only a prosecutor has the right to grant
immunity. If police promise immunity to elicit
information from a suspect, the suspects
statement will be considered involuntary and
will be suppressed
17
Quick Test
  • Tell me if the 5th is violated in any of the
    following procedures and why or why not
  • Seizing a suspects personal diary and private
    papers under a search warrant
  • Using a subpoena duces tecum to compel the target
    of a grand jury to produce his/her personal diary

18
Test Cont
  • Requiring a person under arrest to answer booking
    questions
  • Requiring a person under arrest to appear in a
    line up
  • Requiring a person to appear in a line up and
    state two phrases This is a hold up and Put
    the money in the bag
  • Requiring a suspect to take the witness stand and
    repeat words of an incriminating phone
    conversation

19
Rules for Invoking or Waiving the 5th
  • Invoking the 5th
  • Criminals have the right to remain silent at
    their criminal trial
  • They have a right not to take the stand
  • The prosecution may not call on the defendant as
    a witness
  • Witnesses do not have the right to remain silent
    and must take the stand but can invoke the
    privilege if asked incriminating questions

20
Rules for Invoking or Waiving the 5th Cont..
  • Waiving the privilege
  • Criminal defendants waive the privilege by
    voluntarily taking the stand
  • Criminals thereby waive the right to refuse to
    answer questions during cross-examination that
    are reasonable and related to the scope of the
    precious testimony
  • Witnesses waive the privilege when they
    voluntarily answer incriminating questions

21
Adverse Consequences from Exercising the 5th
  • If a defendant chooses not to testify, the 5th
    prohibits the trial judge or prosecutor from
    making any adverse comment during the trial
  • Witnesses can be compelled to testify, however if
    they become the focus of the questioning and the
    question is incriminating, they can refuse to
    answer it and are protected from any adverse
    punishment
  • Police departments may or may not impose
    sanctions on an officer for refusing answer
    incriminating questions during an investigation

22
Self-Reporting Laws
  • The government has several reporting requirements
    by its citizens such as voter registration,
    income tax, or census
  • Citizens involved in criminal activity are not
    excused from complying with report laws such as
    IRS Code, occupational tax laws etc
  • Citizens can refuse to comply with government
    reporting laws that serve no purpose

23
4th Amendment Protection Bodily
Self-Incrimination
  • The 5th only protects against self-incriminating
    testimony and not evidence that is derived from
    the suspects body rather than his/her own mind.
  • This type evidence is called physical evidence
    and comes under the protection of the 4th
    amendment

24
4th Amendment Protection Bodily
Self-Incrimination Cont..
  • The 5th does not protect the accused from
  • Being compelled to produce physical evidence
  • Fingerprints, photographs, physical measurement,
    handwriting samples, voice exemplars, to furnish
    blood or urine samples, to exhibit scars, marks
    tattoos

25
4th Amendment Protection Bodily
Self-Incrimination Cont..
  • To participate in a line up
  • Stand, talk, walk, speak, write, put on articles
    of clothing for purposed of identification
  • These procedures are all physical characteristics

26
4th Amendment Protection Bodily
Self-Incrimination Cont..
  • Compelled production of evidence is regulated by
    the Fourth Amendment
  • Physical Evidence taken from a suspects body is
    divided into 2 categories
  • Appearance evidence
  • Bodily evidence

27
Appearance Evidence
  • Is all evidence obtained using the following
    procedures
  • Station house line-ups
  • Show up Identifications
  • Photographs
  • Fingerprints and Body measurements
  • Voice and Handwriting Exemplars
  • Field Sobriety Tests

28
Appearance Procedures
  • All appearance procedures are permissible when
    police have grounds for an arrest
  • Police may also transport a suspect short
    distances to a crime scene or the location of a
    witness
  • Prosecutors can apply for a warrant like order to
    compel a suspect to appear for specified
    appearance evidence procedures

29
Bodily Evidence
  • Refers to evidence derived from a suspects body
    by
  • Searching areas not normally exposed to the
    public
  • Penetrating the body surface
  • Removing biological or foreign substances
  • Bodily Evidence includes evidence derived from
    the following procedures

30
Bodily Evidence Cont..
  • Removing incriminating evidence from the bodys
    surface (wax test for gun powder on hands)
  • Taking x-rays
  • Taking body tissue and fluids
  • Performing strip searches and body cavity
    searches
  • Reaching into a suspects mouth, pumping his
    stomach to recover evidence

31
Bodily Evidence Cont..
  • With bodily evidence, citizens have a reasonable
    expectation of privacy which could trigger 4th
    amendment protection
  • Bodily evidence procedures must be performed in a
    reasonable manner
  • 4 factors be satisfied

32
Bodily Evidence Cont..
  • The governments need must outweigh the suspects
    interest in privacy
  • There must be clear indication that the procedure
    will produce needed evidence
  • Police must get a warrant 1st unless there is a
    good chance the evidence will be lost
  • The procedure used to recover the evidence must
    be reasonable and performed in a reasonable manner

33
Various Procedures
  • Testing for intoxication- Warrants are not
    required because blood-alcohol deteriorates
    rapidly. Procedure is justified when making an
    arrest for an intoxicated related offense
  • Swabbing the skin- No warrant needed if police
    believe suspect committed a crime that would
    leave incriminating residue. Swabbing can be
    performed by police personnel

34
Various Procedures
  • Retrieving Swallowed Evidence- Police can use
    reasonable force to retrieve evidence from a
    suspects mouth or prevent him/her from swallowing
    it
  • Reaching into the mouth is ok but the choke hold
    is illegal
  • Strip searches- Can be conducted after lawful
    arrest

35
Various Procedures
  • strip Search Cont.. If police believe the
    suspect has drugs, guns, or contraband secreted
    on his person
  • Strip searches should be conducted by officers of
    the same sex in a private location
  • Body Cavity Searches- Are Highly intrusive

36
Various Procedures Cont..
  • Body Cavity Searches Cont.. - Police must have
    probable cause to believe the suspect has
    secreted evidence into a body cavity
  • The procedure must be performed by qualified
    medical personnel
  • Usually a warrant is required for a body cavity
    search

37
The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com