Business Law in Canada, 6e Chapter 4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Business Law in Canada, 6e Chapter 4

Description:

A tort is an inherently wrongful act that causes injury to another ... The injury must be a direct result of the careless conduct ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:154
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: ruthy
Category:
Tags: business | canada | chapter | law

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Business Law in Canada, 6e Chapter 4


1
Business Law in Canada, 6/e Chapter 4
  • Torts and Professional Liability

2
What Is a Tort?
  • A social wrong (not necessarily a crime)
  • A civil wrong (between individuals)
  • When an intentional or careless act harms another
  • Injured party sues for monetary compensation

3
What Is a Tort?
  • Crimes are social wrongs that affect society as a
    whole
  • Some crimes are also torts
  • A tort is an inherently wrongful act that causes
    injury to another

4
Categories of Tort
  • Intentional or deliberate acts that cause injury
    or loss
  • Careless or negligent acts that cause injury or
    loss

5
Intentional Torts
  • Intentional conduct that causes injury
  • Examples
  • Assault and Battery
  • Trespass to Land
  • False Imprisonment
  • Nuisance
  • Defamation
  • Courts may award punitive damages

6
Intentional Torts
  • Assault and Battery
  • Assault - where there is fear of contact
  • Battery - least touching in anger
  • Defences
  • 1. Accident not mistake
  • 2. Consent (informed)
  • 3. Self-defence (reasonable force)

7
Trespass to Land
  • Being on anothers land without authority
  • permission implied for business offering public
    services
  • Occupier owes only minimal duty to trespasser
  • Continuing trespass remedied by injunction

8
False Imprisonment
  • The unlawful and intentional restraint of a
    person against his/her will
  • Restraint must be total
  • Victim must submit or be forced to comply
  • Restraint may be justified if the person has done
    something s/he can be arrested for.
  • Remedies special, general and punitive damages

9
Nuisance
  • Public nuisance affects public in general
  • Private nuisance interferes with anothers use of
    his/her property
  • Strict liability for inherently dangerous
    situations or products (Rylands v. Fletcher)

10
Defamation
  • A false statement about someone to his detriment
    - must be published or broadcast
  • Slander - spoken defamation
  • Libel - written defamation
  • Damages Assumed for Libel must be proven for
    Slander

Continued ...
11
Defamation/2
  • Defences
  • 1. Truth
  • 2. Absolute Privilege
  • 3. Qualified Privilege
  • 4. Fair Comment

12
Privacy
  • Privacy protection provided by statute law
  • Personal Information Protection and Electronic
    Documents Act
  • Regulates collection and use of private
    information
  • Provides a model code

13
Negligence
  • Inadvertent, careless conduct that causes injury
    to another
  • Important area of tort liability for professionals

14
Case Summary
  • Donoghue v Stevenson set several precedents in
    the law of negligence
  • the test to determine the existence of a duty
  • product liability - manufacturer owes a duty to
    customer
  • privity of contract may not defeat an action for
    negligence in product liability cases

15
Negligence Essential Elements
  • Existence of a duty of care
  • Breach of that duty
  • Injury or damage reasonably
    foreseeable
  • The act caused the injury
  • No contributory negligence

16
Is a Duty Owed?
  • Reasonable Foreseeability Test
  • If it would be apparent to a prudent person that
    the conduct was likely to cause injury - duty is
    owed.
  • We owe a duty to anyone we can reasonably
    anticipate might be harmed by our conduct
  • Is there any reason to reduce or eliminate this
    duty? (Anns case)

17
Duty of Care
  • Misfeasance
  • an act that causes harm to another
  • court will provide remedy
  • Nonfeasance
  • a failure to prevent an injury
  • courts reluctant to provide remedy
  • If a person attempts to help, there is a duty to
    exercise reasonable care

18
Breach of the Duty of Care
  • Reasonable Person Test
  • Reasonable person is a prudent person exercising
    care
  • conduct falling between average and perfect

19
Standard of Conduct
  • What would a reasonable person have done in the
    circumstances?
  • Actions that fall below socially acceptable
    standards create liability for damages
  • Risk - The greater the risk of injury, the higher
    the standard

20
Liability of Children
  • Children liable for their torts
  • standard is that of a reasonable child of that
    age
  • Parents not generally responsible for their
    childrens torts
  • except where there is obvious failure to
    control, instruct or supervise

21
Special Situations
  • Obligations of occupier of property to
  • invitees
  • licensees
  • trespassers Note Occupiers Liability Acts
  • Duties of Innkeepers
  • safeguard property of guests
  • post Section 3 of Innkeepers Act
  • prevent guests from becoming intoxicated

22
Negligent Misstatement
  • Courts will award compensation when negligent
    words cause financial loss.

23
Case for Discussion
  • Haig v. Bamford
  • This case established the legal principal that
  • Liability is restricted to situations where the
    plaintiff knew or should have known that the
    information provided would be relied on by a
    limited group.
  • Is this restriction appropriate?

24
Strict Liability
  • Liability when there is no fault
  • When a dangerous situation is created by an
    unusual use of property, the owner/occupier is
    liable for all damages when it escapes
  • e.g., water, animals

Continued ...
25
Loss or Injury
  • Plaintiff must show injury to self or loss of
    property as a result of defendants negligence
  • Courts will compensate for
  • economic loss
  • mental disorder but not simply mental distress

26
Causation
  • The injury must be a direct result of the
    careless conduct
  • But for test - but for the conduct of the
    plaintiff, no injury would have resulted

27
Defences
  • Remoteness Test
  • Whether the specific type of injury suffered was
    reasonably foreseeable
  • Test established in Anns case applied
  • Thin skull rule
  • Crumbling skull rule

Continued ...
28
Defences/2
  • Contributory negligence
  • plaintiff partially responsible for own loss
  • last clear chance doctrine
  • Negligence Act allows court to apportion
    responsibility

Continued ...
29
Defences/3
  • Voluntarily assuming the risk
  • a person who volunteers to enter a situation
    where the risk of injury is obvious cannot
    recover damages
  • Occupiers Liability Act
  • must be clear intention on the part of the
    volunteer to absolve occupier of legal
    responsibility
  • Does not apply to work-related accidents

30
Product Liability
  • Manufacturers are liable for injuries caused by
    defective products
  • Plaintiff must establish that the manufacturer
    was negligent
  • Breach of manufacturers duty can be implied from
    circumstances
  • Manufacturers must warn of dangers associated
    with product

31
Liability of Experts
  • Professionals and experts held to a high standard
  • require skills and abilities expected of a
    professional in that field
  • must exercise skill with degree of care expected
    from a reasonable person in that profession
  • inexperience does not excuse incompetence
  • common practice that is dangerous or careless is
    not an excuse

32
Professional Liability
  • Duty often set out in contract
  • But tort liability requires adherence to a
    reasonable standard of performance
  • Courts may extend liability to parties outside of
    the contract

33
Negligence
  • Standard of care expected of professionals
  • Reasonable member of the profession
  • Common practice may not measure up to reasonable
    standard
  • Courts will examine the circumstances to
    determine if the conduct was reasonable

34
To Whom Is Duty Owed?
  • People who suffer economic loss because of a
    professionals negligent statements may recover
    damages
  • Whether a duty was owed is determined by
    reasonable foreseeability test
  • This test has been modified by the Anns case

35
Case for Discussion
  • The Hercules Case
  • In Haig v Bamford, the SCC determined that
    accountants owed a duty of care to those they
    knew would rely on the statements they prepared.
  • In the Hercules case, the SCC applied the Anns
    test and limited the range of liability to only
    those they knew would rely on the statements they
    prepared and who used them as intended.

36
Risk Avoidance
  • Professionals should be aware of the standard of
    care expected of them
  • Adapt practices to avoid risk
  • Professionals owe a fiduciary duty to clients
  • Must act with loyalty and good faith
  • Must disclose pertinent information
  • Use extreme care with funds entrusted to them

37
Insurance
  • Often a condition of practice for professionals
  • Protects against damages resulting from errors
    and omissions
  • Premiums can be a significant business expense
  • May cover legal costs when professional is sued

38
Professional Disciplinary Bodies
  • Some exercise significant control over their
    members
  • With membership required
  • With power to levy penalties and suspend
  • Activities regulated by administrative law
  • Charter rights may apply
  • Compliance with human rights legislation required

39
Other Business Torts
  • Inducing breach of contract
  • Deceit
  • Conversion
  • Passing off action
  • Injurious falsehood

40
Privacy
  • Current business concern because access to
    information has been facilitated by data storage
    and retrieval systems and by the Internet
  • Legislation protects private information
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com